e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 3 of 3 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 1 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 1 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)

Integrating Nurse Preferences Into AI-Based Scheduling Systems: Qualitative Study
Traditional scheduling methods often fail to accommodate the preferences and constraints of individual nurses, potentially leading to dissatisfaction, burnout, and high turnover rates [5,6]. However, the extent of these negative effects and the specific factors contributing to dissatisfaction are often unclear. Nurses may feel restricted in their autonomy or, conversely, may desire more guidance to prevent feelings of unfairness [7].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e67747
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Although there is no established cutoff point for body image dissatisfaction, higher scores indicate greater dissatisfaction or concern about body shape [33]. The Cronbach α of this version is 0.93, showing good internal reliability. In a study in which 8 different versions of this scale were compared, this was 1 of the 3 versions that showed the most favorable results in comparison to the original 34-item scale [34].
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e51957
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

The evaluation of factors associated with the nonuse of and dissatisfaction with the patient portal is important to further develop the service and advocate for nonusers. Disparities in the use of patient portals might exacerbate the already existing disparities in health care access and health outcomes [33], increasing digital inequality in societies [34].
JMIR Med Inform 2022;10(4):e37500
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS