e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 3 of 3 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 2 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The PEMAT-P assesses both comprehensibility and actionability. This scale comprises 24 items: 17 related to comprehensibility and 7 related to actionability. Comprehensibility is evaluated in terms of content, word choice and style, the use of numbers, organization, layout, and design, and the use of visual aids [2]. Actionability evaluates whether the material is actionable, that is, whether the material can effectively guide patients to take due medical actions.
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e39808
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Therefore, the aim of this study was to update the 2015 systematic assessment of websites [25] by evaluating the content, suitability, readability, comprehensibility, and quality of information targeting infant nutrition, active play, screen time, and sleep behaviors on websites globally. In addition, this review expanded the 2015 systematic assessment [25] by examining interactivity, features, and cultural considerations of the websites.
J Med Internet Res 2022;24(10):e38641
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS