e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 14 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 4 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 4 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 2 JMIR Medical Education
- 1 JMIR Infodemiology
- 1 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 1 JMIR Serious Games
- 1 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Current Status and Future Directions of Ferroptosis Research in Breast Cancer: Bibliometric Analysis
The study used the following tools for visualization and bibliometric analysis: the R package Bibliometrix (version 4.3.2; Department of Economic and Statistical Sciences at the University of Naples Federico II), VOSviewer (version 1.6.19; Centre for Science and Technology Studies [CWTS] at Leiden University), and Cite Space (version 6.1.R6; Drexel University’s College of Information Science and Technology).
Interact J Med Res 2025;14:e66286
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Previous research compared VOSviewer semantic networks to networks generated from manually coded Twitter text [26]. However, there have been few systematic evaluations of VOSviewer-generated semantic networks derived from social media data. Consequently, our overarching goal is to evaluate VOSviewer’s application to social media data: Can it produce credible semantic networks to be used as analytical and communication tools?
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e58227
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Evolution of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education From 2000 to 2024: Bibliometric Analysis
To present the knowledge structure and emerging research trends, VOSviewer (version 1.6.18; Leiden University), Incites (Clarivate), Interacti Venn (Universidade de São Paulo), and Citespace (Drexel University) were used. Incites is a research evaluation tool developed by Clarivate Analytics, and the scores of citation impact, H-index, journal impact factor, international collaborations, study influence, and immediacy index were directly obtained in Incites.
Interact J Med Res 2025;14:e63775
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Numerous global bibliometric analyses have been conducted using Cite Space and VOSviewer in recent years. These analyses have focused on the comprehensive rehabilitation statuses and research trends of diseases such as cancer, ankylosing spondylitis, motor and neuropathic pain, and osteoarthritis [10-13]. However, to the best of our knowledge, a bibliometric analysis of AI’s application in medical education has yet to be implemented.
JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e51411
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Microsoft Office Excel 2019, VOSviewer (v.1.6.20), and Cite Space (v.6.3.R1 Advanced) were used to analyze all 1172 files. VOSviewer, a bibliometric software, was developed in 2009 by van Eck and Waltman [18] at Leiden University’s Center for Science and Technology Studies in the Netherlands. This Java-based software is free to use and is highly proficient in visualizing and analyzing large-scale data [18].
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e63367
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Chinese Health Insurance in the Digital Era: Bibliometric Study
VOSviewer has better visualization in network and cluster analysis than other software, and the scientometric graphs conform better to current academic research styles. VOSviewer was developed by Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman and features a powerful bibliometric maps function that can clearly visualize the network of literature, keywords, authors, etc [14].
Interact J Med Res 2024;13:e52020
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Global Trends in mHealth and Medical Education Research: Bibliometrics and Knowledge Graph Analysis
VOSviewer (version 1.6.17) was used for cocitation correlation analysis and knowledge mapping [10]. VOSviewer (version 1.6.17) [11] and Pajek64 (version 5.16) were used jointly to analyze the current state of research and time trends. Visualization of country/region coauthorship trends was achieved using the combined powerful mapping capabilities of VOSviewer (version 1.6.17) and SCImago Graphica (version 1.0.34).
JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e52461
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Application of AI in Sepsis: Citation Network Analysis and Evidence Synthesis
To ensure compatibility with Bibliometrix and VOSviewer [12], we saved the data in the “**.txt” format, a format recognized by both tools for conducting analyses. Our data set encompasses a comprehensive range of information, including titles, list of authors, name of countries, list of institutions, abstracts, keywords, name of journals, and publication dates.
Interact J Med Res 2024;13:e54490
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Cite Space (version 5.8.R3; Drexel University) and VOSviewer (version 1.6.11.0; Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University) were used for further data analysis. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed and presented in this study, including the following:
Annual trends of the publications and citations: these present the general trends in this field.
JMIR Serious Games 2023;11:e48354
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Digital Health Literacy: Bibliometric Analysis
Currently popular tools include VOSviewer [33], Cite Space [34], Bib Excel [35], Hist Cite [35], and others. We selected VOSviewer and Cite Space as our analysis tools. The reason for this was that VOSviewer has better visualization in network and cluster analysis, and Cite Space is better in literature timeline analysis. A combination of these two tools can better achieve our research goals.
J Med Internet Res 2022;24(7):e35816
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS