Search Results (1 to 7 of 7 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 5 JMIR Research Protocols
- 1 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

A total of 2 items will be included at the end of the postworkshop questionnaire, which was developed by Kothe and Mullan [41]. The first question will ask participants their level of agreeance on 14 keywords related to the facilitated workshops. For example, whether they felt the workshops were “needed, useful, appropriate, interesting, exciting, worthwhile, too short.” These will be scored on a 5-point Likert scale.
JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e49723
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Behavior Change Training for Health Professionals: Evaluation of a 2-Hour Workshop
The items were constructed based on the feasibility and acceptability questionnaire developed by Kothe and Mullan [24]. The first set of items asked participants to rate their agreement with each of 7 statements on their feelings about whether the workshops were needed, useful, appropriate for the profession, applicable to their current practices, interesting, exciting, and worth their time. The statements were rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree).
JMIR Form Res 2022;6(11):e42010
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

Design and Development of a Digital Weight Management Intervention (ToDAy): Qualitative Study
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(9):e17919
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS