Search Results (1 to 10 of 846 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 266 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 151 JMIR Research Protocols
- 78 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 71 JMIR Formative Research
- 42 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 26 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 25 JMIR Mental Health
- 24 JMIR Serious Games
- 23 JMIR Human Factors
- 20 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 18 JMIR Medical Education
- 15 JMIR Aging
- 11 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 10 JMIR Cancer
- 10 JMIR Cardio
- 9 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 8 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 7 JMIR AI
- 6 JMIR Diabetes
- 4 Iproceedings
- 4 JMIR Dermatology
- 4 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 3 JMIR Nursing
- 3 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 2 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 2 JMIRx Med
- 2 Medicine 2.0
- 1 JMIR Infodemiology
- 1 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Patients with epilepsy were included unless they had complex causes, severe comorbidities, or ongoing assessments or treatments. Patients with long-term pain were eligible if they underwent drug testing and self-administered their medication and were not eligible if they had comorbidities that directly affected drug adjustment, had cognitive impairment, or did not live at home.
Eligible patients were identified through consultations or patient lists provided by health care workers from each department.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e60343
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Furthermore, 35 participants’ entries were removed due to incomplete data or ineligibility (eg, participants with previous CAI counseling experience as we were only interested in their adoption intention before engagement) responses, leaving a final sample size of 239 participants. The gender ratio of participants was nearly balanced (Table 1).
JMIR AI 2025;4:e68960
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Three potential approaches were considered as potentially suitable processes for refining and prioritizing the KPIs for evaluation in this project. The main criterion for consideration was the need for a process that would include all key stakeholders in coming to a consensus in refining and prioritizing KPIs. These were (1) the Sheffield elicitation framework [13], (2) a factorial survey approach [14], or (3) the Delphi technique [15].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e68757
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We planned to include all patients who were diagnosed with cancer in 2022 and reported to the cancer registry as our data foundation for the following research questions:
Q1: What is the distribution of tumor entities across the 6 university hospitals for cases diagnosed in 2022?
Q2: What is the distribution of the administrative gender among the cases of tumor entities diagnosed in 2022?
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65681
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Several facilitators and barriers to delivering these digital interventions were also identified. Barriers comprised patients’ clinical status (eg, more severe symptomatology and medication side effects), interaction issues (eg, lack of involvement and decreased accountability), technological challenges (eg, access to devices and the internet), program elements (eg, language options), and scheduling conflicts.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e63269
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In addition, an independent assessment of 511 references from 22 TURs found that only 11 references were not indexed in MEDLINE. While some loss of relevant studies is inevitable, these findings suggest that the methodological approach used in TU remains sufficiently comprehensive for tertiary evidence synthesis, balancing feasibility and completeness (unpublished data).
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e67248
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The participants for the Keep Pace study were recruited at the outpatient clinics of the Department of Angiology of the University Hospital Graz, Austria. Patients who were shortlisted for getting an angioplasty were contacted and asked to participate in the Keep Pace study. Patients who gave informed consent and fit the inclusion criteria were included in this study.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e65721
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
At T1, patients were asked whether they had visited F2 FGs and OSGs, including consultation behaviors. We also questioned whether they had ever attended a meeting of a PC self-help group and, if so, how often they had attended. Additionally, they were asked about their attitudes concerning initial treatment decisions. Physicians were asked whether their patients had accessed peer-to-peer support services. For this purpose, we applied previously established questionnaire items from our working group [5].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e56092
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The files attached to the manuscript as Multimedia Appendices 4 and 5 were mixed. To correct this, the PDF that was originally attached as:
Multimedia Appendix 4: Further illustration of outcomes in both user groups.
Has been changed to:
Multimedia Appendix 4: Case report forms of primary and secondary end users.
Furthermore, the PDF that was originally attached to the article as:
Multimedia Appendix 5: Case report forms of primary and secondary end users.
JMIR Serious Games 2025;13:e73405
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
These respondents were not just randomly chosen; rather, they represent a diverse cross-section of stakeholders involved in the implementation of digital health care self-monitoring. Among them were representatives from policy-making entities, patients (advocacy groups), multinational pharmaceutical companies, and tech firms specializing in health solutions.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e58264
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS