Search Results (1 to 10 of 2664 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 788 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 454 JMIR Research Protocols
- 292 JMIR Formative Research
- 242 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 117 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 102 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 93 JMIR Mental Health
- 72 JMIR Human Factors
- 70 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 56 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 50 JMIR Aging
- 46 JMIR Serious Games
- 40 JMIR Cancer
- 27 JMIR Dermatology
- 26 Iproceedings
- 26 JMIR Diabetes
- 26 JMIR Medical Education
- 24 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 21 JMIR Cardio
- 17 JMIR Infodemiology
- 17 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 15 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 10 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 9 JMIRx Med
- 6 JMIR AI
- 6 JMIR Nursing
- 4 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 4 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 2 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Participants received R 300 (US $16.85) cash reimbursement for each study visit covering costs for travel and time.
We conducted 60 questionnaires with individuals who had COVID-19; Table 1 shows the findings. We had 21.7% (13/60) male participants, with a median age of 49.5 (IQR 39.5-60) years. Knowledge of post–COVID-19 sequelae was limited, with only 26.7% (16/60) having heard of these complications.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e58436
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Focus groups were conducted in English or Spanish by a researcher (AC or IP-S) and a moderator (IP-S, JB-R, or AMS-M) with previous experience facilitating focus groups. The focus groups were held on the web using Microsoft Teams in April 2023. The focus groups lasted a total of 60 minutes. The size of the groups was small (4 participants on average) due to scheduling difficulties and time zone differences among countries.
A guide was developed based on the 3 Delphi rounds (Multimedia Appendix 2).
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e59405
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The PMIS (Pearson r=−0.76; P
As we examined the sensitivity and specificity data to choose cut scores, we chose to favor sensitivity to minimize missing individuals with true disease in this sample of patients considered high risk because of their cognitive concerns. The cut scores for a positive result on the 5-Cog components were as follows: PMIS ≤6 (range 0-8), Symbol Match ≤25 (range 0-65), and s MCR >5 (range 0-7).
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e60471
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section