This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Digital Health Reviews (1191) Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) (275) Sleep Monitoring, Sleep Quality, Sleep Disorders (170)

Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/43617, first published .
Defining the Digital Measurement of Scratching During Sleep or Nocturnal Scratching: Review of the Literature

Defining the Digital Measurement of Scratching During Sleep or Nocturnal Scratching: Review of the Literature

Defining the Digital Measurement of Scratching During Sleep or Nocturnal Scratching: Review of the Literature

Authors of this article:

Will Ke Wang1 Author Orcid Image ;   Lucia Cesnakova2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jennifer C Goldsack2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jessilyn Dunn1, 3, 4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (1) Tweetations (10) Metrics

    Review

    1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States

    2The Digital Medicine Society, Boston, MA, United States

    3Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States

    4The Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, United States

    Corresponding Author:

    Jennifer C Goldsack, MHS, MBA

    The Digital Medicine Society

    90 Canal St, 4th Floor

    Boston, MA, 02114

    United States

    Phone: 1 765 234 3463

    Email: jennifer@dimesociety.org


    Background: Digital sensing solutions represent a convenient, objective, relatively inexpensive method that could be leveraged for assessing symptoms of various health conditions. Recent progress in the capabilities of digital sensing products has targeted the measurement of scratching during sleep, traditionally referred to as nocturnal scratching, in patients with atopic dermatitis or other skin conditions. Many solutions measuring nocturnal scratch have been developed; however, a lack of efforts toward standardization of the measure’s definition and contextualization of scratching during sleep hampers the ability to compare different technologies for this purpose.

    Objective: We aimed to address this gap and bring forth unified measurement definitions for nocturnal scratch.

    Methods: We performed a narrative literature review of definitions of scratching in patients with skin inflammation and a targeted literature review of sleep in the context of the period during which such scratching occurred. Both searches were limited to English language studies in humans. The extracted data were synthesized into themes based on study characteristics: scratch as a behavior, other characterization of the scratching movement, and measurement parameters for both scratch and sleep. We then developed ontologies for the digital measurement of sleep scratching.

    Results: In all, 29 studies defined inflammation-related scratching between 1996 and 2021. When cross-referenced with the results of search terms describing the sleep period, only 2 of these scratch-related papers also described sleep-related variables. From these search results, we developed an evidence-based and patient-centric definition of nocturnal scratch: an action of rhythmic and repetitive skin contact movement performed during a delimited time period of intended and actual sleep that is not restricted to any specific time of the day or night. Based on the measurement properties identified in the searches, we developed ontologies of relevant concepts that can be used as a starting point to develop standardized outcome measures of scratching during sleep in patients with inflammatory skin conditions.

    Conclusions: This work is intended to serve as a foundation for the future development of unified and well-described digital health technologies measuring nocturnal scratching and should enable better communication and sharing of results between various stakeholders taking part in research in atopic dermatitis and other inflammatory skin conditions.

    J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e43617

    doi:10.2196/43617

    Keywords

    atopic dermatitis; ontologies; nocturnal scratching; quality of life; outcomes measurement; dermatitis; scratch; review method; systematic review; literature review; pruritis 


    Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin that affects up to 25% of children [1] and about 10% of adults in high-income countries [2]. Its most common and bothersome symptom is itch (pruritus), which is an unpleasant skin sensation. Pruritus can result in an urge or reflex to scratch, which further damages the skin and results in a continuous itch-scratch cycle [3], which can in turn have major deleterious effects on patients’ quality of life and clinical course. Moreover, the terms itch and scratch are often used interchangeably, not distinguishing between the sensation of itch and the action of scratching.

    The need to assess the severity of AD symptoms, including itch and scratching, both in clinical practice and in clinical trials of therapeutics is widely recognized by researchers and clinicians. Survey-based or observational measurement of scratching is strongly related to the broader assessment of the subjective pain-like [4] sensation of itch [5]. Scratching, particularly during times of rest that usually happen at night, can result in disturbed sleep for both patients [6-8] and others in the household [9]. During periods of rest and sleep, the willful regulation of behaviors subsides, and other regular daily movements do not interfere with scratching movements. That is why nocturnal scratching has been recognized as a promising novel measurement [10] that brings new insight complementary to current AD measures, offering an opportunity for continuous measurements out of the clinic but also with a certain degree of objectivity. Digital health technologies (DHTs) allow researchers of nocturnal scratch and AD to collect and assess quantifiable information about the behavior of scratching and its impact on sleep and, hence, enhancing our toolbox of assessments to uncover complex relationships between itch, scratching, and sleep, as well as the changes induced by treatments [11].

    No definitive laboratory test or outcome assessment exists to diagnose or track AD continuously, but several clinical outcome assessments—whether clinician or patient reported, or their combination—have been validated for assessing AD severity [12]. One of the most commonly used is the Scoring Atopic Dermatitis Index (SCORAD) [13,14], which classifies AD severity according to the body area affected and the characteristics of the skin lesions. Other established assessments include the Investigator Global Assessment Scale (IGA) [15]; the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) [16]; and the Six Area, Six Sign Atopic Dermatitis Scale (SASSAD) [17]. However, these assessments have several limitations, as they are subject to substantial interobserver variability [18], are unable to capture the full itch-scratch cycle (and its fluctuations), and are administered in the clinic. From the patient’s perspective, the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) [19,20] captures the frequency of itching and disturbed sleep, but it is subjective; can be influenced by mood or suggestion; is subject to noncompliance; and does not capture the duration, severity, or timing of scratching. Only a few of these survey and questionnaire tools look deeper into the intensity and impacts (including sleep related) of itch and scratch [21], while direct, semiobjective, and scalable methods are missing. The current gold standard method based on direct observation of nocturnal scratching and sleep in a single patient—videography in a sleep laboratory assessed by a trained rater—is impractical to scale, is costly, and poses challenges to longitudinal monitoring of disease activity and effects on sleep. An objective convenient measurement of nocturnal scratching would be of great value to assess its impact on daily life, monitor fluctuations in the disease course [22], and indicate therapeutic efficacy in trials.

    Continued advances in DHTs and machine learning algorithms show promise in the measurement of both nocturnal scratching and sleep parameters [23]. They offer the advantages of being able to capture continuous objective data inexpensively, in real time, and in patient populations that cannot report their itch or scratching by themselves [24]. Some drawbacks of these methods are the possibility of missing low-grade scratching and mislabeling sleep versus wake epochs [25]. We found that aggregating or comparing findings across studies in this realm are hampered by variations in definitions for both the “nocturnal” period (or “sleep”), during which nocturnal scratching occurs, and “scratching” itself. We conducted a narrative review of the literature looking for definitions used to date. Based on our findings, we developed unifying evidence-based definitions for “nocturnal scratch,” specifically in the context of digital measurement of scratching during sleep periods and being distinct from describing the sensation of itch. In this paper, we propose ontologies—a set of concepts, their properties, and the relations between them—to advance the standardization of definitions and outcome measurements for the digital measurement of nocturnal scratching.


    Overview

    We performed a narrative literature review of definitions of scratching in patients with skin inflammation and a targeted literature review of sleep in the context of the period during which such scratching occurred. Then we synthesized these findings to propose an evidence-based definition of the novel measure, nocturnal scratch. This process is illustrated in Figure 1. A formal protocol was not registered prospectively.

    ‎
    Figure 1. Literature search and screening pipeline.

    Narrative Review of Scratch Definitions

    Search Strategies

    For the “scratch” search, from March to April 2022, we searched for English-language studies published between January 1996 and March 2022 in the PubMed, IEEE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, limiting the search to dermatitis-related studies in humans. We decided to narrow the scope of the searches to include only papers or articles that had 1 or more of these terms in the title to ensure their relevancy and that they discussed or examined scratch or related topics. This approach was selected after evaluating a preliminary search for the terms “scratch,” “itch,” or “pruritus” in the full text. This approach returned too many papers, the majority of which did not discuss scratch or itch to any degree of importance. The specific search strings used are shown in Table S1 in Multimedia Appendix 1 [11,25-52].

    Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

    For the narrative review of scratch definitions, the titles were screened for the presence of 1 of the search terms in the title as described above, and then 1 of the authors (WKW) and an assistant (see the Acknowledgments) searched the full-text versions of retrieved publications for the presence of any definition of scratching. Studies were excluded if they did not target human research (eg, animal studies). Papers were also excluded if they did not contain both a search term in the title and a definition for scratching. No restrictions were placed on study design, sample size, age of the cohort, or publication type.

    Data Extraction

    One author (WKW) and an assistant independently extracted the following scratch-related data from each included study: author, year published, cohort size, definition of scratching behavior, tool used for scratching, scratching sites assessed, definition for scratch duration, clinical outcome or calculated index used, device used to capture scratching, sleep definition or terminology used, and sleep detection method. Differences between extractors were resolved by consensus. These data were extracted qualitatively and tabulated by year using Word (Microsoft Corporation). Two of the other authors (LC and JD), along with an assistant, reviewed all of the tabular data to ensure that no definitions or descriptions of interest were missed or misrepresented.

    Targeted Review of Sleep Definitions

    Search Strategies

    Compared with scratching, sleep has a much wider and more systematic literature of research. We recognized that the definitions of sleep and its different stages and characterizations are much better described. For the purpose of identifying relevant articles targeting events, symptoms, or conditions happening during sleep, we selected 3 search strategies: searching for sleep-related symptoms and conditions (cramp, pain, spasm, etc) together with a term for the sleep period (sleep, rest, nap, nocturnal, etc), the specific term “sleep opportunity,” and the specific term “attempted sleep” (Table S2 in Multimedia Appendix 1). Similarly to the scratch search, we limited the search to titles only to ensure the relevancy of the results, apart from 1 of the search terms that targeted a lesser-used term (“attempted sleep” in all fields of Google Scholar).

    We performed the searches from March to April 2022. We limited the search for sleep-related symptoms and conditions to PubMed only, as we wanted to target specifically journal articles to look for clinical evidence. We deemed PubMed suitable for this cause, as Google Scholar is known to also include books, scholarly websites, or conference proceeding records. For the term “sleep opportunity,” we performed a title search in both the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. For the term “attempted sleep,” we performed a title search in PubMed and an all-field search in Google Scholar. The specific search strings are shown in Table S2 in Multimedia Appendix 1.

    Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

    For the targeted review of sleep definitions, we screened the abstracts for the presence of a definition or description of sleep in the context of secondary symptoms for a researched disease, as well as a definition or description of sleep opportunity or attempted sleep. Studies were excluded if they did not contain the definition of sleep period or if sleep was not evaluated in the context of the disease that might have effects on sleep. No restrictions were placed on study design, sample size, age of the cohort, or publication type.

    Data Extraction

    For sleep, the same individuals extracted the author, year published, cohort size, sleep definition or terminology used, and sleep detection method. These data were extracted qualitatively and tabulated by year using Word. Two of the other authors (LC and JD), along with an assistant, reviewed all of the tabular data to ensure that no definitions or descriptions of interest were missed or misrepresented. As the literature on the topic is already robust and well rounded, instead of reporting on each article in detail, we elected to incorporate the findings directly into the sleep ontology as a result of this work.

    Synthesis and Development of Proposed Definitions for Broad Adoption

    The extracted data were synthesized into themes based on study characteristics: scratch as a behavior, other characterization of the scratching movement, and measurement parameters for both scratch and sleep. Because of the heterogeneities in study designs, outcome measures, and reporting of outcomes, meta-analytic techniques could not be used to further summarize the studies.

    The synthesis of the results was performed with 2 goals: (1) to identify the most fitting and contextually correct definitions for “scratch” and “nocturnal” (in the context of sleep) and (2) to identify the parameters of the measurement of “scratch” and “nocturnal” to inform the development of ontologies for the novel measurement.

    To achieve the first goal, we reviewed all the findings from the literature search with members of a multistakeholder project team composed of experts in AD, sleep, technology development, drug development, clinical care, and the patient and care partner experience (see the Acknowledgments), and ranked the metrics based on clinical and patient relevance.

    For the development of ontologies for the novel measurement of nocturnal scratch, we adopted the contextual definitions from the first step to serve as a main class under which the related concepts and properties were nested. We evaluated the properties of our selected measures of scratch and sleep and then organized them under the core concepts connected to the definitions. These core concepts represent both the specific subparts of the measure of interest and the technical features of each measurement to be reported when assessing nocturnal scratch. To increase understanding and promote adoption, we added example values (or nested properties, where applicable) that illustrate the information the specific properties add to the overall measurement.

    Finally, we reviewed these findings with regulatory colleagues from the US Food and Drug Administration during a Critical Path Innovation Meeting on July 22, 2022 [53].


    Narrative Review of Scratch Definitions

    We decided to apply a 25-year time constraint on our literature search (ie, between 1996 and 2021) to capture the most recent and up-to-date definitions or descriptions of “scratch.” We purposefully started the search in the 1990s, the era of the proliferation and maturing of new accelerometry-based devices measuring movement and activity [54]. From 1996 to 2021, a total of 1253 unique publications with at least 1 of the search terms in their titles appeared in PubMed. Additional publications were found in the searches of IEEE (n=136), Scopus (n=71), and Web of Science (n=463). After removing duplicates and applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria to all found articles, 29 studies contained a definition of scratch, itch, or pruritus. The terms “itch” and “pruritus” were added due to the frequently interchanged use of the terms itch and scratch. A summary of these studies is presented in Table 1 [11,25-52], and their full details are included in Table S3 in Multimedia Appendix 1.

    Table 1. Summary characteristics of studies included in the review.
    Author and yearStudy participants, nClinical outcome or calculated indexDeviceScratch definition/terminologyScratch detection method
    Ebata et al [26], 199610TSTa, light rubbing (total duration + count), long bouts of scratching (total duration + count), short bouts of scratching (total duration + count)Infrared cameraSome patterns of scratching were observed and then classified into 3 categories: (1) light rubbing, touching, or scratching lasting <5 s; (2) short bouts of scratching with a duration 5-30 s; and (3) long bouts of scratching with a duration >30 s.Manual recognition/count through video recording
    Endo et al [27], 199743Scratch rate, minute scratch records“Scratch monitor” (accelerometric device)N/AbPressure changes on scratch monitor
    Ebata et al [28], 199935TSTInfrared cameraAn apparent action of rubbing or scratching to any part of the body with a rhythmical movement using hands or fingers and sometimes feet lasting >5 s.Manual recognition/count through video recording
    Endo et al [29], 199940Scratch rate, minute scratch records“Scratch monitor” (accelerometric device)N/APressure changes on scratch monitor
    Ebata et al [30], 200155TST (at night)ActiTrac monitorAn apparent action of rubbing or scratching to any part of the body with a rhythmical movement using hands or fingers and sometimes feet lasting >5 s.Piezoceramic sensor calibrated to units of acceleration
    Munday et al [31], 2002155Excoriation scoreInnovaderm digital visual analog scale deviceN/AN/A
    Benjamin et al [32], 200421Proportion of total measured time (%) spent in 1 of the following states: sleep, scratching, restless movement, movement under coversPiezoelectric accelerometer, video recordingScratching was defined to include rhythmic movements, judged by eye, >1 Hz without accompanying movements. By contrast, restlessness, such as frequent turning over in bed, slow rubbing of the face on the pillow, or writhing movements of the limbs, could include short periods of scratch (1 or 2 s) as long as these latter movements were interspersed with other nonscratch activities. Therefore, whereas scratching activity (in the absence of restlessness) could be usefully demarcated, short periods of scratching interspersed with restlessness could not be separated and were summarized as restlessness. Movement under the covers refers to obvious movement that could not be assessed definitely as either belonging to restlessness or scratching.Piezoelectric accelerometer
    Hon et al [33], 200639Wrist activityDigiTrac monitorWrist activities 1-3 HzN/A
    Hon et al [34], 200728Wrist activity for first 3 h of sleepDigiTrac monitor on dominant wristLimb motion 1-3 HzN/A
    Ishiuji et al [35], 200826Scratch performed by electronic deviceMedi-Pak cytology brushWillful scratching: Scratching was accomplished by study personnel by repetitively moving a cytology brush over the ventral forearm 3 cm distal to the iontophoresis site.N/A
    Bender et al [36], 200820Scratching index (not further defined)Polysomnography, electromyographA scratching event was recorded as such when a burst of electromyographic activity of ≥3 s was accompanied by a visible scratching motion.Electromyographic activity accompanied by visible scratching motion
    Tran et al [37], 201045Itch score (0-10)Medi-Pak cytology brushWillful scratching: Participants underwent artificial scratching over the area of the forearm 3 cm distal to the edge of the area of histamine iontophoresis for 2 min. Scratching was accomplished by study personnel repetitively moving a cytology brush over the ventral forearm.N/A
    Petersen et al [38], 201312Activity over first 3 h of sleep; number of accelerations >0.01 gAccelerometer, acoustic, and othersFrom referenced papers: movement with frequency of 1-2 HzTriaxial accelerometry + MLMc of the signal data (logistic regression model)
    Kurihara et al [39], 201310TST percentage; clinician visual estimate of scratching timeElectromyography, microphone, accelerometer, triaxial gyro sensorWillful scratching: The participant moves his right hand to his right cheek and uses his fingers to scratch his cheek 20 times and then returns to the starting position with his arm at his side on the bed. Scratching 1 time was 1 scratching stroke.Changes in myogenic potential of forearm, pressure changes on back of hand, sounds from scratching, expansion/contraction of fingers, acceleration/angular velocity of forearm
    Price and Cohen [11], 2014N/ATST/percentage of recording, SCORADd scoreInfrared video, actigraphy, acoustic deviceAn apparent action of rubbing or scratching to any part of the body with a rhythmical movement using hands or fingers and sometimes feet lasting >5 s.Manual recognition/count through video recording
    Yamanaka et al [40], 201520TST percentageWristwatch, electroencephalogramN/AWristwatch-type scratching counting system detecting small scratching sounds from fingertip at wrist
    Schut et al [41], 201548Scratching induced by experimental video vs control videoVideo and questionnaireAny movement that included rubbing (mere touching did not count as scratching)N/A
    Lee et al [42], 20153Number of times of scratchingAccelerometerThe distance moved, the velocity of the wrist, and the number of scratchings. Because scratching is a periodic movement, consecutive changes of direction of the wrist movements were regarded as the number of scratchings. People may use their wrists and fingers to scratch, but often they use only their fingers. Although scratching with the fingers without significantly moving the wrist causes a tiny amount of acceleration, the acceleration pattern produces the same graph as the pattern of scratching with wrist movement.Accelerometry
    Kurihara et al [43], 2015NReDegree of finger bending (to reflect scratching motion)Piezoceramic sensor between 2 metal platesWillful scratching: The participant moves his right hand to his right cheek and uses his fingers to scratch his cheek 20 times and then returns to the starting position with his arm at his side on the bed. Scratching 1 time was 1 scratching stroke.Amplitude of vibrations produced by scratching
    Camfferman et al [44], 201633SCORAD scratchPolysomnography, videoRecording of scratch movements by the participant using their hand, leg, etc. Video recorded in conjunction with overnight polysomnography later reviewed by a sleep technician for scratching events. The duration of all scratching events was measured.Manual recognition/count through video recording
    Kaburagi and Kurihara [45], 201712TST percentage, number of scratching periodsAccelerometer, gyro sensorWillful scratching: The participant scratches his right cheek 20 times using the fingers of his right hand. He then brings his arm back to the starting position. After a break of 5 s, the participant once again scratches his cheek 20 times in a row. This set of scratching motion is repeated 35 times.Degree of finger bending, acceleration and angular velocity of forearm
    Bartels et al [46], 201897Frequency of localized scratching (primary outcome), frequency of total body scratching (secondary outcome), duration of localized and total body scratching (exploratory)Video cameraAny skin contact movement that could reduce itch (eg, typical scratching using the fingernails, picking with fingernails, or rubbing) while not taking into account touching.Manual recognition/count through video recording
    Moreau et al [47], 201824TSTWrist actigraphy infrared cameraAn apparent action of rubbing or scratching to any part of the body with a rhythmical movement using hands or fingers.2 accelerometer devices, video + MLM of high-resolution actigraphy signals using bidirectional recurrent neural network
    Sanders et al [48], 2019N/AN/AN/ANeurological: Scratching activates spinal interneurons that inhibit itch-sensitive neurons, suppressing the transmission of itch signals to the brain. Scratching an itch also deactivates the amygdala, calming our negative emotions. In this rare case, pain becomes something that we actually seek out to experience relief from itch. The pleasure of scratching is correlated with activity in major reward centers of the brain, such as the ventral tegmental area and the nucleus accumbens. Therefore, in scratching an itch, we experience 2 rewards: relief of the itch (negative reinforcement) and pleasure (positive reinforcement).N/A
    Ikoma et al [49], 2019236TST percentage of total sleep durationVideo, accelerometer in Apple smart watchThis study predefined an acceleration pattern that their algorithm is looking for. Each participant wore 2 identical smart watches (Apple Watch Sport 38 mm, Apple Inc, United States) in which the app was installed, with 1 watch on each wrist. The evaluator, who was blinded to the smart watch data, watched the video of the participants and recorded the timing and duration of all body motions during sleep. If the motions were judged as scratching by the evaluator, they were recorded together with the information on which arm was used and categorized into 3 grades depending on the intensity of scratching motions; “weak” if only fingers were used to scratch without visible movement of the elbow, “moderate” if the elbow visibly moved, and “strong” if both the elbow and the shoulder visibly moved.Changes in acceleration data with algorithm analysis
    Kamath et al [50], 202037Clinician Scratch ScaleDiary/questionnaireN/AVisual observation
    Mahadevan et al [25], 202133TST, number of eventsWrist accelerometer/ambient light sensor/temperature sensor; thermal videographyAny repetitive rubbing or scratching of the body (including through fabric) performed with the hand or any part of the upper limb (from [30]). Initiation frame: First contact of any part of the hand—including fingers, nails, palm, or dorsum—with the scratch area, continuous with the scratching behavior. Termination frame: Last contact of any part of the hand—including fingers, nails, palm, or dorsum—with the scratch area, or the last visible movement of the hand if there is a ≥3-s pause in scratching with the hand still in contact with the scratching area.Visual observation, device outputs + established sleep detection algorithm and MLM of the actigraphy data using feature engineering and random forest classifier
    Hong et al [51], 2021399Survey scoresSurveysSeverity of scratching/excoriation (SCORAD scratch)N/A
    Chun et al [52], 202121TSTInfrared video, acousto-mechanic device strapped to Apple Watch 4Scratching can occur via articulation of the elbow, wrist, or fingers alone. In the mode that engages the entire upper arm, the fingers press against the surface and remain stationary, where movement of the forearm articulating at the elbow joint drives the scratching action. The finger scratching mode, on the other hand, involves mainly local movements of the fingers, without substantial forearm or wrist motion. Mixtures of these 2 modes are also possible. Depending on the location of scratching and the degree of itch, individuals interchangeably use different modes of scratching.Acousto-mechanic signals, visual observation + MLM of accelerometer data using feature engineering and random forest classifier

    aTST: total scratch time.

    bN/A: not applicable.

    cMLM: machine learning modeling.

    dSCORAD: Scoring Atopic Dermatitis Index.

    eNR: not reported.

    The definitions for scratching differed widely. The earliest study [26] had the following description for 3 categories of scratching: “light rubbing, touching or scratching” with any part of the body that lasted <5 seconds (light scratching), 5-30 seconds (short bouts of scratching), or >30 seconds (long bouts of scratching). The most detailed definition of scratching [25] found among all of the articles was “any repetitive rubbing or scratching of the body—including through fabric...performed with any part of the body.” In this publication, the definition of time spent scratching (scratching time) was considered to start with the first video frame showing movement consistent with this action and to end with the last contact with the scratched area or if no movement had occurred in that area for at least 3 seconds. Another common method of defining scratch for the purposes of measurement took the form of instructing study participants to perform a willful scratching movement and learning from that recorded action. Among the 29 publications, we found 7 variables commonly specified, even though most publications only specified 1 or 2 of these variables. The variables were (1) properties of the scratching movement (eg, speed, frequency, pressure, intensity), (2) the scratching tool (hand, fingers, other body part), (3) the body part or area scratched, (4) the duration of scratching bout, (5) minimum separation between bouts, (6) scratch outcome to be measured, and (7) the digital sensing product or method used to record or observe scratching (Table 2).

    Table 2. The most commonly defined and used properties of measured scratching with their definitions and examples.
    Property type and nameDefinitionExample
    Required

    		Characteristics of the scratching movementAspects of the scratching movementSpeed [52], frequency (in Hz) [32,33,38,47,52], pressure [27,39], force used [35,52], acceleration [42,49], velocity [42], etc. Intensity was defined in 1 article as a composite of pressure force, frequency, and speed [52]. In another article, intensity was defined by the articulation of the body parts (“weak” for fingers only, “moderate” including elbow, “strong” if both elbow and shoulder were moving) [49].

    		Scratch Outcome to be MeasuredA final outcome that measures the concept of interest (scratching)Total scratching time [11,28,30], amount of accelerations >0.01 g [38], wrist activity in 0-3 Hz range over the first 3 h of sleep [38], total scratch records per “sleeping time” [29]
    Preferred

    		Scratching toolThe body part used for scratchingHands, fingers, fingernails, or feet [11,26-28,30,38,39,42,45,49,52]

    		Body part or area scratchedThe areas or body parts targeted by the scratching actionHead, face, and neck; right upper extremity; left upper extremity; torso, including back; right lower extremity; left lower extremity [25]; facial areas [39,42,43,45]; any part of the body [11,26,28,30,32,47]

    		Duration of scratching bout and minimum separation between boutsMinimal measured duration of scratching; the minimum time between 2 measured scratching bouts. A pause shorter than this minimum time would result in continued measurement of a scratching bout without a pause.Scratch bout=5 s [11,25,26,28,30,39,45,47,48], 3 s [41,45,49], 2 s [38], 1 s [32]; separation between bouts=3 s [11,25,26,28,30,39,47]

    		Method or tool of recording scratchThe methods or tools used for recording scratching or time during which scratching was monitored. In case of DHTsa, also sensor type or algorithm used.Methods: videography [11,25,26,28,32,41,44,46,47,49,52], accelerometry [11,25,27,29,30,32-34,38-40,42,45,47-49], electromyography [36,39], diary [50], survey [32,51]; tools: infrared CCDb camera [11,26,28,47,52], various wearable wrist accelerometer devices [11,25,27,29,30,32-34,38-40,42,45,47,49], acoustic devices [11,38,52]

    aDHT: digital health technology.

    bCCD: charged-coupled device.

    Targeted Review of Sleep Period Definitions

    Compared with the term “scratch,” the concept of “nocturnal” or, more contextually accurately, “sleep” is more comprehensively researched and well defined. Leveraging the large corpus of existing literature on sleep and existing definitions, we performed a targeted review of the sleep-related search terms describing a period of time one spends with the intention to sleep or in actual sleep, either on its own or together with a specific symptom or condition happening during sleep. The search for secondary symptoms during sleep returned 154 papers (title search) in PubMed. The search for “sleep opportunity” returned 23 papers (title search) in Google Scholar and 127 (title and abstract search) papers in PubMed. Searching for the term “attempted sleep” resulted in 354 papers in Google Scholar and 0 papers in PubMed. We used these papers to find standardized definitions of the period during which sleep occurs. We used the information from the found papers to inform the ontology of sleep.

    Refining the Meaning of “Nocturnal” in the Context of Nocturnal Scratch

    We also searched for definitions or clarifications of what the researchers meant by “nocturnal” in the papers that have detailed descriptions of “scratch.” Among the final 29 publications from the scratch search, only 2 had any description of sleep variables and their definitions for nocturnal scratching (Table S1 in Multimedia Appendix 1) [27,29]. Other publications did not specifically define the sleep period during which scratching was measured, despite using methods measuring sleep such as polysomnography.

    These 2 studies used identical descriptions for sleep. They defined the sleep start time and sleep end (wake) time. These were defined as when the participants attached the scratch monitor before going to sleep until the time when the participants removed the scratch monitor when they woke up. However, a definition of the measurement period overlapping with participants’ sleep was not provided in more detail or by using standard sleep outcome measure terms, such as “sleep opportunity.” No control method for observing or measuring sleep was used in these studies. Hence, based on the findings in our targeted literature search, we developed ontologies to clarify the terms defining the sleep period for the context of nocturnal scratching, which could be easily confused otherwise.

    Our analysis of both scratch and sleep publications brought a conclusion that nocturnal scratch should not be measured during the period of “night” but rather during the period of “sleep.” This is an important recontextualization of the term that has not occurred before. The measurement of scratching within the context of attempted and actual sleep will provide a common understanding of the term, better define the measurement period, and accommodate patients’ needs and behaviors.

    Ontologies and Terminology

    To begin the effort toward standardization of definitions and selection of fit-for-purpose outcome measures, we developed ontologies for the digital measurement of sleep scratching (Figures 2 and 3). For “nocturnal” (Figure 2), this resulted in recontextualizing this term as the period of intended and actual sleep. From this, main concepts were defined (sleep episode, wakefulness episode, metadata), with specific properties and values appearing for each concept. As an example, the properties that were measured for the concept “sleep episode” included duration, total sleep time, sleep stage, the main sleep event, and start and end.

    For “scratching” (Figure 3), we created an ontology that was structurally identical to that created for sleep. For this term, the concepts were scratching episode, scratch area, and metadata. These concepts were described by the properties of duration, tool used, intensity, number of events, and movement type, with specific values attached to each property.

    By deconstructing the terms “sleep/rest/nocturnal” and “scratch” and building ontologies to define constituent concepts and their relationships, we reached our goal of developing a standardized definition of scratch during rest or sleep, otherwise known as nocturnal scratch. This evidence-based and patient-centric definition we propose for nocturnal scratching, or scratching during sleep, is that it is an action of rhythmic and repetitive skin contact movement performed during a delimited time period of intended and actual sleep, not restricted to any specific time of the day or night (Table 3). For further clarity, the concepts underlying this definition can be dissected according to the ontologies in Figures 2 and 3.

    ‎
    Figure 2. Proposed ontology for digital measurement of sleep. COA: clinical outcome assessment; EEG: electroencephalogram; NREM: non–rapid eye movement; PSG: polysomnography; REM: rapid eye movement.
    ‎
    Figure 3. Proposed ontology for digital measurement of dermatitis-related scratching.
    Table 3. Definition and main outcome measure of nocturnal scratch.
    TermDefinitionMain outcome measure
    Nocturnal scratchAction of rhythmic and repetitive skin contact movement performed during a delimited time period of intended and actual sleep, not restricted to any specific time of the day or nightTotal scratch time (sum of all recorded scratching bouts) measured during a delimited period of intended and actual sleep within the total sleep opportunity

    It is important that a main outcome measure for nocturnal scratching is brought forward in this work. Based on the literature review and developed ontologies, we can propose the main outcome measure of nocturnal scratch: the total scratch time (sum of all recorded scratching bouts) measured during a delimited period of intended and actual sleep within the total sleep opportunity (Table 3). Total scratch time can be also represented as a percentage of the measured sleep period. These definitions of measurement properties and main outcome measures of nocturnal scratching are technology agnostic and can be universally adopted across various sensor technologies or algorithms developed to measure and assess these phenomena.


    Principal Results

    In this review of the literature, definitions for scratching-related variables differed widely. These differences—due to varying definitions appropriated for devices, analytical techniques, and study goals—hamper the ability to develop standardized outcome measures to assess and compare digital technologies and to monitor various scratching-related disease states in diverse patient cohorts. In addition, only 2 studies provided any description of the variables used to define sleep, both of which used the same device-specific characteristics. A variety of techniques with inadequate a priori definitions were used to determine the sleep/wake times in the other studies, also hampering cross-study comparisons.

    For nocturnal scratching, the term “nocturnal” is itself an exclusionary misnomer. Conventionally, the term describes actions or events that happen at night (eg, nocturnal animals). However, in medicine, this term is often used for the actions or activities occurring during the time of sleep (eg, nocturnal incontinence). Although the term “nocturnal” in the measurement of nocturnal scratching has been historically used and well established, it has not been precisely defined in the context of patients’ sleep. In a world where researchers and drug developers are becoming more focused on patient centricity, the term “nocturnal” has become insufficient, as patients’ sleep can occur during different parts of the day due to various reasons or situations. Examples include shift workers, cross time zone travelers, infants, or people with sleep disorders. As this term is rooted in a period of sleep, using the closest sleep period definition and outcome measure—sleep opportunity—provides an elegant solution to establish the term for the purposes of measurement.

    While the term “scratch” is widely understood, a unified definition has never been proposed. A definition discerning it from the sensation of itch is often not provided in research studies or during interactions with patients. Moreover, the literature review showed that different research studies often have different definitions of scratching, its measurement, and its properties.

    To aid in a unified understanding, we created ontologies for the digital measurement of scratching during sleep based on our literature review. In the ontologies, the properties and definitions for the main concepts of sleep and scratch, along with their nested properties, present a road map for the development of detailed standardized measurements for use in clinical research and practice. A rich list of properties available to add to assessments will ensure improved specificity of measurement and thus add valuable information about the patient populations.

    Per our ontologies, the inclusion of more advanced properties remains to be decided by specific research groups or tool developers. To use sleep as an example, this would include whether rapid eye movement (REM) and non-REM sleep periods are included in the definition; whether wake periods are included in the overall sleep period measured; and whether resting on the bed before falling asleep, resting in bed before waking up, and waking after sleep onset “count” toward the sleep period. These aspects will need to be specified by the researchers prior to every measurement of scratching during sleep, and we recommend incorporating them based on the measurement ability of the tools used. While some of these variables are optional, we believe that several of the properties should be required at all times, including the definition of the sleep period considered and the device or method used to measure sleep—whether polysomnography, actigraphy, wearable smart watches, or observer recordings.

    In this work, we propose a unified definition of sleep time scratch, or “nocturnal scratch,” together with a list of concepts and properties allowing for the efficient measurement of this phenomenon. Our goal is to enable better communication and sharing of results between various stakeholders taking part in research in AD and other skin inflammatory conditions. The evidence-based definition of the measurement itself, its properties, and main outcome measures provide everyone with a powerful “dictionary” that can ultimately drive rapid acceptance of novel DHT-based measurements in clinical research by the patients themselves, clinicians, industry, technology developers, regulators, and payers. The definition also provides clear specifications for developing digital products that will no longer need to differentiate themselves based on the varied measurement properties but that can now focus on usability, utility, and other features. As a result, researchers, clinicians, and patients will be able to make better choices across high-quality measurement tools.

    Digital biomarkers and digitally measured clinical outcome assessments must be subject to reproducible and meaningful verification and algorithmic and clinical validation [55]. Without meaningful and comprehensive definitions, however, there can be no reliable verification or validation procedures. In addition, researchers can tune the properties (variables mentioned above) to achieve better performance or specificity of information, but that does not necessarily mean better performance and usefulness in the actual application of a digital biomarker. The context of the disease and specifics of the patient population for the measurement will always be important aspects to consider when deliberating the parameters of measurements, as will the value of the measure to the patients themselves [56].

    We are hopeful that these definitions and ontologies will become standardized and common through their wide adoption. Even the origination of the idea for this research supports these outlooks, as it was sparked by a precompetitive collaboration [57] between industry and invited experts from academia, clinical space, patient organizations, and regulatory bodies. We encourage all these stakeholders to use the proposed ontologies and terminology in their research and evaluation of evidence on the digital measurement of nocturnal scratch to drive unified advancement in the adoption of DHT-based measurements. We are aware that agreeing on the standard values across all research requires a consensus between technology developers, clinicians, patients, and regulators, which is not easily achievable. However, we believe by the standardization of definitions and properties based on data and evidence, as well as by expert discussions and future collaborations, the goal of introducing a unified measurement will eventually be achieved.

    Limitations

    This study has limitations. First, the considerable variations in study design and populations for the studies included in this review prevented the assessment of study quality through established evaluation tools [58]. We thus attempted to quantify the quality of evidence in simpler terms by describing the cohort size and particulars of the measurement instruments and methods. In addition, some relevant studies might have been overlooked in our searches, although we included as many applicable terms as possible in the search strings. Finally, studies with negative results might not have been published at all (due to positive publication bias), possibly skewing our findings.

    Conclusions

    Wearable digital technologies and machine learning algorithms show potential in the assessment and monitoring of scratching during sleep. Standardized evidenced-based definitions for variables related to this symptom will aid in evaluations of these tools and their wide adoption in clinical research.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors thank Jerry Yang of Duke University for assistance with the full-text reading of the retrieved publications, Sarah Park for performing the searches, and Patricia A French of Left Lane Communications for assistance with drafting, editing, and formatting the manuscript. The authors also acknowledge all participants and partners in the Digital Medicine Society (DiMe) Nocturnal Scratch project [57] for their leadership and collaboration that made this work possible and, in particular, members of the Ontologies Working Group.

    Authors' Contributions

    WKW contributed to the study concept and design; data collection and extraction, synthesis, and interpretation; and substantial revision of the manuscript. LC contributed to the study concept and design, data interpretation, and substantial revision of the manuscript. JD consulted on the study selection and data extraction. JCG defined the research question and consulted on the implications of the results. All authors also meet the following 4 criteria: (1) substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of the data; (2) drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; (3) final approval of the completed version; and (4) accountability for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

    Conflicts of Interest

    LC and JCG are employees of the Digital Medicine Society (DiMe), a nonprofit organization that aims to advance the safe, effective, equitable, and ethical use of digital medicine to optimize human health. JD is an advisor to Veri, the manufacturer of an app that aims to help consumers make informed decisions about their health. WKW declares no competing interests.

    ‎
    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Supplementary tables.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 198 KB
    1. Odhiambo JA, Williams HC, Clayton TO, Robertson CF, Asher MI, ISAAC Phase Three Study Group. Global variations in prevalence of eczema symptoms in children from ISAAC Phase Three. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009 Dec;124(6):1251-8.e23. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Abuabara K, Magyari A, McCulloch CE, Linos E, Margolis DJ, Langan SM. Prevalence of atopic eczema among patients seen in primary care: data from the health improvement network. Ann Intern Med 2018 Dec 04;170(5):354. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Rinaldi G. The itch-scratch cycle: a review of the mechanisms. Dermatol Pract Concept 2019 Apr;9(2):90-97 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Mollanazar NK, Smith PK, Yosipovitch G. Mediators of chronic pruritus in atopic dermatitis: getting the itch out? Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2016 Dec;51(3):263-292. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Smith MP, Ly K, Thibodeaux Q, Weerasinghe T, Wu JJ, Yosipovitch G, et al. Emerging methods to objectively assess pruritus in atopic dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2019 Sep;9(3):407-420 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Kahn D, Iturriaga C, Bertran K, Fernandez I, Perez-Mateluna G, Borzutzky A, et al. Sleep quality in children with atopic dermatitis during flares and after treatment. Sleep Sci 2020;13(2):172-175 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Lavery M, Stull C, Kinney M, Yosipovitch G. Nocturnal pruritus: the battle for a peaceful night's sleep. Int J Mol Sci 2016 Mar 22;17(3):425 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Lyons AB, Moy L, Moy R, Tung R. Circadian rhythm and the skin: a review of the literature. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2019 Sep;12(9):42-45 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    9. Capozza K, Gadd H, Kelley K, Russell S, Shi V, Schwartz A. Insights from caregivers on the impact of pediatric atopic dermatitis on families: "I'm Tired, Overwhelmed, and Feel Like I'm Failing as a Mother". Dermatitis 2020;31(3):223-227. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Yang AF, Nguyen M, Li AW, Lee B, Chun KS, Wu E, et al. Use of technology for the objective evaluation of scratching behavior: a systematic review. JAAD Int 2021 Dec;5:19-32 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Price A, Cohen D. Assessment of pruritus in patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis: subjective and objective tools. Dermatitis 2014;25(6):334-344. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Frazier W, Bhardwaj N. Atopic dermatitis: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician 2020 May 15;101(10):590-598 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    13. European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index. Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology 1993;186(1):23-31 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Corti M, Corti M. SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Calculator (0.9.0). 2015.   URL: http://www.scorad.corti.li/ [accessed 2023-03-29]
    15. Simpson EL, Bissonnette R, Paller AS, King B, Silverberg JI, Reich K, et al. The Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™): a clinical outcome measure for the severity of atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2022 Oct;187(4):531-538 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Hanifin J, Thurston M, Omoto M, Cherill R, Tofte S, Graeber M. The eczema area and severity index (EASI): assessment of reliability in atopic dermatitis. EASI Evaluator Group. Exp Dermatol 2001 Feb;10(1):11-18. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Berth-Jones J. Six area, six sign atopic dermatitis (SASSAD) severity score: a simple system for monitoring disease activity in atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1996 Sep;135 Suppl 48:25-30. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Charman C, Venn A, Williams H. Reliability testing of the Six Area, Six Sign Atopic Dermatitis severity score. Br J Dermatol 2002 Jun;146(6):1057-1060. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. POEM — Patient Oriented Eczema Measure. University of Nottingham. 2015.   URL: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/research/groups/cebd/resources/poem.aspx [accessed 2023-03-29]
    20. Charman CR, Venn AJ, Williams HC. The patient-oriented eczema measure: development and initial validation of a new tool for measuring atopic eczema severity from the patients' perspective. Arch Dermatol 2004 Dec;140(12):1513-1519. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Heckman CJ, Riley M, Valdes-Rodriguez R, Yosipovitch G. Development and initial psychometric properties of two itch-related measures: scratch intensity and impact, sleep-related itch and scratch. J Invest Dermatol 2020 Nov;140(11):2138-2145.e1 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Kim JE, Lee J, Bessho M, Sakamura K. Field trial of a wearable itch monitoring system for the self-management of atopic dermatitis. 2021 Presented at: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics; October 17-20, 2021; Melbourne, Australia. [CrossRef]
    23. Rahimi-Eichi H, Coombs Iii G, Vidal Bustamante CM, Onnela J, Baker JT, Buckner RL. Open-source Longitudinal Sleep Analysis From Accelerometer Data (DPSleep): algorithm development and validation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021 Oct 06;9(10):e29849 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Nitta S, Maeda T, Koudounas S, Minematsu T, Tobe H, Weller C, et al. Which objective itch-assessment tools are applicable to patients with advanced cognitive impairments? A scoping review. Int J Older People Nurs 2022 Sep;17(5):e12458. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Mahadevan N, Christakis Y, Di J, Bruno J, Zhang Y, Dorsey ER, et al. Development of digital measures for nighttime scratch and sleep using wrist-worn wearable devices. NPJ Digit Med 2021 Mar 03;4(1):42. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Ebata T, Aizawa H, Kamide R. An infrared video camera system to observe nocturnal scratching in atopic dermatitis patients. J Dermatol 1996 Mar;23(3):153-155. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Endo K, Sumitsuji H, Fukuzumi T, Adachi J, Aoki T. Evaluation of scratch movements by a new scratch-monitor to analyze nocturnal itching in atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1997 Nov;77(6):432-435. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Ebata T, Aizawa H, Kamide R, Niimura M. The characteristics of nocturnal scratching in adults with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1999 Jul;141(1):82-86. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Endo K, Sano H, Fukuzumi T, Adachi J, Aoki T. Objective scratch monitor evaluation of the effect of an antihistamine on nocturnal scratching in atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Sci 1999 Dec;22(1):54-61. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Ebata T, Iwasaki S, Kamide R, Niimura M. Use of a wrist activity monitor for the measurement of nocturnal scratching in patients with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2001 Feb;144(2):305-309. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Munday J, Bloomfield R, Goldman M, Robey H, Kitowska G, Gwiezdziski Z, et al. Chlorpheniramine is no more effective than placebo in relieving the symptoms of childhood atopic dermatitis with a nocturnal itching and scratching component. Dermatology 2002;205(1):40-45. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Benjamin K, Waterston K, Russell M, Schofield O, Diffey B, Rees JL. The development of an objective method for measuring scratch in children with atopic dermatitis suitable for clinical use. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004 Jan;50(1):33-40. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Hon K, Lam M, Leung T, Kam W, Lee K, Li M, et al. Nocturnal wrist movements are correlated with objective clinical scores and plasma chemokine levels in children with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2006 Apr;154(4):629-635. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Hon K, Lam M, Wong K, Leung T, Ng P. Pathophysiology of nocturnal scratching in childhood atopic dermatitis: the role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and substance P. Br J Dermatol 2007 Nov;157(5):922-925. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Ishiuji Y, Coghill R, Patel T, Dawn A, Fountain J, Oshiro Y, et al. Repetitive scratching and noxious heat do not inhibit histamine-induced itch in atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2008 Jan;158(1):78-83. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Bender BG, Ballard R, Canono B, Murphy JR, Leung DY. Disease severity, scratching, and sleep quality in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008 Mar;58(3):415-420. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Tran BW, Papoiu ADP, Russoniello CV, Wang H, Patel TS, Chan YH, et al. Effect of itch, scratching and mental stress on autonomic nervous system function in atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 2010 Jul;90(4):354-361 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Petersen J, Austin D, Sack R, Hayes TL. Actigraphy-based scratch detection using logistic regression. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2013 Mar;17(2):277-283. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Kurihara Y, Kaburagi T, Watanabe K. Development of a non-contact sensing method for scratching activity measurement. IEEE Sensors J 2013 Sep;13(9):3325-3330. [CrossRef]
    40. Yamanaka K, Motomura E, Noro Y, Umeda K, Morikawa T, Umeda-Togami K, et al. Olopatadine, a non-sedating H1 antihistamine, decreases the nocturnal scratching without affecting sleep quality in atopic dermatitis. Exp Dermatol 2015 Mar;24(3):227-229. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Schut C, Muhl S, Reinisch K, Claßen A, Jäger R, Gieler U, et al. Agreeableness and self-consciousness as predictors of induced scratching and itch in patients with psoriasis. Int J Behav Med 2015 Dec;22(6):726-734. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. Lee J, Cho D, Song S, Kim S, Im E, Kim J. Mobile system design for scratch recognition. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2015 Presented at: CHI EA '15; April 18-23, 2015; Seoul, Korea p. 1567-1572. [CrossRef]
    43. Kurihara Y, Kaburagi T, Watanabe K, Tanaka H. Development of vibration sensing system with wide dynamic range: monitoring of scratching and turning-over motions during sleep. Artif Life Robotics 2015 Nov 18;20(4):372-378. [CrossRef]
    44. Camfferman D, Short M, Kennedy J, Gold M, Kohler M, Lushington K. Thermoregulation, scratch, itch and sleep deficits in children with eczema. Sleep Med 2016 Sep;25:145-150. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Kaburagi T, Kurihara Y. Algorithm for estimation of scratching time. IEEE Sensors J 2017 Apr 1;17(7):2198-2204. [CrossRef]
    46. Bartels D, van Laarhoven AIM, van de Kerkhof PCM, Evers A. Nocebo effects and scratching behaviour on itch. Acta Derm Venereol 2018 Nov 05;98(10):943-950 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Moreau A, Anderer P, Ross M, Cerny A, Almazan TH, Peterson B. Detection of nocturnal scratching movements in patients with atopic dermatitis using accelerometers and recurrent neural networks. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2018 Jul;22(4):1011-1018. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    48. Sanders KM, Fast K, Yosipovitch G. Why we scratch: function and dysfunction. Exp Dermatol 2019 Dec;28(12):1482-1484. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. Ikoma A, Ebata T, Chantalat L, Takemura K, Mizzi F, Poncet M, et al. Measurement of nocturnal scratching in patients with pruritus using a smartwatch: initial clinical studies with the itch tracker app. Acta Derm Venereol 2019 Mar 01;99(3):268-273 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Kamath BM, Spino C, McLain R, Magee JC, Fredericks EM, Setchell KD, Childhood Liver Disease Research Network (ChiLDReN). Unraveling the relationship between itching, scratch scales, and biomarkers in children with alagille syndrome. Hepatol Commun 2020 Jul;4(7):1012-1018 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Hong MR, Lei D, Yousaf M, Chavda R, Gabriel S, Janmohamed SR, et al. Reliability and longitudinal course of itch/scratch severity in adults with atopic dermatitis. Dermatitis 2021 Oct 01;32(1S):S28-S32. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. Chun KS, Kang YJ, Lee JY, Nguyen M, Lee B, Lee R, et al. A skin-conformable wireless sensor to objectively quantify symptoms of pruritus. Sci Adv 2021 Apr;7(18):eabf9405 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    53. Nocturnal scratch: digital measures development. Digital Medicine Society. 2022 Jul 22.   URL: https://www.dimesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/Insights-from-FDA-final.pdf [accessed 2023-03-01]
    54. Troiano RP, McClain JJ, Brychta RJ, Chen KY. Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research. Br J Sports Med 2014 Jul;48(13):1019-1023 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    55. Goldsack JC, Coravos A, Bakker JP, Bent B, Dowling AV, Fitzer-Attas C, et al. Verification, analytical validation, and clinical validation (V3): the foundation of determining fit-for-purpose for Biometric Monitoring Technologies (BioMeTs). NPJ Digit Med 2020;3:55. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    56. Manta C, Patrick-Lake B, Goldsack J. Digital measures that matter to patients: a framework to guide the selection and development of digital measures of health. Digit Biomark 2020;4(3):69-77 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    57. Driving adoption of nocturnal scratch as a digital endpoint and improving patients' lives. Digital Medicine Society.   URL: https://dimesociety.org/access-resources/digital-measures-nocturnal-scratch/#measures [accessed 2023-03-29]
    58. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 2008 May 03;336(7651):995-998 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    AD: atopic dermatitis
    DHT: digital health technology
    EASI: Eczema Area and Severity Index
    IGA: Investigator Global Assessment Scale
    POEM: Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure
    REM: rapid eye movement
    SASSAD: Six Area, Six Sign Atopic Dermatitis Scale
    SCORAD: Scoring Atopic Dermatitis Index

    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 18.10.22; peer-reviewed by C Price, B Peterson; comments to author 24.11.22; revised version received 22.12.22; accepted 25.03.23; published 18.04.23

    Copyright

    ©Will Ke Wang, Lucia Cesnakova, Jennifer C Goldsack, Jessilyn Dunn. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 18.04.2023.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.