Review
Abstract
Background: Formative experiences in adolescence lay the foundation for healthy and pleasurable romantic and sexual relationships. Exposure to pornography may affect these experiences.
Objective: We aimed to synthesize evidence published in the past decade on the relationship between exposure to pornography and sexual behavior (earlier age of first sex [<16 years], condomless sex, past-year multiple partners [>1], lifetime multiple partners [>1], group sex, sexual aggression including forced sex, paid sex, teenage pregnancy, and history of sexually transmitted infection) in adolescents aged between 10 and 19 years.
Methods: We identified 19 eligible studies by searching MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science databases from January 2010 to November 2022.
Results: Out of 8 studies that assessed earlier age of first sex, 5 studies, including 1 longitudinal study, found a statistically significant association with exposure to pornography. Given that most studies were cross-sectional or had substantial limitations, causal inference could not be made. Also, exposure to pornography was not measured consistently. The evidence was conflicting or insufficient to draw any conclusions regarding other outcomes.
Conclusions: More quantitative research is needed to elucidate the association between pornography exposure and sexual behavior, and sex education should adopt evidence-based approaches to minimize the potential harms from pornography.
Trial Registration: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021227390; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=227390
doi:10.2196/43116
Keywords
Introduction
Adolescence (ages 10-19 years) is a period of marked physical, cognitive, and psychosocial development []. Curiosity and experimentation are common in the context of adolescent psychosexual development [], and adolescents who experience healthy relationships are more likely to have healthy relationships in their young adulthood []. However, some sexual behaviors can increase the risk of sexually transmitted infections or unplanned pregnancy []. Examples include earlier age of first sexual experience, condomless sex, or sex with multiple partners []. Studies have also suggested that teen dating violence, including sexual aggression in adolescence, is linked to substance abuse problems, depression, and psychosis []. Hence, studying the factors associated with these types of sexual behaviors in adolescence is crucial for understanding how to best support the healthy development of adolescents.
In adults and older populations of young adults, quantitative studies have demonstrated associations between pornography exposure and behaviors such as sex with multiple partners and condomless sex and sex during intoxication [,]. Qualitative and mixed methods studies have also supported this association [-]. In the era of en masse digitalization and the widespread use of smartphones and other readily accessible digital media, exposure to pornography has become ubiquitous []. Studies in Australia [] and the United States [] suggest that adolescents are exposed to pornography by the age of 13 years on average for males and 17 years for females despite laws prohibiting showing or supplying pornography for those aged <18 years [-]. This raises concerns as to whether exposure to pornography influences sexual behavior during adolescence.
As noted in a review by Peter and Valkenburg [] in 2016, there has been increasing empirical research on this subject area. However, whether pornography exposure is causally associated with sexual behavior in adolescence remains contentious [-]. It has been argued that adolescents are aware of the shortcomings and artificiality of pornography, hence the impact on sexual behavior is limited [], whereas others have argued the converse, claiming that pornography exposure is a strong predictor of earlier age of first sex, sexual aggression, and other sexual behaviors [], as well as a platform upon which adolescents develop their sexual identities and relationships []. Previous systematic reviews of the evidence focused on college students [] and adolescents diagnosed with porn addiction [] and did not consider some potentially important sexual behaviors such as paid sex []. We sought to update the Peter and Valkenburg [] review in the era of ubiquitous smartphones by systematically reviewing the empirical literature measuring exposure to pornography and its associations with sexual behaviors in adolescents in the general population.
Methods
Overview
We conducted a systematic review of quantitative studies that examined the associations between exposure to pornography and sexual behaviors in adolescents aged between 10 and 19 years. We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines (
Figure 1 and and ) [,]. This systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021227390).
We searched 6 databases: CINAHL (via EBSCOhost), Cochrane Reviews (via Ovid, see for specific Cochrane databases searched), Embase (via Ovid), MEDLINE (via Ovid), PsycINFO (via Ovid), and Web of Science (all databases: Web of Science, Current Contents Connect, BIOSIS Previews, CAB Abstracts, and MEDLINE). The search strategy, developed in MEDLINE and later adapted to other databases, used controlled vocabulary and free-text terms that related to the 2 key concepts of adolescents and pornography () as appropriate for each database. The search strategy, including adaptations, was developed by an experienced specialist research librarian. By design, search terms did not include “preteen*” and “prepubert*” because these terms were considered less likely to yield studies about young users of pornography than about child pornography (see Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria). Similarly, the names of apps were not included as search terms, because the apps are used not only for pornography by our definition (in subsequent section) but also for interactive sexual experiences. The searches were limited to peer-reviewed papers published from January 1, 2010, to November 30, 2022, to update a previous review article []. Other studies that were found to be independent of our search strategy were identified through citation searches.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
To be considered eligible, studies must have reported quantitative empirical findings on the association between exposure to pornography and sexual behavior outcomes (
Table 1). Qualitative studies and systematic reviews were excluded from analysis. For this review, exposure to pornography was defined as a participant’s report of any contact with sexually explicit or erotic media (pornography), with the intent of sexual arousal []. We included studies that did not define the exposure but used synonymous terms such as “sexually explicit material,” “adult or X-rated material,” or “pornography” without defining it in the methods. We excluded studies on child pornography, that is, sexually explicit or erotic material portraying individuals aged <18 years.
Sexual behavioral outcomes included those with established associations with adverse health and social outcomes (Table 1). Studies describing sexual aggression were limited to those that measured forced or coercive penetrative sex, excluding those that reported only on forced or coercive kissing and touching or used only the term “sexual acts” without further specification. Composite indices of sexual behaviors were excluded, as the association could not be clearly mapped to a specific behavior. The included studies were limited to those with adolescent participants (aged 10-19 years, inclusive), in which the age range was not provided, and the reported mean or median age was within this range. Included studies were those from a general population sample, and studies with clinical or specific population groups (eg, juvenile detention) were excluded. There was no restriction on the ethnicity of the participants or the study country. Multiple studies that analyzed the same cohort were considered together if they reported different associations.
| Outcome | Definition |
| Earlier age of first sex |
|
| Sex for payment OR paid sex |
|
| Other sexual behaviors |
|
| Adverse sexual health consequences |
|
| Sexual aggression OR violence indicative of forced sex (described scale must include forced sex) |
|
aSTI: sexually transmitted infection.
Data Extraction
The first author (PP) conducted the search and removed duplicates using EndNote X9 []. PP reviewed the titles and abstracts (N=5852) and reviewed the full text (n=337) for eligibility (Figure 1). In cases of doubt (n=7), another author (SRS) was consulted. A total of 19 studies were eligible for inclusion. Information about the study location, design, sample size calculation, participants, setting, exposures, outcomes, control variables, methods of statistical analysis, effect sizes, and their variations were extracted by PP and MR. Where possible, effect sizes were calculated from the data if not reported through the study. Included studies either reported on sex or gender. For this systematic review, we used male/female/nonbinary gender or male/female sex to describe the gender or sex of the cohorts as reported in each study.
Quality Assessment
Study quality was assessed independently by the authors PP and MR using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale []. For the Newcastle-Ottawa scale used to assess longitudinal studies, we replaced the item “was follow-up long enough for outcome to occur” with “whether the outcome was assessed to be at low levels at baseline.” Cross-sectional studies were assessed based on the representativeness of the sample, sample size, addressing the influence of nonrespondents on the reported effect estimates, exposure, and outcome, reporting of statistical analyses, and comparison of outcome and control groups ( [-]). Longitudinal studies were assessed based on the representativeness of the sample, selection of a nonexposed cohort, assessment of exposure, outcome (at baseline and subsequent waves), follow-up rates, and comparability of outcome and control groups (). In cases of conflicts, 2 other authors (ML and JM) were consulted. Low risk of bias was classified as a score of ≥7, moderate risk of bias as a score of 4 to 6, and high risk of bias as a score of 0 to 3.
Results
Included Studies
Initial searches identified 5852 abstracts, and 19 studies met the inclusion criteria (Figure 1). This included 11 cross-sectional studies [-], 2 case-control studies [,], and 6 prospective cohort studies [-]. Furthermore, 8 studies addressed early age (<16 years) of first sex [,,,,,,,]; 5 studies addressed sexual behaviors including condomless sex [,,,,]; 2 studies examined multiple sexual partners during lifetime; a single study examined group sex []; 3 studies examined coercive or forced sex [,,]; and 5 studies examined other behaviors including paid sex [,,], teenage pregnancy [], and history of sexually transmitted infections [].
The included studies were conducted across 13 countries (), and 2 studies were conducted internationally across various countries in Europe [,] (). Most studies were conducted in European countries (n=9) [,,,,,,-], followed by countries in Asia (n=6) [,,,,,], the United States (n=3) [,,], and Eastern Uganda (n=1) []. Ten studies reported on the frequency of pornography exposure [,,,,,,,-], and of these studies, one [] reported “regular” exposure without further definition. Four studies reported exposure to different pornography contents [,,,], including violent pornography (aggressive sexual acts) and pornography with condomless sex (). Exposure to pornography was not uniformly measured; 7 studies did not define pornography in their methods [,,,,-] and a further 6 studies defined it as “sexually explicit content,” “adult content,” “banned media,” or “R-rated media” [,-,,] (). Similarly, the definitions of outcomes varied across studies. Age at first sex was measured prospectively in one study by asking at each follow-up whether an adolescent had ever had sexual intercourse [] and retrospectively in 2 studies by asking the age at first sexual intercourse [,]. Another longitudinal study assessed the outcome of the first sexual experience in a sexually naive population at baseline, with a mean age at baseline of <16 years []. Four studies had a mean sample age of <16 years, so any participant in these samples who had sexual intercourse was considered to have had a young age of first sex [,,,]. “Multiple sexual partners” included an adolescent self-reporting sex with more than one partner over their lifetime (n=2) [,] and having ever participated in group sex (n=1) []. Studies of forced or coercive sex included participants as perpetrators (n=3) [,,] and survivors (n=2) [,]. Studies of paid sex included participants as buyers (n=3) [,,] or sellers (n=2) [,]. Because of the heterogeneity in how exposure and outcomes were measured across studies, a meta-analysis was not possible.
Early Age of First Sex
A total of 8 studies (2 prospective cohorts, 1 case-control, and 5 cross-sectional) assessed the relationship between pornography exposure in adolescence and earlier age of first sex (defined as below the age of 16 years; Table 2 [,,,,,,,]). Of the 6 cross-sectional studies that examined this outcome, 2 studies [,] assessed only male adolescents, whereas the other 4 studies [,,,] studied cohorts of both males and females and the analysis was not stratified by sex. Two prospective cohort studies reported conflicting findings regarding this association. The first study, of 639 male adolescents, conducted in Belgium [] found a positive longitudinal relationship between exposure to pornography and an earlier age of first sex. The second study [] reported no association between exposure to pornography and an earlier age of first sex in the overall sample. However, adolescents with a later age of first exposure to pornography had a significantly lower probability of reporting first sexual experience in subsequent waves than their counterparts with earlier exposure to porn. Subsequent sensitivity analyses to account for missing values showed no major association between the timing of porn exposure and first sex in males but showed an association between regular exposure to porn versus no exposure and first sex in females []. Both studies were assessed to have a low risk of bias. Four cross-sectional studies of low to moderate risk of bias conducted in Sweden [], Thailand [], Eastern Uganda [], and 23 EU countries [] supported this association. Two studies did not identify any substantial associations. In 2013, Sahay et al [] presented a P value close to the threshold and conjectured that the rarity of the outcome in their sample limited the power to detect a true association.
| Study (year) | Country of study | Sample size, n (% F/M/NBa, gender or F/M sex as reported) and age for analyzed sample, mean (SD) | Risk of bias | Effect estimate, P value | Comment on association | |||||||
| Outcome is reporting the age of first sex below 16 years | ||||||||||||
| Cross sectional studies | ||||||||||||
| Donevan et al [] (2017) | Sweden |
| Low |
|
| |||||||
| Svedin et al [] (2011) | Sweden |
| Low |
|
| |||||||
| Outcome is reporting of any sex, but mean age of cohort is below 16 years | ||||||||||||
| Cross-sectional study | ||||||||||||
| Atwood et al [] (2012) | Thailand |
| Moderate |
|
| |||||||
| Bukenya [] (2020) | Uganda |
| Low |
|
| |||||||
| Sahay [] (2013) | India |
| Moderate |
|
| |||||||
| Ševčíková et al [] (2014) | EU countries |
| Low |
|
| |||||||
| Prospective cohort study | ||||||||||||
| Matković et al [] (2018) | ||||||||||||
| Croatia (Rijeka) |
| Low |
|
| ||||||||
| Croatia (Zagreb) |
|
|
| |||||||||
| Vandenbosch et al [] (2013) | Belgium |
| Low |
|
| |||||||
aF/M/NB: female/male/nonbinary.
bNR: not reported.
cAOR: adjusted odds ratio.
dSTD: sexually transmitted disease.
eβ: unstandardized regression coefficient.
Condomless Sex
A total of 5 studies (3 prospective cohorts, 1 case-control, and 1 cross-sectional) assessed the relationship between pornography exposure in adolescence and participation in condomless sex (Table 3 [,,,,]). Two studies [,] were conducted in the United States, and one each in Croatia [], Taiwan [] and the Netherlands []. The largest study assessing this outcome was a prospective cohort study of 2054 participants conducted in Taiwan [], and the smallest was a cross-sectional study of 206 participants conducted in the United States []. Of the 2 cross-sectional studies that examined this outcome, one studied a cohort of male adolescents [], whereas the other examined a cohort of males and females, where analysis was not stratified by gender []. The 3 longitudinal studies reported cohorts of male and female adolescents, where the analysis was not stratified by sex. However, one study [] included gender as an interaction term to analyze the effects of gender on the association, while another [] adjusted for gender in the regression models.
The results of these studies were mixed. Among 3 longitudinal studies [,,], one conducted in Taiwan [] reported a positive association and was assessed to have a moderate risk of bias, while the studies from Croatia and the Netherlands [,] reported no major associations and were assessed to have a low risk of bias. Both cross-sectional studies supported a positive association between exposure to pornography and condomless sex in the samples [,]. Nelson et al (2019) examined pornography patterns in non-heterosexual male adolescents [], a study that was assessed to have a low risk of bias. Specifically, this study found that those who viewed more condomless sex (>50% of total pornography viewed) were more likely to have reported participating in condomless sex []. Another cross-sectional study that found an association, by Wright et al [], was assessed to have a high risk of bias owing to poor adjustment of confounders and ascertainment of exposures and outcomes.
| Study (year) | Country of study | Sample size, n (% F/M/NBa, gender or F/M sex as reported) and age for analyzed sample, mean (SD) | Risk of bias | Effect estimate, P value | Comment on association | ||
| Condomless sex | |||||||
| Cross-sectional studies | |||||||
| Nelson et al [] (2019) | United States |
| Low |
|
| ||
| Wright [] (2020) | United States |
| High |
|
| ||
| Prospective cohort studies | |||||||
| Koletić et al [] (2019) | Croatia |
| Low |
|
| ||
| Lin et al [] (2020) | Taiwan |
| Moderate |
|
| ||
| Peter et al [] (2011) | The Netherlands |
| Low |
|
| ||
| Group sex | |||||||
| Cross-sectional studies | |||||||
| Donevan and Mattebo [] (2017) | Sweden |
| Low |
|
| ||
| Lifetime sexual partners | |||||||
| Prospective cohort studies | |||||||
| Koletić et al [] (2019) | Croatia |
| Low |
|
| ||
| Lin, Liu, and Yi [] (2020) | Taiwan |
| Moderate |
|
| ||
aF/M/NB: female/male/nonbinary.
bAOR: adjusted odds ratio.
cNR: not reported.
dOR: odds ratio.
eβ: unstandardized regression coefficient.
fNS: nonsignificant P value.
Multiple Sexual Partners
Two prospective studies examined the association between pornography exposure and multiple lifetime sexual partners [,]. These studies were conducted in Croatia [] and Taiwan []. Both studies examined male and female cohorts. Koletić et al [] included gender as an interaction term to analyze the effects of gender on the association, whereas Lin et al [] adjusted for gender in the regression models. The study by Lin et al, 2020 [] found an association between pornography exposure and multiple sexual partners and was assessed to have a moderate risk of bias owing to not measuring the outcome at baseline, having a low proportion of the sample reporting the outcome, and limited assessment of follow-up and retention rates (Table 3). This study reported exposure to pornography across different media (such as comic books and web sites) in a single exposure variable. Koletić et al [] found a major association but only in a nonadjusted model. A single cross-sectional study conducted in Sweden on a cohort of male adolescents reported a nonsignificant association between exposure to pornography and participation in group sex [], that is, sex with multiple partners simultaneously (Tables 1 and 3).
Forced or Coercive Sex
A total of three cross-sectional studies [,,] assessed the relationship between pornography exposure in adolescence and experiences of forced or coercive penetrative sex (Table 4). These studies were conducted in the United States [], Sweden [] and 5 European countries []. The largest study was by Barter et al [] in 2021 of 3277 adolescents, and the smallest was conducted by Rostad et al [] in 2019 with 1766 adolescents. Furthermore, 2 out of 3 studies reported a major positive association in reported experiences of forced or coercive sex in males only [,]. Two of the 3 studies [,] stratified their analyses as male or female, and one of the studies examined only male adolescents [].
| Study (year) | Country of study | Sample size, n (% F/M/NBa, gender or F/M sex as reported) and age for analyzed sample, mean (SD) | Risk of bias | Effect estimate, P value | Comment on association | |||||||
| Forced or coercive sex | ||||||||||||
| Cross-sectional studies | ||||||||||||
| Rostad et al [] (2019) | United States |
| Low |
|
| |||||||
| Svedin et al [] (2011) | Sweden |
| Low |
|
| |||||||
| Barter et al [] (2021) | England, Italy, Norway, Bulgaria, and Cyprus |
| Low |
|
| |||||||
| Paid sex (bought sex) | ||||||||||||
| Cross-sectional studies | ||||||||||||
| Ng and Wong []d (2016) | Singapore | 300 (100% male), median=8 (IQR 18-19) years | Low |
|
| |||||||
| Svedin et al [] (2011) | Sweden |
| Low |
|
| |||||||
| Prospective cohort studies | ||||||||||||
| Averdijk [] (2020) | Switzerland |
| Moderate |
|
| |||||||
| Paid sex (sold sex) | ||||||||||||
| Cross-sectional studies | ||||||||||||
| Svedin et al [] (2011) | Sweden |
| Low |
|
| |||||||
| Prospective cohort studies | ||||||||||||
| Averdijk [] (2020) | Switzerland |
| Moderate |
|
| |||||||
| Teenage pregnancy | ||||||||||||
| Case-control analysis | ||||||||||||
| Siti-HaidahSiti-Haidah et al [] (2017) | Malaysia |
| Moderate |
|
| |||||||
| History of sexually transmitted infections | ||||||||||||
| Cross-sectional studies | ||||||||||||
| Kim et al [] (2016) | South Korea |
| Low |
|
| |||||||
aF/M/NB: female/male/nonbinary.
bAOR: adjusted odds ratio
cNR: not reported.
dReported median age of cohort (IQR).
eOR: odds ratio.
Paid Sex
The relationship between pornography exposure and “paying for sex” was inconsistent (Table 4). Studies have been conducted in Singapore [], Sweden [], and Switzerland []. A prospective cohort study [] reporting this exposure and outcome found a positive association between exposure to pornography and sex. This was supported by one [] of the 2 cross-sectional studies [,] that examined this association. There are an insufficient number of studies examining both male and female adolescents to conclude whether this association was gender dependent, as both Ng et al [] and Svedin et al [] reported on male adolescents yet found opposing substantial associations. Regarding the outcome of selling sex, a prospective cohort study found no association with pornography viewing []. However, they reported an interaction effect with gender, whereby females with high pornography consumption were more likely to sell sex than those with low consumption. One cross-sectional study [] that sampled only male adolescents found a positive association between selling sex and viewing pornography. There are an insufficient number of studies examining this association to draw conclusions.
Sexual Health Consequences
One study reported a major association between exposure to pornography and teenage pregnancy [], whereas another found an association with a history of sexually transmitted diseases [] (Table 4). The study of teenage pregnancy was assessed to have a moderate risk of bias, largely due to poor assessment of nonrespondents and limited justification of sample size. Both studies were limited by a lack of representative samples.
Discussion
We identified 19 papers published in the past 10 years that reported the association between pornography exposure and sexual behaviors in adolescents. Our review found that exposure to pornography in adolescence is associated with an earlier age of first sex (below 16 years of age). Notably, recent studies with higher-quality evidence supported the existence of a relationship between exposure to pornography and earlier age of first sex for adolescents aged 10-19 years. Out of the studies, 4 cross-sectional studies [,,,] and 1 longitudinal study found this association. Two cross-sectional studies did not report a significant association, with the study by Sahay et al [] limited by a low proportion of the population reporting the outcome, and the study by Svedin et al [] limited by the retrospective nature of the reported outcomes and the era in which data collection occurred (before access to smartphones and high-resolution internet video). Another longitudinal study by Matković [] also found inconsistent associations between pornography exposure and age of first sex, depending on how the exposure was measured (timing and quantity) and the gender of the adolescent. However, these were not consistently present in all analyses. The study was limited by the baseline mean age of the sample being 15.8 (SD 0.5) years and the fact that sexual debut soon after this age would be expected. A review by Peter and Valkenburg in 2016 [] also reported an association between pornography exposure and earlier age of sexual activity, and our review has strengthened this finding with the inclusion of additional, more recent studies. We did not find an association between exposure to pornography and any other sexual behaviors. Notably, a positive association between exposure to pornography and earlier age at first sex in adolescence does not imply a causal relationship, even when a temporal association is identified, as in a longitudinal study []. For example, adolescents who are more interested in sexual activity and therefore more likely to become sexually active may also be more likely to view pornography because of their interest in it. Both Donevan et al [] and Svedin et al [] reported higher exposure to pornography in those seeking it as a source of inspiration or knowledge about sex.
There was a limited number of studies, mainly cross-sectional, examining the relationship between exposure to pornography and forced sex, paid sex, multiple partners, teenage pregnancy, and history of sexually transmitted infection [,-,,,-,]. There is clearly a need for more longitudinal studies to determine whether exposure to pornography is associated with other sexual behaviors in adolescents. In contrast to previous reviews [,], we examined forced penetrative sex separately from sexual aggression (aggressive intentions or coerced nonpenetrative sexual behaviors such as kissing or touching). We found mixed results, which might be clarified if the studies were to report these outcomes separately. We excluded some studies [,,] where forced sex was measured only as “forced sexual acts” and hence accounted for forced sexual behaviors that are strictly not forced sexual intercourse, such as kissing or touching against one’s will. It is also worth noting that one study included in this review found an association between exposure to pornography and forced sex [] focused specifically on violent pornography, defined as any erotic media depicting individuals being forced into sexual acts. A recent meta-analysis found that violent pornography was modestly correlated with sexual aggression and noted difficulties in interpreting the data owing to citation biases and researcher expectancy effects []. In addition, a systematic review conducted in 2021 aligned with our observations, noting the difficulty of clarifying the association between pornography consumption and nonconsensual acts such as rape []. This may differ from the impact of nonviolent pornography, which has been associated with reduced sexual aggression in older populations [,,]. It is possible that exposure to violent pornography is associated with sexually aggressive behavior.
Before considering the significance of our findings, we recognize that our systematic review was not without its limitations, particularly the potential for missing literature. This may have been the case because our choice of search terms and databases was not sent for external peer review [,], and we excluded grey literature. However, using a wide array of databases spanning across multiple disciplines (), consulting with an expert librarian, and searching citations of included articles, we conducted a comprehensive search to address the aims of this review. This review included studies from 13 different countries and 2 cross-national European studies (Appendix 4). Most studies were conducted in high-income Western settings. For multiple lifetime sexual partners, no major association with pornography exposure was found when the study was conducted in a Western country (Croatia) [], but there was an association in an Eastern country (Taiwan) []. A similar pattern was identified for the outcomes of group sex, teenage pregnancy, and history of sexually transmitted infections (Tables 3 and 4), yet there are insufficient studies examining or comparing culturally diverse locations to draw conclusions. The role of cultural influence on the relationship between pornography exposure and sexual behaviors is under-studied in adolescents, but this review suggests that country and culture may be important. Several articles assessing the relationship between exposure to pornography and outcomes of sexual behavior in older populations have suggested the significance of cultural context as an influence on how susceptible an individual is to adopt the sexual scripts prescribed in pornography [-]. In certain cultures, where access to sexual health education is limited, adolescents tend to use pornography as one of the few sources of sexual health knowledge []. It is possible that in societies without sex education, adolescents may more readily adopt sexual scripts presented in pornography [,], normalizing sexual behaviors depicted in pornography. Despite this conjecture, the role of culture in adolescents’ exposure to pornography and its relationship with sexual behaviors remains unknown, and further studies are recommended.
Inconsistent findings on the association between exposure to pornography in adolescence and sexual behavior also likely reflect the limitations of research studies. Consistent with a previous review [], we found that exposure to pornography was not assessed in a uniform or reproducible manner (). Nearly half of the studies did not define pornography in their methods, and a further 5 studies defined it simply as “sexually explicit content,” “adult content,” or “banned material.” A lack of specificity in exposure may impact a study’s ability to identify an existing association. It also prevents the pooling of data in a meta-analysis, limiting the ability to increase the power to detect an association. There is a clear need to standardize the definition and quantification of pornography. Two studies identified that adolescents commonly reported using pornography as an information source [,]. Such ideas align with previous findings that adolescents learn about sex, sexual identities, and sexuality through pornography [,]. Pornography content, perceptions of that content, frequency of use, and reasons for use are important dimensions of pornography exposure. A consistent and reliable measurement of these dimensions will help elucidate the pathways between pornography and sexual behavior in adolescents. In addition, as in the case of studies assessing sexual aggression indicative of forced sex (Table 4 and ), questionnaires assessing sexual behaviors require careful piloting and validation to ensure that they are understood by adolescents as intended. Furthermore, statistical analyses that do not combine forced sex with other sexually aggressive acts into one outcome can help to further clarify the observed associations. A review of how sexual aggression has been measured and reported thus far in the literature could help clarify the literature on pornography use and its associations with forced sex. To further clarify the nature of the observed associations, studies should also control for baseline confounders, such as access to or the quality of sexual health knowledge received by adolescents. While we recommend further research to develop more reliable and robust measures of exposure and outcomes, we also recognize that this type of research on adolescents’ behavior presents ethical barriers. There is a high level of moral concern in society regarding the potentially harmful influence of pornography on adolescents, including among research participants. This concern is likely to translate into barriers to the approval and funding of research on this topic.
Most studies in this review were not inclusive of adolescents who were sexuality or gender-diverse. It has also been reported that same-sex-attracted male adolescents use pornography to negotiate their sexual identity, learn about the mechanics of sex and performance, and define ideas of pain and pleasure []. Another study found that sexuality diverse adolescents used social media to share sexual information []. Hence, it is possible that pornography may have different associations with sexual behaviors in sexuality diverse adolescents than in cisgender heterosexual peers. We recommend studies on sexual behaviors and their relationship to pornography in sexuality and gender-diverse adolescents.
Recent findings [] suggest that sexual attitudes mediate the relationship between pornography exposure and sexual behavior. Recent studies in the United States [] have found that adults use pornography as a source of sex information. In college students, studies suggest a mediating role of sexual education in the relationship between exposure to pornography and sexual behaviors [-]. It is possible that individuals are most strongly influenced by pornography when they have limited access to sex education. Therefore, supporting international guidelines [], we also recommend that sex education be school based, universal, comprehensive, accurate, evidence informed, and age appropriate.
Acknowledgments
We thank Ms Kanchana Ekanayake (Associate of the Australian Library and Information Association, AALIA, and Certified Professional, CP) for their assistance in developing the search strategy for this systematic review. This work was supported by a summer research scholarship (2020) from the Faculty of Medicine and Health at the University of Sydney. We also disclose that no protocol was prepared for this review. This review is registered in PROSPERO, the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021227390). All quality assessments and extracted data are available in the . PP was supported by a Research Training Program Scholarship at the University of Sydney. JLM was supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (grant numbers 1161445 and 1134894). ML was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Career Development Fellowship.
Conflicts of Interest
None declared.
Multimedia Appendix 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist (2020) for systematic review on adolescent (aged 10-19 years) use of pornography.
DOCX File , 32 KB
Multimedia Appendix 2
PRISMA-S (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Literature Search Extension) checklist for systematic review on adolescent (aged 10-19 years) use of pornography.
DOCX File , 20 KB
Multimedia Appendix 3
Search strategies used for systematic literature search on adolescent (aged 10-19 years) use of pornography.
DOCX File , 15 KB
Multimedia Appendix 4
Summary, definition of exposure, and grading of quality of studies included in the present systematic review.
DOCX File , 38 KBReferences
- Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Santelli JS, Ross DA, Afifi R, Allen NB, et al. Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet 2016 Jun 11;387(10036):2423-2478 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Ott MA, Pfeiffer EJ. "That's nasty" to curiosity: early adolescent cognitions about sexual abstinence. J Adolesc Health 2009 Jun;44(6):575-581 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Meier A, Allen G. Romantic relationships from adolescence to young adulthood: evidence from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Sociol Q 2009;50(2):308-335 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Crandall A, Magnusson BM, Novilla ML. Growth in adolescent self-regulation and impact on sexual risk-taking: a curve-of-factors analysis. J Youth Adolesc 2018 Apr;47(4):793-806. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Young H, Burke L, Nic Gabhainn S. Sexual intercourse, age of initiation and contraception among adolescents in Ireland: findings from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) Ireland study. BMC Public Health 2018 Mar 16;18(1):362 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Taquette SR, Monteiro DL. Causes and consequences of adolescent dating violence: a systematic review. J Inj Violence Res 2019 Jul;11(2):137-147 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Harkness EL, Mullan B, Blaszczynski A. Association between pornography use and sexual risk behaviors in adult consumers: a systematic review. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2015 Feb;18(2):59-71. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Lim MS, Agius PA, Carrotte ER, Vella AM, Hellard ME. Young Australians' use of pornography and associations with sexual risk behaviours. Aust N Z J Public Health 2017 Aug;41(4):438-443 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Litsou K, Byron P, McKee A, Ingham R. Learning from pornography: results of a mixed methods systematic review. Sex Educ 2021;21(2):236-252. [CrossRef]
- Mustanski B, Newcomb ME, Clerkin EM. Relationship characteristics and sexual risk-taking in young men who have sex with men. Health Psychol 2011 Sep;30(5):597-605 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Richardson C. "I imagine the male isn't in the video and it is me:" a mixed methods study of internet pornography, masculinity, and sexual aggression in emerging adulthood. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. 2018. URL: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1334&context=cehsdiss [accessed 2022-08-05]
- Wright PJ, Herbenick D, Paul B. Casual condomless sex, range of pornography exposure, and perceived pornography realism. Commun Res 2022 Jun;49(4):547-566. [CrossRef]
- Anderson LE, Dingle GA, O'Gorman B, Gullo MJ. Young adults' sexual health in the digital age: perspectives of care providers. Sex Reprod Healthc 2020 Oct;25:100534. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Herbenick D, Fu TC, Wright P, Paul B, Gradus R, Bauer J, et al. Diverse sexual behaviors and pornography use: findings from a nationally representative probability survey of Americans aged 18 to 60 years. J Sex Med 2020 Apr;17(4):623-633. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Fleming MJ, Greentree S, Cocotti-Muller D, Elias KA, Morrison S. Safety in cyberspace: adolescents' safety and exposure online. Youth Soc 2006 Dec;38(2):135-154. [CrossRef]
- Lim MS, Carrotte ER, Hellard ME. The impact of pornography on gender-based violence, sexual health and well-being: what do we know? J Epidemiol Community Health 2016 Jan;70(1):3-5. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Mason M. Legislation Relating to Pornography in Australia. Department of the Parliamentary Library, Australia. Canberra, Australia: Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia; 1992 Oct 20. URL: https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22library%2Fprspub%2FG1610%22 [accessed 2023-02-14]
- Waltman M. Pornography: The Politics of Legal Challenges. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; Sep 23, 2021.
- Peter J, Valkenburg PM. Adolescents and pornography: a review of 20 years of research. J Sex Res 2016;53(4-5):509-531. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Koletić G, Štulhofer A, Tomić I, Knežević Ćuća J. Associations between Croatian adolescents’ use of sexually explicit material and risky sexual behavior: a latent growth curve modeling approach. Int J Sex Health 2019 Feb 19;31(1):77-91. [CrossRef]
- Luder MT, Pittet I, Berchtold A, Akré C, Michaud PA, Surís JC. Associations between online pornography and sexual behavior among adolescents: myth or reality? Arch Sex Behav 2011 Oct;40(5):1027-1035. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ, Hamburger M, Diener-West M, Leaf PJ. X-rated material and perpetration of sexually aggressive behavior among children and adolescents: is there a link? Aggress Behav 2011;37(1):1-18. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- McKee A, Litsou K, Byron P, Ingham R. What Do We Know About the Effects of Pornography After Fifty Years of Academic Research?. Milton Park, UK: Taylor & Francis; 2022.
- Alexandraki K, Stavropoulos V, Anderson E, Latifi MQ, Gomez R. Adolescent pornography use: a systematic literature review of research trends 2000-2017. Curr Psychiatr Rev 2018 Sep 05;14(1):47-58. [CrossRef]
- Attwood F, Smith C, Barker M. ‘I’m just curious and still exploring myself’: young people and pornography. New Media Soc 2018 Oct;20(10):3738-3759. [CrossRef]
- de Alarcón R, de la Iglesia JI, Casado NM, Montejo AL. Online porn addiction: what we know and what we don't-a systematic review. J Clin Med 2019 Jan 15;8(1):91 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, Ayala AP, Moher D, Page MJ, PRISMA-S Group. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2021 Jan 26;10(1):39 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Ashton S, McDonald K, Kirkman M. What does ‘pornography’ mean in the digital age? Revisiting a definition for social science researchers. Porn Stud 2019 Feb 07;6(2):144-168. [CrossRef]
- Team EndNote. EndNote. Clarivate. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Clarivate; 2013. URL: https://endnote.com/ [accessed 2021-01-01]
- Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. 2000. URL: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp [accessed 2021-03-12]
- Atwood KA, Zimmerman R, Cupp PK, Fongkaew W, Miller BA, Byrnes HF, et al. Correlates of precoital behaviors, intentions, and sexual initiation among Thai adolescents. J Early Adolesc 2012 Jun;32(3):364-386. [CrossRef]
- Barter C, Lanau A, Stanley N, Aghtaie N, Överlien C. Factors associated with the perpetration of interpersonal violence and abuse in young people’s intimate relationships. J Youth Stud 2022;25(5):547-563. [CrossRef]
- Bukenya JN, Nakafeero M, Ssekamatte T, Isabirye N, Guwatudde D, Fawzi WW. Sexual behaviours among adolescents in a rural setting in eastern Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Trop Med Int Health 2020 Jan;25(1):81-88 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Donevan M, Mattebo M. The relationship between frequent pornography consumption, behaviours, and sexual preoccupancy among male adolescents in Sweden. Sex Reprod Healthc 2017 Jun;12:82-87. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Kim S, Lee C. Factors affecting sexually transmitted infections in South Korean high school students. Public Health Nurs 2016 May;33(3):179-188. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Nelson KM, Perry NS, Carey MP. Sexually explicit media use among 14-17-year-old sexual minority males in the U.S. Arch Sex Behav 2019 Nov;48(8):2345-2355 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Ng JY, Wong ML. Determinants of heterosexual adolescents having sex with female sex workers in Singapore. PLoS One 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147110 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Rostad WL, Gittins-Stone D, Huntington C, Rizzo CJ, Pearlman D, Orchowski L. The association between exposure to violent pornography and teen dating violence in grade 10 high school students. Arch Sex Behav 2019 Oct;48(7):2137-2147 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Ševčíková A, Šerek J, Barbovschi M, Daneback K. The roles of individual characteristics and liberalism in intentional and unintentional exposure to online sexual material among European youth: a multilevel approach. Sex Res Soc Policy 2014 Jan 4;11(2):104-115. [CrossRef]
- Svedin CG, Akerman I, Priebe G. Frequent users of pornography. A population based epidemiological study of Swedish male adolescents. J Adolesc 2011 Aug;34(4):779-788. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Wright PJ, Herbenick D, Paul B. Adolescent condom use, parent-adolescent sexual health communication, and pornography: findings from a U.S. probability sample. Health Commun 2020 Nov;35(13):1576-1582. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Sahay S, Nirmalkar A, Sane S, Verma A, Reddy S, Mehendale S. Correlates of sex initiation among school going adolescents in Pune, India. Indian J Pediatr 2013 Oct;80(10):814-820. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Siti-Haidah MI, Susan MK, Bujang MA, Voon YL, Chan LF, Abdul-Wahab N, et al. The relationship between exposure to sexually explicit material and teenage pre-marital pregnancy. Pertanika J Soc Sci Humanit 2017 Sep;25(3):1059-1072 [FREE Full text]
- Averdijk M, Ribeaud D, Eisner M. Longitudinal risk factors of selling and buying sexual services among youths in Switzerland. Arch Sex Behav 2020 May;49(4):1279-1290 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Koletić G, Kohut T, Štulhofer A. Associations between adolescents' use of sexually explicit material and risky sexual behavior: a longitudinal assessment. PLoS One 2019 Jun 26;14(6):e0218962 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Lin WH, Liu CH, Yi CC. Exposure to sexually explicit media in early adolescence is related to risky sexual behavior in emerging adulthood. PLoS One 2020 Apr 10;15(4):e0230242 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Matković T, Cohen N, Štulhofer A. The use of sexually explicit material and its relationship to adolescent sexual activity. J Adolesc Health 2018 May;62(5):563-569. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Peter J, Valkenburg PM. The influence of sexually explicit internet material on sexual risk behavior: a comparison of adolescents and adults. J Health Commun 2011 Aug;16(7):750-765. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Vandenbosch L, Eggermont S. Sexually explicit websites and sexual initiation: reciprocal relationships and the moderating role of pubertal status. J Res Adolesc 2013 Dec;23(4):621-634. [CrossRef]
- Štulhofer A. Is male adolescents' sexual aggressiveness better explained by prior pornography use or callousness? A brief report. Sex Abuse 2021 Apr;33(3):361-373. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Wright PJ, Paul B, Herbenick D. Preliminary insights from a U.S. probability sample on adolescents' pornography exposure, media psychology, and sexual aggression. J Health Commun 2021 Jan 02;26(1):39-46. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Ferguson CJ, Hartley RD. Pornography and sexual aggression: can meta-analysis find a link? Trauma Violence Abuse 2022 Jan;23(1):278-287. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- McKee A, Litsou K, Byron P, Ingham R. The relationship between consumption of pornography and consensual sexual practice: results of a mixed method systematic review. Can J Hum Sex 2021 Dec 01;30(3):387-396. [CrossRef]
- Wright PJ, Paul B, Herbenick D. Pornography, impersonal sex, and sexual aggression: a test of the confluence model in a national probability sample of men in the U.S. Aggress Behav 2021 Sep;47(5):593-602. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Albury K. Young people, media and sexual learning: rethinking representation. Sex Educ 2013 Aug;13(sup1):S32-S44. [CrossRef]
- Fox NJ, Bale C. Bodies, pornography and the circumscription of sexuality: a new materialist study of young people’s sexual practices. Sexualities 2018 Mar;21(3):393-409. [CrossRef]
- McNair B. Rethinking the effects paradigm in porn studies. Porn Stud 2014 Mar 21;1(1-2):161-171. [CrossRef]
- Rowland DL, Uribe D. Pornography use: what do cross-cultural patterns tell us? In: Rowland DL, Jannini EA, editors. Cultural Differences and the Practice of Sexual Medicine: A Guide for Sexual Health Practitioners. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020:317-334.
- Samkange-Zeeb FN, Spallek L, Zeeb H. Awareness and knowledge of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) among school-going adolescents in Europe: a systematic review of published literature. BMC Public Health 2011 Sep 25;11:727 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Sun C, Bridges A, Johnson JA, Ezzell MB. Pornography and the male sexual script: an analysis of consumption and sexual relations. Arch Sex Behav 2016 May;45(4):983-994. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Rasmussen AL, Svarrer RO, Lauszus FF. Adolescents show sex-specific preferences on media when pornography is a major source of sexual knowledge. J Genit Syst Disord 2017 Apr 03;06(02):1000171 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
- Arrington-Sanders R, Harper GW, Morgan A, Ogunbajo A, Trent M, Fortenberry JD. The role of sexually explicit material in the sexual development of same-sex-attracted Black adolescent males. Arch Sex Behav 2015 Apr;44(3):597-608 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Berger MN, Taba M, Marino JL, Lim MS, Cooper SC, Lewis L, et al. Social media's role in support networks among LGBTQ adolescents: a qualitative study. Sex Health 2021 Nov;18(5):421-431. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Wright PJ. Pornography and sexual behavior: do sexual attitudes mediate or confound? Commun Res 2020 Apr;47(3):451-475. [CrossRef]
- Rothman EF, Beckmeyer JJ, Herbenick D, Fu TC, Dodge B, Fortenberry JD. The prevalence of using pornography for information about how to have sex: findings from a nationally representative survey of U.S. adolescents and young adults. Arch Sex Behav 2021 Feb;50(2):629-646. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Feldmann J, Middleman AB. Adolescent sexuality and sexual behavior. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002 Oct;14(5):489-493. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- McCormack M, Wignall L. Enjoyment, exploration and education: understanding the consumption of pornography among young men with non-exclusive sexual orientations. Sociology 2017 Oct;51(5):975-991 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Pinkleton BE, Austin EW, Chen YC, Cohen M. Assessing effects of a media literacy-based intervention on US adolescents' responses to and interpretations of sexual media messages. J Child Media 2013 Nov;7(4):463-479. [CrossRef]
- The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, United Nations Population Fund, United Nations Children's Fund, United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, World Health Organization. International technical guidance on sexuality education: an evidence-informed approach. UNESCO Publishing. 2018. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000260770 [accessed 2022-10-22]
Abbreviations
| PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses |
Edited by R Kukafka, G Eysenbach; submitted 30.09.22; peer-reviewed by C Price; comments to author 01.11.22; revised version received 29.01.23; accepted 31.01.23; published 28.02.23
Copyright©Pranujan Pathmendra, Michelle Raggatt, Megan SC Lim, Jennifer L Marino, S Rachel Skinner. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 28.02.2023.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.