This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

e-Mental Health and Cyberpsychology (1387) Problematic Internet Use, Online Gambling and Game Addiction (105)

Published on in Vol 22, No 5 (2020): May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/16468, first published .
The Mediator Roles of Problematic Internet Use and Perceived Stress Between Health Behaviors and Work-Life Balance Among Internet Users in Germany and China: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Study

The Mediator Roles of Problematic Internet Use and Perceived Stress Between Health Behaviors and Work-Life Balance Among Internet Users in Germany and China: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Study

The Mediator Roles of Problematic Internet Use and Perceived Stress Between Health Behaviors and Work-Life Balance Among Internet Users in Germany and China: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Study

Authors of this article:

Lingling Gao1 Author Orcid Image ;   Yiqun Gan2 Author Orcid Image ;   Amanda Whittal1 Author Orcid Image ;   Song Yan1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sonia Lippke1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (4) Tweetations (4) Metrics

    Original Paper

    1Department of Psychology & Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany

    2School of Psychological Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Corresponding Author:

    Yiqun Gan, PhD

    School of Psychological Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health

    Peking University

    5 Yiheyuan Rd, Haidian District

    Beijing

    China

    Phone: 86 10 62757271

    Email: ygan@pku.edu.cn


    Background: Work-life balance is associated with health behaviors. In the face of digitalization, understanding this link requires a theory-based investigation of problematic internet use and perceived stress, which are so far unknown.

    Objective: On the basis of the compensatory carry-over action model, this study aimed to determine whether problematic internet use and perceived stress mediate the relationship between health behaviors and work-life balance in two groups of internet users from different environments (residents in Germany and China). We also investigated whether the place of residence was a moderator.

    Methods: An online questionnaire (N=877) was administered to residents from Germany (n=374) and China (n=503) in 3 languages (German, English, and Chinese). Moderated mediation analyses were run with health behaviors as the independent variable, work-life balance as the dependent variable, problematic internet use and perceived stress as the mediator variables, and place of residence as a potential moderator.

    Results: On a mean level, individuals in Germany reported less problematic internet use and more health behaviors than individuals in China; however, they also had lower work-life balance and higher perceived stress. Results showed that health behaviors seem to be directly related to work-life balance in both groups. Among the residents of Germany, a partial mediation was revealed (β=.13; P=.01), whereas among the residents of China, a full mediation was found (β=.02; P=.61). The mediator role of perceived stress was compared with problematic internet use in all the serial models and the parallel model. Residence moderated the relationship between health behaviors and work-life balance: The interrelation between health behaviors and work-life balance was stronger in Germany (β=.19; P<.001) than in China (β=.11; P=.01) when controlling for other variables.

    Conclusions: The findings of this study are in line with the compensatory carry-over action model. To promote work-life balance, individuals should perform health behaviors to help overcome problematic internet use and perceived stress. Both problematic internet use and perceived stress mediated health behaviors and work-life balance partially in German study participants and fully in Chinese study participants.

    J Med Internet Res 2020;22(5):e16468

    doi:10.2196/16468

    Keywords

    healthy lifestyle; work-life balance; internet; healthy diet; exercise; culture 


    Work-Life Balance

    Increasingly, many people struggle with maintaining a work-life balance [1] and have to manage issues arising from a poor work-life balance, such as sickness, limitations in the ability to work, and absence of work [2]. There has been increasing attention on how best to achieve a work-life balance in the modern society, which has been investigated by researchers from different perspectives. Work time (eg, long work hours) has been found to have a negative association with work-life balance [3-5]. When exploring the ways to decrease this issue, it was found that the internet can help change the traditional work model to a more flexible model. The use of emails, smartphones, and home computers, for example, makes it possible to work without having a typical nine-to-five workday [6], which may help to maintain a work-life balance. However, it was also found that excessive internet use can decrease work-life balance [7-9]. Perceived stress was also found to be an important factor that affects work-life balance negatively [10], but which could be mitigated by health behaviors [9]. Previous evidence has indicated that health behaviors (eg, regular physical activity and healthy diet) help to prevent stress [11]. Moreover, health behaviors, such as regular physical activity and healthy nutrition of employees, have also been recommended to maintain a work-life balance [12-14].

    Health Behaviors

    Common important health behaviors include both health-promoting behaviors [15], for instance, physical activity [16,17] and a healthy diet (eg, sufficient water intake and fruit and vegetable intake) [18,19], and health-risk behaviors [16,17], such as smoking status [16,20,21] and alcohol consumption status [22,23]. Previous studies have found that different single health behaviors are interrelated [16], such as diet and exercise [24,25] and smoking and alcohol consumption [18]. There is increasing focus on how to help employees maintain their work-life balance. Besides efforts by employers, employees can also help themselves to improve their work-life balance by performing health behaviors after work. Employees’ health behaviors are the focus of this study that sought to explore how people’s health behaviors interrelate with work-life balance.

    Perceived Stress and Problematic Internet Use as Mediators

    As described earlier, not only health behaviors but also problematic internet use and perceived stress have been found to play a role in work-life balance [10,26]. The compensatory carry-over action model by Lippke [27] provides an approach to understanding the underlying psychological and behavioral mechanisms of multiple behaviors related to an outcome. However, the model has not yet been applied to the main focus of this paper, that is, work-life balance, internet use, and health behaviors. According to this model, different behaviors are not isolated; rather, they interact with each other in complex ways. Emotionally relevant higher-level goals (such as work-life balance) drive different health behaviors by initiating and strengthening behavior-specific intentions [27]. If individuals have set a higher-level goal and did not reach this goal (eg, because of situations such as work stress), their well-being is affected [28-30]. As previous studies have indicated, most people experience different stressors within their lives, which can interfere with adopting and maintaining behaviors [27]. In line with this model, perceived stress has been found to be a negative indicator of quality of life [31-33]. Moreover, it has been found that stress acts as a mediator between work-family conflict and psychological health [34]. Previous evidence has also indicated that health behaviors (eg, regular physical activity and healthy diet) help to prevent stress [11] and maintain a work-life balance [12-14]. Among a sample of working individuals, higher perceived stress was found to be associated with a higher fat diet and less physical activity [35,36]. Perceived stress may be one factor that undermines the positive relationship between health behaviors and work-life balance. However, the mediator role of perceived stress between health behaviors and work-life balance has received limited attention in previous research. This study is a novel effort to fill this gap, in particular, to help understand the interrelation of different health behaviors and internet use behavior on the basis of the compensatory carry-over action model.

    Previous studies have also found that poor health behaviors, such as inadequate nutrition intake, were related to problematic internet use [7-9]. According to the compensatory carry-over action model [27], the outcome experience (eg, problematic internet use) from one behavior (eg, internet use behavior) may also affect a higher-level goal (eg, work-life balance) together with another behavior (eg, health behavior). Although the internet may help to arrange flexible work time and in turn maintain work-life balance [6], for some people, problematic internet use can also harbor hazards to their work-life balance [7-9]. Moreover, time is a finite resource, the use of which must be divided among individual needs, work, and family needs [37]. Problematic internet use may occupy the time one could spend on physical activity, family, and work and is thus negatively related to work-life balance. Excessive internet use has been found to be associated with behaviors that negatively affect people’s health, mood, work, and occupation [38]. So far, little is known about the relationship between health behaviors and work-life balance, while also considering the risk brought by problematic internet use. Owing to the large number of people suffering from the consequences of problematic internet use [39], it is important to examine how health behaviors combined with problematic internet use interrelate with work-life balance.

    Some studies have indicated that problematic internet use has a direct impact on perceived stress [40,41], for example, it was found that problematic internet use is related to perceived stress and negative feelings, such as depression and anxiety [42,43]. Other studies have shown that perceived stress plays an important role in problematic internet use [44,45]. According to the compensatory carry-over action model [27], both perceived stress and problematic internet use may mediate the relationship between health behaviors and a higher-level goal (ie, work-life balance).

    In this study, this underlying mechanism of this relationship was explored by comparing two possible serial models, with perceived stress and problematic internet use as serial mediators. If problematic internet use is assumed to influence perceived stress, then the chain is as follows: health behavior → problematic internet use → perceived stress → work-life balance. If one assumes that perceived stress influences problematic internet use, then the chain is as follows: health behavior → perceived stress → problematic internet use → work-life balance.

    Place of Residence Differences Among Study Variables

    Previous studies have shown large cultural differences between China and Germany [46,47]. For example, according to Hofstede’s empirical framework, Germany is representative of a Western country and individualistic society, in which people consider their needs over the needs of the organization to which they belong. Conversely, China is representative of an Eastern country and collectivistic society, in which people put the needs of the organization before individual needs [48-52].

    On the basis of these differences, previous studies comparing work-life balance between Western and Eastern companies revealed that work-life balance ranks higher in Western companies than in Eastern companies, as more attention is given to it [53]. The contexts of work-life conflict and solution in China are significantly different from those found in Western countries [54]. Some studies have found that in Eastern countries, family, including elderly parents, may provide advice and emotional support when people need help in maintaining a work-life balance [55,56]. Culture has been found to moderate the relationship between work resources and work-family conflict [57]. Although health behaviors as personal resources [58] were found to be associated with work-life balance [12-14], the moderator role of the place of residence between health behaviors and work-life balance still needs to be investigated.

    The difference in health behaviors between Western countries, such as European countries and the United States, and Eastern countries, such as China, was investigated in previous studies [59,60]. Factors such as the geographic, historical, and economic development stage of a country and the coping mechanisms of its citizens may affect people’s health behaviors, such as food preferences and physical activity [61,62]. For example, the number of facilities for physical activity provided by the government (eg, parks) may inhibit or facilitate participation in physical activity, depending on the socioeconomic status [62]. It has been found that fruit intake and physical activity have higher prevalence in Western countries [63], and the percentage of nonsmokers is higher in Eastern countries than that in Western counties [63]. Differences in perceived stress exist between Western and Eastern countries as well [64,65]. For problematic internet use, previous studies have shown that Eastern counties have a higher internet addiction score than Western countries [66,67].

    Proposed Research Questions

    On the basis of these previous research findings and the compensatory carry-over action model, this study sought to understand and explore the mechanisms underlying the relationship between health behaviors and work-life balance.

    The following two major research questions were addressed:

    1. Do problematic internet use and perceived stress mediate the relationship between health behaviors and work-life balance in both Germany and China?
    2. Does the country of residence moderate the relationship between a healthy lifestyle and work-life balance?

    Participants

    The online survey included 877 participants (538/877, 61.3% women). German (98/877, 11.2%) and English (276/877, 31.5%) versions of the questionnaire were used to collect data in Germany (group 1: residents in Germany), and a Chinese (503/877, 57.4%) version of the questionnaire was used to collect data in China (group 2: residents in China). A minimum sample size of 233 was used in both groups. The participants’ ages ranged from 17 to 65 years (mean 30.0, SD 10.8).

    Procedure

    Data were gathered from residents in middle-sized cities in Germany (Bremen) and China (Shijiazhuang). As Germany is the second most popular migration destination in the world [68] and English is widely spoken in Germany, both German and English versions of the questionnaire were provided for the participants to freely choose the language they prefer (no significant differences were found between the German and English versions of the questionnaire in the pilot analyses). Residents in China were provided with the Chinese version of the questionnaire.

    The online questionnaires were used to collect data from October 2016 to August 2018 through email (in Germany and China), Facebook (in Germany), and link distribution face to face (with the help of the research assistants in Germany and with the help of primary school teachers who distributed the questionnaires among the pupils’ parents at parent-teacher conferences in China). Participants answered multiple-choice questions by clicking the appropriate check box and open questions by inputting text content. On the first page of the survey, all participants were informed of the confidentiality, anonymity, and voluntary nature of their responses and given the opportunity to obtain the study results by providing contact information on the page. Those who clicked the box to provide their informed consent could continue to the questionnaire pages. The study received ethical approval by the Ethics Commission of the German Association of Psychology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie, EK-A-SL022013). The link for the survey was sent to the staff and students in universities. Study participants were also asked to forward the invitation and the link to families and friends in Germany and China.

    Measures

    Health behavior was operationalized from the summation of 5 items: physical activity, sufficient water consumption, nutrition, smoking status, and alcohol consumption status. For the purposes of analysis, each behavior was coded into a binary variable, with 0 representing the unhealthy option. Physical activity was assessed with the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire [69], which has been tested for use in adults and has shown cross-cultural validity and reliability [70]. This questionnaire covers mild, moderate, and strenuous physical activities. Participants indicated the duration (in minutes) and frequency (in days) of each activity domain per week. Minutes per week were multiplied by days per week to obtain a sum score per activity domain and then added for total activity per week. Total physical activity was classified as 1 (those who fulfilled the World Health Organization’s recommendation of ≥2.5 hours per week) and 0 (physical activity <2.5 hours per week).

    Sufficient water consumption was assessed by the question, “Please think about your typical weeks, do you drink 1.5 L of non-alcoholic and non-caffeinated beverage (water, juice, fruit and herbal tea) during the day?” and it was possible to answer with yes (1) or no (0). This question has been shown to have acceptable reliability and validity [16]. Nutrition was measured by the question, “Please think about your typical weeks, do you eat five or more servings of fruit and vegetable per day?” and was to be answered with yes or no. This question has also been shown to have acceptable reliability and validity [71]. Smoking status was assessed by asking participants “Are you a smoker?” Answers were classified into 1 (nonsmoker or ex-smoker) and 0 (occasional smoker or regular smoker). The alcohol consumption status was assessed by asking participants “Do you drink alcohol on a regular basis?” and was classified as 1 (no) and 0 (yes). Both the smoking and alcohol questions have been shown to have acceptable reliability and validity [72]. All different health behaviors were summed, with 0 indicating the fewest health behaviors performed and 5 indicating the performance of all health behaviors on the recommended level.

    Work-life balance was measured by using a 5-item scale [73] consisting of employees’ satisfaction with their achieved balance between work and private life. Answers were on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Sample items were “I am satisfied with the balance between my work and private life.”; “It is difficult for me to balance my work and private life”; and “I am meeting the requirements of both my work and my private life.” The Cronbach alpha was .81 in this study.

    Perceived stress was measured with 2 questions from the Perceived Stress Scale [74], as in previous studies [75]—“In the last month, how often have you felt nervous and stressed?” and “In the last month, how often have you felt difficulties were piling up so high that you could not overcome them?”—and it was rated on a 5-point Likert scale. The Cronbach alpha was .75 in this study.

    Problematic internet use was assessed with the Internet Addiction Questionnaire (ISS-10r) [76]. The current version includes 10 items with answer scores on a scale of 1 to 4 ranging from completely disagree to agree completely (eg, “I often spend more time on the internet than I intended”). For the evaluation of problematic internet use, ISS-10r sum values of the 5 subscales (loss of control, withdrawal symptoms, development of tolerance, negative consequences on work and performance, and negative consequences on social relationships) were utilized. The total score can vary from 20 to 80 and distinguishes 3 types of internet use: no problematic internet use (20-49), problematic internet use tendency (50-59), problematic internet use (60-80). The ISS-10r is one of the validated tools to assess problematic internet use, and the Cronbach alpha was .81 in this study.

    Participants also answered sociodemographic questions, including those on age, gender, height, weight, marital status, employment status, and education level.

    Statistical Analysis

    A correlation analysis was performed to investigate the relationships between health behaviors, perceived stress, problematic internet use, and work-life balance in both groups (group 1: residents in Germany and group 2: residents in China). Moderated mediation analyses were run with health behaviors as the independent variable, work-life balance as the dependent variable, problematic internet use and perceived stress as the mediator variables, and place of residence as a moderator in both groups. Moderated mediation analyses were performed using SPSS version 24 (IBM Corp) and PROCESS [77]. Significance was accepted at an alpha level of .05.


    Preliminary Analyses

    In this survey, 42.6% (374/877) of participants completed the German or English version of the questionnaire (group 1: residents in Germany), and 57.4% (503/877) of participants completed the Chinese version of the questionnaire (group 2: residents in China). When comparing health behavior items between these 2 different places of residence groups, Physical activity participation was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (245/374, 65.5% vs 277/503, 55.1%; P=.002), more participants have Sufficient water consumption in group 1 than in group 2 (270/374, 72.2% vs 213/503, 42.3%; P<.001), more participants drink alcohol on a regular basis (alcohol consumption status) in group 1 than in group 2 (180/374, 48.1% vs 125/503, 24.9%; P<.001), and there were no significant differences in Nutrition (P=.35) and Smoking status (P=.85) between the 2 groups. When comparing other variables between these 2 different places of residence groups, problematic internet use and work-life balance scores of group 2 were significantly higher than those of group 1, whereas perceived stress and health behaviors were lower in group 2. Descriptive statistics are presented in Table 1.

    Table 1. Descriptive statistics of main study variables in the 2 groups (N=877; group 1: residents in Germany and group 2: residents in China).
    VariablesGroup 1, mean (SD)Group 2, mean (SD)Totalt test (df)P value



    		Mean (SD)Range

    Age (years)26.7 (12.5)32.5 (8.4)30.0 (10.8)17-65−8.24 (875)<.001
    Problematic internet use41.8 (11.6)44.2 (11.9)43.2 (11.8)20-80−2.96 (875).003
    Perceived stress5.3 (1.8)4.6 (1.5)4.9 (1.6)2-106.32 (875)<.001
    Health behaviors3.0 (1.1)2.9 (1.2)2.9 (1.2)0-52.44 (875).02
    Work-life balance16.5 (4.5)18.0 (4.1)17.4 (4.3)5-25−5.36 (875)<.001

    Correlation Analyses in Different Groups

    Table 2 displays the bivariate Pearson correlation between health behaviors, problematic internet use, perceived stress, and work-life balance. In both groups, health behaviors were positively correlated with work-life balance, whereas problematic internet use and perceived stress were negatively related to a healthy lifestyle and work-life balance.

    Table 2. Pearson correlation of variables in 2 groups.
    Group 1aGroup 2b
    123456
    1. GendercN/Ac−0.07−0.190.100.02−0.04
    2. Age−0.11N/A−0.05−0.36−0.200.15
    3. Health behaviors−0.04−0.06N/A−0.12−0.270.11
    4. Problematic internet use0.15−0.40−0.16N/A0.32−0.22
    5. Perceived stress−0.02−0.23−0.140.35N/A−0.32
    6. Work-life balance0.010.160.19−0.27−0.45N/A

    aGroup 1: residents in Germany; correlations presented below the diagonal.

    bGoup 2: residents in China; correlations presented above the diagonal.

    cGender was dummy coded such that 1=female and 2=male. r≥.15, P=.01; 0.10≤ r≤.14, P=.05.

    dN/A: not applicable.

    Testing for Mediation Effects

    The first aim of the study was to examine whether problematic internet use and perceived stress mediate the relationship between a healthy lifestyle and work-life balance in general. Two possible serial mediation models and one parallel model were estimated and assessed to investigate the mediator roles of problematic internet use and perceived stress.

    Serial Mediation

    Serial mediation assumes “a causal chain linking the mediators, with a specified direction of causal flow” [78]. Model 6 of PROCESS was used to test 2 possible chains: (1) health behavior → problematic internet use → perceived stress → work-life balance and (2) health behavior → perceived stress → problematic internet use → work-life balance. The proposed research model for chain 1 and results after controlling for covariates (age and gender) are presented in Figure 1. The mediation effect accounted for 19% of the total effect: F5,871=39.78; P<.001. The residual direct effect was not significant (c’ in Figure 1). There were significant indirect paths from health behaviors to work-life balance through problematic internet use (a1d1, β=.01, 95% CI 0.002 to 0.03) and perceived stress (b1a3, β=.06, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.09). Furthermore, the indirect path from health behaviors to work-life balance through both problematic internet use and perceived stress was also significant (a1a2a3, β=.01, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.02). When substituting the order of the mediators to test chain 2, the indirect path remained significant with P<.001, but the effect was weaker (β=.003, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.01).

    ‎
    Figure 1. Serial mediation model and path coefficients predicting work-life balance. Path a1 → a2 → a3 is the full serial mediation path (1). Path a1d1 is the path from health behavior to work-life balance through problematic internet use. Path b1a3 is the path from health behavior to work-life balance through perceived stress.
    View this figure
    Parallel Mediation

    Parallel mediation assumes that problematic internet use and perceived stress do not influence each other when they mediate the relationship between health behaviors and work-life balance. Model 4 of PROCESS [77] was used to examine parallel mediation. The results of all participants are displayed in Table 3. After controlling for covariates (ie, age and gender), the results revealed that health behaviors were negatively associated with problematic internet use (model 2), which in turn was also interrelated with work-life balance (model 4). In addition, health behaviors were found to be negatively associated with perceived stress (model 3), which was also linked negatively to work-life balance (model 4).

    The residual direct effect was not significant, with P=.10 (model 4). The indirect effect of problematic internet use was β=.01, 95% CI 0.002 to 0.03, and the indirect effect of perceived stress was β=.08, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.11. Most variance could be explained in model 4, predicting work-life balance with health behaviors, problematic internet use, and perceived stress.

    Results exploring the mediation effects in group 1 and group 2 are shown in Figure 2. In group 1, the residual direct effect was still significant (β=.13; P=.01) after including the mediators indicating a partial mediation only. The indirect effect of problematic internet use was β=.02, 95% CI 0.003 to 0.05; the indirect effect of perceived stress was β=.07, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.11. The mediation effect accounted for 23% of the total effect (F5,368=22.48; P<.001).

    In group 2, the residual direct effect was not significant (β=.02; P=.61) when including the mediators, indicating a full mediation. The indirect effect of problematic internet use was β=.01, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.04; the indirect effect of perceived stress was β=.07, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.11. The mediation effect accounted for 12% of the total effect (F5,497=14.06; P<.001).

    Table 3. Mediation effects of health behaviors on work-life balance.
    PredictorsModel 1a (work-life balance)Model 2b (problematic internet use)Model 3c (perceived stress)Model 4d (work-life balance)

    		β (95% CI)P valueβ (95% CI)P valueβ (95% CI)P valueβ (95% CI)P value
    Gendere.04 (−0.10 to 0.18).53.14 (0.02 to 0.27).03−0.10 (−0.23 to 0.03).14.02 (−0.11 to 0.15).76
    Age (years).02 (0.01 to 0.03)<.001−0.03 (−0.04 to −0.03)<.001−0.03 (−0.03 to −0.02)<.001.01 (0.001 to 0.01).02
    Health behaviors.14 (0.08 to 0.21)<.001−0.15 (−0.22 to −0.09)<.001−0.21 (−0.28 to −0.15)<.001.05 (−0.01 to 0.12).10
    Problematic internet useN/AfN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A−0.08 (−0.15 to −0.01).02
    Perceived stressN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A−0.36 (−0.42 to −0.29)<.001

    aR2=0.06, F3,873=17.73, P<.001.

    bR2=0.14, F3,873=47.55, P<.001.

    cR2=0.11, F3,873=36.83, P<.001.

    dR2=0.19, F5,871=39.78, P<.001.

    eGender was dummy coded with 1=female and 2=male.

    fN/A: not applicable.

    ‎
    Figure 2. Multiple mediation model with standardized regression coefficients predicting work-life balance in both groups. G1, Group 1: residents in Germany; G2, Group 2: residents in China.
    View this figure

    Testing for Mediated Moderation

    The second aim of the study was to examine whether place of residence moderates the relationship between health behavior and work-life balance. This was tested with a mediated moderation analysis (model 8) of PROCESS [77], and the results are displayed in Table 4. In model 1, the total effect of the health behaviors on work-life balance was significant, and this association was not moderated by the place of residence. In model 2, the direct effect of health behaviors on problematic internet use was significant, and this association was also not moderated by the place of residence. In model 3, the direct effect of health behaviors on perceived stress was significant, and this association was also not moderated by the place of residence. In model 4, the direct effect of health behaviors on work-life balance was significant, and there was a significant moderation effect of the place of residence.

    To further demonstrate the pattern of this moderation effect, the interaction effect by simple slopes between health behaviors and place of residence on work-life balance is plotted in Figure 3. The simple slope test revealed that in group 1, the interrelation between health behaviors and work-life balance was significant (β=.19; P<.001), whereas this relation was weaker in group 2 (β=.11; P=.01). All predictors accounted for 20% of the variance in work-life balance in this model.

    Table 4. Mediated moderation effects of health behaviors on work-life balance.
    PredictorsModel 1a (work-life balance)Model 2b (problematic internet use)Model 3c (perceived stress)Model 4d (work-life balance)

    		β (95% CI)P valueβ (95% CI)P valueβ (95% CI)P valueβ (95% CI)P value
    Gendere.03 (−0.10 to 0.17).63.14 (0.02 to 0.27).03−0.10 (−0.23 to 0.03).13.02 (−0.11 to 0.14).82
    Age (years).02 (0.01 to 0.02)<.001−0.04 (−0.04 to 0.00)<.001−0.02 (−0.03 to −0.02)<.001.01 (−0.00 to 0.01).15
    Health behaviors.15 (0.09 to 0.22)<.001−0.15 (−0.21 to −0.08)<.001−0.22 (−0.28 to −0.16)<.001.07 (0.003 to 0.13).04
    Residence.15 (0.08 to 0.21)<.001.19 (0.13 to 0.25)<.001−0.16 (−0.22 to −0.10)<.001.11 (0.05 to 0.18)<.001
    Problematic internet useN/AfN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A−0.10 (−0.17 to −0.04).003
    Perceived stressN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A−0.34 (−0.40 to −0.27)<.001
    Health behaviors × residence−0.05 (−0.12 to 0.01).11−0.04 (−0.03 to 0.10).25−0.04 (−0.10 to 0.03).28−0.06 (−0.12 to 0.00).05

    aR2=0.08, F5,871=15.09, P<.001.

    bR2=0.18, F5,871=37.15, P<.001.

    cR2=0.14, F5,871=27.97, P<.001.

    dR2=0.20, F7,869=31.04, P<.001.

    eGender was dummy coded with 1=female and 2=male.

    fN/A: not applicable.

    ‎
    Figure 3. Interaction of health behaviors and residence on work-life balance (Group 1: residents in Germany; Group 2: residents in China).
    View this figure

    Principal Findings

    An online questionnaire assessed residents from Germany (n=374) and China (n=503) in 3 languages (German, English, and Chinese). On a mean level, individuals in Germany reported less problematic internet use and more health behaviors than individuals in China; however, they also had lower work-life balance and higher perceived stress. This study is one of the first studies to explore the potential mechanisms through which health behaviors impact work-life balance [10,26,79]. Results revealed that health behaviors were indirectly related to work-life balance through perceived stress and problematic internet use, and the mediator role of problematic internet use was not prominent in either of the serial models or the parallel model. There was a partial mediation in Germany (group 1) and a full mediation in China (group 2). The relation between health behaviors and work-life balance was significant in group 1, whereas it was weaker in group 2. This study utilized the compensatory carry-over action model as the underlying understanding in investigating how health behaviors interrelate with employees’ work-life balance.

    Mediator Roles of Stress and Problematic Internet Use

    When testing the mediator roles of stress and problematic internet use, in both serial and parallel mediation models, the residual direct effect was not significant, which indicated that problematic internet use and perceived stress fully mediated the indirect association between health behaviors and work-life balance. In the serial mediation models, the chain health behavior → problematic internet use → perceived stress → work-life balance was superior to the chain health behavior → perceived stress → problematic internet use → work-life balance. However, the effect size was small. Neither of the proposed serial models revealed a large mediating effect. In the parallel model, results exploring the mediation effects in the Germany group and the China group revealed that in the Germany group, the residual direct effect was significant. This may indicate that problematic internet use and perceived stress partially mediated the indirect association between health behaviors and work-life balance. In the China group, the residual direct effect was not significant, which is because problematic internet use and perceived stress fully mediated the indirect association between health behaviors and work-life balance.

    Although health behaviors in general were better in Germany than in China, the work-life balance score was lower. According to the model, this was because of the significant difference in the mediator-perceived stress, which was much higher in Germany than in China. This is in line with previous studies [79].

    The mediator role of perceived stress in this study is consistent with previous studies, which found that perceived stress could be mitigated by health behaviors [9] and affected work-life balance negatively [10]. Thus, perceived stress management is of high importance. This result also supports the compensatory carry-over action model, as work-life balance is not only associated with predictor variables related to health behaviors but also with mediator variables, such as perceived stress. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that clarifies the mediator roles of perceived stress and problematic internet use in a healthy lifestyle consisting of different single health behaviors and work-life balance in different countries of residence.

    Although previous studies have found health behaviors to be negatively associated with problematic internet use [7-9], which in turn affects work-life balance [80-82], in this study, the meditation role of problematic internet use was not prominent compared with the perceived stress mediator. This may be because of the interaction between perceived stress and problematic internet use. This study revealed that there was a significant relationship between problematic internet use and perceived stress. Previous studies have indicated that problematic internet use has a direct impact on perceived stress [40,41]; however, perceived stress may also come from other aspects, such as occupational, interpersonal, or financial stresses [83]. Moreover, previous research has demonstrated that perceived stress plays an important role in problematic internet use [44,45]. It is difficult to judge which factor affects the other, as it depends on circumstances, and this study was only cross-sectional.

    Apart from perceived stress and problematic internet use, the path between health behaviors and work-life balance may also be explained by other variables, such as gender. Gender differences have been found in relation to health behaviors in previous studies [84], and they have also been highlighted in work-life balance studies [5]. Some studies have found that women often have more difficulty maintaining a balance because of pressures at work and social role demands at home [85,86]. However, other studies have indicated that men and women report similar levels of work-life balance [87]. Other studies have shown that women tend to present a more positive work-life balance attitude compared with men [88]. Further studies that focus on the organization of work taking the employee’s gender difference into account are recommended.

    Moderation Role of Place of Residence

    This study found that problematic internet use score in China was higher than that in Germany. This is in line with the previous studies, which found that people of an Asian background, such as Chinese, have higher problematic internet use scores than people from Europe or the United States [66,89].

    Countries of residence rather than countries of birth were compared in this study, as it has been found that the effects on people’s individual life from the place of residence appear to be higher than those from the place of birth [90]. From a closer look at country differences in health behaviors, it seems that the country where one lives provides the context within which a certain kind of behavior is shaped. In the case of Germany, it would be of interest to study the role of the country as a context variable in the health life and behavior of its residents, regardless of their cultural origin. Not only health behaviors but also work-life balance was different because of the country of residence, which involves influences of the natural environment, language, religion, custom, and particular ways of life [91,92]. This study found that the indirect association between health behaviors and work-life balance was moderated by the place of residence. The relation between health behaviors and work-life balance was significant in residents living in Germany, whereas it was weaker in residents in China.

    This finding is in line with and further supports previous studies that explored health behaviors related to work-life balance [12,14,17,26,93]. This study also replicates studies that examined work-life balance across different societies [53]. The result showing that the relation between health behaviors and work-life balance was significant in Germany, whereas it was weaker in China, supports the compensatory carry-over action model. The model permits different applicability in 2 distinct countries of residence, from which, besides health behaviors, work-life balance could be affected by different factors. Previous studies have found that in Eastern countries, gender socialization plays an important role in one’s perception toward work-life balance [53]. Moreover, although age was controlled in this study, other variables such as family responsibility status may be associated with work-life balance as well. Previous studies have indicated that older and married individuals felt less stressed than younger and unmarried people [75]. The possibility of married status in many Chinese participants might modulate the effect of health behaviors on work-life balance as well. This argument should be further explored in future research.

    In this study, compared with residents in China, more people in Germany engaged in physical activity for at least 2.5 hours per week and drank enough water, whereas more people in Germany drank alcohol than people in China. These findings are in line with previous studies that have investigated health behaviors in Western countries and Eastern countries [63]. The moderation of the place of residence provides a broad perspective toward the promotion of work-life balance among 2 very diverse groups of countries of residence. By contrasting residents from China and Germany as representatives of prevailing Eastern and Western lifestyles, respectively, we may be able to gain a more global perspective in this issue. Professionals in the medical field should advise their patients in China to engage in more health behaviors and patients in Germany to find ways of lowering perceived stress to balance their lifestyle more adequately.

    Limitations

    Some limitations of this study should be addressed. First, this was a cross-sectional survey, which limits causal inferences. Moreover, there was a significant age difference between participants in the 2 groups. Although age and gender were included as control variables in this study, other variables such as family responsibility status may be associated with different ages and may impact the results as well. Second, health behaviors only included physical activity, nutrition and water intake, and smoking and alcohol status. However, other behaviors, such as dental hygiene adherence and sexual behaviors, are also related to health and may have an influence. Third, perceived stress was measured with only two items by using the shortened version of the measurement scale, and the Cronbach alpha was not high. The accuracy may not be as good as a full version. Finally, the data were mainly collected within Germany and China. Although participants with a migrant background were able to complete the English version of the questionnaire, the sample range was still limited. Moreover, the years of residence were not controlled, but it may also impact individuals’ behaviors. Further studies should overcome these limitations by using longitudinal and experimental designs and considering more aspects and potential factors. It would also be valuable to include more people with different backgrounds regarding their country of residence while controlling other influences.

    Conclusions

    In summary, this study sheds light on how people’s health behaviors interrelate with work-life balance, perceived stress, and problematic internet use. It provides evidence that health behaviors are indirectly related to work-life balance through perceived stress and problematic internet use. This study revealed a partial mediation among residents in Germany and a full mediation among residents in China. The relation between health behaviors and work-life balance was stronger in Germany, whereas it was weaker in China. Besides performing health behaviors, helping people to relieve their perceived stress and spend only healthy amounts of time with the internet seems essential to maintain a better work-life balance. Future research should be performed in different countries and in different languages, and should be well grounded on a culture theory, such as Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory [48,49].

    Acknowledgments

    This research was partially funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under research grant no. 01EL1822F and Jacobs University Bremen.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    1. Tanaka S, Maruyama Y, Ooshima S, Ito H. Working condition of nurses in Japan: awareness of work-life balance among nursing personnel at a university hospital. J Clin Nurs 2011 Jan;20(1-2):12-22. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Tuomi K, Vanhala S, Nykyri E, Janhonen M. Organizational practices, work demands and the well-being of employees: a follow-up study in the metal industry and retail trade. Occup Med (Lond) 2004 Mar;54(2):115-121. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Albertsen K, Rafnsdóttir G, Grimsmo A, Tómasson K, Kauppinen K. Workhours and worklife balance. Scand J Work Environ Health 2008(5):14-21 [FREE Full text]
    4. Jansen NW, Kant I, Nijhuis FJ, Swaen GM, Kristensen TS. Impact of worktime arrangements on work-home interference among Dutch employees. Scand J Work Environ Health 2004 Apr;30(2):139-148 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Fagan C, Lyonette C, Smith M, Saldaña-Tejeda A, International Labour Office. Conditions of Work and Employment Branch. The Influence of Working Time Arrangements on Work-life Integration or 'Balance' : A Review of the International Evidence. Geneva: ILO; 2012.
    6. Delecta P. Work life balance. Int J Curr Res 2011 Apr;3(4):186-189 [FREE Full text]
    7. Yen JY, Yen CF, Chen CC, Chen SH, Ko CH. Family factors of internet addiction and substance use experience in Taiwanese adolescents. Cyberpsychol Behav 2007 Jun;10(3):323-329. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Ghassemzadeh L, Shahraray M, Moradi A. Prevalence of internet addiction and comparison of internet addicts and non-addicts in Iranian high schools. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008 Dec;11(6):731-733. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Brito AB, Bastos V, Junior SP, Franco J, Messias R, Pinho L, et al. Semantic Scholar. Montes Claros, Brazil: Unimontes Científica; 2018. Lifestyle and Internet Use: Addiction and Its Correlations   URL: https:/​/pdfs.​semanticscholar.org/​f995/​a68a9d1e9d8a1f30e9a907ebaa7e488bd998.​pdf?_ga=2.​53645480.​1035631690.​1582702052-1679671381.​1567599385 [accessed 2020-02-26]
    10. Holden S, Sunindijo RY. Technology, long work hours, and stress worsen work-life balance in the construction industry. Int J Integr Eng 2018;10(2):-. [CrossRef]
    11. Zschucke E, Renneberg B, Dimeo F, Wüstenberg T, Ströhle A. The stress-buffering effect of acute exercise: evidence for HPA axis negative feedback. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2015 Jan;51:414-425. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Davis KD, Gere J, Sliwinski MJ. Investigating the work-family conflict and health link: repetitive thought as a mechanism. Stress Health 2017 Oct;33(4):330-338. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Fleig L, Küper C, Lippke S, Schwarzer R, Wiedemann AU. Cross-behavior associations and multiple health behavior change: a longitudinal study on physical activity and fruit and vegetable intake. J Health Psychol 2015 May;20(5):525-534. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Mazzola JJ, Moore JT, Alexander K. Is work keeping us from acting healthy? How workplace barriers and facilitators impact nutrition and exercise behaviors. Stress Health 2017 Dec;33(5):479-489. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Rogers R, Prentice-Dunn S, Gochman D. Handbook of Health Behavior Research 1: Personal and Social Determinants. New York, NY, US: Plenum Press; 1997.
    16. Lippke S, Nigg CR, Maddock JE. Health-promoting and health-risk behaviors: theory-driven analyses of multiple health behavior change in three international samples. Int J Behav Med 2012 Mar;19(1):1-13 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Warnick JL, Pfammatter A, Champion K, Galluzzi T, Spring B. Perceptions of health behaviors and mobile health applications in an academically Elite College population to inform a targeted health promotion program. Int J Behav Med 2019 Apr;26(2):165-174. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. de Ridder D, Kroese F, Evers C, Adriaanse M, Gillebaart M. Healthy diet: health impact, prevalence, correlates, and interventions. Psychol Health 2017 Aug;32(8):907-941. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Richert J, Reuter T, Wiedemann AU, Lippke S, Ziegelmann J, Schwarzer R. Differential effects of planning and self-efficacy on fruit and vegetable consumption. Appetite 2010 Jun;54(3):611-614. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. de Graaf A, van den Putte B, Nguyen M, Zebregs S, Lammers J, Neijens P. The effectiveness of narrative versus informational smoking education on smoking beliefs, attitudes and intentions of low-educated adolescents. Psychol Health 2017 Jul;32(7):810-825. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Chen X, Lau M, Kan MY, Chiang I, Hu Y, Gong J, et al. Lifestyle and addictive behaviors among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong, Macau, Taipei, Wuhan, and Zhuhai - a first cross-subculture assessment. Int J Behav Med 2016 Oct;23(5):561-570. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Black N, Mullan B, Sharpe L. Computer-delivered interventions for reducing alcohol consumption: meta-analysis and meta-regression using behaviour change techniques and theory. Health Psychol Rev 2016 Sep;10(3):341-357. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Kuntsche E, Kuntsche S, Thrul J, Gmel G. Binge drinking: health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychol Health 2017 Aug;32(8):976-1017. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Keller S, Maddock JE, Hannöver W, Thyrian JR, Basler H. Multiple health risk behaviors in German first year university students. Prev Med 2008 Mar;46(3):189-195. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Boudreaux ED, Wood KB, Mehan D, Scarinci I, Taylor CL, Brantley PJ. Congruence of readiness to change, self-efficacy, and decisional balance for physical activity and dietary fat reduction. Am J Health Promot 2003;17(5):329-336. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Lippke S, Fleig L, Wiedemann AU, Schwarzer R. A computerized lifestyle application to promote multiple health behaviors at the workplace: testing its behavioral and psychological effects. J Med Internet Res 2015 Oct 1;17(10):e225 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Lippke S. Modelling and supporting complex behavior change related to obesity and diabetes prevention and management with the compensatory carry-over action model. J Diabetes Obes 2014;1(2):1-5. [CrossRef]
    28. Koestner R, Lekes N, Powers TA, Chicoine E. Attaining personal goals: self-concordance plus implementation intentions equals success. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002 Jul;83(1):231-244. [Medline]
    29. Matuska K, Bass J, Schmitt JS. Life balance and perceived stress: predictors and demographic profile. OTJR (Thorofare N J) 2013;33(3):146-158. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Meyer D, Jayawardana MW, Muir SD, Ho DY, Sackett O. Promoting psychological well-being at work by reducing stress and improving sleep: mixed-methods analysis. J Med Internet Res 2018 Oct 19;20(10):e267 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Malinauskas R. The associations among social support, stress, and life satisfaction as perceived by injured college athletes. Soc Behav Personal 2010;38(6):741-752. [CrossRef]
    32. Warren CM, Otto AK, Walkner MM, Gupta RS. Quality of life among food allergic patients and their caregivers. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2016 May;16(5):38. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Matuska K, Bass J. Life balance and stress in adults with medical conditions or obesity. OTJR (Thorofare N J) 2016 Apr;36(2):74-81. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Sharma J, Dhar RL, Tyagi A. Stress as a mediator between work-family conflict and psychological health among the nursing staff: Moderating role of emotional intelligence. Appl Nurs Res 2016 May;30:268-275. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Allen TD, Armstrong J. Further examination of the link between work-family conflict and physical health. Am Behav Sci 2006;49(9):1204-1221. [CrossRef]
    36. Lippke S, Wienert J, Kuhlmann T, Fink S, Hambrecht R. Perceived stress, physical activity and motivation: findings from an internet study. Ann Sports Med Re 2015;2(1):1012-1017 [FREE Full text]
    37. Milkie MA, Mattingly MJ, Nomaguchi KM, Bianchi SM, Robinson JP. The time squeeze: parental statuses and feelings about time with children. J Marriage Fam 2004 Aug;66(3):739-761. [CrossRef]
    38. Widyanto L, Griffiths M. Unravelling the web: adolescents and internet addiction. In: Information Resources Management Association , editor. Virtual Communities: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications. Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global; 2011:2433-2453.
    39. Ioannidis K, Treder MS, Chamberlain SR, Kiraly F, Redden SA, Stein DJ, et al. Problematic internet use as an age-related multifaceted problem: evidence from a two-site survey. Addict Behav 2018 Jun;81:157-166 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Akin A, Iskender M. Internet addiction and depression, anxiety and stress. Int Online J Educ Sci 2011;3(1):138-148 [FREE Full text]
    41. Samaha M, Hawi NS. Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Comput Human Behav 2016;57:321-325. [CrossRef]
    42. Ostovar S, Allahyar N, Aminpoor H, Moafian F, Nor MB, Griffiths MD. Internet addiction and its psychosocial risks (depression, anxiety, stress and loneliness) among Iranian adolescents and young adults: A structural equation model in a cross-sectional study. Int J Ment Health Addiction 2016;14(3):257-267. [CrossRef]
    43. Khalili-Mahani N, Smyrnova A, Kakinami L. To each stress its own screen: a cross-sectional survey of the patterns of stress and various screen uses in relation to self-admitted screen addiction. J Med Internet Res 2019 Apr 2;21(4):e11485 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Li D, Zhang W, Li X, Zhou Y, Zhao L, Wang Y. Stressful life events and adolescent Internet addiction: the mediating role of psychological needs satisfaction and the moderating role of coping style. Comput Human Behav 2016;63(17):408-415. [CrossRef]
    45. Zhao F, Zhang Z, Bi L, Wu X, Wang W, Li Y, et al. The association between life events and internet addiction among Chinese vocational school students: the mediating role of depression. Comput Human Behav 2017;70:30-38. [CrossRef]
    46. Schwartz SH. Individualism-collectivism: critique and proposed refinements. J Cross Cult Psychol 1990;21(2):139-157. [CrossRef]
    47. Oetzel J, Ting-Toomey S, Masumoto T, Yokochi Y, Pan X, Takai J, et al. Face and facework in conflict: a cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Commun Monogr 2001;68(3):235-258. [CrossRef]
    48. Hofstede G. Culture and organizations. Int Stud Manag Organ 1980;10(4):15-41. [CrossRef]
    49. Hofstede G. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage publications; 2001.
    50. Diehl S, Terlutter R, Weinberg P. Advertising Effectiveness in Different Cultures: Results of an Experiment Analyzing the Effects of Individualistic and Collectivistic Advertising on Germans and Chinese. In: Proceedings of the 2003 European Advances in Consumer Research. 2003 Presented at: ACR'03; June 4-7, 2003; Dublin.
    51. Singelis TM, Triandis HC, Bhawuk DP, Gelfand MJ. Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: a theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cult Res 1995;29(3):240-275. [CrossRef]
    52. Earley PC. Social loafing and collectivism: a comparison of the United States and the People's Republic of China. Adm Sci Q 1989;34(4):565-581. [CrossRef]
    53. Chandra V. Work–life balance: eastern and western perspectives. Int J Hum Res Manag 2012 Mar;23(5):1040-1056. [CrossRef]
    54. Xiao Y, Cooke FL. Work-life balance in China? Social policy, employer strategy and individual coping mechanisms. Asia Pac J Hum Res 2012;50(1):6-22. [CrossRef]
    55. Lu J, Siu O, Spector PE, Shi K. Antecedents and outcomes of a fourfold taxonomy of work-family balance in Chinese employed parents. J Occup Health Psychol 2009 Apr;14(2):182-192. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    56. Gan Y, Gan T, Chen Z, Miao M, Zhang K. Functional pathways of social support for mental health in work and family domains among Chinese scientific and technological professionals. Stress Health 2015 Oct;31(4):336-349. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    57. Lu L, Cooper CL, Kao S, Chang T, Allen TD, Lapierre LM, et al. Cross-cultural differences on work-to-family conflict and role satisfaction: a Taiwanese-British comparison. Hum Res Manage 2010;49(1):67-85. [CrossRef]
    58. Sorensen G, Emmons K, Hunt MK, Barbeau E, Goldman R, Peterson K, et al. Model for incorporating social context in health behavior interventions: applications for cancer prevention for working-class, multiethnic populations. Prev Med 2003 Sep;37(3):188-197. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    59. Sansone G, Fong GT, Hall PA, Guignard R, Beck F, Mons U, et al. Time perspective as a predictor of smoking status: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Surveys in Scotland, France, Germany, China, and Malaysia. BMC Public Health 2013 Apr 15;13:346 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    60. Siegrist M, Shi J, Giusto A, Hartmann C. Worlds apart. Consumer acceptance of functional foods and beverages in Germany and China. Appetite 2015 Sep;92:87-93. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    61. Wright LT, Nancarrow C, Kwok PM. Food taste preferences and cultural influences on consumption. Br Food J 2001;103(5):348-357. [CrossRef]
    62. Hulteen RM, Smith JJ, Morgan PJ, Barnett LM, Hallal PC, Colyvas K, et al. Global participation in sport and leisure-time physical activities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 2017 Feb;95:14-25. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    63. Grant N, Wardle J, Steptoe A. The relationship between life satisfaction and health behavior: a cross-cultural analysis of young adults. Int J Behav Med 2009;16(3):259-268. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    64. Chun CA, Moos RH, Cronkite RC. Culture: a fundamental context for the stress and coping paradigm. In: Wong PT, Wong LC, editors. Handbook of Multicultural Perspectives on Stress and Coping. Salmon Tower Building, New York City, USA: Springer; 2006:29-53.
    65. Sawang S, Oei TP, Goh YW. Are Country and Culture Values Interchangeable? Int J Cross Cult Manag 2006;6(2):205-219. [CrossRef]
    66. Lopez-Fernandez O. Cross-cultural research on internet addiction: a systematic review. Int Arch Addict Res Med 2015;1(2):1-8. [CrossRef]
    67. Peterka-Bonetta J, Sindermann C, Sha P, Zhou M, Montag C. The relationship between Internet Use Disorder, depression and burnout among Chinese and German college students. Addict Behav 2019 Feb;89:188-199. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    68. Webb A. Bloomberg. 2014 May 20. Germany Top Migration Land After US in New OECD Ranking   URL: https:/​/www.​bloomberg.com/​news/​articles/​2014-05-20/​immigration-boom-propels-germany-past-u-k-in-new-oecd-ranking [accessed 2019-09-01]
    69. Mäder U, Martin BW, Schutz Y, Marti B. Validity of four short physical activity questionnaires in middle-aged persons. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006 Jul;38(7):1255-1266. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    70. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-1395. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    71. Lippke S, Ziegelmann JP, Schwarzer R, Velicer WF. Validity of stage assessment in the adoption and maintenance of physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Psychol 2009 Mar;28(2):183-193 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    72. Renner B, Hahn A, Schwarzer R. Risiko und Gesundheitsverhalten. Berlin, Germany: Free University Berlin; 1996.
    73. Syrek C, Bauer-Emmel C, Antoni C, Klusemann J. Entwicklung und Validierung der Trierer Kurzskala zur Messung von Work-Life Balance (TKS-WLB). Diagnostica 2011 Jul;57(3):134-145. [CrossRef]
    74. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983 Dec;24(4):385-396. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    75. Klein EM, Brähler E, Dreier M, Reinecke L, Müller KW, Schmutzer G, et al. The German version of the Perceived Stress Scale - psychometric characteristics in a representative German community sample. BMC Psychiatry 2016 May 23;16:159 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    76. Hahn A, Jerusalem M, Meixner-Dahle S. André Hahn. 2014. Fragebogen zur Internetsucht (ISS-20r) und Normwerte   URL: http://andre-hahn.de/downloads/pub/2014/2014_ISS20-Internetsuchtskala.pdf [accessed 2019-09-10]
    77. Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York City, USA: Guilford Publications; 2017.
    78. Hayes AF. Andrew F Hayes. 2012. PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling White Paper   URL: http://afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf [accessed 2019-09-10]
    79. English AS, Zeng ZJ, Ma JH. The stress of studying in China: primary and secondary coping interaction effects. Springerplus 2015;4:755 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    80. Quiñones-García C, Korak-Kakabadse N. Compulsive internet use in adults: a study of prevalence and drivers within the current economic climate in the UK. Comput Human Behav 2014;30:171-180. [CrossRef]
    81. Buckner JE, Castille CM, Sheets TL. The Five Factor Model of personality and employees’ excessive use of technology. Computers in Human Behavior 2012;28(5):1947-1953. [CrossRef]
    82. Goodman CA. Digital Commons @ Gardner-Webb University. Digital Commons @ Gardner-Webb University: Gardner-Webb; 2017. Stress and Social Media: Implications for Nurses' Quality of Life   URL: https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1272&context=nursing_etd [accessed 2019-09-10]
    83. Sturgeon JA, Arewasikporn A, Okun MA, Davis MC, Ong AD, Zautra AJ. The psychosocial context of financial stress: Implications for inflammation and psychological health. Psychosom Med 2016;78(2):134-143 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    84. Minges KE, Chao A, Nam S, Grey M, Whittemore R. Weight status, gender, and race/ethnicity: are there differences in meeting recommended health behavior guidelines for adolescents? J Sch Nurs 2015 Apr;31(2):135-145 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    85. Rehman S, Roomi MA. Gender and work‐life balance: a phenomenological study of women entrepreneurs in Pakistan. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 2012;19(2):209-228. [CrossRef]
    86. Griep RH, Toivanen S, van Diepen C, Guimarães JM, Camelo LV, Juvanhol LL, et al. Work-family conflict and self-rated health: the role of gender and educational level. Baseline data from the Brazilian longitudinal study of adult health (ELSA-Brasil). Int J Behav Med 2016 Jun;23(3):372-382 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    87. Emslie C, Hunt K, Macintyre S. Gender, work-home conflict, and morbidity amongst white-collar bank employees in the United Kingdom. Int J Behav Med 2004;11(3):127-134. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    88. Selvarajan T, Slattery J, Stringer DY. Relationship between gender and work related attitudes: a study of temporary agency employees. J Bus Res 2015;68(9):1919-1927. [CrossRef]
    89. Samli R. A review of internet addiction on the basis of different countries (2007–2017). In: Information Resources Management Association , editor. Substance Abuse and Addiction: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global; 2019:215-235.
    90. Rudnev M. Value adaptation among intra-European migrants. J Cross Cult Psychol 2014 Aug;45(10):1626-1642. [CrossRef]
    91. Benson M, O'Reilly K. Migration and the search for a better way of life: a critical exploration of lifestyle migration. Soc Rev 2009;57(4):608-625. [CrossRef]
    92. Hossain K. Securitizing the Arctic indigenous peoples: a community security perspective with special reference to the Sámi of the European high north. Polar Sci 2016;10(3):415-424. [CrossRef]
    93. van Scheppingen AR, de Vroome EM, ten Have KC, Zwetsloot GI, Bos EH, van Mechelen W. Motivations for health and their associations with lifestyle, work style, health, vitality, and employee productivity. J Occup Environ Med 2014 May;56(5):540-546. [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    ISS-10r: Internet Addiction Questionnaire

    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 02.10.19; peer-reviewed by N Khalili-Mahani, M Wong, Z Ma; comments to author 27.11.19; revised version received 09.12.19; accepted 07.02.20; published 11.05.20

    Copyright

    ©Lingling Gao, Yiqun Gan, Amanda Whittal, Song Yan, Sonia Lippke. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 11.05.2020.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.