This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Demographics of Users, Social & Digital Divide (739) Health Services Research (482) Internet Access and Digital Technology Use in an Elderly Population (209) Health Services Research and Health Care Utilization in Older Patients (86)

Published on in Vol 20, No 5 (2018): May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/8203, first published .
The Health and Retirement Study: Analysis of Associations Between Use of the Internet for Health Information and Use of Health Services at Multiple Time Points

The Health and Retirement Study: Analysis of Associations Between Use of the Internet for Health Information and Use of Health Services at Multiple Time Points

The Health and Retirement Study: Analysis of Associations Between Use of the Internet for Health Information and Use of Health Services at Multiple Time Points

Authors of this article:

Hyunju Shim1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jennifer Ailshire1 Author Orcid Image ;   Elizabeth Zelinski1 Author Orcid Image ;   Eileen Crimmins1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (16) Tweetations (14) Metrics

    Original Paper

    USC Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States

    *all authors contributed equally

    Corresponding Author:

    Hyunju Shim, MSW

    USC Davis School of Gerontology

    University of Southern California

    3715 McClintock Ave.

    Los Angeles, CA, 90089-0191

    United States

    Phone: 1 2137405156

    Email: hyunjush@usc.edu


    Background: The use of the internet for health information among older people is receiving increasing attention, but how it is associated with chronic health conditions and health service use at concurrent and subsequent time points using nationally representative data is less known.

    Objective: This study aimed to determine whether the use of the internet for health information is associated with health service utilization and whether the association is affected by specific health conditions.

    Methods: The study used data collected in a technology module from a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling older Americans aged 52 years and above from the 2012 Health and Retirement Study (HRS; N=991). Negative binomial regressions were used to examine the association between use of Web-based health information and the reported health service uses in 2012 and 2014. Analyses included additional covariates adjusting for predisposing, enabling, and need factors. Interactions between the use of the internet for health information and chronic health conditions were also tested.

    Results: A total of 48.0% (476/991) of Americans aged 52 years and above reported using Web-based health information. The use of Web-based health information was positively associated with the concurrent reports of doctor visits, but not over 2 years. However, an interaction of using Web-based health information with diabetes showed that users had significantly fewer doctor visits compared with nonusers with diabetes at both times.

    Conclusions: The use of the internet for health information was associated with higher health service use at the concurrent time, but not at the subsequent time. The interaction between the use of the internet for health information and diabetes was significant at both time points, which suggests that health-related internet use may be associated with fewer doctor visits for certain chronic health conditions. Results provide some insight into how Web-based health information may provide an alternative health care resource for managing chronic conditions.

    J Med Internet Res 2018;20(5):e200

    doi:10.2196/jmir.8203

    Keywords

    health information technology; health services; disease management; chronic disease; geriatrics 


    Background

    Using the internet for health information has the potential to be a tool for health management [1]. Substantial evidence supports the idea that people improve their knowledge and ability to manage their own health by using Web-based health information [2-4]. Some studies find that more than half of patients using online tools report that they believed health information on the Web was as good as information from their primary physicians [5].

    However, empirical tests of the association between the use of the Web-based health information and the use of medical care from a physician among older adults in the United States have been limited to mostly cross-sectional analyses. Previous literature suggests that the use of the internet for health information is associated with more visits to a doctor among older adults in the United States [6,7]. Research has also shown that health-related internet users are younger, more highly educated, have better cognitive functioning, better health literacy, and are sicker [7,8-11]. However, because most of these studies among older persons have been largely descriptive with a cross-sectional design, whether the effect of using the internet for health information on health service use is independent or correlated with other concurrent factors in the model remains unclear. In addition, the interactions between health-related internet use and different disease conditions on health care utilization have not been tested despite its implications for self-care management.

    Due to these limitations, the evidence on the effect of using the internet for health information remains mixed. Some studies have reported that searching for health information on the Web may offer older adults an opportunity to engage in more patient-centered interactions with physicians and promote self-health management [12], such as through the use of online discussion boards or searching for information on diseases and conditions. Other researchers, however, have found that the use of the internet for health purposes may not be influential on individuals’ offline interactions with their physicians and treatment decision-making [13], and have raised concerns that such activity may exacerbate health-related anxiety among some individuals [14].

    Theoretical Framework

    Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Services Use is one of the most widely used models that identifies constructs related to the use of health care services [15-20]. This model has been refined and expanded over the years and remains the most highly adopted approach to modeling health service usage [21,22]. The model posits that health care use is influenced by individuals’ predisposing factors, enabling factors, and need factors. Our model is derived from the Andersen model of general health service usage [16,21,22], as described in Figure 1. Predisposing factors describe factors that incline people to use health care services (eg, age, gender), which include personality traits in this study. Recent studies have suggested that psychological characteristics are important to include among predisposing factors [23]. Enabling factors facilitate health service use (eg, health insurance, regular source of care, use of Web-based health information). For instance, the availability of health-related information has recently emerged as an important enabling characteristic among members of ethnic minority groups [24]. However, applying this model to older people and including the use of health-related information on the Web specifically as an independent factor remains unexplored. Therefore, we include the use of Web-based health information as one of the enabling factors that predispose people to health service use. Sense of control is also included as a psychosocial characteristic that may be enabling, as sense of control has been shown to be a key factor influencing both optimism and discomfort in individuals’ readiness to use technology [25], and those with high sense of control were found to be more likely to seek Web-based health information [26-28]. Need factors include both self-perceived and evaluated health needs (eg, comorbid conditions, self-reported health). This study examines reports of 5 doctor-diagnosed health conditions (ie, hypertension, diabetes, cancer, heart disease, and stroke) as an indicator of need.

    ‎
    Figure 1. Conceptual framework.
    View this figure

    Objective

    The primary purpose of this study was to examine whether the health-related internet use is linked to health service usage at 2 time points in a nationally representative survey. Examining the use at multiple time points helps to clarify whether using the internet for health information is associated with subsequent use in health care utilization or whether the association is only concurrent. Additionally, we also explore whether having a chronic health condition and the use of Web-based health information are synergistic by testing their interactions, which have not been examined in prior studies. Examination of the synergistic effect of different diseases and the use of the internet for health information on physician visits may have important implications for developing future tools for self-care management. The findings of this study provide the first evidence on the association between the use of the internet for health information and health service use at multiple time points and add to our understanding on how different diseases are related to this association. Using nationally representative data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), we aim to (1) test whether the use of Web-based health information and health service use are associated at concurrent and subsequent times (2) and examine whether the association is different among individuals with different chronic conditions.


    Data

    We used data from the HRS, a nationally representative sample of more than 20,000 older Americans aged 50 years and above. In 2012, the HRS included a technology module including a question on the use of Web-based health information that was administered to a random subsample of 1740 participants from the core participants.

    Health service use is indicated by responses to a question on the number of visits to a doctor in the past 2 years. We assessed the effect of Web-based health information use on health care utilization both in the period (2012) concurrent with the reported internet use and in the period (2014) after the use, to see whether associations are present subsequent to the reported use of Web-based health information.

    We also used psychosocial measures collected in a self-administered leave-behind questionnaire (SAQ) that is also administered to a random subsample of core participants on a biennial basis. The first random half-sample of households received the SAQ in 2010 and the second half in 2012. The combined 2010 and 2012 sample had an overall response rate of 71% [29].

    Therefore, we limited the sample to 1737 respondents who responded to the question on the use of Web-based health information. For 2012, 73 cases were missing on visits to a doctor; 265 participants who did not have complete information in 2014 were also excluded. We also removed 251 respondents who did not meet age eligibility (under age 52 years), 34 participants who were missing on covariates, and 123 participants who revealed missing data on 5 psychosocial measures in the SAQ. The final analytic sample comprised 991 persons aged 52 years and above in 2012 who were followed up and had complete information in 2014.

    Measures

    Health Service Use

    Health service use is measured by the number of times participants saw or talked to a medical doctor about their health in the last 2 years, reported in 2012 and 2014. Respondents were asked, “Aside from any hospital stays or outpatient surgery, how many times have you seen or talked to a medical doctor about your health, including emergency room or clinic visits in the last two years?” This question has regularly been used in the literature based on the HRS to assess health care utilization [30].

    We categorized the independent variables affecting health service use according to conceptual framework in Figure 1, as predisposing, enabling, and need factors.

    Predisposing Factors

    Demographic Variables

    Demographic variables included age and gender (male or female). Personality traits include neuroticism, conscientiousness, and openness because these 3 personality traits were found to be significant predictors of health-related internet use and health service use in prior studies [7,31]. These traits were derived from participants’ rating of how well a list of words described them (1=a lot, 2=some, 3=a little, and 4=not at all). Response options were reverse coded to indicate higher agreement with each personality construct. Neuroticism was measured by moody, worrying, nervous, and calm (reversed; alpha=.71); conscientiousness with organized, responsible, hardworking, self-disciplined, careless (reversed), reckless (reversed), impulsive (reversed), cautious, thorough, and thrifty (alpha=.71); and openness to experience with creative, imaginative, intelligent, curious, broad-minded, sophisticated, and adventurous (alpha=.78). The composite scores for each trait ranged from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating more of a given personality trait (see Multimedia Appendix 1). The scores of all items were then averaged within subdimensions of each personality trait. These personality items have been validated for comparability of each adjective item and tested for measurement invariance for assessing personality across different age groups [32,33].

    Enabling Factors

    Use of Web-Based Health Information

    For assessing the use of Web-based health information, respondents were asked, “Do you use websites for finding medical and health information?” in the 2012 Technology Module. The response was binary (1=yes, 0=no) and coded as a dichotomous variable.

    Sense of Control

    We included sense of control indicated by perceived constraints and mastery (see Multimedia Appendix 2). Perceived constraints indicate one’s assessment of external problems or barriers and were measured by participants’ reports of agreement or disagreement with the 5 statements on how they perceive barriers or obstacles in life. Perceived mastery indicates one’s assessment of sense of competence over life circumstances and was measured by agreement or disagreement with the 5 statements. The answers for both questions used a 6-level Likert scale and the composite scores ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree), with higher values indicating greater agreement. The Cronbach alpha reliability coefficients were high for both constraints (alpha=.86) and mastery (alpha=.89). The scores of all items were then averaged within each of the 2 scales. All the psychosocial measures were coded following the instructions from the HRS psychosocial questionnaire guidelines [34].

    Other Covariates

    We included sociodemographic and other characteristics that facilitate health service uses. Educational attainment is measured with years of completed education, ranging from 0 to 17. Marital status (1=married, 0=not married) and employment (1=working, 0=not working) are dichotomized. Insurance was also a binary variable indicating whether the respondent reported having any type of public or private insurance (0=none, 1=has insurance). Having a regular source of care was assessed with the question that asked “Is there a place that you usually go to when you are sick or need advice about your health?” with a dichotomous answer (1=yes, 0=no). Cognitive functioning is measured by a summary score based on a series of tests including immediate and delayed recall tests (0-20), backward counting (0-2), and a serial 7s subtraction (0-5), with a score ranging from 0 to 27 [35]. This score assessing working memory and attention has been used in in many studies as a composite score indicating cognitive functioning [36,37].

    Need Factors

    Health Covariates

    Health measures include self-reports of whether a doctor ever told the respondent that he or she had a set of chronic conditions: hypertension, diabetes, cancer, heart disease, or stroke. Responses were coded into binary variables indicating the presence or absence of each condition in 2012 and 2014.

    Statistical Analyses

    We first examined bivariate associations using χ2 tests and F ratios to examine differences between users and nonusers of Web-based health information on predisposing, enabling, and need characteristics. We then turned to testing the predictive value of the use of Web-based health information for the number of visits to a doctor for both 2012 and 2014. We first estimated the effect of using Web-based health information on doctor visits controlling for predisposing, enabling, and need factors using negative binomial regressions. The examination of doctor visits data showed that the variances were higher than the means within each level of the use of Web-based health information, suggesting overdispersion of count data. Therefore, negative binomial regression models were used to address skewed distribution and overdispersion of the count data [38]. The likelihood ratio test also showed that the negative binomial model fitted better than a Poisson model. This method has been used in prior HRS studies that examined doctor visits as an outcome of interest [30,39]. In addition, interaction terms for the use of Web-based health information and 5 doctor-diagnosed health conditions were included to examine whether the use differentially affects these health conditions to have synergistic effects on doctor visits.

    Finally, to test the validity of the overall results and detect any potential type I error of interaction terms, we performed the False Discovery Rate (FDR)-controlling procedure tests. The FDR-controlling procedure test detects the expected proportion of false positives through dividing the number of true null hypotheses rejected by the total number of hypotheses rejected, which can also be regarded as the probability of making even one error if all null hypotheses are true [40]. We applied the Benjamini-Yekutieli method to test whether the significant results were spurious or not, using Stata’s multproc command [41]. Stata 13 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX) is used to estimate all models. Analytic results were weighted using Stata’s survey prefix commands (SVY) to account for complex survey design in terms of differential sampling probabilities, nonresponse, population stratification, and sample weights.


    Sample Characteristics

    Table 1 describes the sociodemographic, health, health care utilization characteristics of the internet users for health information compared with nonusers. Women were more likely to be users of Web-based health information (58.3% of users). The users were also significantly more likely to be younger, married, and in the labor force. Users were more conscientious (3.32 [SD 0.38] vs 3.22 [SD 0.43], P=.001) and open to experience (3.04 [SD 0.49] vs 2.87 [SD 0.51], P<.001). Users also had better cognitive functioning (17.25 [SD 3.48] vs 15.12 [SD 4.24], P<.001), but differences between users and nonusers on disease-related characteristics were mixed. The presence of hypertension and heart disease differed significantly between users and nonusers: 17.8% of users compared with 25.3% of nonusers on heart disease. However, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of diabetes, cancer, and stroke between users and nonusers (Table 1).

    The 2-Time Point Analysis and the Interaction of the Use of Web-Based Health Information

    Table 2 presents the results from the negative binomial regression models predicting the number of visits to a doctor in 2012 and 2014. Model 1 and Model 3 present the adjusted models with all predisposing, enabling, and need factors. Among predisposing factors, being female was associated with higher visits to doctors in both 2012 and 2014.

    The use of Web-based health information was associated with significantly more doctor visits in 2012 (b=0.189, SE=0.095, P=.048), but the association was not significant in 2014 (b=0.047, SE=0.091, P=.60), indicating that the number of visits to a doctor in the last 2 years reported concurrently is higher among those who report the use of Web-based health information, but the effect on use in the next 2 years is not significant. Model 2 and Model 4 add interaction terms with different disease conditions and the use of Web-based health information. The inclusion of interaction terms in Model 2 and Model 4 showed the synergistic effect of the use of Web-based health information and diabetes at both time points. Having diabetes (b=0.561, SE=0.140, P<.001) was associated with a higher number of visits to a doctor, but when the respondents used Web-based health information, the predicted number of visits was lower (b=−0.575, SE=0.204, P=.005). The results were similar in the 2014 models for the main effect (b=0.493, SE=0.130, P<.001) and the interaction term (b=−0.409, SE=0.179, P=.022). The interaction between the use of Web-based health information and diabetes on doctor visits is plotted in Figures 2 and 3.

    Among predisposing factors, being female was associated with higher visits to doctors across all models. Conscientiousness was significantly associated with fewer visits to doctors in 2012 (b= −0.255, SE=0.127, P=.04), but not in 2014. Similarly, openness to experience was significantly associated with more doctor visits in 2012 (b=0.290, SE=0.100, P=.004) only. Among enabling characteristics, being able to work was associated with less number of doctor visits across all models.

    To test the validity and robustness of these findings, all estimates were tested for multiplicity using the Benjamini-Yekutieli method with the corrected overall critical P value of .002. For the significant results in 2012, having the usual source of care and the main effect of diabetes were rejected with the overall corrected P values. For 2014, the main effect of having diabetes and constant were rejected. However, the interaction effect for diabetes remained significant.

    Table 1. Sample characteristics: Health and Retirement Study (2012). Weighted percentages and weighted means with standard deviation in parentheses.
    VariablesTotal (N=991)Users (N=476)Nonusers (N=515)P valuea
    Female, n (%)557 (52.9)290 (58.3)267 (46.3).003
    Married, n (%)603 (64.0)315 (68.1)288 (59.0).021
    Working, n (%)333 (39.8)197 (46.3)136 (31.7)<.001
    Doctor-diagnosed health conditions, n (%)



    		Hypertension613 (55.5)277 (49.7)336 (62.7).001

    		Diabetes213 (18.6)98 (17.1)115 (20.4).26

    		Cancer145 (14.8)77 (15.9)68 (13.6).41

    		Heart disease230 (21.1)95 (17.8)135 (25.3).019

    		Stroke62 (6.0)26 (4.5)36 (7.7).10
    Any insurance, n (%)822 (80.6)388 (78.3)434 (83.4).12
    Usual source care, n (%)862 (87.6)420 (88.0)442 (87.2).78
    Age, mean (SD)65.31 (9.47)62.79 (7.78)68.37 (10.40)<.001
    Years of education, mean (SD)13.64 (2.58)14.25 (2.35)12.90 (2.66)<.001
    Cognitive functioningb, mean (SD)16.29 (3.98)17.25 (3.48)15.12 (4.24)<.001
    Psychosocial factorsc, mean (SD)




    		Neuroticism (1-4)2.02 (0.60)2.04 (0.62)2.00 (0.59).51

    		Conscientiousness (1-4)3.27 (0.41)3.32 (0.38)3.22 (0.43).001

    		Openness (1-4)2.96 (0.50)3.04 (0.49)2.87 (0.51)<.001

    		Perceived constraint (1-6)2.00 (1.04)1.93 (1.09)2.07 (0.97).09

    		Perceived mastery (1-6)4.83 (1.06)4.88 (1.07)4.78 (1.04).21
    Number of visits to a doctor, mean (SD)




    		20128.53 (13.49)9.40 (15.76)7.46 (10.02).04

    		20148.06 (10.15)8.35 (10.08)7.71 (10.23).41

    aP value indicates significant difference between users and nonusers.

    bCognitive functioning indicates average summary score based on a series of tests including immediate and delayed recall tests (0-20), backward counting (0-2), and a serial 7s subtraction (0-5), with a score ranging from 0 to 27.

    cPsychosocial factors indicate average scores on a scale.

    Table 2. Negative binomial regression analysis of association between the use of Web-based health information and visits to a doctor (N=991).
     Predictor 20122014
     Model 1Model 2Model 3Model 4

    		βPSEβPSEβPSEβPSE
    Predisposing factors












    		Age0.000 .96(0.007)0.003 .60(0.006)−0.005 .35(0.005)−0.005 .34(0.005)

    		Female0.284.008(0.107)0.289.004(0.101)0.213.01(0.085)0.228.008(0.085)
    Personality traits

    		Neuroticism0.080.40 (0.096)0.084 .35(0.092)0.120 .11(0.077)0.115 .12(0.076)

    		Conscientiousness−0.255.04(0.127)−0.254.03(0.118)−0.211 .10(0.130)−0.202 .12(0.130)

    		Openness0.290.004(0.100)0.286.004(0.098)0.060 .56(0.103)0.063 .53(0.102)
    Enabling factors












    		Use Web-based health information0.189.048(0.095)0.157 .30(0.152)0.047 .60(0.091)0.008 .96(0.157)

    		Education0.018 .34(0.019)0.023 .20(0.018)0.046.007(0.017)0.046.006(0.016)

    		Working−0.265.038(0.127)−0.232.04(0.115)−0.270.004(0.092)−0.271.004(0.092)

    		Married−0.094 .39(0.111)−0.091 .37(0.102)0.010 .90(0.087)0.018.83(0.085)

    		Insurance0.212 .12(0.137)0.192 .14(0.131)0.302.018(0.127)0.314.01(0.122)

    		Regular source of care0.514.001(0.158)0.518<.001(0.143)0.195 .18(0.148)0.196 .18(0.148)

    		Cognition0.017 .27(0.015)0.017 .21(0.014)0.008 .56(0.013)0.006 .66(0.014)
    Sense of control            

    		Perceived constraint−0.049 .36(0.054)−0.052 .31(0.052)−0.076 .09(0.046)−0.079 .09(0.047)

    		Perceived mastery−0.028 .53(0.045)−0.027 .52(0.042)0.006 .89(0.045)0.003 .94(0.044)
    Need factors












    		Hypertension0.254.01(0.099)0.272.028(0.123)0.301<.001(0.084)0.183.10 (0.113)


    		× Use Health Information   −0.042 .81(0.179)   0.220.19(0.168)

    		Diabetes0.276.007(0.102)0.561<.001(0.140)0.298.003(0.100)0.493<.001(0.130)


    		× Use Health Information   −0.575.005(0.204)   −0.409.022(0.179)

    		Cancer0.304.04(0.146)0.130 .42(0.162)0.057 .58(0.103)0.165 .31(0.163)


    		× Use Health Information   0.256 .33(0.267)   −0.177 .37(0.199)

    		Heart Disease0.394.005(0.139)0.076 .56(0.129)0.212.02(0.093)0.164 .21(0.132)


    		× Use Health Information   0.625.009(0.238)   0.120 .48(0.173)

    		Stroke0.197 .40(0.236)0.191 .31(0.188)0.371 .12(0.240)0.396 .24(0.338)


    		× Use Health Information   −0.050 .91(0.491)   −0.181 .67(0.430)
    ‎
    Figure 2. Predicted mean number of visits to doctors and the interaction of the use of Web-based health information and diabetes in 2012.
    View this figure
    ‎
    Figure 3. Predicted mean number of visits to doctors and the interaction of the use of Web-based health information and diabetes in 2014.
    View this figure

    Principal Findings

    Almost half (48.0%) of the adults in this national sample of the US population aged 52 years and above used the internet for health information. This estimate is comparable to the national estimates of Web-based health information users reported in other studies, which range from 48.2% [42] to 58.0% [43] for older Americans. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effect of the use of the internet for health information on the health service use among older adults at multiple time points and test the interaction effects with different diseases.

    Among the predisposing factors, being female was consistently associated with a higher number of physician visits. This result is consistent with prior evidences on gender differences in the use of the internet for health information and health service use [6,7]. Prior studies found that women had higher health literacy than men, even when adjusting for sociodemographic and health factors [44,45]. Further studies will need to examine more detailed understanding of what motivates women to use health service more. Although the results on conscientiousness are counterintuitive, it is important to note that the significant association between conscientiousness and doctor visits was reported only among older men and not older women [46]. The relationship between personality and health service use remains unclear. There are more studies on diseases and personality, which found conscientious people are significantly less likely to have onset of diseases [47]. Because association between conscientiousness and doctor visits per se has received relatively little attention, further studies may focus on this relationship to clarify this association.

    Regarding enabling factors, the use of Web-based health information was associated with more doctor visits at the same period, which is consistent with prior findings [6,7]. However, the association was not significant 2 years later. As most studies focused on examinations of using Web-based health information and doctor visits at one time point, using multiple time points in our study helps to understand how persistent the finding is over time. The lack of a relationship in 2014 indicates that the association is strongest when the use of the internet for health care information and health service use is coterminous, raising the possibility that the initial association was due to either reverse causation or causation by a third factor, such as need.

    On the other hand, with regard to need factors, the interaction between the use of Web-based health information and chronic conditions on doctor visits was consistent for all models at both time points. Although the main effect of having diabetes was associated with more doctor visits, the association was negative when the use of the internet for health information was interacted with diabetes, suggesting a reduced number of visits to a doctor associated with being a user of Web-based health information with diabetic conditions. This result remained robust through the multiplicity tests and adds a novel finding to the existing literature.

    Implications and Future Directions

    Our study indicates that there may be an opportunity to further promote the development of resources for self-care and health management. Diabetes is a chronic condition that requires self-care as an essential component of management [48]. Due to this, there are many mobile phone apps and devices targeting diabetic patients [49-51], which may offer sources of health management that substitute visits to doctors. For practical reasons, some diabetic patients may prefer using Web-based health information to going to physicians.

    Using the internet for health information may enable people with fewer economic resources to manage their conditions in a cost-efficient way. The national evaluation of health care costs for managing diabetes in the United States in 2012 stood at US $245 billion, out of which 9.0% was associated with physician office visits [52]. Therefore, the use of Web-based health information might be used to offset some of the burden. Additionally, online support could provide an opportunity for people with physical disabilities, who otherwise may find it difficult to visit physicians on a regular basis, to utilize health care resources. A recent meta-analysis estimating the risk of physical disability associated with diabetes reported that diabetes nearly doubles the risks of mobility disability [53]. Being able to use Web-based health information may enable older adults to manage their conditions despite physical disability. Finally, using Web-based health information could also be an enabling resource for older people who face linguistic barriers in utilizing health care services. One study found that the health-related internet use enabled Korean immigrant women in the United States to assist with self-care management, ranging from diagnosis and treatment to the recommendation of hospitals by allowing communications free of concerns about language barriers, indicating the potential empowerment by the use of the internet for health information among immigrant populations [54]. As the number of people who cannot speak fluent English is high among older immigrants, this finding has important implications for the use of Web-based health information in relation to health service use.

    However, evaluating the effectiveness of the use of Web-based health information for chronic disease management remains to be addressed in future studies. One prior study reported that users of Web-based health information checked their blood glucose more regularly and practiced health behaviors better than nonusers among 344 patients with type 2 diabetes [55]. Yet, another qualitative study of 46 diabetic patients found that most participants passively received information, and although some diabetic patients collected information from Web sources, they sought medical professionals’ confirmation on the reliability and applicability of information [56]. Therefore, it is not clear whether and how using Web-based health information is an alternative or a supplement to conventional health care resources.

    There is also a concern regarding the quality of Web-based health information. Some prior studies reported that community-dwelling older adults aged 50 years and above showed general concerns regarding the credibility of Web-based health information and how time-consuming the Web-based health information search can be [57]. These concerns were echoed by a study conducted on caregivers and their older care recipients, which raised questions on the reliability and effectiveness of Web-based health information [58]. Future studies should attempt to address concerns related to the reliability of Web-based health information and its implications for self-care management of chronic conditions for both older adults and their family caregivers. Additionally, the potential for the use of Web-based health information to enable socioeconomically and physically marginalized population to utilize the health care system merits further research attention.

    Limitations

    This study has several limitations. First, the questions on doctor visits at the first time point did not indicate a clear timing of the doctor visits relative to the use of Web-based health information. Although we examined doctor visits in both 2012 and 2014 to partly address this issue, this does not completely eliminate concerns in interpreting the findings. There is also a possibility that people may not have accurately responded to the question on visits to the doctor due to memorability reasons with regard to a 24-month time horizon. Second, the relatively simple question on the use of Web-based health information in the HRS also limited the scope of analysis. Detailed information on the purpose for seeking Web-based health information (eg, communicating with physicians, searching for information, taking care of their spouses) would have advanced our understanding on why some older adults seek health information on the internet and why women use Web-based health information more. Despite these limitations in the questions, however, this study has a unique contribution to expand our understanding on the association between the use of the internet for health information and health service utilization by using a nationally representative sample. Finally, the study relies on self-reports of doctor-diagnosed medical conditions which may have some reporting errors. However, previous research has shown relatively high agreement between self-reports of health conditions and medical record reports [59,60].

    Conclusions

    This study provides the first evidence on how the use of the internet for health information and chronic health conditions are synergistically associated with doctor visits at 2 different time points. The findings indicate that, although the use of Web-based health information is independently associated with doctor visits concurrently, this effect does not remain significant 2 years later. However, for those with a certain chronic health conditions, using Web-based health information is significantly associated with fewer doctor visits at both time points, suggesting a potential avenue for future research in exploring the implications of the use of Web-based health information among older people. Examination of predisposing, enabling, and need factors, as well as their interactions, adds to our understanding of the relative importance of association between the use of Web-based health information and health service use.

    Using the internet for health information may help older adults with a barrier to access conventional health care system—including those with lower socioeconomic resources, physical limitations, and linguistic barriers—to manage their conditions. However, caution needs to be exercised in extrapolating these study findings. Although accessing the health information on the Web may provide an alternative source of health care services, further research will need to evaluate quality and reliability of Web-based health information to elucidate the potential role of using this technology for health management among older people.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported in part by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) grant P30 – AG017265. The Health and Retirement Study is funded by NIA grant U01AG009740 to the University of Michigan. The paper greatly benefited from the helpful comments of all coauthors, and all errors are the corresponding author’s own.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    ‎

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Questions on personality traits (Health and Retirement Study, 2012).

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 146KB
    ‎

    Multimedia Appendix 2

    Questions on sense of control (Health and Retirement Study, 2012).

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 145KB
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2010. Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Strategic Framework: Optimum Health and Quality of Life for Individuals with Multiple Chronic Conditions   URL: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ash/initiatives/mcc/mcc_framework.pdf [WebCite Cache]
    2. Bolle S, van Weert JC, Daams JG, Loos EF, de Haes HC, Smets EM. Online health information tool effectiveness for older patients: a systematic review of the literature. J Health Commun 2015;20(9):1067-1083. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Houston TK, Allison JJ. Users of internet health information: differences by health status. J Med Internet Res 2002 Nov;4(2):E7 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Morahan-Martin JM. How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: a cross-cultural review. Cyberpsychol Behav 2004 Oct;7(5):497-510. [Medline]
    5. Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ, Reinert SE, Friedmann PD, Moulton AW. Patients' use of the internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med 2002 Mar;17(3):180-185 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    6. Choi N. Relationship between health service use and health information technology use among older adults: analysis of the US National Health Interview Survey. J Med Internet Res 2011 Apr 20;13(2):e33 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Flynn KE, Smith MA, Freese J. When do older adults turn to the internet for health information? findings from the Wisconsin longitudinal study. J Gen Intern Med 2006 Dec;21(12):1295-1301 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Amante DJ, Hogan TP, Pagoto SL, English TM, Lapane KL. Access to care and use of the Internet to search for health information: results from the US national health interview survey. J Med Internet Res 2015;17(4):e106 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, et al. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging 2006 Jun;21(2):333-352 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Elliot AJ, Mooney CJ, Douthit KZ, Lynch MF. Predictors of older adults' technology use and its relationship to depressive symptoms and well-being. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2014 Sep;69(5):667-677 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Levy H, Janke AT, Langa KM. Health literacy and the digital divide among older Americans. J Gen Intern Med 2015 Mar;30(3):284-289. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Winstein CJ, Requejo PS, Zelinski EM, Mulroy SJ, Crimmins EM. A transformative subfield in rehabilitation science at the nexus of new technologies, aging, and disability. Front Psychol 2012;3:340 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Baker L, Wagner TH, Singer S, Bundorf MK. Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA 2003 May 14;289(18):2400-2406. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Te PF, Baumgartner SE, Hartmann T, Tanis M. The curious case of cyberchondria: a longitudinal study on the reciprocal relationship between health anxiety and online health information seeking. J Anxiety Disord 2016 Oct;43:32-40. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Andersen R. A behavioral model of families' use of health services. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago; 1968.
    16. Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 1995 Mar;36(1):1-10. [Medline]
    17. Coulton C, Frost AK. Use of social and health services by the elderly. J Health Soc Behav 1982 Dec;23(4):330-339. [Medline]
    18. Kim H, Lee M. Factors associated with health services utilization between the years 2010 and 2012 in Korea: using Andersen's behavioral model. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2016 Feb;7(1):18-25 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Mitchell J, Krout JA. Discretion and service use among older adults: the behavioral model revisited. Gerontologist 1998 Apr;38(2):159-168. [Medline]
    20. Wolinsky FD, Johnson RJ. The use of health services by older adults. J Gerontol 1991 Nov;46(6):S345-S357. [Medline]
    21. Babitsch B, Gohl D, von Lengerke T. Re-revisiting Andersen's behavioral model of health services use: a systematic review of studies from 1998-2011. Psychosoc Med 2012;9:Doc11 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Andersen R, Davidson PS. Access to care. In: Changing the US health care system. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 2013:33-70.
    23. Schomerus G, Appel K, Meffert PJ, Luppa M, Andersen RM, Grabe HJ, et al. Personality-related factors as predictors of help-seeking for depression: a population-based study applying the Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2013 Nov;48(11):1809-1817. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Ani C, Bazargan M, Bazargan-Hejazi S, Andersen R, Hindman D, Baker R. Correlates of self-diagnosis of chronic medical and mental health conditions in under-served African American and Latino populations. Ethn Dis 2008;18(2 Suppl 2):S2-105. [Medline]
    25. Lin C, Shih H, Sher PJ. Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: the TRAM model. Psychol Mark 2007 Jul;24(7):641-657. [CrossRef]
    26. Campbell R. Older women and the internet. J Women Aging 2004;16(1-2):161-174. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Campbell RJ, Harris KD, Wabby J. The internet and locus of control in older adults. 2002 Presented at: The AMIA Symposium; 2002; San Antonio, TX.
    28. Roncancio AM, Berenson AB, Rahman M. Health locus of control, acculturation, and health-related internet use among Latinas. J Health Commun 2012;17(6):631-640 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Heeringa S, Connor J. Technical description of the health and retirement survey sample design. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 1995.   URL: http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/userg/HRSSAMP.pdf [WebCite Cache]
    30. Gerst-Emerson K, Jayawardhana J. Loneliness as a public health issue: the impact of loneliness on health care utilization among older adults. Am J Public Health 2015 May;105(5):1013-1019. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Landers R, Lounsbury J. An investigation of big five and narrow personality traits in relation to internet usage. Comput Human Behav 2006;22(2):283-293. [CrossRef]
    32. Roberts B, Jackson J, Duckworth A, Von Culin K. Personality measurement and assessment in large panel surveys. Forum Health Econ Policy 2011 Apr 18;14(3):1-23 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Zimprich D, Allemand M, Lachman M. Factorial structure and age-related psychometrics of the MIDUS personality adjective items across the life span. Psychol Assess 2012 Mar;24(1):173-186 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Smith J, Fisher G, Ryan L, Clarke P, House J, Weir D. Psychosocial and lifestyle questionnaire. Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research. 2013.   URL: http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/userg/HRS2006-2010SAQdoc.pdf [WebCite Cache]
    35. Crimmins EM, Kim JK, Langa KM, Weir DR. Assessment of cognition using surveys and neuropsychological assessment: the health and retirement study and the aging, demographics, and memory study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2011 Jul;66 Suppl 1:i162-i171 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Xiang X, An R. The impact of cognitive impairment and comorbid depression on disability, health care utilization, and costs. Psychiatr Serv 2015 Nov;66(11):1245-1248. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. McEvoy CT, Guyer H, Langa KM, Yaffe K. Neuroprotective diets are associated with better cognitive function: the health and retirement study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2017 Aug;65(8):1857-1862 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Cameron A, Trivedi P. Microeconometrics using stata, 2nd Edition. College Station, Texas: Stata Press; 2009.
    39. Kim ES, Konrath SH. Volunteering is prospectively associated with health care use among older adults. Soc Sci Med 2016 Jan;149:122-129 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Benjamini YD. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat 2001;29(4):1165-1188.
    41. Newson R. Multiple-test proceduressmile plots. Stata J 2003;3(2):109-132.
    42. Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, Croyle RT, Arora NK, Rimer BK, et al. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first health information national trends survey. Arch Intern Med 2005;165(22):2618-2624. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Fox S, Duggan M. Pew Research Center. Health online   URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/PIP_HealthOnline.pdf [accessed 2018-04-23] [WebCite Cache]
    44. Lee HY, Lee J, Kim NK. Gender differences in health literacy among Korean adults: do women have a higher level of health literacy than men? Am J Mens Health 2015 Sep;9(5):370-379. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. von WC, Knight K, Steptoe A, Wardle J. Functional health literacy and health-promoting behaviour in a national sample of British adults. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 Dec;61(12):1086-1090 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Jerram K, Coleman P. The big five personality traits and reporting of health problems and health behaviour in old age. Br J Health Psychol 1999;4(2):181-192. [CrossRef]
    47. Weston S, Hill P, Jackson J. Personality traits predict the onset of disease. Soc Psychol Pers Sci 2014 Oct 13;6(3):309-317. [CrossRef]
    48. Shrivastava SR, Shrivastava PS, Ramasamy J. Role of self-care in management of diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2013 Mar 05;12(1):14 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. Demidowich AP, Lu K, Tamler R, Bloomgarden Z. An evaluation of diabetes self-management applications for android smartphones. J Telemed Telecare 2012 Jun;18(4):235-238. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Wu S. Supporting diabetes self-management among older adults through mobile technology application and intergenerational support: Imtop program design and effectiveness. 2017.   URL: https://sswr.confex.com/sswr/2017/webprogram/Paper30286.html [WebCite Cache]
    51. Zheng L, Wang Y, Hao S, Shin AY, Jin B, Ngo AD, et al. Web-based real-time case finding for the population health management of patients with diabetes mellitus: a prospective validation of the natural language processing-based algorithm with statewide electronic medical records. JMIR Med Inform 2016 Nov 11;4(4):e37 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care 2013 Apr;36(4):1033-1046 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    53. Wong E, Backholer K, Gearon E, Harding J, Freak-Poli R, Stevenson C, et al. Diabetes and risk of physical disability in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2013 Oct;1(2):106-114 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    54. Kim S, Yoon J. InformationR. The use of an online forum for health information by married Korean women in the United States   URL: http://www.informationr.net/ir/17-2/paper514.html [WebCite Cache]
    55. Jamal A, Khan SA, AlHumud A, Al-Duhyyim A, Alrashed M, Bin SF, et al. Association of online health information-seeking behavior and self-care activities among type 2 diabetic patients in Saudi Arabia. J Med Internet Res 2015 Aug 12;17(8):e196 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    56. Longo DR, Schubert SL, Wright BA, LeMaster J, Williams CD, Clore JN. Health information seeking, receipt, and use in diabetes self-management. Ann Fam Med 2010;8(4):334-340 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    57. Silver MP. Patient perspectives on online health information and communication with doctors: a qualitative study of patients 50 years old and over. J Med Internet Res 2015 Jan 13;17(1):e19 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    58. Nijland N, van GJ, Boer H, Steehouder MF, Seydel ER. Evaluation of internet-based technology for supporting self-care: problems encountered by patients and caregivers when using self-care applications. J Med Internet Res 2008 May 15;10(2):e13 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    59. Bergmann MM, Byers T, Freedman DS, Mokdad A. Validity of self-reported diagnoses leading to hospitalization: a comparison of self-reports with hospital records in a prospective study of American adults. Am J Epidemiol 1998 May 15;147(10):969-977. [Medline]
    60. Bush TL, Miller SR, Golden AL, Hale WE. Self-report and medical record report agreement of selected medical conditions in the elderly. Am J Public Health 1989 Nov;79(11):1554-1556. [Medline]

    ‎
    FDR: False Discovery Rate
    HRS: Health and Retirement Study
    SAQ: self-administered leave-behind questionnaire

    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 03.07.17; peer-reviewed by K Paixao, S Bidmon, S Baumeister; comments to author 17.08.17; revised version received 14.12.17; accepted 11.04.18; published 25.05.18

    Copyright

    ©Hyunju Shim, Jennifer Ailshire, Elizabeth Zelinski, Eileen Crimmins. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 25.05.2018.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.