This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions (3297) Theoretical Frameworks and Concepts (252)

Published on in Vol 17, No 4 (2015): April

This is a member publication of Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Toronto, ON, Canada

The Use of Behavior Change Theory in Internet-Based Asthma Self-Management Interventions: A Systematic Review

The Use of Behavior Change Theory in Internet-Based Asthma Self-Management Interventions: A Systematic Review

The Use of Behavior Change Theory in Internet-Based Asthma Self-Management Interventions: A Systematic Review

Authors of this article:

Mustafa Al-Durra1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Monika-Bianca Torio1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Joseph A Cafazzo1, 2, 4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (34) Tweetations (37) Metrics

    Review

    1Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

    2Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, The Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    3Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    4Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Corresponding Author:

    Mustafa Al-Durra, BSc, MSc

    Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Techna Institute, University Health Network

    Toronto General Hospital, R Fraser Elliott Building, 4th Floor

    190 Elizabeth Street

    Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4

    Canada

    Phone: 1 416 340 4800 ext 4765

    Fax:1 416 340 3595

    Email: maldurra@ehealthinnovation.org


    Background: The high prevalence rate of asthma represents a major societal burden. Advancements in information technology continue to affect the delivery of patient care in all areas of medicine. Internet-based solutions, social media, and mobile technology could address some of the problems associated with increasing asthma prevalence.

    Objective: This review evaluates Internet-based asthma interventions that were published between 2004 and October 2014 with respect to the use of behavioral change theoretical frameworks, applied clinical guidelines, and assessment tools.

    Methods: The search term (Asthma AND [Online or Internet or Mobile or Application or eHealth or App]) was applied to six bibliographic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, BioMed Central, ProQuest Computing, Web of Knowledge, and ACM Digital Library) including only English-language articles published between 2004 and October 2014. In total, 3932 articles matched the priori search terms and were reviewed by the primary reviewer based on their titles, index terms, and abstracts. The matching articles were then screened by the primary reviewer for inclusion or exclusion based on their abstract, study type, and intervention objectives with respect to the full set of priori inclusion and exclusion criteria; 331 duplicates were identified and removed. A total of 85 articles were included for in-depth review and the remaining 3516 articles were excluded. The primary and secondary reviewer independently reviewed the complete content of the 85 included articles to identify the applied behavioral change theories, clinical guidelines, and assessment tools. Findings and any disagreement between reviewers were resolved by in-depth discussion and through a consolidation process for each of the included articles.

    Results: The reviewers identified 17 out of 85 interventions (20%) where at least one model, framework, and/or construct of a behavioral change theory were applied. The review identified six clinical guidelines that were applied across 30 of the 85 interventions (35%) as well as a total of 21 assessment tools that were applied across 32 of the 85 interventions (38%).

    Conclusions: The findings of this literature review indicate that the majority of published Internet-based interventions do not use any documented behavioral change theory, clinical guidelines, and/or assessment tools to inform their design. Further, it was found that the application of clinical guidelines and assessment tools were more salient across the reviewed interventions. A consequence, as such, is that many Internet-based asthma interventions are designed in an ad hoc manner, without the use of any notable evidence-based theoretical frameworks, clinical guidelines, and/or assessment tools.

    J Med Internet Res 2015;17(4):e89

    doi:10.2196/jmir.4110

    Keywords

    asthma; self-care; self-management; eHealth, mHealth; mobile health; telehealth; telemedicine; Internet; review 


    Introduction

    Asthma is a common chronic inflammatory disease of the airways with symptoms including cough, breathlessness, and wheezing. According to World Health Organization (WHO) estimates, there are some 235 million people in the world currently suffering from asthma. The WHO also estimates that asthma is the most common non-communicable disease among children [1,2].

    Combined with the aging population trend and increasing cost of health care services, the high prevalence rate of asthma represents a major societal burden as well as a substantial challenge to the traditional models of health care providers, patients, and their families. A number of cost analysis studies have reported that the annual economic cost of asthma due to direct medical costs from hospital stays, as well as indirect costs from lost school and workdays, amounted to more than US $56 billion in the United States in 2007, CAN $1.8 billion in Ontario, Canada in 2011, and €19.3 billion in European adult populations in 2010 [3-5].

    Advancements in the field of information technology continue to change patient care in all areas of medicine. Internet-based solutions, social media, and mobile technology could help to mitigate some of the problems associated with the increasing asthma prevalence [6].

    The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Expert Panel Report 3 (NHLBI EP3) Asthma Guidelines suggest that there is a potential use for information technologies to provide patients with skills to control their asthma and improve outcomes [7,8].

    None of the existing literature reviews focused on evaluating Internet-based asthma interventions with respect to the evidence base around the behavioral change theoretical frameworks, applied clinical guidelines, and assessment tools.

    The primary objective of this literature review was to identify and evaluate Internet-based asthma interventions that were published between 2004 and October 2014 with respect to the use of the behavioral change, self-care, and self-management theoretical frameworks as well as the application of clinical guidelines and assessment tools.


    Methods

    Research Questions

    We established the following primary research question: What is the use of behavioral change, self-care, and self-management theoretical frameworks within the context of Internet-based asthma interventions?

    Our secondary research question was: What is the use of clinical guidelines and assessment tools within the context of Internet-based asthma interventions?

    Inclusion Criteria

    The review included all asthma-related Internet-based interventions, such as Internet-based applications, electronic diary solutions, mobile apps, and/or any other kind of computer-based applications with the focus on patient-centric Internet-based applications as well as provider-to-patient applications.

    The bibliographic databases search included relevant studies and interventions that were published between 2004 and October 2014 and was limited to literature published in the English language.

    Exclusion Criteria

    The review excluded any electronic record management systems that are provider-centric and used to organize patient visits at the clinic and/or hospital settings such as electronic medical records (EMR), electronic health records (EHR), and hospital information systems (HIS). Also, telemedicine interventions that merely leveraged the conventional wired or wireless telephone technology as a medium to facilitate a verbal communication and/or short message service (SMS) between patients and their providers were excluded. The review excluded any educational-only studies that utilized Web-based resources, such as social media, decision support tools, and wikis, for the sole purpose of providing educational content for asthma patients, caregivers, and/or providers.

    The bibliographic databases search excluded studies whose main objective was to design, develop, and assess eHealth tools, such as Web, Internet, and mobile apps, without providing critical analysis of their impact and contribution within a given asthma intervention context.

    Search Strategy

    Overview

    The search term was applied to six bibliographic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, BioMed Central, ProQuest Computing, Web of Knowledge, and ACM Digital Library) including only English articles published between 2004 and October 2014. The search was conducted in the following steps.

    Search Term

    We limited the search to English-language articles published between 2004 and October 2014. The search term was:

    • [Asthma] AND
    • [English language and year="2004 -Current"] AND
    • [Online or Internet or Mobile or Application or eHealth or App]
    Step I — Abstract Evaluation

    The primary reviewer evaluated the abstracts, titles, and index terms of all matching articles in the bibliographic databases where the search term was applied. Based on this preliminary review, all relevant articles were listed for potential inclusion.

    Step II — Screening for Inclusion

    In this step, the primary reviewer evaluated relevant articles in the preliminary list for final inclusion or exclusion based on their abstract, study type, and intervention focus with respect to the full set of priori inclusion and exclusion criteria.

    Step III — Removal of Duplicates

    Internal and cross-database duplicates were identified and removed from all included articles from Step II. Duplicates within each database were first identified and removed. Cross-database duplicates were then identified and removed through a manual consolidation process.

    Step IV — Independent Review

    The complete published papers of all included articles were then reviewed, analyzed, and assessed thoroughly by two reviewers independently. The primary and secondary reviewers independently reviewed the complete content of the included articles to identify the applied theoretical frameworks, clinical guidelines, and assessment tools with the objective to answer the priori research questions. Findings and disagreements between the primary and secondary reviewers were resolved by in-depth discussions and through a consolidation process for each of the included articles.


    Overview

    In total, and across all six bibliographic databases, 3932 articles matched the priori search terms and were reviewed by the primary reviewer based on their titles, index terms, and abstracts in Step I.

    In Step II, 3516 articles were excluded by the primary reviewer on their abstract, study type, and intervention focus that met the priori exclusion criteria.

    A total of 331 duplicates were identified and removed in Step III.

    In the last step, the remaining 85 articles were included for independent and in-depth review by the two reviewers. Figure 1 depicts the search breakdown and results for all six bibliographic databases.

    The majority of the reviewed studies and interventions reported the following key targeted behaviors [9-13]: (1) managing environmental triggers, (2) accessing asthma services, (3) medication adherence, (4) monitoring peak flow regularly by using portable meters, (5) keeping rescue inhaler accessible, and (6) smoke reduction or cessation.

    The findings of the review results will be discussed in three different sections: Theoretical Frameworks, Clinical Guidelines and Assessment Tools, and Other Reviews.

    ‎
    Figure 1. Search results from the six bibliographic databases.
    View this figure

    Theoretical Frameworks

    Overview

    The motive behind conducting this review was to answer the primary research question with respect to whether existing Internet-based interventions for asthma were founded on any behavioral-change theories. And if so, to what extent did these theoretical frameworks inform the design and evaluation of these interventions?

    This review identified 17 out of 85 interventions (20%) where at least one model, framework, and/or construct of a behavioral change theory was applied. This implies that the majority of our reviewed interventions did not apply any documented behavioral change theory to inform the design of their interventions. This finding is consistent with what is reported in the literature. Theory-driven strategies for aiding individuals in changing or managing health behaviors are lacking [9].

    As such, this review found that there are only a limited number of well-established behavioral change theories and models that were referenced and applied across multiple studies. In total, the reviewers were able to identify 10 behavioral change theories and models that were applied across multiple interventions versus 13 other theories and models that were only applied once within the context of a single study and/or intervention.

    Table 1 provides a list of all applied theoretical frameworks and models that were identified across the 85 reviewed interventions.

    In the following sections, the theoretical frameworks that were applied in more than three studies will be further analyzed and discussed.

    Table 1. Applied theoretical frameworks and models of the 85 reviewed Internet-based asthma interventions.
    Theoretical frameworksNumber of studiesCited interventions
    Gamification4[13-16]
    Health Belief Model4[10-12,17]
    Tailoring4[10-13]
    Transtheoretical Model4[9,10,12,17]
    Attribution Theory3[11,13,17]
    Chronic Care Model2[18,19]
    Motivational Interviewing2[11,17]
    Self-Determination Theory2[17,20]
    Social Cognitive Theory2[13,21]
    Technology Acceptance Model2[22,23]
    Biobehavioral Family Model (BFM)1[16]
    Dual Processing Theory1[13]
    Ecological Systems Theory1[24]
    Instructional Theory1[13]
    Intervention Mapping1[13]
    Marlatt’s Theory of Relapse1[17]
    Motivational Theory1[13]
    Norma Engaging Multimedia Design (NEMD)1[16]
    Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relations1[22]
    Social Learning Theory1[25]
    Sociohistoric Theory1[13]
    The eHealth Behavior Management Model1[9]
    Theory of Planned Behavior1[9]
    Watson’s Model of Caring1[22]
    Gamification

    In the past, computer and video games were perceived to be a waste of time and harmful in many aspects to those who play such games excessively, especially for the child and adolescent age groups [26,27]. Nevertheless, the advancement in audio-visual and telecommunication technologies has ignited a new era for today’s games. While the term “gamification” is still evolving, it could be defined as “the use of video game elements in non-gaming systems to improve user experience (UX) and user engagement” [28].

    There is a growing body of evidence emphasizing the potential benefits of the social, health, and educational science behind computer games [29]. The potential application of computer games in the health domain was well addressed by the Games for Health projects. The project has defined a taxonomy to depict five main types of games used in health care: Preventative, Therapeutic, Assessment, Educational, and Informatics [27].

    This review has shown that principles, concepts, and strategies of gamification were only applied in four studies. However, these four studies only targeted children up to 12 years old [13-16]. The reviewers could not cite any Internet-based asthma interventions employing gamification concepts for the adolescent or adults’ population groups.

    In one study conducted in 2013, an online peer support group for asthmatic children used an existing commercial networking website, Club Penguin, to help asthmatic children deal with difficult situations in an engaging manner [14].

    Another two studies reported the success of an award-winning program called “Okay With Asthma”, where an interactive digital story was developed and delivered online to support children with their asthma and psychosocial management strategies. This was done through leveraging and employing a novel behavioral model, the Biobehavioral Family Model [15,16].

    The “Okay With Asthma” program successfully used the five factors (simulation interactivity, construct interactivity, immediacy, feedback, and goals) identified by the Norma Engaging Multimedia Design model to design its usability and feasibility testing approach [16,30].

    Simulation interactivity describes the child’s ability to ‘become’ a character in the story, whereas construct interactivity refers to the availability of activities for the child to create or build in the virtual world. Immediacy is the user’s ability to observe all the actions and interactions that take place in the system. Children need feedback to show that their choices matter; without consequences, there would be no point in performing the actions. The model’s final tenet is goal setting. Whether the goal is set extrinsically (by the game developer) or intrinsically (the child determining own goals), it is important for there to be goals to achieve. [31]

    As well, the Watch-Discover-Think-Act (WDTA) study [13] provided an applied example of how behavioral and motivation theories could be translated within the context of gamification. The WDTA program developed a game that walks through 18 real-life and four fantasy scenarios. The players, who are children with asthma, have to complete a set of tasks related to asthma self-management in order to progress across scenarios. Feedback is provided as a reinforcement of information for the children and their parents.

    As depicted in Table 2, the reviewers were able to validate the translation steps of the behavioral change theoretical methods in the “Watch-Discover-Think-Act” [13] study against a number of other studies, such as the five factors of the Norma Engaging Multimedia Design model that were applied within the context of “Okay With Asthma” [16]. The correlation between the findings of those two different studies validates the impact and influence gamification theories and methods could have to increase patients’ motivation, self-efficacy, and engagement level within the context of Internet-based asthma interventions.

    Table 2. Correlation between the applied theoretical methods and factors of the two studies, “Watch-Discover-Think-Act” and “Okay With Asthma”.
    WDTA (Watch-Discover-Think-Act)Okay With Asthma
    Personalized InformationSimulation Interactivity
    Fantasy Context + Multiple ModalitiesConstruct Interactivity
    Learner ControlImmediacy
    ReinforcementFeedback
    Goal SettingsGoals
    Health Belief Model

    The Health Belief Model dates back to the 1950s, initially developed by Hochbaum (1958) and Rosenstock (1960), and then extended by Kirscht and Becker in 1974 [32]. The Health Belief Model is a theoretical framework that attempts to study and predict the individual’s health preferences and actions based on observed attitudes and personal beliefs. The model explains the individual’s motivation to take a health care-related action based on the following factors:

    (1) The existence of sufficient motivation (or health concern) to make health issues salient of relevant.
    (2) The belief that one is susceptible (vulnerable) to a serious health problem or to the sequelae of that illness or condition. This is often termed perceived threat.
    (3) The belief that following a particular health recommendation would be beneficial in reducing the perceived threat, and at a subjectively-acceptable cost. [33]

    The Health Belief Model was applied in the context of providing individualized messages and communication with patients to promote self-efficacy and better patient engagement [10-12,17].

    The Puff City program that was evaluated in six Detroit high schools and reported in four different studies [10-12,17] identified and evaluated three core behaviors: namely, controller medication adherence, rescue inhaler availability, and smoking cessation/reduction. In the event of a negative change in any of the three core behaviors, theory-based health messages and information on asthma control were sent to the patients to sustain their self-efficacy and asthma self-regulation [12].

    Tailoring

    In the literature, “tailoring” is defined as “…assessment and provision of feedback based on information that is known or hypothesized to be most relevant for each individual participant of a program” [11,34,35], and “…any combination of information or change strategies intended to reach one specific person, based on characteristics that are unique to that person, related to the outcome of interest, and have been derived from an individual assessment” [10,35].

    A number of studies and interventions have pointed out the significance of identifying the resistant groups at earlier stages of the intervention. These groups are less motivated to change their behavior and take ownership in managing their asthma. The objective is to use “tailoring” as a means to apply behavioral change theories, such as the Transtheoretical Model and the Health Belief Model, to motivate those subgroups and achieve positive changes in their behaviors with respect to their self-efficacy and asthma management [10-13]. The reviewed studies have utilized “tailoring” to customize the communication and education strategies with the targeted resistant subgroup based on their beliefs, attitude, and personalized information.

    Transtheoretical Model

    The Transtheoretical Model promotes individuals to change their behaviors for a healthier lifestyle.

    The Transtheoretical Model is based on the premise that individuals are in one of five possible stages of change associated with a particular behavior. Precontemplation is the stage in which a person has no interest in changing the behavior. Contemplation is when a person would like to change the behavior someday but is not yet ready. Preparation is when a person is ready to make the change but needs assistance in moving that want into reality. The more active stages include Action and Maintenance. Those in Action have begun the behavior change process. Key to their success is moving the change to Maintenance, where change takes place over time. [9,36]

    The review identified three different studies where the concepts of the Transtheoretical Model were applied in the methods’ design and patients’ assessment through the stages of the change [9,10,12,17].

    The Asthma Management Demonstration Project was developed to manage the following four asthma-related behaviors for asthma patients among employees and students of Western Michigan University: monitoring peak flow measurements, accessing asthma services, using prescription asthma medications properly, and managing environmental triggers [9]. Based on concepts of Transtheoretical Model, the project developed transactional questioning to stage their asthma patients according to their readiness to change their asthma-related behavior [9].

    The Web-based Puff City program has also applied concepts of Transtheoretical Model to motivate their patients to change three core asthma-related behaviors: controller medication adherence, rescue inhaler availability, and smoking cessation/reduction [10,12,17].

    Clinical Guidelines and Assessment Tools

    Overview

    In response to our secondary research question, we found that the application and employment of clinical guidelines and assessment tools were more abundant than theoretical frameworks across the reviewed interventions. The review identified 30 out of 85 interventions (35%) where at least one documented clinical guideline was applied. In total, there were six clinical guidelines applied across the 30 identified interventions as listed in Table 3.

    As such, the review identified 32 out of 85 interventions (38%) where at least one documented assessment tool was applied. In total, there were 21 assessment tools applied across the 32 identified interventions as listed in Table 4.

    This review found that many guidelines and assessment tools were broadly adopted by a relatively large number of interventions, for example, the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program referenced across 15 (of the 85) interventions [10-12,16-18,20-22,37-42], the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines referenced across 13 interventions [43-55], and the Asthma Control Questionnaire referenced across 11 interventions [19,20,44,49,56-62].

    Table 3. Applied clinical guidelines of the 85 reviewed Internet-based asthma interventions.
    Clinical guidelinesNumber of studiesCited interventions
    National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP)15[10-12,16-18,20-22,37-42]
    Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Guidelines13[43-55]
    British Guideline on the Management of Asthma1[54]
    Canadian Asthma Consensus Guidelines (CACG)1[63]
    International ERS/ATS Guidelines on Definition, Evaluation and Treatment of Severe Asthma1[54]
    Standards for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with COPD1[47]
    Table 4. Applied assessment tools of the 85 reviewed Internet-based asthma interventions.
    Assessment toolsNumber of studiesCited interventions
    Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)11[19,20,44,49,56-62]
    Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaires (AQLQ)9[19,44,48,50,59,62,64-66]
    Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ)8[43,50,52,53,57,61,67,68]
    Asthma Control Test (ACT)8[42,51-53,64,67-69]
    International Survey of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaire4[11,12,55,68]
    Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (ATAQ)3[49,57,60]
    Child Asthma Control Test (C-ACT)3[52,53,68]
    Mini Asthma Quality of Life (Mini AQLQ)3[56,58,63]
    Knowledge, Attitude and Self-Efficacy Asthma Questionnaire (KASE-AQ)2[58,60]
    Pediatric Asthma Caregivers Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ)2[52,53]
    The Asthma Life Quality Questionnaire (ALQ)2[56,64]
    The Consumer Asthma Knowledge Questionnaire and inhalation technique with the standardized checklist of the Dutch Asthma Foundation2[57,59]
    Air Quality Health Index (AQHI)1[63]
    Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma Questionnaire (ARIA)1[68]
    Asthma Behavior Checklist (ABC)1[25]
    Asthma Self-Regulatory Development Interview1[17]
    Children’s Health Survey for Asthma (CHSA) by the American Academy of Pediatrics1[70]
    Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI)1[25]
    Illness Management Survey (IMS)1[67]
    Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support1[11]
    The Royal College of Physicians’ “Three Key Questions”1[71]
    International Asthma Guidelines

    With the aim to employ an evidence base to reduce asthma prevalence, morbidity, and mortality, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) was launched in 1993 as a collaboration between the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institutes of Health, and the World Health Organization [72]. The GINA guidelines were referenced in 13 of the 85 reviewed interventions [43-55].

    Another example of internationally applied asthma guidelines is the International Survey of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaire. Established in 1991, the ISAAC guidelines aimed to investigate asthma in the pediatric population as a measure to control the increasing conditions on the global scale [73]. Items from the ISAAC guidelines were included in the Lung Health Survey in four of the reviewed interventions [11,12,55,68].

    National Asthma Guidelines

    In response to the increasing asthma challenges in the United States, the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) was initiated in March 1989 by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [74]. This review has shown that the NAEPP guidelines were the most referenced asthma guidelines across all reviewed interventions as they were implemented in the design of 15 out of the 85 reviewed interventions [10-12,16-18,20-22,37-42].

    This review identified a number of national clinical guidelines that were adopted and applied in a smaller number of interventions conducted at the national level, such as the British Guideline on the Management of Asthma [54], the Canadian Asthma Consensus Guidelines (CACG) [63], and the Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) in Canada, as well as the standardized checklist of the Dutch Asthma Foundation [57,59].

    Pediatric Asthma Guidelines

    In addition to the national and international guidelines, the review also identified a number of children-specific guidelines such as the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ) [43,50,52,53,57,61,67,68], International Survey of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaire [11,12,55,68], the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) [25], the Children’s Health Survey for Asthma (CHSA) by the American Academy of Pediatrics [70], and the Child Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) [52,53,68].

    Other Reviews

    A total of 14 other reviews of Internet- and electronic-based asthma interventions were identified. These reviews did not evaluate Internet-based asthma interventions with respect to the evidence base around the behavioral change theoretical frameworks, applied clinical guidelines, and assessment tools. However, the identified other reviews share similar discussions around main topics such as patients’ perception of Internet-based interventions, limitation of existing studies, and the effect of evolving Internet and mobile technologies on the relationship between asthma patients and their health care providers.

    Six of the 14 reviews indicated that Internet-based interventions were well-perceived by asthma patients and their usage was associated with promoting positive health behaviors among asthma patient groups [6,7,75-78]. On the other hand, a number of reviews reported that numerous studies for existing interventions were conducted on a small group of subjects for a limited, and often short, period of time resulting in mixed results with respect to controlling asthma symptoms and improving quality of life for asthma patients [1,7,79-81]. Last, four reviews shared concerns pertaining to the increased diffusion of Internet and mobile technologies into the delivery of care and to its impact on the clinician-patient relationship that could have negative effect on both patients and health care providers [1,7,79,80].


    Discussion

    Principal Findings

    In an attempt to answer the primary research question pertaining to the evidence base around the behavioral change, self-care, and self-management theoretical frameworks applied within the context of the reviewed Internet-based asthma interventions, the reviewers identified 17 out of 85 interventions (20%) where at least one model, framework, and/or construct of a behavioral change theory was applied. This implies that the majority of our reviewed interventions did not apply any documented behavioral change theory to inform their design. As such, this review found that only a limited number of behavioral change theories and models were referenced and applied across multiple studies.

    In total, the reviewers were able to identify 10 behavioral change theories and models that were applied across multiple (more than one) interventions versus 13 other theories and models that were only applied within the context of a single study and/or intervention.

    Compared to the applied theoretical frameworks, and in response to the secondary research question, the reviewers were able to report that the application and employment of clinical guidelines and assessment tools were more salient across the reviewed interventions. The review identified six clinical guidelines that were applied across 30 of the 85 interventions (35%) as well as a total of 21 assessment tools that were applied across 32 of the 85 interventions (38%).

    The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines were the most referenced asthma guidelines across all the reviewed interventions as they were implemented in the design of 15 out of the 85 reviewed interventions [10-12,16-18,20-22,37-42].

    Limitations

    This review has a number of limitations. First, the reviewers searched the literature in six major bibliographic databases between 2004 and October 2014 only; there may be other relative studies published in other databases. Second, the reviewers did not employ any theory or guidelines to evaluate the quality of each included and reviewed study. Thus, all reviewed studies are assumed to be of the same quality.

    Conclusions

    It was found that the majority of published interventions did not apply behavioral change theory, clinical guidelines, and/or assessment tools to inform their design. Further, it was found that the application of clinical guidelines and assessment tools were more salient across the reviewed interventions. A consequence, therefore, is that many Internet-based asthma interventions are designed in an ad hoc manner, without the use of any notable evidence-based theoretical frameworks, clinical guidelines, and/or assessment tools.

    Conflicts of Interest

    The editor/publisher of this journal (GE) is academic supervisor of the first author, but had no role in making any decisions regarding this paper, which was handled by an associate editor.

    1. McLean S, Chandler D, Nurmatov U, Liu J, Pagliari C, Car J, et al. Telehealthcare for asthma: a Cochrane review. CMAJ 2011 Aug 9;183(11):E733-E742 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. World Health Organization. 2013 Nov. Asthma fact sheet N°307   URL: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs307/en/ [accessed 2014-07-20] [WebCite Cache]
    3. Barnett SBL, Nurmagambetov TA. Costs of asthma in the United States: 2002-2007. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011 Jan;127(1):145-152 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Smetanin P, Stiff D, Briante C, Ahmad S, Wong L, Ler A. Life and economic impact of lung disease in Ontario: 2011 to 2041. RiskAnalytica, on behalf of the Ontario Lung Association 2011 [FREE Full text]
    5. Accordini S, Corsico AG, Braggion M, Gerbase MW, Gislason D, Gulsvik A, et al. The cost of persistent asthma in Europe: an international population-based study in adults. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2013;160(1):93-101. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Nickels A, Dimov V. Innovations in technology: social media and mobile technology in the care of adolescents with asthma. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2012 Dec;12(6):607-612. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Mosnaim GS, Powell LH, Rathkopf M. A review of published studies using interactive Internet tools or mobile devices to improve asthma knowledge or health outcomes. Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology 2012 Jun;25(2):55-63. [CrossRef]
    8. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Bethesda, MD: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US); 2007.
    9. Bensley RJ, Mercer N, Brusk JJ, Underhile R, Rivas J, Anderson J, et al. The eHealth Behavior Management Model: a stage-based approach to behavior change and management. Prev Chronic Dis 2004 Oct;1(4):A14 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    10. Joseph CLM, Havstad SL, Johnson D, Saltzgaber J, Peterson EL, Resnicow K, et al. Factors associated with nonresponse to a computer-tailored asthma management program for urban adolescents with asthma. J Asthma 2010 Aug;47(6):667-673 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Joseph CLM, Ownby DR, Havstad SL, Saltzgaber J, Considine S, Johnson D, Research team members. Evaluation of a web-based asthma management intervention program for urban teenagers: reaching the hard to reach. J Adolesc Health 2013 Apr;52(4):419-426 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Joseph CLM, Peterson E, Havstad S, Johnson CC, Hoerauf S, Stringer S, Asthma in Adolescents Research Team. A web-based, tailored asthma management program for urban African-American high school students. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007 May 1;175(9):888-895 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Shegog R, Bartholomew LK, Gold RS, Pierrel E, Parcel GS, Sockrider MM, et al. Asthma management simulation for children: translating theory, methods, and strategies to effect behavior change. Simul Healthc 2006;1(3):151-159. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Stewart M, Letourneau N, Masuda JR, Anderson S, McGhan S. Impacts of online peer support for children with asthma and allergies: "It just helps you every time you can't breathe well". J Pediatr Nurs 2013;28(5):439-452. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Wyatt TH, Hauenstein EJ. Pilot testing Okay With Asthma: an online asthma intervention for school-age children. J Sch Nurs 2008 Jun;24(3):145-150. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Wyatt TH, Li X, Huang Y, Farmer R, Reed D, Burkhart PV. Developing an interactive story for children with asthma. Nurs Clin North Am 2013 Jun;48(2):271-285. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Lu M, Ownby DR, Zoratti E, Roblin D, Johnson D, Johnson CC, et al. Improving efficiency and reducing costs: Design of an adaptive, seamless, and enriched pragmatic efficacy trial of an online asthma management program. Contemp Clin Trials 2014 May;38(1):19-27. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Hartmann CW, Sciamanna CN, Blanch DC, Mui S, Lawless H, Manocchia M, et al. A website to improve asthma care by suggesting patient questions for physicians: qualitative analysis of user experiences. J Med Internet Res 2007;9(1):e3 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. van Gaalen JL, Beerthuizen T, van der Meer V, van Reisen P, Redelijkheid GW, Snoeck-Stroband JB, et al. Long-term outcomes of internet-based self-management support in adults with asthma: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2013;15(9):e188 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Gustafson D, Wise M, Bhattacharya A, Pulvermacher A, Shanovich K, Phillips B, et al. The effects of combining Web-based eHealth with telephone nurse case management for pediatric asthma control: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2012;14(4):e101 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Meischke H, Lozano P, Zhou C, Garrison MM, Christakis D. Engagement in "My Child's Asthma", an interactive web-based pediatric asthma management intervention. Int J Med Inform 2011 Nov;80(11):765-774 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Haze KA, Lynaugh J. Building patient relationships: a smartphone application supporting communication between teenagers with asthma and the RN care coordinator. Comput Inform Nurs 2013 Jun;31(6):266-71; quiz 272. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Lin SP, Yang HY. Exploring key factors in the choice of e-health using an asthma care mobile service model. Telemed J E Health 2009 Nov;15(9):884-890. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Jeong HE, Arriaga RI. Using an ecological framework to design mobile technologies for pediatric asthma management. In: The 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services.: ACM; 2009 Sep Presented at: MobileHCI '09; 2009; Bonn, Germany. [CrossRef]
    25. Clarke SA, Calam R, Morawska A, Sanders M. Developing web-based Triple P 'Positive Parenting Programme' for families of children with asthma. Child Care Health Dev 2014 Jul;40(4):492-497. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Griffiths M. Video games and health: Video gaming is safe for most players and can be useful in health care. BMJ 2005;331(7509):122-123. [CrossRef]
    27. Sawyer B. From cells to cell processors: the integration of health and video games. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 2008 Dec;28(6):83-85. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Deterding S, Dixon D, Nacke LE, O'Hara K, Sicart M. Gamification: Using game design elements in non-gaming contexts. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2011 Presented at: CHI EA'11; 2011; Vancouver, BC   URL: http://gamification-research.org/chi2011/ [CrossRef]
    29. McCallum S. Gamification and serious games for personalized health. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012;177:85-96. [Medline]
    30. Said NS. An engaging multimedia design model. In: Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Interaction Design and Children: Building a Community. New York, NY: ACM; 2004 Presented at: IDC'04; June 1-3, 2004; Baltimore, MD p. 169. [CrossRef]
    31. Said N, Rahman S, Yassin SF. Revisiting an engaging experience to identify metacognitive strategies towards developing a multimedia design model. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies 2009;3(2):115-125.
    32. Baum A. The Health Belief Model. In: Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health, and Medicine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
    33. Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q 1988;15(2):175-183. [Medline]
    34. Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ, Glassman B. One size does not fit all: the case for tailoring print materials. Ann Behav Med 1999;21(4):276-283. [Medline]
    35. Kreuter MW, Skinner CS. Tailoring: what's in a name? Health Educ Res 2000 Feb;15(1):1-4 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    36. Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Fava JL, Norman GJ, Redding CA. Smoking cessation and stress management: applications of the Transtheoretical Model of behavior change. Homeostasis in Health and Disease 1998 Jul;38(5-6):216-233.
    37. Farzanfar R, Finkelstein J, Friedman RH. Testing the usability of two automated home-based patient-management systems. J Med Syst 2004 Apr;28(2):143-153. [Medline]
    38. Joshi A, Amelung P, Arora M, Finkelstein J. Clinical impact of home automated telemanagement in asthma. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005:1000 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    39. Lee HR, Yoo SK, Jung SM, Kwon NY, Hong CS. A Web-based mobile asthma management system. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11 Suppl 1:56-59. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Malone F, Callahan CW, Chan DS, Sheets S, Person DA. Caring for children with asthma through teleconsultation: "ECHO-Pac, The Electronic Children's Hospital of the Pacific". Telemed J E Health 2004;10(2):138-146. [Medline]
    41. Meltzer EO, Kelley N, Hovell MF. Randomized, cross-over evaluation of mobile phone vs paper diary in subjects with mild to moderate persistent asthma. Open Respir Med J 2008;2:72-79 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. Van SD, Magzamen S, Truelove S, Morrison T. Remote monitoring of inhaled bronchodilator use and weekly feedback about asthma management: an open-group, short-term pilot study of the impact on asthma control. PLoS One 2013;8(2):e55335 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Deschildre A, Béghin L, Salleron J, Iliescu C, Thumerelle C, Santos C, et al. Home telemonitoring (forced expiratory volume in 1 s) in children with severe asthma does not reduce exacerbations. Eur Respir J 2012 Feb;39(2):290-296 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Hashimoto S, Brinke AT, Roldaan AC, van Veen IH, Möller GM, Sont JK, et al. Internet-based tapering of oral corticosteroids in severe asthma: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Thorax 2011 Jun;66(6):514-520. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Hung SH, Tseng HC, Tsai WH, Lin HH, Cheng JH, Chang YM. Care for Asthma via Mobile Phone (CAMP). Stud Health Technol Inform 2007;126:137-143. [Medline]
    46. Jan RL, Wang JY, Huang MC, Tseng SM, Su HJ, Liu LF. An internet-based interactive telemonitoring system for improving childhood asthma outcomes in Taiwan. Telemed J E Health 2007 Jun;13(3):257-268. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Liu WT, Huang CD, Wang CH, Lee KY, Lin SM, Kuo HP. A mobile telephone-based interactive self-care system improves asthma control. Eur Respir J 2011 Feb;37(2):310-317 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    48. Rasmussen LM, Phanareth K, Nolte H, Backer V. Internet-based monitoring of asthma: a long-term, randomized clinical study of 300 asthmatic subjects. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005 Jun;115(6):1137-1142. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. van der Meer V, van Stel HF, Bakker MJ, Roldaan AC, Assendelft WJJ, Sterk PJ, SMASHING (Self-Management of Asthma Supported by Hospitals‚ ICT‚ Nurses and General practitioners) Study Group. Weekly self-monitoring and treatment adjustment benefit patients with partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma: an analysis of the SMASHING study. Respir Res 2010;11:74 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Willems Daniëlle CM, Joore MA, Hendriks JJE, Nieman FHM, Severens JL, Wouters EFM. The effectiveness of nurse-led telemonitoring of asthma: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Eval Clin Pract 2008 Aug;14(4):600-609. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Uysal MA, Mungan D, Yorgancioglu A, Yildiz F, Akgun M, Gemicioglu B, Study Group‚ Turkish Asthma Control Test (TACT)‚ Turkey. Asthma control test via text messaging: could it be a tool for evaluating asthma control? J Asthma 2013 Dec;50(10):1083-1089. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. Voorend-van BS, Vaessen-Verberne AA, Landstra AM, Brackel HJ, van den Berg NJ, Caudri D, et al. Monitoring childhood asthma: web-based diaries and the asthma control test. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014 Jun;133(6):1599-605.e2. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    53. Hofstede J, de Bie J, van Wijngaarden B, Heijmans M. Knowledge, use and attitude toward eHealth among patients with chronic lung diseases. Int J Med Inform 2014 Dec;83(12):967-974. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    54. Ram FS, McNaughton W. Giving Asthma Support to Patients (GASP): a novel online asthma education, monitoring, assessment and management tool. J Prim Health Care 2014;6(3):238-244. [Medline]
    55. Wanick Sarinho S, Menezes Júnior J, Gusmão C, Lyra NRS. Experience in the development of a mobile diagnosis support system for asthma: Intelimed. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2014 Feb;133(2):AB127-AB127. [CrossRef]
    56. Araújo L, Jacinto T, Moreira A, Castel-Branco MG, Delgado L, Costa-Pereira A, et al. Clinical efficacy of web-based versus standard asthma self-management. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2012;22(1):28-34 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    57. Rikkers-Mutsaerts ERVM, Winters AE, Bakker MJ, van Stel HF, van der Meer V, de Jongste JC, et al. Internet-based self-management compared with usual care in adolescents with asthma: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Pulmonol 2012 Dec;47(12):1170-1179. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    58. Ryan D, Price D, Musgrave SD, Malhotra S, Lee AJ, Ayansina D, et al. Clinical and cost effectiveness of mobile phone supported self monitoring of asthma: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2012;344:e1756 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    59. van der Meer V, Bakker MJ, van den Hout WB, Rabe KF, Sterk PJ, Kievit J, SMASHING (Self-Management in Asthma Supported by Hospitals‚ ICT‚ Nurses and General Practitioners) Study Group. Internet-based self-management plus education compared with usual care in asthma: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009 Jul 21;151(2):110-120. [Medline]
    60. van der Meer V, van Stel HF, Detmar SB, Otten W, Sterk PJ, Sont JK. Internet-based self-management offers an opportunity to achieve better asthma control in adolescents. Chest 2007 Jul;132(1):112-119. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    61. Vasbinder EC, Janssens HM, Rutten-van Mölken MPMH, van DL, de Winter BCM, de Groot RCA, e-MATIC Study Group. e-Monitoring of Asthma Therapy to Improve Compliance in children using a real-time medication monitoring system (RTMM): the e-MATIC study protocol. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013;13:38 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    62. Morrison D, Wyke S, Thomson NC, McConnachie A, Agur K, Saunderson K, et al. A Randomized trial of an Asthma Internet Self-management Intervention (RAISIN): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2014;15:185 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    63. Licskai C, Sands TW, Ferrone M. Development and pilot testing of a mobile health solution for asthma self-management: asthma action plan smartphone application pilot study. Can Respir J 2013 Aug;20(4):301-306 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    64. Cruz-Correia R, Fonseca J, Lima L, Araújo L, Delgado L, Castel-Branco MG, et al. Web-based or paper-based self-management tools for asthma--patients' opinions and quality of data in a randomized crossover study. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007;127:178-189. [Medline]
    65. Mayers I, Ohinmaa A, Vethanayagam D, Sharpe HM, O’Hara C, Majaesic C, et al. TThe virtual asthma clinic: Managing asthma patients online. Chest 2005 Oct 01;128(4_MeetingAbstracts):244S-244S. [CrossRef]
    66. Lin HC, Chiang LC, Wen TN, Yeh KW, Huang JL. Development of online diary and self-management system on e-Healthcare for asthmatic children in Taiwan. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2014 Oct;116(3):299-310. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    67. Mulvaney SA, Ho YX, Cala CM, Chen Q, Nian H, Patterson BL, et al. Assessing adolescent asthma symptoms and adherence using mobile phones. J Med Internet Res 2013;15(7):e141 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    68. Zomer-Kooijker K, van Erp FC, Balemans WAF, van Ewijk BE, van der Ent Cornelis K, Expert Network for Children with Respiratory and Allergic Symptoms. The expert network and electronic portal for children with respiratory and allergic symptoms: rationale and design. BMC Pediatr 2013;13:9 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    69. Burbank AJ, Hall-Barrow J, Denman RR, Lewis SD, Hewes M, Schellhase DE, et al. There's an app for that: A pilot and feasibility study of mobile-based asthma action plans. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2013 Feb;131(2):AB161-AB161. [CrossRef]
    70. Arnold RJ, Stingone JA, Claudio L. Computer-assisted school-based asthma management: a pilot study. JMIR Res Protoc 2012;1(2):e15 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    71. Cleland J, Caldow J, Ryan D. A qualitative study of the attitudes of patients and staff to the use of mobile phone technology for recording and gathering asthma data. J Telemed Telecare 2007;13(2):85-89. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    72. The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA).   URL: http://www.ginasthma.org/About-Us [accessed 2014-07-20] [WebCite Cache]
    73. The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood.   URL: http://isaac.auckland.ac.nz/ [accessed 2014-07-20] [WebCite Cache]
    74. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). 2013. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program   URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/about/naepp/ [accessed 2014-07-20] [WebCite Cache]
    75. Hieftje K, Edelman EJ, Camenga DR, Fiellin LE. Electronic media-based health interventions promoting behavior change in youth: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr 2013 Jun;167(6):574-580 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    76. Jaana M, Paré G, Sicotte C. Home telemonitoring for respiratory conditions: a systematic review. Am J Manag Care 2009 May;15(5):313-320 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    77. Van Gaalen JL, Hashimoto S, Sont JK. Telemanagement in asthma: an innovative and effective approach. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2012 Jun;12(3):235-240. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    78. Tran N, Coffman JM, Sumino K, Cabana MD. Patient reminder systems and asthma medication adherence: a systematic review. J Asthma 2014 Jun;51(5):536-543. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    79. García-Lizana F, Sarría-Santamera A. New technologies for chronic disease management and control: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2007;13(2):62-68. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    80. McLean S, Chandler D, Nurmatov U, Liu J, Pagliari C, Car J, et al. Telehealthcare for asthma: a Cochrane review. CMAJ 2011 Aug 9;183(11):E733-E742 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    81. Marcano Belisario JS, Huckvale K, Greenfield G, Car J, Gunn LH. Smartphone and tablet self management apps for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;11:CD010013. [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    ABC: Asthma Behavior Checklist
    ACQ: Asthma Control Questionnaire
    ACT: Asthma Control Test
    ALQ: Asthma Life Quality Questionnaire
    AQHI: Air Quality Health Index
    AQLQ: Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaires
    ATAQ: Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire
    CACG: Canadian Asthma Consensus Guidelines
    C-ACT: Child Asthma Control Test
    CHSA: Children’s Health Survey for Asthma
    COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    ECBI: Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory
    eHealth: electronic health
    EHR: electronic health records
    EMR: electronic medical records
    GINA: Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines
    HIS: hospital information system
    IMS: Illness Management Survey
    ISAAC: International Survey of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood questionnaire
    KASE-AQ: Knowledge, Attitude and Self-Efficacy Asthma Questionnaire
    Mini AQLQ: Mini Asthma Quality of Life
    NAEPP: National Asthma Education and Prevention Program
    NHLBI EP3: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Expert Panel Report 3
    NHLBI: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
    PAQLQ: Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire
    SMS: short message service
    UX: user experience
    WDTA: Watch-Discover-Think-Act
    WHO: World Health Organization

    Edited by H Potts; submitted 08.12.14; peer-reviewed by J Fonseca, K Stawarz; comments to author 31.12.14; revised version received 09.02.15; accepted 09.03.15; published 02.04.15

    Copyright

    ©Mustafa Al-Durra, Monika-Bianca Torio, Joseph A Cafazzo. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 02.04.2015.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.