This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Letters to the Editor (39) Artificial Intelligence (1198) Chatbots and Conversational Agents (463) Generative Language Models Including ChatGPT (206) Digital Science, Open Science (70)

Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/50844, first published .
AI Is Changing the Landscape of Academic Writing: What Can Be Done? Authors’ Reply to: AI Increases the Pressure to Overhaul the Scientific Peer Review Process. Comment on “Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened”

AI Is Changing the Landscape of Academic Writing: What Can Be Done? Authors’ Reply to: AI Increases the Pressure to Overhaul the Scientific Peer Review Process. Comment on “Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened”

AI Is Changing the Landscape of Academic Writing: What Can Be Done? Authors’ Reply to: AI Increases the Pressure to Overhaul the Scientific Peer Review Process. Comment on “Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened”

Authors of this article:

Martin Májovský1 Author Orcid Image ;   Tomas Mikolov2 Author Orcid Image ;   David Netuka1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (1) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Kim H, Yang J, Chang D, Lenke L, Pizones J, Castelein R, Watanabe K, Trobisch P, Mundis Jr G, Suh S, Suk S. Assessing the Reproducibility of the Structured Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT and Bard Compared to Human-Written Abstracts in the Field of Spine Surgery: Comparative Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e52001 View