This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Commentary (12) Chatbots and Conversational Agents (463) Artificial Intelligence (1198) Epublishing and Open Access (80) Digital Science, Open Science (70) Generative Language Models Including ChatGPT (206)

Published on in Vol 25 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/49323, first published .
Open Science and Software Assistance: Commentary on “Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened”

Open Science and Software Assistance: Commentary on “Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened”

Open Science and Software Assistance: Commentary on “Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened”

Authors of this article:

Pedro L Ballester1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (2) Tweetations (25) Metrics

Journals

  1. Liu N, Brown A. AI Increases the Pressure to Overhaul the Scientific Peer Review Process. Comment on “Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened”. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e50591 View
  2. Coraci D, Maccarone M, Regazzo G, Accordi G, Papathanasiou J, Masiero S. ChatGPT in the development of medical questionnaires. The example of the low back pain. European Journal of Translational Myology 2023 View