This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Telehealth and Telemonitoring (1566) Clinical Communication, Electronic Consultation and Telehealth (549)

Published on in Vol 19, No 12 (2017): December

The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients

The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients

The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients

Authors of this article:

Kiek Tates1 Author Orcid Image ;   Marjolijn L Antheunis1 Author Orcid Image ;   Saskia Kanters1 Author Orcid Image ;   Theodoor E Nieboer2 Author Orcid Image ;   Maria BE Gerritse2, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (69) Tweetations (94) Metrics

Journals

  1. Shaw S, Cameron D, Wherton J, Seuren L, Vijayaraghavan S, Bhattacharya S, A’Court C, Morris J, Greenhalgh T. Technology-Enhanced Consultations in Diabetes, Cancer, and Heart Failure: Protocol for the Qualitative Analysis of Remote Consultations (QuARC) Project. JMIR Research Protocols 2018;7(7):e10913 View
  2. Escura Sancho S, Ros Cerro C, Anglès-Acedo S, Bataller Sánchez E, Espuña-Pons M. Cómo la pandemia por COVID-19 ha cambiado la forma de atender a las pacientes en una unidad de uroginecología. Clínica e Investigación en Ginecología y Obstetricia 2020;47(3):111 View
  3. Chérrez-Ojeda I, Felix M, Mata V, Vanegas E, Simancas-Racines D, Aguilar M, Gavilanes A, Chedraui P, Vera C. Use and Perceptions of Information and Communication Technologies Among Ecuadorian Nurses: A Cross-sectional Study. The Open Nursing Journal 2020;14(1):8 View
  4. Chérrez-Ojeda I, Felix M, Mata V, Vanegas E, Simancas-Racines D, Aguilar M, Gavilanes A, Chedraui P, Vera C. Use and Perceptions of Information and Communication Technologies Among Ecuadorian Nurses: A Cross-sectional Study. The Open Nursing Journal 2020;14(1):8 View
  5. Melchiorre M, Lamura G, Barbabella F, MacLure K. eHealth for people with multimorbidity: Results from the ICARE4EU project and insights from the “10 e’s” by Gunther Eysenbach. PLOS ONE 2018;13(11):e0207292 View
  6. Cao B, Zhao P, Bien-Gund C, Tang W, Ong J, Fitzpatrick T, Tucker J, Luo Z. The Web-Based Physician is Ready to See You: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of Physicians Using a Mobile Medical App to Evaluate Patients With Sexually Transmitted Diseases in China. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(10):e10531 View
  7. Wattanapisit A, Teo C, Wattanapisit S, Teoh E, Woo W, Ng C. Can mobile health apps replace GPs? A scoping review of comparisons between mobile apps and GP tasks. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2020;20(1) View
  8. Trabjerg T, Jensen L, Sondergaard J, Trabjerg N, Sisler J, Hansen D. Investigating whether shared video-based consultations with patients, oncologists, and GPs can benefit patient-centred cancer care: a qualitative study. BJGP Open 2020;4(2):bjgpopen20X101023 View
  9. Barsom E, Jansen M, Tanis P, van de Ven A, Blussé van Oud-Alblas M, Buskens C, Bemelman W, Schijven M. Video consultation during follow up care: effect on quality of care and patient- and provider attitude in patients with colorectal cancer. Surgical Endoscopy 2021;35(3):1278 View
  10. Knapton K. The future of physiotherapy. British Journal of Community Nursing 2019;24(5):236 View
  11. Plevinsky J, Young M, Carmody J, Durkin L, Gamwell K, Klages K, Ghosh S, Hommel K. The Impact of COVID-19 on Pediatric Adherence and Self-Management. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2020;45(9):977 View
  12. Cernadas Ramos A, Bouzas-Lorenzo R, Mesa del Olmo A, Barral Buceta B. Opinión de los facultativos y usuarios sobre avances de la e-salud en atención primaria. Atención Primaria 2020;52(6):389 View
  13. Mirzaei T, Kashian N. Revisiting Effective Communication Between Patients and Physicians: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study Comparing Text-Based Electronic Versus Face-to-Face Communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(5):e16965 View
  14. Grimes C, Balk E, Crisp C, Antosh D, Murphy M, Halder G, Jeppson P, Weber LeBrun E, Raman S, Kim-Fine S, Iglesia C, Dieter A, Yurteri-Kaplan L, Adam G, Meriwether K. A guide for urogynecologic patient care utilizing telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: review of existing evidence. International Urogynecology Journal 2020;31(6):1063 View
  15. Tretyakov K. Medical Aid In Dying And Telemedicine: Improving Access And Protecting Patients. SSRN Electronic Journal 2018 View
  16. Lucivero F, Jongsma K. A mobile revolution for healthcare? Setting the agenda for bioethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 2018;44(10):685 View
  17. Liu X, Jiang S, Sun M, Chi X. Examining Patterns of Information Exchange and Social Support in a Web-Based Health Community: Exponential Random Graph Models. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(9):e18062 View
  18. Nibali L, Ide M, Ng D, Buontempo Z, Clayton Y, Asimakopoulou K. The perceived impact of Covid-19 on periodontal practice in the United Kingdom: A questionnaire study. Journal of Dentistry 2020;102:103481 View
  19. Rigamonti L, Albrecht U, Lutter C, Tempel M, Wolfarth B, Back D. Potentials of Digitalization in Sports Medicine: A Narrative Review. Current Sports Medicine Reports 2020;19(4):157 View
  20. Henoch I, Strang S, Larnebratt C, Hermansson J. Digital health support – a good thing, but not for me: experiences of family caregivers and healthcare staff. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling 2023;51(1):150 View
  21. Liu J, Gao L. Analysis of topics and characteristics of user reviews on different online psychological counseling methods. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2021;147:104367 View
  22. Mueller M, Knop M, Niehaves B, Adarkwah C. Investigating the Acceptance of Video Consultation by Patients in Rural Primary Care: Empirical Comparison of Preusers and Actual Users. JMIR Medical Informatics 2020;8(10):e20813 View
  23. Pettit M, Shukla S, Zhang J, Sunil Kumar K, Khanduja V. Virtual exams: has COVID-19 provided the impetus to change assessment methods in medicine?. Bone & Joint Open 2021;2(2):111 View
  24. Veldhuizen I, Schroen E, Lee E, Kurtansky N, Dusza S, van der Hulst R, Pusic A, Hoogbergen M. Sun Protection Behavior Following Skin Cancer Resection and Reconstruction. Journal of Cancer Education 2022;37(5):1401 View
  25. Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, Scott W, Park C, Christopoulos G, Vogel S, Draper-Rodi J. Remote management of musculoskeletal pain: a pragmatic approach to the implementation of video and phone consultations in musculoskeletal practice. PAIN Reports 2020;5(6):e878 View
  26. Ali S, Majlöf A, Fedorów K. Mobile health and telemedicine on the forefront of psychiatry: expanding care and increasing safety. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine 2023;40(2):308 View
  27. Du L, Xu J, Chen X, Zhu X, Zhang Y, Wu R, Ji H, Zhou L. Rebuild doctor–patient trust in medical service delivery in China. Scientific Reports 2020;10(1) View
  28. Murugesu S, Galazis N, Jones B, Chan M, Bracewell-Milnes T, Ahmed-Salim Y, Grewal K, Timmerman D, Yazbek J, Bourne T, Saso S. Evaluating the use of telemedicine in gynaecological practice: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2020;10(12):e039457 View
  29. Pooni R, Pageler N, Sandborg C, Lee T. Pediatric subspecialty telemedicine use from the patient and provider perspective. Pediatric Research 2022;91(1):241 View
  30. Imam S, Karanasios G, Khatib M, Cavale N, Amar O, Mayou B. Resumption of Cosmetic Surgery During COVID – Experience of a Specialised Cosmetic Surgery Day-case Hospital. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 2021;74(11):3178 View
  31. Parker K, Chia M. Patient and clinician satisfaction with video consultations in dentistry - part one: patient satisfaction. British Dental Journal 2021 View
  32. Chae W, Choi D, Park E, Jang S. Improved Inpatient Care through Greater Patient–Doctor Contact under the Hospitalist Management Approach: A Real-Time Assessment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(11):5718 View
  33. Hartasanchez S, Heen A, Kunneman M, García-Bautista A, Hargraves I, Prokop L, May C, Montori V. Remote shared decision making through telemedicine: A systematic review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling 2022;105(2):356 View
  34. Chartash D, Sharifi M, Emerson B, Frank R, Schoenfeld E, Tanner J, Brandt C, Taylor R. Documentation of Shared Decisionmaking in the Emergency Department. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2021;78(5):637 View
  35. Engeltjes B, Rosman A, Bertens L, Wouters E, Cronie D, Scheele F. Reliability of Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 2021;Volume 14:3247 View
  36. Menhadji P, Patel R, Asimakopoulou K, Quinn B, Khoshkhounejad G, Pasha P, Garcia Sanchez R, Ide M, Kalsi P, Nibali L. Patients’ and dentists’ perceptions of tele-dentistry at the time of COVID-19. A questionnaire-based study. Journal of Dentistry 2021;113:103782 View
  37. Toaff M, Grimes C. Telemedicine in Urogynecology. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 2021;48(3):487 View
  38. Leow J, Lin K, Chew L. Patient satisfaction and behavioural intention in using the home medication delivery service in an ambulatory oncology centre. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice 2023;29(1):22 View
  39. Griffeth J, Shroff B, Carrico C, Cook P, Lindauer S. Patient perspectives on teledentistry and face-to-face doctor interaction during orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2023;163(3):328 View
  40. Das D, Kenton K, Mueller M, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Collins S, Bretschneider C, Geynisman-Tan J. Patient Satisfaction With Telehealth Visits for New Patient Appointments for Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Randomized Trial of Telehealth Versus Standard In-Person Office Visits. Urogynecology 2023;29(2):273 View
  41. Ghosh S, Chakraborty S, Gupta N, Basu S. What ails physician review websites? A study of information needs of patients. Decision Support Systems 2023;166:113897 View
  42. Kim Y, Ortega M, Acker R, Valentine K, Ayati E, Von Bargen E. Synchronous Telemedicine Model in Urogynecology: Are Patients Willing to Continue Telemedicine in the Post–COVID-19 Pandemic Era?. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery 2022;Publish Ahead of Print View
  43. Mehta U, Basavaraju R, Ramesh A, Kesavan M, Thirthalli J. Motor Resonance During Action Observation and Its Relevance to Virtual Clinical Consultations: Observational Study Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. JMIR Mental Health 2022;9(10):e40652 View
  44. Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, Scott W, Park C, Christopoulos G, Vogel S, Draper-Rodi J. Telemedizinisches Schmerzmanagement von muskuloskeletalem Schmerz. Der Schmerz 2023;37(5):360 View
  45. Zimbile F, David S, Daemen M, Goossens A, Creemers J, Crutzen R. Introducing video consultations at public sexual health clinics in the Netherlands: a mixed-methods study. Health Promotion International 2022;37(5) View
  46. Chung C, Wong D. Telemedicine in urogynaecology during COVID‐19 in Hong Kong: An assessment of Chinese patients’ acceptability using a validated questionnaire. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2022;62(3):426 View
  47. Gavurova B, Dvorsky J, Popesko B. Patient Satisfaction Determinants of Inpatient Healthcare. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(21):11337 View
  48. Rowe S, Paratz E, Fahy L, Prior D, MacIsaac A. Telehealth in Australian cardiology: insight into factors predicting the use of telephone versus video during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Internal Medicine Journal 2021;51(8):1229 View
  49. Carbajo Martín L, Martín Álvarez R, Astier Peña M, Rotaeche del Campo R, Navarro Pérez J, Párraga Martínez I. Descripción de la implantación y grado de desarrollo de tecnología de comunicación e informática de los equipos de Atención Primaria en los servicios autonómicos de salud en España. Revista Clínica de Medicina de Familia 2021 View
  50. Giacomin M, Brinton C, Rule N. Narcissistic individuals exhibit poor recognition memory. Journal of Personality 2022;90(5):675 View
  51. Dao A, Dunivan G. Patient-Centered Goals for Treatment of Pelvic Floor Disorders. Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports 2022;17(4):210 View
  52. Heath M, Appan R, Henry R. Value alignment's role in mitigating resistance to IT use: The case of physicians'resistance to electronic health record systems. Information & Management 2022;59(8):103702 View
  53. Lynnerup C, Nørreslet M, Graabæk T. Attitudes towards video communication for New Medicine Service at community pharmacies – A qualitative pilot study. Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy 2022;5:100103 View
  54. Engeltjes B, van Herk N, Visser M, van Wijk A, Cronie D, Rosman A, Scheele F, Wouters E. Patients’ experiences with an obstetric telephone triage system: A qualitative study. Patient Education and Counseling 2023;108:107610 View
  55. Hundal J, Bade K, Hsu E, Chhabra J, Menendez A. Defining the Current Landscape, Attitudes, and Perceived Barriers of Virtual Medicine in Underserved Populations. JCO Oncology Practice 2022;18(12):e1987 View
  56. Dufour S, Clancy A, Wu M. Technical Update No. 433: eHealth Solutions for Urinary Incontinence Among Women. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2023;45(2):150 View
  57. Bol N, Antheunis M. Skype or Skip? Causes and Consequences of Intimate Self-Disclosure in Computer-Mediated Doctor-Patient Communication. Media Psychology 2022;25(5):706 View
  58. Dufour S, Clancy A, Wu M. Mise à jour technique No 433 : Cybersanté et incontinence urinaire chez la femme. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2023;45(2):160 View
  59. Qi M, Cui J, Li X, Han Y. Influence of E-consultation on the Intention of First-Visit Patients to Select Medical Services: Results of a Scenario Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e40993 View
  60. Ding S. Integrative medicine for pelvic floor disorders: A conceptual framework. Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine 2023;3(3):140 View
  61. Hamad N, Folorunsho E. Simulated Participants' Experiences and Challenges With Online and Face-to-Face Interactions During COVID-19. Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare 2023 View
  62. Tenfelde K, Bol N, Schoonman G, Bunt J, Antheunis M. Exploring the impact of patient, physician and technology factors on patient video consultation satisfaction. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View
  63. Mazouri-Karker S, Braillard O, Lüchinger R, Bajwa N, Achab S, Hudelson P, Dao M, Junod-Perron N. Patients preferences for communication during video consultations. Patient Education and Counseling 2023;115:107894 View
  64. Gerritse M, de Swart E, de Vries M, Kluivers K. Identifying Womens' Needs in Making a Treatment Decision for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Qualitative Study. Women's Health Reports 2023;4(1):358 View
  65. Tseng Y, Jarupreechachan W, Lee T. Understanding the Benefits and Design of Chatbots to Meet the Healthcare Needs of Migrant Workers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2023;7(CSCW2):1 View
  66. Xu S, Ware D, Plankey M. Computer-mediated Communication and Healthcare Satisfaction among Middle-aged Men Living with or without HIV. Georgetown Medical Review 2024;8(1) View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Szauter K. Clinical Simulation. View
  2. Miller D, Patel M, Makhni E. Quality Improvement and Patient Safety in Orthopaedic Surgery. View