This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Public (e)Health, Digital Epidemiology and Public Health Informatics (636) Formative Studies and eHealth/mHealth Development (515) Aging in Place (226)

Published on in Vol 18, No 5 (2016): May

What it Takes to Successfully Implement Technology for Aging in Place: Focus Groups With Stakeholders

What it Takes to Successfully Implement Technology for Aging in Place: Focus Groups With Stakeholders

What it Takes to Successfully Implement Technology for Aging in Place: Focus Groups With Stakeholders

Authors of this article:

Sebastiaan Theodorus Michaël Peek1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Eveline JM Wouters1 Author Orcid Image ;   Katrien G Luijkx2 Author Orcid Image ;   Hubertus JM Vrijhoef2, 3, 4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (100) Tweetations (19) Metrics

Journals

  1. Leung R. Increasing the Impact of JMIR Journals in the Attention Economy. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(10):e16172 View
  2. Koon L, Remillard E, Mitzner T, Rogers W. Aging Concerns, Challenges, and Everyday Solution Strategies (ACCESS) for adults aging with a long-term mobility disability. Disability and Health Journal 2020;13(4):100936 View
  3. LoBuono D, Leedahl S, Maiocco E. Teaching Technology to Older Adults: Modalities Used by Student Mentors and Reasons for Continued Program Participation. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 2020;46(1):14 View
  4. Kwan Chan C, Lei J. Contracting social services in China: The case of the Integrated Family Services Centres in Guangzhou. International Social Work 2017;60(6):1343 View
  5. Hallewell Haslwanter J, Neureiter K, Garschall M. User-centered design in AAL. Universal Access in the Information Society 2020;19(1):57 View
  6. Cabrita M, Tabak M, Vollenbroek-Hutten M. Older Adults’ Attitudes Toward Ambulatory Technology to Support Monitoring and Coaching of Healthy Behaviors: Qualitative Study. JMIR Aging 2019;2(1):e10476 View
  7. Koch M, Stolee P, MacNeil M, Elliott J, Morita P, Kuspinar A, Juzwishin D. Innovation processes for ageing-related health technologies. Healthcare Management Forum 2021;34(1):34 View
  8. Guo C, Ashrafian H, Ghafur S, Fontana G, Gardner C, Prime M. Challenges for the evaluation of digital health solutions—A call for innovative evidence generation approaches. npj Digital Medicine 2020;3(1) View
  9. Lee Y, Lee P, Ng C, Teo C, Abu Bakar A, Abdullah K, Khoo E, Hanafi N, Low W, Chiew T. Usability and utility evaluation of the web-based “Should I Start Insulin?” patient decision aid for patients with type 2 diabetes among older people. Informatics for Health and Social Care 2018;43(1):73 View
  10. Abdi S, de Witte L, Hawley M. Emerging Technologies With Potential Care and Support Applications for Older People: Review of Gray Literature. JMIR Aging 2020;3(2):e17286 View
  11. Chadborn N, Blair K, Creswick H, Hughes N, Dowthwaite L, Adenekan O, Pérez Vallejos E. Citizens’ Juries: When Older Adults Deliberate on the Benefits and Risks of Smart Health and Smart Homes. Healthcare 2019;7(2):54 View
  12. Gjestsen M, Wiig S, Testad I. Health Care Personnel’s Perspective on Potential Electronic Health Interventions to Prevent Hospitalizations for Older Persons Receiving Community Care: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(1):e12797 View
  13. Daniele K, Marcucci M, Cattaneo C, Borghese N, Zannini L. How Prefrail Older People Living Alone Perceive Information and Communications Technology and What They Would Ask a Robot for: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(8):e13228 View
  14. Brauner P, Ziefle M. Serious Motion-Based Exercise Games for Older Adults: Evaluation of Usability, Performance, and Pain Mitigation. JMIR Serious Games 2020;8(2):e14182 View
  15. Wenyi L. Involvement of Social Workers in the Community Service Provision System for the Older People in Urban China. Australian Social Work 2021;74(4):448 View
  16. Chen S, Liu C, Wang Z, McAdam R, Brennan M, Davey S, Cheng T. How Geographical Isolation and Aging in Place Can Be Accommodated Through Connected Health Stakeholder Management: Qualitative Study With Focus Groups. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(5):e15976 View
  17. Nakrem S, Solbjør M, Pettersen I, Kleiven H. Care relationships at stake? Home healthcare professionals’ experiences with digital medicine dispensers – a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 2018;18(1) View
  18. Kim H, Kelly S, Lafortune L, Brayne C, Heyn P. A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging. The Gerontologist 2021;61(7):e345 View
  19. van Doorn-van Atten M, de Groot L, Romea A, Schwartz S, de Vries J, Haveman-Nies A. Implementation of a multicomponent telemonitoring intervention to improve nutritional status of community-dwelling older adults: a process evaluation. Public Health Nutrition 2019;22(2):363 View
  20. Newbury R, Lape J. Well-being, Aging in Place, and Use of the Kawa Model: A Pilot Study. Annals of International Occupational Therapy 2021;4(1):15 View
  21. El Morr C, AlHamzah M, Ng P, Purewal A, Al-Omran M. Knowledge of peripheral arterial disease: Results of an intervention to measure and improve PAD knowledge in Toronto. Vascular 2017;25(5):479 View
  22. van Lieshout F, Yang R, Stamenova V, Agarwal P, Cornejo Palma D, Sidhu A, Engel K, Erwood A, Bhatia R, Bhattacharyya O, Shaw J. Evaluating the Implementation of a Remote-Monitoring Program for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Qualitative Methods from a Service Design Perspective. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(10):e18148 View
  23. van Boekel L, Wouters E, Grimberg B, van der Meer N, Luijkx K. Perspectives of Stakeholders on Technology Use in the Care of Community-Living Older Adults with Dementia: A Systematic Literature Review. Healthcare 2019;7(2):73 View
  24. Teles S, de Sousa R, Abrantes D, Bertel D, Ferreira A, Paúl C. Bridging the gap between technology and older adults: insights from a collaborative workshop on R&D methodologies for ambient assisted living solutions. Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments 2019;5(4):195 View
  25. Wang S, Bolling K, Mao W, Reichstadt J, Jeste D, Kim H, Nebeker C. Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives. Healthcare 2019;7(2):60 View
  26. Chang F, Eriksson A, Östlund B. Discrepancies between Expected and Actual Implementation: The Process Evaluation of PERS Integration in Nursing Homes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(12):4245 View
  27. Ford C. Professional associations can nurture interdisciplinary partnerships to better serve rural-dwelling older adults. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults 2018;19(4):298 View
  28. Balenzano C. Promoting family well‐being and social cohesion: The networking and relational approach of an innovative welfare service in the Italian context. Child & Family Social Work 2021;26(1):100 View
  29. Garvelink M, Jones C, Archambault P, Roy N, Blair L, Légaré F. Deciding How to Stay Independent at Home in Later Years: Development and Acceptability Testing of an Informative Web-Based Module. JMIR Human Factors 2017;4(4):e32 View
  30. Zotti F, Pappalardo D, Capocasale G, Sboarina A, Bertossi D, Albanese M. <p>Aesthetic Dentistry, How You Say and How You See: A 500-People Survey on Digital Preview and Color Perception</p>. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry 2020;Volume 12:377 View
  31. Cohen C, Kampel T, Verloo H. Acceptability Among Community Healthcare Nurses of Intelligent Wireless Sensor-system Technology for the Rapid Detection of Health Issues in Home-dwelling Older Adults. The Open Nursing Journal 2017;11(1):54 View
  32. Hallewell Haslwanter J, Fitzpatrick G. The Development of Assistive Systems to Support Older People: Issues that Affect Success in Practice. Technologies 2017;6(1):2 View
  33. van Hoof J, Bennetts H, Hansen A, Kazak J, Soebarto V. The Living Environment and Thermal Behaviours of Older South Australians: A Multi-Focus Group Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019;16(6):935 View
  34. Christie H, Schichel M, Tange H, Veenstra M, Verhey F, de Vugt M. Perspectives From Municipality Officials on the Adoption, Dissemination, and Implementation of Electronic Health Interventions to Support Caregivers of People With Dementia: Inductive Thematic Analysis. JMIR Aging 2020;3(1):e17255 View
  35. Vadillo L, Martín-Ruiz M, Pau I, Conde R, Valero M. A Smart Telecare System at Digital Home: Perceived Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Expectations for Healthcare Professionals. Journal of Sensors 2017;2017:1 View
  36. Dalmer N. A logic of choice: Problematizing the documentary reality of Canadian aging in place policies. Journal of Aging Studies 2019;48:40 View
  37. Luijkx K, van Boekel L, Janssen M, Verbiest M, Stoop A. The Academic Collaborative Center Older Adults: A Description of Co-Creation between Science, Care Practice and Education with the Aim to Contribute to Person-Centered Care for Older Adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(23):9014 View
  38. Forsberg E, Thorstensen E, Dias Casagrande F, Holthe T, Halvorsrud L, Lund A, Zouganeli E. Is RRI a new R&I logic? A reflection from an integrated RRI project. Journal of Responsible Technology 2021;5:100007 View
  39. Willard S, van Rossum E, Spreeuwenberg M, de Witte L. Perceived Impact of an Online Community Care Platform for Dutch Older Adults on Local Participation, Informal Caregiving, and Feelings of Connectedness: Pretest-Posttest Observational Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(12):e20304 View
  40. Vergouw J, Smits-Pelser H, Kars M, van Houwelingen T, van Os-Medendorp H, Kort H, Bleijenberg N. Needs, barriers and facilitators of older adults towards eHealth in general practice: a qualitative study. Primary Health Care Research & Development 2020;21 View
  41. Bellandi V, Ceravolo P, Cristiano A, Damiani E, Sanna A, Trojaniello D. A design methodology for matching smart health requirements. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 2021;33(22) View
  42. Eriksson-Backa K, Hirvonen N, Enwald H, Huvila I. Enablers for and barriers to using My Kanta – A focus group study of older adults’ perceptions of the National Electronic Health Record in Finland. Informatics for Health and Social Care 2021;46(4):399 View
  43. Wrede C, Braakman-Jansen A, van Gemert-Pijnen L. Requirements for Unobtrusive Monitoring to Support Home-Based Dementia Care: Qualitative Study Among Formal and Informal Caregivers. JMIR Aging 2021;4(2):e26875 View
  44. Ng P, Nicholas S, Wee S, Yau T, Chan A, Chng I, Yap L, Ng T. Implementation and effectiveness of a multi-domain program for older adults at risk of cognitive impairment at neighborhood senior centres. Scientific Reports 2021;11(1) View
  45. Meng F, Song F, Guo M, Wang F, Feng X, Wang D, Xu L. Status and Influential Factors of Intelligent Healthcare in Nursing Homes in China. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2021;39(5):265 View
  46. Cuesta M, German Millberg L, Karlsson S, Arvidsson S. Welfare technology, ethics and well-being a qualitative study about the implementation of welfare technology within areas of social services in a Swedish municipality. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 2020;15(sup1):1835138 View
  47. Zander V, Gustafsson C, Landerdahl Stridsberg S, Borg J. Implementation of welfare technology: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2023;18(6):913 View
  48. Haan M, Brankaert R, Kenning G, Lu Y. Creating a Social Learning Environment for and by Older Adults in the Use and Adoption of Smartphone Technology to Age in Place. Frontiers in Public Health 2021;9 View
  49. Pirzada P, Wilde A, Doherty G, Harris-Birtill D. Ethics and acceptance of smart homes for older adults. Informatics for Health and Social Care 2022;47(1):10 View
  50. Li F, Lu Y. ENGAGING END USERS IN AN AI-ENABLED SMART SERVICE DESIGN - THE APPLICATION OF THE SMART SERVICE BLUEPRINT SCAPE (SSBS) FRAMEWORK. Proceedings of the Design Society 2021;1:1363 View
  51. Tessarolo F, Petsani D, Conotter V, Nollo G, Conti G, Nikolaidou M, Onorati G, Bamidis P, Konstantinidis E. Developing ambient assisted living technologies exploiting potential of user-centred co-creation and agile methodology: the CAPTAIN project experience. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 2024;15(5):2661 View
  52. Cristiano A, Musteata S, De Silvestri S, Bellandi V, Ceravolo P, Cesari M, Azzolino D, Sanna A, Trojaniello D. Older Adults’ and Clinicians’ Perspectives on a Smart Health Platform for the Aging Population: Design and Evaluation Study. JMIR Aging 2022;5(1):e29623 View
  53. Tirado-Morueta R, Rodríguez-Martín A, Álvarez-Arregui E, Ortíz-Sobrino M, Aguaded-Gómez J. The digital inclusion of older people in Spain: technological support services for seniors as predictor. Ageing and Society 2023;43(6):1409 View
  54. ARICI A, BAYRAM M. YAŞLILIKTA DİJİTAL ÇAĞI YAKALAMAK. Ufkun Ötesi Bilim Dergisi 2021;21(2):367 View
  55. Puaschitz N, Jacobsen F, Mannseth J, Angeles R, Berge L, Gedde M, Husebo B. Factors associated with access to assistive technology and telecare in home-dwelling people with dementia: baseline data from the LIVE@Home.Path trial. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2021;21(1) View
  56. Dequanter S, Steenhout I, Fobelets M, Gagnon M, Sasseville M, Bourbonnais A, Giguère A, Ndiaye M, Lambert A, Gorus E, Buyl R. Technology implementation in care practices for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive decline: Perspectives of professional caregivers in Quebec and Brussels. DIGITAL HEALTH 2022;8:205520762211396 View
  57. Mathijssen E, de Lange W, Bleijenberg N, van Houwelingen T, Jaarsma T, Trappenburg J, Westland H. Factors That Influence the Use of eHealth in Home Care: Scoping Review and Cross-sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e41768 View
  58. Kong D, Liu S, Hong Y, Chen K, Luo Y. Perspectives on the popularization of smart senior care to meet the demands of older adults living alone in communities of Southwest China: A qualitative study. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;11 View
  59. Bin Noon G, Hanjahanja-Phiri T, Dave H, Fadrique L, Teague J, Morita P. Exploring the Role of Active Assisted Living in the Continuum of Care for Older Adults: Thematic Analysis. JMIR Aging 2023;6:e40606 View
  60. Appel L, Lewis S, Kisonas E, Recknagel J. VRCHIVE: experiences conducting an online workshop teaching intergenerational participants to create virtual reality films about their lives during the COVID pandemic. Educational Gerontology 2022;48(7):305 View
  61. Li R, Shi M, Abankwa D, Xu Y, Richter A, Ng K, Song L. Exploring the Market Requirements for Smart and Traditional Ageing Housing Units: A Mixed Methods Approach. Smart Cities 2022;5(4):1752 View
  62. Liljeroos M, Arkkukangas M. Implementation of Telemonitoring in Health Care: Facilitators and Barriers for Using eHealth for Older Adults with Chronic Conditions. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 2023;Volume 16:43 View
  63. Wrede C, Braakman-Jansen A, van Gemert-Pijnen L. How to create value with unobtrusive monitoring technology in home-based dementia care: a multimethod study among key stakeholders. BMC Geriatrics 2022;22(1) View
  64. Seinsche J, de Bruin E, Carpinella I, Ferrarin M, Moza S, Rizzo F, Salatino C, Giannouli E. Older adults' needs and requirements for a comprehensive exergame-based telerehabilitation system: A focus group study. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;10 View
  65. Oostra D, Fierkens C, Alewijnse M, Olde Rikkert M, Nieuwboer M, Perry M. Implementation of interprofessional digital communication tools in primary care for frail older adults: An interview study. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2023;37(3):362 View
  66. Fang K, Ginige J, Basilakis J, Bjering H, Javadi B. Smart Homecare Research Translation Into Broader Practice: Enablers, Barriers and Directions. IEEE Access 2022;10:134726 View
  67. Khalili-Mahani N, Sawchuk K. Double-Bind of Recruitment of Older Adults Into Studies of Successful Aging via Assistive Information and Communication Technologies: Mapping Review. JMIR Aging 2022;5(4):e43564 View
  68. Vos E, de Bruin S, Pees S, van der Beek A, Proper K, Hall A. Views of Older Adults on Using Support to Prevent Overload in Informal Caregivers: Results of a Story Completion Study. Health & Social Care in the Community 2023;2023:1 View
  69. Chang F, Östlund B, Kuoppamäki S. Domesticating Social Alarm Systems in Nursing Homes: Qualitative Study of Differences in the Perspectives of Assistant Nurses. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e44692 View
  70. Tobis S, Piasek-Skupna J, Neumann-Podczaska A, Suwalska A, Wieczorowska-Tobis K. The Effects of Stakeholder Perceptions on the Use of Humanoid Robots in Care for Older Adults: Postinteraction Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e46617 View
  71. Finn E, Whang C, Hong P, Costa S, Callahan E, Huang T. Strategies to improve the implementation of intensive lifestyle interventions for obesity. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;11 View
  72. Chapman S, Miller J, Spetz J. Emerging Health Technologies in Long-Term Care and Suppliers’ Views on Their Potential to Assist and Support the Workforce. Medical Care Research and Review 2023;80(6):619 View
  73. Kawasaki M, Nishiura Y, Mizuno J, Inoue T. Provision status of assistive products for cognition to older adults with cognitive impairment among rehabilitation therapists. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2023:1 View
  74. Seo E, Lee S. Implications of Aging in Place in the Context of the Residential Environment: Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023;20(20):6905 View
  75. Hurvitz N, Ilan Y. The Constrained-Disorder Principle Assists in Overcoming Significant Challenges in Digital Health: Moving from “Nice to Have” to Mandatory Systems. Clinics and Practice 2023;13(4):994 View
  76. Metting E, van Luenen S, Baron A, Tran A, van Duinhoven S, Chavannes N, Hevink M, Lüers J, Kocks J. Overcoming the Digital Divide for Older Patients With Respiratory Disease: Focus Group Study. JMIR Formative Research 2023;7:e44028 View
  77. Myeong S, Bokhari S. Building Participative E-Governance in Smart Cities: Moderating Role of Institutional and Technological Innovation. Sustainability 2023;15(20):15075 View
  78. van Santen J, Dröes R, Blanson Henkemans O, Schoone M, Valk R, Straten A, Meiland F. Implementation of exergaming for people with dementia: facilitators, barriers, and recommendations. Aging & Mental Health 2024;28(2):244 View
  79. Seinsche J, de Bruin E, Saibene E, Rizzo F, Carpinella I, Ferrarin M, Moza S, Ritter T, Giannouli E. A Newly Developed Exergame-Based Telerehabilitation System for Older Adults: Usability and Technology Acceptance Study. JMIR Human Factors 2023;10:e48845 View
  80. Obegu P, Nkangu M, Ngo N, Wanda F, Kasonde M, Kibu O, Abong N, Ndiforchu V, Fantaye A, Buh A, Gobina R, Foretia D, Fobellah N, Yaya S. Community participation for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health: insights from the design and implementation of the BornFyne-prenatal management system digital platform in Cameroon. Frontiers in Digital Health 2023;5 View
  81. Kastl A, Rauner Y, Mayer-Huber S, Oestreich C, Benstetter F, Fettke U. Stakeholder needs assessment for developing ageing in place solutions – a qualitative study. BMC Geriatrics 2024;24(1) View
  82. Leedahl S, Souza K, Capolino A, Brasher M, Pascuzzi E, Azzinaro C, Ellison T, Estus E, Maigret M. Improving Technology Use, Digital Competence, and Access to Community Resources Among Older Participants in the University of Rhode Island Engaging Generations Cyber‐Seniors digiAGE Pilot Study. Journal of Elder Policy 2023;2(3):55 View
  83. Mois G, Beer J. Toward a Framework for Embodiment in Communication Technologies: Facilitating Social Connectivity for Older Adults. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2020;64(1):28 View
  84. Sun X, Chen Z, Jiang Q. An Empirical Study on the Willingness of Young Elderly to Use Elderly Companion Robot. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2024:1 View
  85. Ahmed M, Marín M, Gangas P, Bentlage E, Louro C, Brach M. Improving the Acceptability and Implementation of Information and Communication Technology–Based Health Care Platforms for Older People With Dementia or Parkinson Disease: Qualitative Study Results of Key Stakeholders. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e58501 View
  86. Van der Roest H, Christie H, Franco-Martin M, Dröes R, de Vugt M, Meiland F. Determinants of (un)successful implementation of research-based assistive technologies in dementia care: an explorative survey (Preprint). JMIR Aging 2023 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Chang F, Kuoppamäki S, Östlund B. Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Healthy and Active Aging. View
  2. Hallewell Haslwanter J. Computers Helping People with Special Needs. View
  3. Teles S, Kofler A, Schmitter P, Ruscher S, Paúl C, Bertel D. Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health. View
  4. Soar J, Yu L, Al-Hakim L. The Impact of Digital Technologies on Public Health in Developed and Developing Countries. View
  5. Andreoni G, Konstantinidis E, Petsani D, Bamidis P, Gatsios D, Fotiadis D, op den Akker H, Torres M, Tenorio-Laranga J, Cordasco G, González-Fraile E, Esposito A, Kornes M, Chollet G, Fernández-Ruanova B, Veleva V, Žnidaršič M, Ženko B, Osojnik A, Wheeler R, Gand K, Schlieter H, Kyriazakos S, Caprino M, Nicolas L, Kropf J, Luengo I, Jimeno P, Mambretti C. Digital Health Technology for Better Aging. View
  6. Nebeker C, Parrish E, Graham S. Artificial Intelligence in Brain and Mental Health: Philosophical, Ethical & Policy Issues. View
  7. Tobis S. Gerontechnology. A Clinical Perspective. View
  8. Glufke A, Kunhardt H, Eder K. Digitale Technik für ambulante Pflege und Therapie II. View