Published on in Vol 18, No 1 (2016): January

Features of Computer-Based Decision Aids: Systematic Review, Thematic Synthesis, and Meta-Analyses

Features of Computer-Based Decision Aids: Systematic Review, Thematic Synthesis, and Meta-Analyses

Features of Computer-Based Decision Aids: Systematic Review, Thematic Synthesis, and Meta-Analyses

Journals

  1. Staszewska A, Zaki P, Lee J. Computerized Decision Aids for Shared Decision Making in Serious Illness: Systematic Review. JMIR Medical Informatics 2017;5(4):e36 View
  2. Katapodi M, Jung M, Schafenacker A, Milliron K, Mendelsohn-Victor K, Merajver S, Northouse L. Development of a Web-based Family Intervention for BRCA Carriers and Their Biological Relatives: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Usability Study. JMIR Cancer 2018;4(1):e7 View
  3. Vromans R, van Eenbergen M, Pauws S, Geleijnse G, van der Poel H, van de Poll-Franse L, Krahmer E. Communicative aspects of decision aids for localized prostate cancer treatment – A systematic review. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations 2019;37(7):409 View
  4. Scalia P, Durand M, Faber M, Kremer J, Song J, Elwyn G. User-testing an interactive option grid decision aid for prostate cancer screening: lessons to improve usability. BMJ Open 2019;9(5):e026748 View
  5. Fisher A, Mills K, Teesson M, Marel C. Shared decision‐making among people with problematic alcohol/other drug use and co‐occurring mental health conditions: A systematic review. Drug and Alcohol Review 2021;40(2):307 View
  6. Wysocki T, James L, Milkes A, Taylor A, Pierce J, Brinkman W, Carakushansky M, Ross J, Hirschfeld F. Electronically Verified Use of Internet-Based, Multimedia Decision Aids by Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Caregivers. MDM Policy & Practice 2018;3(1):238146831876985 View
  7. Bogza L, Patry-Lebeau C, Farmanova E, Witteman H, Elliott J, Stolee P, Hudon C, Giguere A. User-Centered Design and Evaluation of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Older Adults Living With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Their Health Care Providers: Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(8):e17406 View
  8. Jimbo M, Sen A, Plegue M, Hawley S, Kelly-Blake K, Rapai M, Zhang M, Zhang Y, Xie X, Ruffin M. Interactivity in a Decision Aid: Findings From a Decision Aid to Technologically Enhance Shared Decision Making RCT. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2019;57(1):77 View
  9. Baptista S, Teles Sampaio E, Heleno B, Azevedo L, Martins C. Web-Based Versus Usual Care and Other Formats of Decision Aids to Support Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(6):e228 View
  10. Verschueren S, Buffel C, Vander Stichele G. Developing Theory-Driven, Evidence-Based Serious Games for Health: Framework Based on Research Community Insights. JMIR Serious Games 2019;7(2):e11565 View
  11. Donnelly K, Elwyn G, Theiler R, Thompson R. Promoting or Undermining Quality Decision Making? A Qualitative Content Analysis of Patient Decision Aids Comparing Surgical and Medication Abortion. Women's Health Issues 2019;29(5):414 View
  12. Pei D, Liang B, Du W, Wang P, Liu J, He M, Lu Y. Multimedia patient education to assist oral impression taking during dental treatment: A pilot study. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2017;102:150 View
  13. Garvin J, Kim Y, Gobbel G, Matheny M, Redd A, Bray B, Heidenreich P, Bolton D, Heavirland J, Kelly N, Reeves R, Kalsy M, Goldstein M, Meystre S. Automating Quality Measures for Heart Failure Using Natural Language Processing: A Descriptive Study in the Department of Veterans Affairs. JMIR Medical Informatics 2018;6(1):e5 View
  14. Lopez‐Olivo M, Ingleshwar A, Volk R, Jibaja‐Weiss M, Barbo A, Saag K, Leong A, Suarez‐Almazor M. Development and Pilot Testing of Multimedia Patient Education Tools for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoporosis, and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research 2018;70(2):213 View
  15. Hermes E, Lyon A, Schueller S, Glass J. Measuring the Implementation of Behavioral Intervention Technologies: Recharacterization of Established Outcomes. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(1):e11752 View
  16. De Rosis S, Vainieri M. Incentivizing ICT in healthcare: A comparative analysis of incentive schemes in Italian Regions. International Journal of Healthcare Management 2017;10(1):1 View
  17. Tremblay M, Vallée C, Carignan M, Provencher V, Delli-Colli N, Poulin V, Giguère A, Careau E, Giroux D. Design and implementation of the Competency Assessment Tool (CAT): user experience usability study. Informatics for Health and Social Care 2020;45(1):57 View
  18. Ben Gassem A, Foxton R, Bister D, Newton J. Patients’ Acceptability of Computer-Based Information on Hypodontia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JDR Clinical & Translational Research 2018;3(3):246 View
  19. Lopez-Olivo M, Suarez-Almazor M. Digital Patient Education and Decision Aids. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America 2019;45(2):245 View
  20. Vigod S, Hussain-Shamsy N, Stewart D, Grigoriadis S, Metcalfe K, Oberlander T, Schram C, Taylor V, Dennis C. A patient decision aid for antidepressant use in pregnancy: Pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Affective Disorders 2019;251:91 View
  21. Davis S, MacKay L. Moving Beyond the Rhetoric of Shared Decision-Making: Designing Personal Health Record Technology With Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes. Canadian Journal of Diabetes 2020;44(5):434 View
  22. Emmerson K, Harding K, Taylor N. Providing exercise instructions using multimedia may improve adherence but not patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation 2019;33(4):607 View
  23. Lin P, Fang S, Kuo Y. Development and Usability Testing of a Decision Support App for Women Considering Breast Reconstruction Surgery. Journal of Cancer Education 2021;36(1):160 View
  24. Gibson B, Butler J, Doyon K, Ellington L, Bray B, Zeng Q. Veterans Like Me: Formative evaluation of a patient decision aid design. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2017;71:S46 View
  25. Scalia P, Durand M, Kremer J, Faber M, Elwyn G. Online, Interactive Option Grid Patient Decision Aids and their Effect on User Preferences. Medical Decision Making 2018;38(1):56 View
  26. Adam S, Birch P, Coe R, Bansback N, Jones A, Connolly M, Demos M, Toyota E, Farrer M, Friedman J. Assessing an Interactive Online Tool to Support Parents' Genomic Testing Decisions. Journal of Genetic Counseling 2019;28(1):10 View
  27. Adepoju I, Albersen B, De Brouwere V, van Roosmalen J, Zweekhorst M. mHealth for Clinical Decision-Making in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2017;5(3):e38 View
  28. Patel M, Namboodri B, Platts-Mills T. Modernizing Informed Consent During Emergency Care. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2020;76(3):350 View
  29. Xie J, Ke Q, Cheng Y, Everhart N. Meta-synthesis in Library & Information Science Research. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2020;46(5):102217 View
  30. den Ouden J, The R, Myren B, Boll D, Driel W, Lalisang R, Kruitwagen R, van Altena A. Development of a decision aid for primary treatment of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 2020;30(6):837 View
  31. Zeng-Treitler Q, Gibson B, Hill B, Butler J, Christensen C, Redd D, Shao Y, Bray B. The effect of simulated narratives that leverage EMR data on shared decision-making: a pilot study. BMC Research Notes 2016;9(1) View
  32. Yu L, Li P, Yang S, Guo P, Zhang X, Liu N, Wang J, Zhang W. Web-based decision aids to support breast cancer screening decisions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 2020;9(14):985 View
  33. Benedict C, Dauber-Decker K, King D, Hahn A, Ford J, Diefenbach M. A Decision Aid Intervention for Family Building After Cancer: Developmental Study on the Initial Steps to Consider When Designing a Web-Based Prototype. JMIR Formative Research 2021;5(1):e20841 View
  34. Gültzow T, Smit E, Hudales R, Dirksen C, Hoving C. Smoker profiles and their influence on smokers’ intention to use a digital decision aid aimed at the uptake of evidence-based smoking cessation tools: An explorative study. DIGITAL HEALTH 2020;6:205520762098024 View
  35. Shojaie D, Hoffman A, Amaku R, Cabanillas M, Sosa J, Waguespack S, Zafereo M, Hu M, Grubbs E. Decision Making When Cancer Becomes Chronic: Needs Assessment for a Web-Based Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Patient Decision Aid. JMIR Formative Research 2021;5(7):e27484 View
  36. Schwartz P, O’Doherty K, Bentley C, Schmidt K, Burgess M. Layperson Views about the Design and Evaluation of Decision Aids: A Public Deliberation. Medical Decision Making 2021;41(5):527 View
  37. Trevena L, Bonner C, Okan Y, Peters E, Gaissmaier W, Han P, Ozanne E, Timmermans D, Zikmund-Fisher B. Current Challenges When Using Numbers in Patient Decision Aids: Advanced Concepts. Medical Decision Making 2021;41(7):834 View
  38. Baroutsou V, Underhill-Blazey M, Appenzeller-Herzog C, Katapodi M. Interventions Facilitating Family Communication of Genetic Testing Results and Cascade Screening in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer or Lynch Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers 2021;13(4):925 View
  39. Tong G, Geng Q, Wang D, Liu T. Web-based decision aids for cancer clinical decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Supportive Care in Cancer 2021;29(11):6929 View
  40. Shaffer V, Brodney S, Gavaruzzi T, Zisman-Ilani Y, Munro S, Smith S, Thomas E, Valentine K, Bekker H. Do Personal Stories Make Patient Decision Aids More Effective? An Update from the International Patient Decision Aids Standards. Medical Decision Making 2021;41(7):897 View
  41. Kim S, Aceti M, Baroutsou V, Bürki N, Caiata-Zufferey M, Cattaneo M, Chappuis P, Ciorba F, Graffeo-Galbiati R, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Jeong J, Jung M, Kim S, Kim J, Lim M, Ming C, Monnerat C, Park H, Park S, Pedrazzani C, Rabaglio M, Ryu J, Saccilotto R, Wieser S, Zürrer-Härdi U, Katapodi M. Using a Tailored Digital Health Intervention for Family Communication and Cascade Genetic Testing in Swiss and Korean Families With Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Protocol for the DIALOGUE Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2021;10(6):e26264 View
  42. Squeo G, Sarosiek B, McConnell G. Patient education is an essential component of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway in colon and rectal surgery. Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery 2021;32(3):100829 View
  43. Agarwal S, Glenton C, Tamrat T, Henschke N, Maayan N, Fønhus M, Mehl G, Lewin S. Decision-support tools via mobile devices to improve quality of care in primary healthcare settings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021;2021(7) View
  44. Floriano F, Boeira L, Biella C, Pereira V, Carvalho M, Barreto J, Oliveira S. Estratégias para abordar a Judicialização da Saúde no Brasil: uma síntese de evidências. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 2023;28(1):181 View
  45. Ho Y, Hsu P, Yang K. Peritoneal dialysis after shared decision-making: the disparity between reality and patient expectations. BMC Nursing 2022;21(1) View
  46. Fang S, Lin P, Kuo Y. Long-Term Effectiveness of a Decision Support App (Pink Journey) for Women Considering Breast Reconstruction Surgery: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2021;9(12):e31092 View
  47. Eiriksdottir V, Jonsdottir T, Valdimarsdottir H, Taylor K, Schwartz M, Hilmarsson R, Gudmundsson E, Fridriksson J, Baldursdottir B. An Adaptation, Extension and Pre-Testing of an Interactive Decision Aid for Men Diagnosed with Localized Prostate Cancer in Iceland: A Mixed-Method Study. Behavioral Medicine 2023;49(2):137 View
  48. Floriano F, Boeira L, Biella C, Pereira V, Carvalho M, Barreto J, Oliveira S. Strategies to approach the judicialization of health in Brazil: an evidence brief. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 2023;28(1):181 View
  49. Kalpakjian C, Haapala H, Ernst S, Orians B, Barber M, Mulenga L, Bolde S, Kreschmer J, Parten R, Carlson S, Rosenblum S, Jay G. Development and pilot test of a pregnancy decision making tool for women with physical disabilities. Health Services Research 2023;58(1):223 View
  50. Horwood C, Luthuli S, Mapumulo S, Haskins L, Jensen C, Pansegrouw D, McKerrow N. Challenges of using e-health technologies to support clinical care in rural Africa: a longitudinal mixed methods study exploring primary health care nurses’ experiences of using an electronic clinical decision support system (CDSS) in South Africa. BMC Health Services Research 2023;23(1) View
  51. Margier J, Gafni A, Moumjid N. Informing decision makers about public preferences for different modalities of cancer treatment in the Rhône–Alps region in France. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2023;39(1) View
  52. Barahona-Correa J, Romero-Alvernia D, Rueda-Ortiz C, Muñoz O, Garcia A, Fernández-Ávila D. Social media as source of information for Spanish-speaking patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2022;31(8):953 View
  53. Kalch A, Küchler C, Albani A, Bilandzic H, Fischer S, Kirchberger I. On the need for narratives in patient information: Differentiating types and functions of narratives from pulmonary embolism patients' point of view. Frontiers in Communication 2022;7 View
  54. Wang T, Chiu P, Chen K, Hung L. Efficacy of a decision support intervention for reducing decisional conflict in patients with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen: A randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 2021;50:101865 View
  55. Tsai C, Fang C, Chen M, Yen M, Yeh C, Lai Z, Hsu M, Wang S. Development and Pilot Usefulness Testing of an Interactive Computerized Patient Decision Aid for Intraocular Lens Selection Before Cataract Surgery. Patient Preference and Adherence 2022;Volume 16:189 View
  56. Zhao B, Yi M, Lyu H, Zhang X, Liu Y, Song X. Decision-making experiences of breast cancer patients related to contralateral prophylactic mastectomy—a systematic meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Supportive Care in Cancer 2023;31(4) View
  57. Hershberger P, Gallo A, Adlam K, Driessnack M, Grotevant H, Klock S, Pasch L, Gruss V. Development of the Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking (TELL Tool): A digital decision aid intervention about children's origins from donated gametes or embryos. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View
  58. Moritz W, Westman A, Politi M, DOD Working Group , Fox I. Assessing an Online Patient Decision Aid about Upper Extremity Reconstructive Surgery for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Pilot Testing Knowledge, Decisional Conflict, and Acceptability. MDM Policy & Practice 2023;8(2) View
  59. Wu C, Yeh T, Chu G, Ho Y. Effectiveness of computerised decision aids for patients with chronic diseases in shared decision‐making: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2024;33(7):2732 View
  60. Maserat E. Integrated Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Decision Support Information System. Journal of Clinical Research in Paramedical Sciences 2024;13(1) View
  61. Daye D, Parker R, Tripathi S, Cox M, Brito Orama S, Valentin L, Bridge C, Uppot R. CASCADE: Context-Aware Data-Driven AI for Streamlined Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Recommendations in Oncology. Cancers 2024;16(11):1975 View
  62. Yu L, Sun X, Gong J, Liu M, Yu S, Liu L. Effectiveness of shared decision‐making for mode of delivery after caesarean section: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2024 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Laranjo L, Lau A, Coiera E. Cognitive Informatics in Health and Biomedicine. View
  2. ter Stege J, Sherman K. Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. View
  3. ter Stege J, Sherman K. Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. View
  4. Abujarad F, Wang S, Ulrich D, Mougalian S, Killelea B, Fraenkel L, Gross C, Evans S. Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design for Diversity, Well-being, and Social Development. View
  5. Shirazian S, Maesaka J, Imbriano L, Mattana J. Diabetes and Kidney Disease. View