This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (782)

Published on in Vol 17, No 5 (2015): May

Response Rates for Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Web-Based Versus Paper Questionnaires: Comparison of Two Invitational Methods in Older Colorectal Cancer Patients

Response Rates for Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Web-Based Versus Paper Questionnaires: Comparison of Two Invitational Methods in Older Colorectal Cancer Patients

Response Rates for Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Web-Based Versus Paper Questionnaires: Comparison of Two Invitational Methods in Older Colorectal Cancer Patients

Authors of this article:

Nicole JE Horevoorts1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Pauline AJ Vissers1 Author Orcid Image ;   Floortje Mols1 Author Orcid Image ;   Melissa SY Thong1 Author Orcid Image ;   Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (72) Tweetations (24) Metrics

Journals

  1. El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, El Aroussy N, Bahlas S, Hegazi M, Palmer D, Youssef S. Toward electronic health recording: evaluation of electronic patient reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) system for remote monitoring of early systemic lupus patients. Clinical Rheumatology 2017;36(11):2461 View
  2. Steingrímsdóttir Ó, Engdahl B, Hansson P, Stubhaug A, Nielsen C. The Graphical Index of Pain: a new web-based method for high-throughput screening of pain. Pain 2020;161(10):2255 View
  3. Gyllén J, Magnusson G, Forsberg A. Parents’ Reported Experiences When Having a Child with Cataract—Important Aspects of Self-Management Obtained from the Pediatric Cataract Register (PECARE). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(17):6329 View
  4. Bulkley J, O’Keeffe-Rosetti M, Wendel C, Davis J, Danforth K, Harrison T, Kwan M, Munneke J, Brooks N, Grant M, Leo M, Banegas M, Weinmann S, McMullen C. The effect of multiple recruitment contacts on response rates and patterns of missing data in a survey of bladder cancer survivors 6 months after cystectomy. Quality of Life Research 2020;29(4):879 View
  5. van Roij J, Zijlstra M, Ham L, Brom L, Fransen H, Vreugdenhil A, Raijmakers N, van de Poll-Franse L, Youssef-ELSoud M, Creemers G, van den Borne B, de Jong W, Baars A, van den Beuken - van Everdingen M, Kuip E, Bunnik R, Hendriks M, Mandigers C, van Basten J, van Kampen – van den Boogaart V, Werner P, van Zuylen L, de Graeff A, van Lindert A, Soesan M, Hunting J, Smals A, van de Winkel L, Stege G, Verhaert L, Peters N, Pepels M, Smilde T, Nieboer P, de Hosson S, den Boer M, Pitz C, Heyne R, Tjin-A-Ton M, van der Padt – Pruijsten A, van den Berg P, Krouwels F, van Leeuwen-Snoeks L, van der Meer F, Vos A, Veldhuis G, Poppema B, Thijs-Visser M, Heller-Baan R, van Laren M, van den Brink K, Douma G, Kloover J, Sommeijer D, Pronk L, Janssens - van Vliet E, van der Velden L, Hafkamp E, Codrington H, Tarasevych S, van Bochove A, de Boer J, Vink G. Prospective cohort study of patients with advanced cancer and their relatives on the experienced quality of care and life (eQuiPe study): a study protocol. BMC Palliative Care 2020;19(1) View
  6. Grasdalsmoen M, Engdahl B, Fjeld M, Steingrímsdóttir Ó, Nielsen C, Eriksen H, Lønning K, Sivertsen B, Oyeyemi A. Physical exercise and chronic pain in university students. PLOS ONE 2020;15(6):e0235419 View
  7. Mols F, van de Poll-Franse L, Vreugdenhil G, Beijers A, Kieffer J, Aaronson N, Husson O. Reference data of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CIPN20 Questionnaire in the general Dutch population. European Journal of Cancer 2016;69:28 View
  8. Faria L, Reis S, Leite K, da Cruz J, Pimenta R, Viana N, Amaral G, Santos G, Ilias D, Fakhouri F, Xavier G, Srougi M, Passerotti C. Digital application developed to evaluate functional results following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2020;197:105683 View
  9. Ebert J, Huibers L, Christensen B, Christensen M. Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(1):e24 View
  10. Taylor T, Scott A. Do Physicians Prefer to Complete Online or Mail Surveys? Findings From a National Longitudinal Survey. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2019;42(1):41 View
  11. D’Silva C, Côté P, Murphy B, Barakat-Haddad C. Developing and evaluating the feasibility of administering the SLUMP questionnaire for evaluating ergonomic exposures to laptop use in university students. Work 2018;60(2):235 View
  12. Mlikotic R, Parker B, Rajapakshe R. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(3):e70 View
  13. Fitzgerald D, Hockey R, Jones M, Mishra G, Waller M, Dobson A. Use of Online or Paper Surveys by Australian Women: Longitudinal Study of Users, Devices, and Cohort Retention. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(3):e10672 View
  14. Hems M, Harkes M, Moret-Hartman M, Melis R, Schoon Y. Eerste ervaringen met patiënt gerapporteerde uitkomstmaten in de geriatrie. Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie 2017;48(6):287 View
  15. Welbie M, Wittink H, Westerman M, Topper I, Snoei J, Devillé W. Using Plain Language and Adding Communication Technology to an Existing Health-Related Questionnaire to Help Generate Accurate Information: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(4):e140 View
  16. Thong M, Mols F, Doege D, van de Poll-Franse L, Arndt V. Population-based cancer survivorship research: Experiences from Germany and the Netherlands. Journal of Cancer Policy 2018;15:87 View
  17. Raijmakers N, Zijlstra M, van Roij J, Husson O, Oerlemans S, van de Poll-Franse L. Health-related quality of life among cancer patients in their last year of life: results from the PROFILES registry. Supportive Care in Cancer 2018;26(10):3397 View
  18. Mols F, Husson O, Oudejans M, Vlooswijk C, Horevoorts N, van de Poll-Franse L. Reference data of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: five consecutive annual assessments of approximately 2000 representative Dutch men and women. Acta Oncologica 2018;57(10):1381 View
  19. Doolin J, Halpin M, Berry J, Hshieh T, Zerillo J. Why focus on patient-reported outcome measures in older colorectal cancer patients?. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2020;46(3):394 View
  20. Begnaud A, Joseph A, Lindgren B. Randomized Electronic Promotion of Lung Cancer Screening: A Pilot. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics 2017;(1):1 View
  21. Ng S, Kirkman M, Fisher J, Pusic A, Parker E, Cooter R, Elder E, Moore C, McNeil J, Hopper I. Establishing the acceptability of a brief patient reported outcome measure and feasibility of implementing it in a breast device registry – a qualitative study. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2019;3(1) View
  22. Engan H, Hilmarsen C, Sittlinger S, Sandmæl J, Skanke F, Oldervoll L. Are web-based questionnaires accepted in patients attending rehabilitation?. Disability and Rehabilitation 2016;38(24):2406 View
  23. Oerlemans S, Arts L, Horevoorts N, van de Poll-Franse L. “Am I normal?” The Wishes of Patients With Lymphoma to Compare Their Patient-Reported Outcomes With Those of Their Peers. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(8):e288 View
  24. Azevedo B, Oliveira C, Araujo G, Silva F, Damato T, Pinto R, Christofaro D. Is There Equivalence Between the Electronic and Paper Version of the Questionnaires for Assessment of Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain?. Spine 2020;45(6):E329 View
  25. Pejtersen J, Claydon-Mueller L. The effect of monetary incentive on survey response for vulnerable children and youths: A randomized controlled trial. PLOS ONE 2020;15(5):e0233025 View
  26. Reedijk M, Lenters V, Slottje P, Pijpe A, Peeters P, Korevaar J, Bueno-de-Mesquita B, Verschuren W, Verheij R, Pieterson I, van Leeuwen F, Rookus M, Kromhout H, Vermeulen R. Cohort profile: LIFEWORK, a prospective cohort study on occupational and environmental risk factors and health in the Netherlands. BMJ Open 2018;8(2):e018504 View
  27. El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef S, Bahlas S, Almedany S, Ahmed I, Palmer D. Toward Electronic Health Recording: Evaluation of Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures System for Remote Monitoring of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis. The Journal of Rheumatology 2016;43(12):2106 View
  28. Palojoki S, Pajunen T, Saranto K, Lehtonen L. Electronic Health Record-Related Safety Concerns: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Electronic Health Record Users. JMIR Medical Informatics 2016;4(2):e13 View
  29. Arts L, Oerlemans S, Posthuma E, Issa D, Oosterveld M, van der Griend R, Nijziel M, van de Poll-Franse L. Web-Based Self-Management for Patients With Lymphoma: Assessment of the Reach of Intervention of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(5):e17018 View
  30. Pompili C, Boele F, Absolom K, Holch P, Clayton B, Smyllie E, Franks K, Velikova G. Patients’ views of routine quality of life assessment following a diagnosis of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2020;31(3):324 View
  31. Paul S A, Simon S S, Kumar S, Chacko R. Assessing perceptions of oral health related quality of life in dental implant patients. Experience of a tertiary care center in India. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research 2018;8(2):74 View
  32. Grant J, Graven L. High Priority Problems Experienced by Informal Caregivers of Individuals With Heart Failure. Home Health Care Management & Practice 2019;31(2):75 View
  33. Cabitza F, Dui L, Banfi G. PROs in the wild: Assessing the validity of patient reported outcomes in an electronic registry. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2019;181:104837 View
  34. Kall M, Marcellin F, Harding R, Lazarus J, Carrieri P. Patient-reported outcomes to enhance person-centred HIV care. The Lancet HIV 2020;7(1):e59 View
  35. Grant J, Graven L. Heart failure caregivers’ support services: Implications for palliative care. Progress in Palliative Care 2020;28(5):318 View
  36. Moody C, Dewey C, Niel L. Cross-sectional survey of cat handling practices in veterinary clinics throughout Canada and the United States. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2020;256(9):1020 View
  37. Bion J, Brookes O, Brown C, Tarrant C, Archer J, Buckley D, Buckley L, Clement I, Evison F, Smith F, Gibbins C, Hayton E, Jones J, Lilford R, Mullhi R, Packer G, Perkins G, Shelton J, Snelson C, Sullivan P, Vlaev I, Wolstenholme D, Wright S. A framework and toolkit of interventions to enhance reflective learning among health-care professionals: the PEARL mixed-methods study. Health Services and Delivery Research 2020;8(32):1 View
  38. Ooues G, Clift P, Bowater S, Arif S, Epstein A, Prasad N, Adamson D, Cummings M, Spencer C, Woodmansey P, Borley J, Ingram T, Morley-Davies A, Roberts W, Qureshi N, Hawkesford S, Pope N, Anthony J, Gaffey T, Thorne S, Hudsmith L. Patient experience within the adult congenital heart disease outreach network: a questionnaire-based study. Journal of Congenital Cardiology 2018;2(1) View
  39. Wintner L, Sztankay M, Riedl D, Rumpold G, Nickels A, Licht T, Holzner B. How to implement routine electronic patient‐reported outcome monitoring in oncology rehabilitation. International Journal of Clinical Practice 2021;75(4) View
  40. Yu C, Choi D, Bruno B, Thorpe K, Straus S, Cantarutti P, Chu K, Frydrych P, Hoang-Kim A, Ivers N, Kaplan D, Leung F, Maxted J, Rezmovitz J, Sale J, Sodhi-Helou S, Stacey D, Telner D. Impact of MyDiabetesPlan, a Web-Based Patient Decision Aid on Decisional Conflict, Diabetes Distress, Quality of Life, and Chronic Illness Care in Patients With Diabetes: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(9):e16984 View
  41. Richter M, Storck M, Blitz R, Goltermann J, Seipp J, Dannlowski U, Baune B, Dugas M, Opel N. Repeated Digitized Assessment of Risk and Symptom Profiles During Inpatient Treatment of Affective Disorder: Observational Study. JMIR Mental Health 2020;7(12):e24066 View
  42. Wright A, Elcombe E, Burns E. “Paper, face-to-face and on my mobile please”: A survey of women’s preferred methods of receiving antenatal education. Women and Birth 2021;34(6):e547 View
  43. Sivertsen B, Harvey A, Gradisar M, Pallesen S, Hysing M. Delayed sleep–wake phase disorder in young adults: prevalence and correlates from a national survey of Norwegian university students. Sleep Medicine 2021;77:184 View
  44. Kühne F, Maas J, Weck F. Warum nehmen Verhaltenstherapeut_innen an Fortbildungen teil?. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie 2019;48(4):219 View
  45. Dinur T, Istaiti M, Frydman D, Becker-Cohen M, Szer J, Zimran A, Revel-Vilk S. Patient reported outcome measures in a large cohort of patients with type 1 Gaucher disease. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 2020;15(1) View
  46. Ailawadhi S, Swaika A, Advani P, Hodge D, Paulus A, Khera N, Hashmi S, Alegria V, Abdulazeez M, Bodepudi S, Jamwal K, Roy V, Sher T, Chanan-Khan A, Ailawadhi M. Awareness of myeloma care and the global impact of treatment: An international internet-based prospective study. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice 2022;28(2):425 View
  47. Parker K, Chia M. Patient and clinician satisfaction with video consultations in dentistry - part one: patient satisfaction. British Dental Journal 2021 View
  48. Potard C, Pochon R, Henry A, Combes C, Kubiszewski V, Roy A. Relationships Between School Bullying and Frustration Intolerance Beliefs in Adolescence: A Gender-Specific Analysis. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy 2022;40(1):103 View
  49. Sivertsen B, Hysing M, Harvey A, Petrie K. The Epidemiology of Insomnia and Sleep Duration Across Mental and Physical Health: The SHoT Study. Frontiers in Psychology 2021;12 View
  50. Horn M, Reinke E, Mather R, O’Donnell J, George S. Electronic health record–integrated approach for collection of patient-reported outcome measures: a retrospective evaluation. BMC Health Services Research 2021;21(1) View
  51. Bulkley J, McMullen C, Rawlings A, Krouse R, Francisco M, Sterrett A, Burnett-Hartman A, Pawloski P, Corley D, Colwell J, Feigelson H. The association of bowel function, participation in life activities, and quality of life in rectal cancer survivors. Quality of Life Research 2022;31(2):487 View
  52. Humphries B, Cox J, Parkash R, Thabane L, Foster G, MacKillop J, Nemis‐White J, Hamilton L, Ciaccia A, Choudhri S, Xie F. Patient‐Reported Outcomes and Patient‐Reported Experience of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the IMPACT‐AF Clinical Trial. Journal of the American Heart Association 2021;10(15) View
  53. Hlubocky F, Daugherty C, Peppercorn J, Young K, Wroblewski K, Yamada S, Lee N. Utilization of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Platform to Evaluate the Psychosocial and Quality-of-Life Experience Among a Community Sample of Ovarian Cancer Survivors. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics 2022;(6) View
  54. Moura L, Schwamm E, Moura Junior V, Seitz M, Hsu J, Cole A, Schwamm L. Feasibility of the collection of patient-reported outcomes in an ambulatory neurology clinic. Neurology 2016;87(23):2435 View
  55. van Eenbergen M, Vromans R, Tick L, Vreugdenhil G, Krahmer E, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse L. Comparing Survivors of Cancer in Population-Based Samples With Those in Online Cancer Communities: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study. JMIR Cancer 2022;8(1):e19379 View
  56. Ossowski S, Kammerer A, Stram D, Piazza-DeLap L, Basch E, Katzel J. Patient-Reported Outcomes Integrated Within an Electronic Medical Record in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics 2021;(5):842 View
  57. Gyllén J, Haargaard B, Nyström A, Tornqvist K, Udén D, Magnusson G, Forsberg A. PECARE: Parental Feedback to Improve Congenital Cataract Care in Sweden. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus 2023;60(4):288 View
  58. Olsson C, Josse Eklund A, Larsson M, Ringnér A. Sexuality After Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: Patients' Experiences and Psychometric Testing of the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire-Swedish Version II. Cancer Nursing 2021;44(6):499 View
  59. van de Poll-Franse L, Horevoorts N, Schoormans D, Beijer S, Ezendam N, Husson O, Oerlemans S, Schagen S, Hageman G, Van Deun K, van den Hurk C, van Eenbergen M, Mols F, Rooij B, Raijmakers N, Vlooswijk C, Bonhof C, Ekels A, Hoedjes M, van Cappellen – van Maldegem S, Ham L, van de Graaf D, van Roij J. Measuring Clinical, Biological, and Behavioral Variables to Elucidate Trajectories of Patient-Reported Outcomes: The PROFILES Registry. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2022;114(6):800 View
  60. Vissers P, Vink G, Koelink M, Koopman M, Arts L, Oerlemans S, May A, van de Poll-Franse L, van Erning F. Evaluation of an individual feedback report on patient-reported outcomes in the Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer cohort. Supportive Care in Cancer 2022;30(9):7303 View
  61. Yu H, Yu Q, Nie Y, Xu W, Pu Y, Dai W, Wei X, Shi Q. Data Quality of Longitudinally Collected Patient-Reported Outcomes After Thoracic Surgery: Comparison of Paper- and Web-Based Assessments. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(11):e28915 View
  62. Chen S, Keglovits M, Devine M, Stark S. Sociodemographic Differences in Respondent Preferences for Survey Formats: Sampling Bias and Potential Threats to External Validity. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation 2022;4(1):100175 View
  63. Bulkley J, Varga A, Dickerson J, Crawford P, Croen L, Daida Y, Fombonne E, Hatch B, Lee A, Massolo M, Vaughn K, Lynch F. A framework for measuring the cost to families of caring for children’s health: the design, methodology, and study population of the r-Kids study. BMC Pediatrics 2023;23(1) View
  64. Saleem J, Beak P, Eardley W, Trompeter A. Digitalising patient reported outcome collection tools in orthopaedic trauma–A scoping review. Injury 2023;54(7):110792 View
  65. Moran M, Canova T, Hicks C, Blecker N. A Qualitative Study Exploring the Regional Feasibility of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Data Collection for Orthopedic Trauma Patients. Cureus 2023 View
  66. Spencer K, Absolom K, Allsop M, Relton S, Pearce J, Liao K, Naseer S, Salako O, Howdon D, Hewison J, Velikova G, Faivre-Finn C, Bekker H, van der Veer S. Fixing the Leaky Pipe: How to Improve the Uptake of Patient-Reported Outcomes–Based Prognostic and Predictive Models in Cancer Clinical Practice. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics 2023;(7) View
  67. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Woolf B, Perkins C. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023;2023(11) View
  68. AMBROŽ M, KENDIR C, BOERMA W, KLEMENC-KETIŠ Z. Patient Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS): Methodological Considerations of a Field Trial in Slovenia. Slovenian Journal of Public Health 2024;63(1):30 View
  69. Pock E, Lohrmann C, Hoffmann M, Schwarz C, Schoberer D. Evaluation of the usefulness and understandability of information leaflets on fall prevention from the perspective of hospital patients and their relatives. Health Information & Libraries Journal 2024 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. El Miedany Y. Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Rheumatic Diseases. View
  2. Hussain D, Ross P, Bednar P. Digital Technology and Organizational Change. View
  3. van de Poll-Franse L, Prins J, Verdonck-de Leeuw I. Leerboek oncologie. View