This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Digital Health Reviews (1186)

Published on in Vol 14, No 5 (2012): Sep-Oct

Using Noninferiority Tests to Evaluate Telemedicine and E-Health Services: Systematic Review

Using Noninferiority Tests to Evaluate Telemedicine and E-Health Services: Systematic Review

Using Noninferiority Tests to Evaluate Telemedicine and E-Health Services: Systematic Review

Authors of this article:

Per Egil Kummervold1, 2 ;   Jan-Are K Johnsen2, 3 ;   Stein Olav Skrøvseth4 ;   Rolf Wynn2, 3
Article Authors Cited by (26) Tweetations (13) Metrics

Journals

  1. Culmer N, Smith T, Stager C, Meyer H, Quick S, Grimm K. Evaluation of the triple aim of medicine in prehospital telemedicine: A systematic literature review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2020;26(10):571 View
  2. Pollack M. Pediatric Emergency Department Telemedicine. Critical Care Medicine 2013;41(10):2455 View
  3. Müller K, Alstadhaug K, Bekkelund S. Telemedicine in the management of non-acute headaches: A prospective, open-labelled non-inferiority, randomised clinical trial. Cephalalgia 2017;37(9):855 View
  4. Parker S, Dark F, Newman E, Korman N, Meurk C, Siskind D, Harris M. Longitudinal comparative evaluation of the equivalence of an integrated peer-support and clinical staffing model for residential mental health rehabilitation: a mixed methods protocol incorporating multiple stakeholder perspectives. BMC Psychiatry 2016;16(1) View
  5. Berry J, Mansbach J. Being Mindful About Follow-up Care After Pediatric Hospitalization for Bronchiolitis. JAMA Pediatrics 2020;174(9):e201945 View
  6. Gonzalez Garcia M, Fatehi F, Bashi N, Varnfield M, Iyngkaran P, Driscoll A, Neil C, Hare D, Oldenburg B. A Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Utilizing Telemedicine for Improving Heart Failure Readmission: Can a Realist Approach Bridge the Translational Divide?. Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology 2019;13:117954681986139 View
  7. Bonten T, Rauwerdink A, Wyatt J, Kasteleyn M, Witkamp L, Riper H, van Gemert-Pijnen L, Cresswell K, Sheikh A, Schijven M, Chavannes N. Online Guide for Electronic Health Evaluation Approaches: Systematic Scoping Review and Concept Mapping Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(8):e17774 View
  8. Portnoy J, Waller M, De Lurgio S, Dinakar C. Telemedicine is as effective as in-person visits for patients with asthma. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 2016;117(3):241 View
  9. Koskas P, Scemama E, Wolfowicz B. Internet-based questionnaire to self-assess autonomy and obtain a life-at-home services enforcement plan: a retrospective validation study. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2015;21(5):276 View
  10. Schramm K, Grassl N, Nees J, Hoffmann J, Stepan H, Bruckner T, Haun M, Maatouk I, Haist M, Schott T, Sohn C, Schott S. Women’s Attitudes Toward Self-Monitoring of Their Pregnancy Using Noninvasive Electronic Devices: Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2019;7(1):e11458 View
  11. Loohuis A, Wessels N, Jellema P, Vermeulen K, Slieker‐ten Hove M, van Gemert‐Pijnen J, Berger M, Dekker J, Blanker M. The impact of a mobile application‐based treatment for urinary incontinence in adult women: Design of a mixed‐methods randomized controlled trial in a primary care setting. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2018;37(7):2167 View
  12. Han Y, Lu Z, Poon W. Noninferiority testing for matched‐pair ordinal data with misclassification. Statistics in Medicine 2019;38(28):5332 View
  13. Barbosa I, Silva M. Nursing care by telehealth: what is the influence of distance on communication?. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem 2017;70(5):928 View
  14. Raatz M, Ward E, Marshall J, Burns C. Evaluating the Use of Telepractice to Deliver Pediatric Feeding Assessments. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2021;30(4):1686 View
  15. Burke B, Hall R, Dehnel P, Alexander J, Bell D, Bunik M, Burke B, Kile J. Telemedicine: Pediatric Applications. Pediatrics 2015;136(1):e293 View
  16. Raatz M, Ward E, Marshall J, Burns C. Evaluating the Use of Telepractice for Bottle-Feeding Assessments. Children 2021;8(11):989 View
  17. Loohuis A, Burger H, Wessels N, Dekker J, Malmberg A, Berger M, Blanker M, van der Worp H. Prediction model study focusing on eHealth in the management of urinary incontinence: the Personalised Advantage Index as a decision-making aid. BMJ Open 2022;12(7):e051827 View
  18. Adams L, Adamo N, Hollocks M, Valmaggia L, Brewster A, Watson J, Krisson M, Simonoff E. Examining clinicians’ concerns delivering telemental health interventions directly to autistic individuals during COVID-19. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 2022;94:101956 View
  19. Williams S, Ebrahimzadeh J, Clay D, Constantino G, Heiman J, Wangensteen K, Valverde K, Mahmud N, Katona B. Comparing telemedicine and in-person gastrointestinal cancer genetic appointment outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice 2023;21(1) View
  20. Werkmeister B, Haase A, Fleming T, Officer T. Global Implications From the Rise and Recession of Telehealth in Aotearoa New Zealand Mental Health Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Formative Research 2023;7:e50486 View
  21. Artymowicz A, Douglas C, Cockerham K. The Role of Ophthalmology in Tele-Stroke Consults for Triaging Acute Vision Loss. Open Access Emergency Medicine 2024;Volume 16:45 View
  22. Akers J, Miller J, Seignemartin B, MacLean L, Mandal B, Kogan C. Expanding Access to Patient Care in Community Pharmacies for Minor Illnesses in Washington State. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research 2024;Volume 16:233 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Ospina-Pinillos L, Krausz R, Hickie I. Innovations in Global Mental Health. View
  2. Ospina-Pinillos L, Krausz R, Hickie I. Innovations in Global Mental Health. View
  3. Bedolla J, Pines J. Evidence‐Based Emergency Care. View
  4. Gentry M, Srinivasan S, Rabinowitz T, Hilty D. Geriatric Psychiatry. View