e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 609 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 154 JMIR Formative Research
- 140 JMIR Human Factors
- 76 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 50 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 32 JMIR Research Protocols
- 23 JMIR Serious Games
- 22 JMIR Aging
- 20 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 15 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 13 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 12 JMIR Cancer
- 9 JMIR Mental Health
- 8 JMIR Medical Education
- 6 JMIR Cardio
- 5 JMIRx Med
- 4 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 3 Iproceedings
- 3 JMIR Nursing
- 3 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 2 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 2 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 1 JMIR Diabetes
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
Simultaneously, usability focuses on how efficiently, effectively, and satisfactorily a system can be used to perform expected tasks [13,14]. In geriatric institutions, usability considerations extend to physical ergonomics (eg, size, weight, tactile interfaces, voice interaction), user safety, and emotional comfort [37].
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e76496
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Beyond evaluating usability and acceptability, another aim of this study was to critically examine the research process itself. By reflecting on our methodology, we seek to identify valuable lessons that can inform and improve future usability and acceptability studies for TEC development in the PD field and related areas.
This study fills an important gap in the literature by moving beyond individual assessments of digital health tools.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67986
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
They will be assessed using 4 questionnaires, namely the User Engagement Scale-Short Form (UES-SF) [34], the System Usability Scale (SUS) [35], the Italian version of the Chatbot Usability Scale (version B; ITA BUS B) [36], and the User Mobile Application Rating Scale (u MARS) [37], which will be administered at different time slots throughout the study, in particular at the end of the week 3 and at the end of the study (ie, week 6).
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e53891
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This phase involved assessing the usability of the Arabic Self Back app for both the Android and i OS operating systems using the validated and translated Arabic version of the System Usability Scale (A-SUS) [17]. The SUS is a questionnaire used to evaluate the usability of a wide variety of new software systems [18]. It comprises 10 questions which are answered using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “I strongly disagree” to “I strongly agree.”
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e59777
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
ReachCare mobile apps for patients experiencing suicidality in the emergency department: development and usability Reference 8: Evaluation of diagnostic and triage accuracy and usability of a symptom checker in an emergencyusability
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e67608
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
To further enhance the algorithms and features of the AI chatbot, it is essential to test its usability among a large number of end-users using predefined metrics. Therefore, we conducted this observational study to evaluate the usability of our AI chatbot for promoting HIV testing among MSM in Malaysia.
The AI chatbot was created and embedded into the website MYHIV365.com. The description of the chatbot and the website has been published elsewhere [6].
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e70034
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
After an initial build of the platform to include the functionality of an initial assessment of the caregiving situation followed by access to the safety and emotions domains of the GP4 C content, we conducted caregiver usability testing on these domains to identify additional design needs in preparation for a randomized trial.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e60143
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Conversational Systems for Social Care in Older Adults: Protocol for a Scoping Review
A recent systematic review of AI conversational agents in health care identified positive or mixed evidence for effectiveness and usability [24]. Still, it highlights that qualitative perceptions of these technologies could be more guarded. Many studies lacked rigorous designs or sufficient reporting, limiting conclusive assessments of their clinical and operational impact.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e72310
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
To measure the overall usability of m Health technologies, the system usability scale (SUS) is a widely used instrument, which showed robust results in previous studies [24]. In addition, usability studies often report on ease of use, user experience, and user engagement, depending on the focus of the study [25].
JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e69079
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Usability and Quality of the JoyPop App: Prospective Evaluation Study
Despite this, the majority of mental health apps available in major marketplaces have not undergone usability and quality evaluations [35,37,38].
Usability is defined as a “quality attribute that assesses how easy interfaces are to use” [39]. Evaluating mental health app usability can reveal factors (eg, functionality, feature usefulness, layout, and readability) that reduce engagement and use [35,36].
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e65472
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS