@Article{info:doi/10.2196/23205, author="Farsi, Deema", title="Social Media and Health Care, Part I: Literature Review of Social Media Use by Health Care Providers", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="5", volume="23", number="4", pages="e23205", keywords="social media", keywords="social networking", keywords="internet", keywords="health care", keywords="COVID-19", keywords="research activity", keywords="medical education", keywords="telemedicine", keywords="mobile phone", abstract="Background: As the world continues to advance technologically, social media (SM) is becoming an essential part of billions of people's lives worldwide and is affecting almost every industry imaginable. As the world is becoming more digitally oriented, the health care industry is increasingly visualizing SM as an important channel for health care promotion, employment, recruiting new patients, marketing for health care providers (HCPs), building a better brand name, etc. HCPs are bound to ethical principles toward their colleagues, patients, and the public in the digital world as much as in the real world. Objective: This review aims to shed light on SM use worldwide and to discuss how it has been used as an essential tool in the health care industry from the perspective of HCPs. Methods: A literature review was conducted between March and April 2020 using MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for all English-language medical studies that were published since 2007 and discussed SM use in any form for health care. Studies that were not in English, whose full text was not accessible, or that investigated patients' perspectives were excluded from this part, as were reviews pertaining to ethical and legal considerations in SM use. Results: The initial search yielded 83 studies. More studies were included from article references, and a total of 158 studies were reviewed. SM uses were best categorized as health promotion, career development or practice promotion, recruitment, professional networking or destressing, medical education, telemedicine, scientific research, influencing health behavior, and public health care issues. Conclusions: Multidimensional health care, including the pairing of health care with SM and other forms of communication, has been shown to be very successful. Striking the right balance between digital and traditional health care is important. ", doi="10.2196/23205", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e23205", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33664014" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/27275, author="Borges do Nascimento, J{\'u}nior Israel and Marcolino, Soriano Milena and Abdulazeem, Mohamed Hebatullah and Weerasekara, Ishanka and Azzopardi-Muscat, Natasha and Gon{\c{c}}alves, Andr{\'e} Marcos and Novillo-Ortiz, David", title="Impact of Big Data Analytics on People's Health: Overview of Systematic Reviews and Recommendations for Future Studies", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="13", volume="23", number="4", pages="e27275", keywords="public health", keywords="big data", keywords="health status", keywords="evidence-based medicine", keywords="big data analytics", keywords="secondary data analysis", keywords="machine learning", keywords="systematic review", keywords="overview", keywords="World Health Organization", abstract="Background: Although the potential of big data analytics for health care is well recognized, evidence is lacking on its effects on public health. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the use of big data analytics on people's health based on the health indicators and core priorities in the World Health Organization (WHO) General Programme of Work 2019/2023 and the European Programme of Work (EPW), approved and adopted by its Member States, in addition to SARS-CoV-2--related studies. Furthermore, we sought to identify the most relevant challenges and opportunities of these tools with respect to people's health. Methods: Six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Epistemonikos) were searched from the inception date to September 21, 2020. Systematic reviews assessing the effects of big data analytics on health indicators were included. Two authors independently performed screening, selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the AMSTAR-2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2) checklist. Results: The literature search initially yielded 185 records, 35 of which met the inclusion criteria, involving more than 5,000,000 patients. Most of the included studies used patient data collected from electronic health records, hospital information systems, private patient databases, and imaging datasets, and involved the use of big data analytics for noncommunicable diseases. ``Probability of dying from any of cardiovascular, cancer, diabetes or chronic renal disease'' and ``suicide mortality rate'' were the most commonly assessed health indicators and core priorities within the WHO General Programme of Work 2019/2023 and the EPW 2020/2025. Big data analytics have shown moderate to high accuracy for the diagnosis and prediction of complications of diabetes mellitus as well as for the diagnosis and classification of mental disorders; prediction of suicide attempts and behaviors; and the diagnosis, treatment, and prediction of important clinical outcomes of several chronic diseases. Confidence in the results was rated as ``critically low'' for 25 reviews, as ``low'' for 7 reviews, and as ``moderate'' for 3 reviews. The most frequently identified challenges were establishment of a well-designed and structured data source, and a secure, transparent, and standardized database for patient data. Conclusions: Although the overall quality of included studies was limited, big data analytics has shown moderate to high accuracy for the diagnosis of certain diseases, improvement in managing chronic diseases, and support for prompt and real-time analyses of large sets of varied input data to diagnose and predict disease outcomes. Trial Registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42020214048; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display\_record.php?RecordID=214048 ", doi="10.2196/27275", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e27275", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33847586" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/22477, author="Meiksin, Rebecca and Melendez-Torres, J. G. and Falconer, Jane and Witzel, Charles T. and Weatherburn, Peter and Bonell, Chris", title="eHealth Interventions to Address Sexual Health, Substance Use, and Mental Health Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Systematic Review and Synthesis of Process Evaluations", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="23", volume="23", number="4", pages="e22477", keywords="eHealth", keywords="digital health", keywords="men who have sex with men", keywords="sexual health", keywords="HIV", keywords="STI", keywords="substance use", keywords="mental health", keywords="systematic review", keywords="process evaluation", abstract="Background: Men who have sex with men (MSM) face disproportionate risks concerning HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, substance use, and mental health. These outcomes constitute an interacting syndemic among MSM; interventions addressing all 3 together could have multiplicative effects. eHealth interventions can be accessed privately, and evidence from general populations suggests these can effectively address all 3 health outcomes. However, it is unclear how useable, accessible, or acceptable eHealth interventions are for MSM and what factors affect this. Objective: We undertook a systematic review of eHealth interventions addressing sexual risk, substance use, and common mental illnesses among MSM and synthesized evidence from process evaluations. Methods: We searched 19 databases, 3 trials registers, OpenGrey, and Google, and supplemented this by reference checks and requests to experts. Eligible reports were those that discussed eHealth interventions offering ongoing support to MSM aiming to prevent sexual risk, substance use, anxiety or depression; and assessed how intervention delivery or receipt varied with characteristics of interventions, providers, participants, or context. Reviewers screened citations on titles, abstracts, and then full text. Reviewers assessed quality of eligible studies, and extracted data on intervention, study characteristics, and process evaluation findings. The analysis used thematic synthesis. Results: A total of 12 reports, addressing 10 studies of 8 interventions, were eligible for process synthesis. Most addressed sexual risk alone or with other outcomes. Studies were assessed as medium and high reliability (reflecting the trustworthiness of overall findings) but tended to lack depth and breadth in terms of the process issues explored. Intervention acceptability was enhanced by ease of use; privacy protection; use of diverse media; opportunities for self-reflection and to gain knowledge and skills; and content that was clear, interactive, tailored, reflective of MSM's experiences, and affirming of sexual-minority identity. Technical issues and interventions that were too long detracted from acceptability. Some evidence suggested that acceptability varied by race or ethnicity and educational level; findings on variation by socioeconomic status were mixed. No studies explored how intervention delivery or receipt varied by provider characteristics. Conclusions: Findings suggest that eHealth interventions targeting sexual risk, substance use, and mental health are acceptable for MSM across sociodemographic groups. We identified the factors shaping MSM's receipt of such interventions, highlighting the importance of tailored content reflecting MSM's experiences and of language affirming sexual-minority identities. Intervention developers can draw on these findings to increase the usability and acceptability of integrated eHealth interventions to address the syndemic of sexual risk, substance use, and mental ill health among MSM. Evaluators of these interventions can draw on our findings to plan evaluations that explore the factors shaping usability and acceptability. ", doi="10.2196/22477", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e22477", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33890855" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/24982, author="Eberle, Claudia and Loehnert, Maxine and Stichling, Stefanie", title="Clinical Effectiveness of Different Technologies for Diabetes in Pregnancy: Systematic Literature Review", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="28", volume="23", number="4", pages="e24982", keywords="diabetes technologies", keywords="diabetes management", keywords="pregnancy", keywords="digital health", keywords="eHealth", keywords="systematic review", abstract="Background: Hyperglycemia in pregnancy occurs worldwide and is closely associated with health issues in women and their offspring, such as pregnancy and birth complications, respectively, as well as comorbidities, such as metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. To optimize the management of diabetic pregnancies, sustainable strategies are urgently needed. Investigation of constantly evolving technologies for diabetes that help to manage pregnancy and health is required. Objective: We aimed to conduct a systematic review to assess the clinical effectiveness of technologies for diabetes in pregnancy. Methods: Relevant databases including MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched in September 2020 for clinical studies (2008-2020). Findings were organized by type of diabetes, type of technology, and outcomes (glycemic control, pregnancy- and birth-related outcomes, and neonatal outcomes). Study quality was assessed using Effective Public Health Practice Project criteria. Results: We identified 15 randomized controlled trials, 3 randomized crossover trials, 2 cohort studies, and 2 controlled clinical trials. Overall, 9 studies focused on type 1 diabetes, 0 studies focused on gestational diabetes, and 3 studies focused on both type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. We found that 9 studies were strong quality, 11 were moderate quality, and 2 were weak quality. Technologies for diabetes seemed to have particularly positive effects on glycemic control in all types of diabetes, shown by some strong and moderate quality studies. Positive trends in pregnancy-related, birth-related, and neonatal outcomes were observed. Conclusions: Technologies have the potential to effectively improve the management of diabetes during pregnancy. Further research on the clinical effectiveness of these technologies is needed, especially in pregnant women with type 2 diabetes. ", doi="10.2196/24982", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e24982", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33908894" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/22215, author="Gaspar, Martins Andr{\'e}a G. and Lap{\~a}o, Velez Lu{\'i}s", title="eHealth for Addressing Balance Disorders in the Elderly: Systematic Review", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="28", volume="23", number="4", pages="e22215", keywords="balance disorders", keywords="falls", keywords="elderly", keywords="eHealth", keywords="telemedicine", abstract="Background: The population is aging on a global scale, triggering vulnerability for chronic multimorbidity, balance disorders, and falls. Falls with injuries are the main cause of accidental death in the elderly population, representing a relevant public health problem. Balance disorder is a major risk factor for falling and represents one of the most frequent reasons for health care demand. The use of information and communication technologies to support distance healthcare (eHealth) represents an opportunity to improve the access and quality of health care services for the elderly. In recent years, several studies have addressed the potential of eHealth devices to assess the balance and risk of falling of elderly people. Remote rehabilitation has also been explored. However, the clinical applicability of these digital solutions for elderly people with balance disorders remains to be studied. Objective: The aim of this review was to guide the clinical applicability of eHealth devices in providing the screening, assessment, and treatment of elderly people with balance disorders, but without neurological disease. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) statement. Data were obtained through searching the PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and SciELO databases. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasiexperimental studies (QESs) published between January 2015 and December 2019 were included. The quality of the evidence to respond to the research question was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal for RCTs and the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for QESs. RCTs were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We provide a narrative synthesis of the main outcomes from the included studies. Results: Among 1030 unduplicated articles retrieved, 21 articles were included in this review. Twelve studies explored different technology devices to obtain data about balance and risk of falling. Nine studies focused on different types of balance exercise training. A wide range of clinical tests, functional scales, classifications of faller participants, sensor-based tasks, intervention protocols, and follow-up times were used. Only one study described the clinical conditions of the participants. Instrumental tests of the inner ear were neither used as the gold-standard test nor performed in pre and postrehabilitation assessments. Conclusions: eHealth has potential for providing additional health care to elderly people with balance disorder and risk of falling. In the included literature, the heterogeneity of populations under study, methodologies, eHealth devices, and time of follow-up did not allow for clear comparison to guide proper clinical applicability. This suggests that more rigorous studies are needed. ", doi="10.2196/22215", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e22215", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33908890" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/26877, author="Ruhi, Umar and Chugh, Ritesh", title="Utility, Value, and Benefits of Contemporary Personal Health Records: Integrative Review and Conceptual Synthesis", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="29", volume="23", number="4", pages="e26877", keywords="electronic personal health records", keywords="PHR", keywords="functionality synopsis", keywords="value analysis", keywords="consumer health informatics", abstract="Background: Contemporary personal health record (PHR) technologies offer a useful platform for individuals to maintain a lifelong record of personally reported and clinically sourced data from various points of medical care. Objective: This paper presents an integrative review and synthesis of the extant literature on PHRs. This review draws upon multiple lenses of analysis and deliberates value perspectives of PHRs at the product, consumer, and industry levels. Methods: Academic databases were searched using multiple keywords related to PHRs for the years 2001-2020. Three research questions were formulated and used as selection criteria in our review of the extant literature relevant to our study. Results: We offer a high-level functional utility model of PHR features and functions. We also conceptualize a consumer value framework of PHRs, highlighting the applications of these technologies across various health care delivery activities. Finally, we provide a summary of the benefits of PHRs for various health care constituents, including consumers, providers, payors, and public health agencies. Conclusions: PHR products offer a myriad of content-, connectivity-, and collaboration-based features and functions for their users. Although consumers benefit from the tools provided by PHR technologies, their overall value extends across the constituents of the health care delivery chain. Despite advances in technology, our literature review identifies a shortfall in the research addressing consumer value enabled by PHR tools. In addition to scholars and researchers, our literature review and proposed framework may be especially helpful for value analysis committees in the health care sector that are commissioned for the appraisal of innovative health information technologies such as PHRs. ", doi="10.2196/26877", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e26877", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33866308" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/26939, author="McCall, C. Hugh and Hadjistavropoulos, D. Heather and Sundstr{\"o}m, Francis Christopher Richard", title="Exploring the Role of Persuasive Design in Unguided Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety Among Adults: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="29", volume="23", number="4", pages="e26939", keywords="ICBT", keywords="internet", keywords="depression", keywords="anxiety", keywords="persuasive design", keywords="eHealth", abstract="Background: Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) is an effective treatment that can overcome barriers to mental health care. Various research groups have suggested that unguided ICBT (ie, ICBT without therapist support) and other eHealth interventions can be designed to enhance user engagement and thus outcomes. The persuasive systems design framework captures most design recommendations for eHealth interventions, but there is little empirical evidence that persuasive design is related to clinical outcomes in unguided ICBT. Objective: This study aims to provide an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of unguided ICBT for depression and anxiety, describe the frequency with which various persuasive design principles are used in such interventions, and use meta-regression to explore whether a greater number of persuasive design elements predicts efficacy in unguided ICBT for depression and anxiety. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of 5 databases to identify randomized controlled trials of unguided ICBT for depression and anxiety. We conducted separate random effects meta-analyses and separate meta-regressions for depression and anxiety interventions. Each meta-regression included 2 steps. The first step included, as a predictor, whether each intervention was transdiagnostic. For the meta-regression of ICBT for depression, the first step also included the type of control condition. The number of persuasive design principles identified for each intervention was added as a predictor in the second step to reveal the additional variance in effect sizes explained by persuasive design. Results: Of the 4471 articles we identified in our search, 46 (1.03\%) were eligible for inclusion in our analyses. Our meta-analyses showed effect sizes (Hedges g) ranging from 0.22 to 0.31 for depression interventions, depending on the measures taken to account for bias in the results. We found a mean effect size of 0.45 (95\% CI 0.33-0.56) for anxiety interventions, with no evidence that the results were inflated by bias. Included interventions were identified as using between 1 and 13 persuasive design principles, with an average of 4.95 (SD 2.85). The meta-regressions showed that a greater number of persuasive design principles predicted greater efficacy in ICBT for depression (R2 change=0.27; B=0.04; P=.02) but not anxiety (R2 change=0.05; B=0.03; P=.17). Conclusions: These findings show wide variability in the use of persuasive design in unguided ICBT for depression and anxiety and provide preliminary support for the proposition that more persuasively designed interventions are more efficacious, at least in the treatment of depression. Further research is needed to clarify the role of persuasive design in ICBT. ", doi="10.2196/26939", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e26939", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33913811" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/25140, author="Cliffe, Bethany and Tingley, Jessica and Greenhalgh, Isobel and Stallard, Paul", title="mHealth Interventions for Self-Harm: Scoping Review", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="30", volume="23", number="4", pages="e25140", keywords="mHealth", keywords="self-harm", keywords="digital interventions", keywords="self-injury", keywords="NSSI", keywords="mobile phone", abstract="Background: Self-harm is a growing issue with increasing prevalence rates; however, individuals who self-harm do not often receive treatment. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions are a possible solution to some of the barriers that individuals face when seeking support, and they have also been found to be effective in improving mental health. Thus far, reviews of mHealth interventions for self-harm have been limited by study type. Therefore, we determined that a broader scoping review will provide a more exhaustive understanding of mHealth interventions for self-harm. Objective: This scoping review aims to identify mHealth interventions for self-harm within the literature, understand the types and features of interventions that have been developed and evaluated, highlight research findings around mHealth interventions for self-harm, and determine what outcomes are typically used to assess the efficacy of interventions. Methods: A search was conducted using Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, PsycEXTRA, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were included if they described an mHealth intervention designed to have a direct (ie, if the intervention was designed for self-harm or for people who self-harm) or indirect (ie, if self-harm was measured as an outcome) treatment effect and if the paper was available in English. There were no exclusion criteria based on the study design. Results: A total of 36 papers were included in the review, and most of them were randomized controlled trials published within the last 4 years. The interventions were mostly smartphone apps and calling or texting services, with 62\% (21/34) having underlying therapeutic models to inform the intervention content. They were generally shown to be promising and appealing, but only 5 were widely available for use. Outcomes focused on a reduction of self-harm and suicidality, mood, and the users' experiences of the intervention. Samples were typically nondiverse, and there was limited variety in the study designs and in the measurements of self-harm recovery. Conclusions: Promising and appealing mHealth interventions have been developed but are not widely available. Research could benefit from greater diversity as well as a broader and more nuanced understanding of recovery from self-harm. ", doi="10.2196/25140", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e25140", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33929329" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/26699, author="M{\"o}nninghoff, Annette and Kramer, Niklas Jan and Hess, Jan Alexander and Ismailova, Kamila and Teepe, W. Gisbert and Tudor Car, Lorainne and M{\"u}ller-Riemenschneider, Falk and Kowatsch, Tobias", title="Long-term Effectiveness of mHealth Physical Activity Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="30", volume="23", number="4", pages="e26699", keywords="mHealth", keywords="physical activity", keywords="systematic review", keywords="meta-analysis", keywords="mobile phone", abstract="Background: Mobile health (mHealth) interventions can increase physical activity (PA); however, their long-term impact is not well understood. Objective: The primary aim of this study is to understand the immediate and long-term effects of mHealth interventions on PA. The secondary aim is to explore potential effect moderators. Methods: We performed this study according to the Cochrane and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and PsycINFO in July 2020. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials of mHealth interventions targeting PA as a primary outcome in adults. Eligible outcome measures were walking, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), total physical activity (TPA), and energy expenditure. Where reported, we extracted data for 3 time points (ie, end of intervention, follow-up ?6 months, and follow-up >6 months). To explore effect moderators, we performed subgroup analyses by population, intervention design, and control group type. Results were summarized using random effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Results: Of the 2828 identified studies, 117 were included. These studies reported on 21,118 participants with a mean age of 52.03 (SD 14.14) years, of whom 58.99\% (n=12,459) were female. mHealth interventions significantly increased PA across all the 4 outcome measures at the end of intervention (walking standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.46, 95\% CI 0.36-0.55; P<.001; MVPA SMD 0.28, 95\% CI 0.21-0.35; P<.001; TPA SMD 0.34, 95\% CI 0.20-0.47; P<.001; energy expenditure SMD 0.44, 95\% CI 0.13-0.75; P=.01). Only 33 studies reported short-term follow-up measurements, and 8 studies reported long-term follow-up measurements in addition to end-of-intervention results. In the short term, effects were sustained for walking (SMD 0.26, 95\% CI 0.09-0.42; P=.002), MVPA (SMD 0.20, 95\% CI 0.05-0.35; P=.008), and TPA (SMD 0.53, 95\% CI 0.13-0.93; P=.009). In the long term, effects were also sustained for walking (SMD 0.25, 95\% CI 0.10-0.39; P=.001) and MVPA (SMD 0.19, 95\% CI 0.11-0.27; P<.001). We found the study population to be an effect moderator, with higher effect scores in sick and at-risk populations. PA was increased both in scalable and nonscalable mHealth intervention designs and regardless of the control group type. The risk of bias was rated high in 80.3\% (94/117) of the studies. Heterogeneity was significant, resulting in low to very low quality of evidence. Conclusions: mHealth interventions can foster small to moderate increases in PA. The effects are maintained long term; however, the effect size decreases over time. The results encourage using mHealth interventions in at-risk and sick populations and support the use of scalable mHealth intervention designs to affordably reach large populations. However, given the low evidence quality, further methodologically rigorous studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term effects. ", doi="10.2196/26699", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e26699", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33811021" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/23914, author="Kazevman, Gill and Mercado, Marck and Hulme, Jennifer and Somers, Andrea", title="Prescribing Phones to Address Health Equity Needs in the COVID-19 Era: The PHONE-CONNECT Program", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="6", volume="23", number="4", pages="e23914", keywords="digital health equity", keywords="health inequity", keywords="digital determinants of health", keywords="emergency medicine", keywords="COVID-19", keywords="public health", keywords="health policy", keywords="primary care", keywords="cell phone", doi="10.2196/23914", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e23914", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33760753" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/21726, author="Davies, R. Alisha and Honeyman, Matthew and Gann, Bob", title="Addressing the Digital Inverse Care Law in the Time of COVID-19: Potential for Digital Technology to Exacerbate or Mitigate Health Inequalities", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="7", volume="23", number="4", pages="e21726", keywords="COVID-19", keywords="digital divide", keywords="digital exclusion", keywords="digital health", keywords="health inequality", keywords="population health", doi="10.2196/21726", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e21726", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33735096" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/23635, author="Li, Yaning and Ye, Hongqiang and Ye, Fan and Liu, Yunsong and Lv, Longwei and Zhang, Ping and Zhang, Xiao and Zhou, Yongsheng", title="The Current Situation and Future Prospects of Simulators in Dental Education", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="8", volume="23", number="4", pages="e23635", keywords="dental simulator", keywords="dental education", keywords="virtual reality", doi="10.2196/23635", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e23635", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33830059" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/24179, author="Steinkamp, Jackson and Kantrowitz, Jacob and Sharma, Abhinav and Bala, Wasif", title="Beyond Notes: Why It Is Time to Abandon an Outdated Documentation Paradigm", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="20", volume="23", number="4", pages="e24179", keywords="electronic medical records", keywords="health informatics", keywords="information chaos", keywords="medical documentation", keywords="clinicians", keywords="medical notes", keywords="electronic medical notes", keywords="medical team", doi="10.2196/24179", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e24179", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33877053" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/25916, author="Logan, E. Deirdre and Simons, E. Laura and Caruso, J. Thomas and Gold, I. Jeffrey and Greenleaf, Walter and Griffin, Anya and King, D. Christopher and Menendez, Maria and Olbrecht, A. Vanessa and Rodriguez, Samuel and Silvia, Megan and Stinson, N. Jennifer and Wang, Ellen and Williams, E. Sara and Wilson, Luke", title="Leveraging Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality to Combat Chronic Pain in Youth: Position Paper From the Interdisciplinary Network on Virtual and Augmented Technologies for Pain Management", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="26", volume="23", number="4", pages="e25916", keywords="virtual reality", keywords="pediatric", keywords="chronic pain", abstract="Background: Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) interventions are emerging as promising tools in the treatment of pediatric chronic pain conditions. However, in this young field, there is little consensus to guide the process of engaging in the development and evaluation of targeted VR-based interventions. Objective: The INOVATE-Pain (Interdisciplinary Network on Virtual and Augmented Technologies for Pain management) consortium aims to advance the field of VR for pediatric chronic pain rehabilitation by providing guidance for best practices in the design, evaluation, and dissemination of VR-based interventions targeting this population. Methods: An interdisciplinary meeting of 16 academics, clinicians, industry partners, and philanthropy partners was held in January 2020. Results: Reviewing the state of the field, the consortium identified important directions for research-driven innovation in VR and AR clinical care, highlighted key opportunities and challenges facing the field, and established a consensus on best methodological practices to adopt in future efforts to advance the research and practice of VR and AR in pediatric pain. The consortium also identified important next steps to undertake to continue to advance the work in this promising new area of digital health pain interventions. Conclusions: To realize the promise of this realm of innovation, key ingredients for success include productive partnerships among industry, academic, and clinical stakeholders; a uniform set of outcome domains and measures for standardized evaluation; and widespread access to the latest opportunities, tools, and resources. The INOVATE-Pain collaborative hopes to promote the creation, rigorous yet efficient evaluation, and dissemination of innovative VR-based interventions to reduce pain and improve quality of life for children. ", doi="10.2196/25916", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e25916", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33667177" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/25502, author="Lalande, Kathleen and Greenman, S. Paul and Bouchard, Karen and Johnson, M. Susan and Tulloch, Heather", title="The Healing Hearts Together Randomized Controlled Trial and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Tutorial for Transitioning From an In-Person to a Web-Based Intervention", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="6", volume="23", number="4", pages="e25502", keywords="web-based intervention", keywords="internet-based intervention", keywords="randomized controlled trial", keywords="COVID-19", keywords="research", keywords="tutorial", keywords="digital medicine", keywords="behavioral medicine", keywords="telehealth", keywords="telemedicine", keywords="cardiovascular rehabilitation", doi="10.2196/25502", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e25502", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33729984" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/19439, author="Wadensten, Towe and Nystr{\"o}m, Emma and Franz{\'e}n, Karin and Lindam, Anna and Wasteson, Elisabet and Samuelsson, Eva", title="A Mobile App for Self-management of Urgency and Mixed Urinary Incontinence in Women: Randomized Controlled Trial", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="5", volume="23", number="4", pages="e19439", keywords="eHealth", keywords="mHealth", keywords="urinary incontinence", keywords="urgency urinary incontinence", keywords="mixed urinary incontinence", keywords="self-management", keywords="mobile app", keywords="smartphone app", keywords="women", abstract="Background: Many women experience urgency (UUI) and mixed (MUI) urinary incontinence but commonly hesitate to seek care. Treatment access and self-management for these conditions can be supported through eHealth approaches. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the mobile app T{\"a}t II for self-management of UUI and MUI in women. Methods: This randomized controlled trial included women ?18 years old with UUI or MUI and ?2 leakages per week. Those with red-flag symptoms were excluded. Participants were recruited via analog and digital advertisements and screened for initial selection through a web-based questionnaire. Data were collected using another questionnaire and a 2-day bladder diary. A telephone interview confirmed the symptom diagnosis. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive access to a treatment app (including pelvic floor muscle training, bladder training, psychoeducation, lifestyle advice, tailored advice, exercise log, reinforcement messages, and reminders) or an information app (control group), with no external treatment guidance provided. The primary outcome was incontinence symptoms at the 15-week follow-up, measured using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ)?Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF). Urgency symptoms were assessed using the ICIQ?Overactive Bladder Module (ICIQ-OAB) and quality of life using the ICIQ?Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life Module (ICIQ-LUTSqol). Incontinence episode frequency (IEF) was calculated per bladder diary entries. Improvement was measured using the Patient's Global Impression of Improvement. All outcomes were self-reported. Cure was defined as no leakages per the bladder diary. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed. Results: Between April 2017 and March 2018, 123 women (mean age 58.3, SD 9.6 years) were randomized to the treatment (n=60, 2 lost to follow-up) or information (n=63) group. Of these, 35 (28\%) women had UUI, and 88 (72\%) had MUI. Mean ICIQ-UI SF score at follow-up was lower in the treatment group than in the information group (estimated difference ?3.1, 95\% CI ?4.8 to ?1.3). The estimated between-group difference was ?1.8 (95\% CI ?2.8 to ?0.99) for mean ICIQ-OAB score and ?6.3 (95\% CI ?10.5 to ?2.1) for the mean ICIQ-LUTSqol score at follow-up. IEF reduction from baseline to follow-up was greater in the treatment group (?10.5, IQR ?17.5 to ?3.5) than in the information group (P<.001). Improvement was reported by 87\% (52/60) of treatment group participants and by 30\% (19/63) of information group participants. The cure rate was 32\% in the treatment group, and 6\% in the information group (odds ratio 5.4, 95\% CI 1.9-15.6; P=.002). About 67\% (40/60) of the treatment group participants used the app more than thrice a week. Conclusions: The treatment app was effective for improving urgency and mixed incontinence in women. When self-management is appropriate, this app may be a good alternative to pharmacological treatment or other conservative management, thus increasing access to care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03097549; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03097549 ", doi="10.2196/19439", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e19439", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33818395" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/24260, author="Bailey, Eleanor and Robinson, Jo and Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario and Nedeljkovic, Maja and Valentine, Lee and Bendall, Sarah and D'Alfonso, Simon and Gilbertson, Tamsyn and McKechnie, Ben and Rice, Simon", title="Moderated Online Social Therapy for Young People With Active Suicidal Ideation: Qualitative Study", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="5", volume="23", number="4", pages="e24260", keywords="suicide", keywords="youth", keywords="social media", keywords="internet-based intervention", abstract="Background: Web-based interventions are a promising approach to support youth at risk of suicide, and those incorporating peer-to-peer social networking may have the added potential to target interpersonal states of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness. Owing to feasibility and safety concerns, including fear of contagion, this had not been tested until recently. In 2018, we conducted a pilot evaluation to test the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of a Moderated Online Social Therapy intervention, called Affinity, with a sample of young people with active suicidal ideation. Objective: The aim of this study is to report qualitative data collected from study participants regarding their experience of the web-based social network and the consequent safety features. Methods: Affinity is a closed website incorporating 3 key components: therapeutic content delivered via comics, peer-to-peer social networking, and moderation by peers and clinicians. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 17 young people who participated in the pilot study after 8 weeks of exposure to the intervention. Interview data from 2 young people who did not use Affinity were excluded from the analysis. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis, with the frequency of responses characterized using the consensual qualitative research method. The results are reported in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist. Results: A total of 4 overarching themes were identified: a safe and supportive environment, the importance of mutual experiences, difficulty engaging and connecting, and the pros and cons of banning discussions about suicide. Interestingly, although Affinity was perceived to be safe and free of judgment, concerns about negative evaluation and triggering others were significant barriers to posting on the social network. Participants generally supported the banning of conversations about suicide, although for some this was perceived to reinforce stigma or was associated with frustration and distress. Conclusions: The results not only support the safety and potential therapeutic benefit of the social networking aspect of Affinity but also highlight several implementation challenges. There is a need to carefully balance the need for stringent safety and design features while ensuring that the potential for therapeutic benefit is maximized. ", doi="10.2196/24260", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e24260", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33818392" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/21466, author="Biliunaite, Ieva and Kazlauskas, Evaldas and Sanderman, Robbert and Truskauskaite-Kuneviciene, Inga and Dumarkaite, Austeja and Andersson, Gerhard", title="Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Informal Caregivers: Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="7", volume="23", number="4", pages="e21466", keywords="caregiver burden", keywords="informal caregivers", keywords="internet intervention", keywords="cognitive behavioral therapy", keywords="eHealth", keywords="mHealth", abstract="Background: Caregiving for a family member can result in reduced well-being for the caregiver. Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) may be one way to support this population. This is especially the case for caregivers in countries with limited resources, but high demand for psychological services. Objective: In this study we evaluated the effects of a therapist-guided 8-week-long ICBT intervention for informal caregivers. Methods: In total, 63 participants were recruited online and randomized either to the intervention or to the wait-list control group. The main study outcome was the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI). Secondary outcomes included measures of caregiver depression, anxiety, stress, and quality of life. Results: Moderate between-group effect sizes were observed for the CBI measure, in favor of the intervention group, with a Cohen d=--0.70 for the intention-to-treat analysis. Analyses of the subscales of the CBI showed significant reductions on the subscales of Development and Physical Health. Moderate reductions were found for depression and anxiety scores as indicated by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scores. Large between-group effects were observed for reduction in stress and increase in quality of life as indicated by the Perceived Stress Scale-14 (PSS-14), The Brunnsviken Brief Quality of Life Scale (BBQ), and The World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5). In addition, participants experienced little to no difficulty in using the program and were mostly satisfied with the intervention's platform and the choice of content. Conclusions: This is the first internet intervention study for informal caregivers in Lithuania. The results suggest that therapist-guided ICBT can be effective in reducing caregiver burden, anxiety, depression, stress, and improving quality of life. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04052724; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04052724 ", doi="10.2196/21466", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e21466", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33825687" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/22399, author="Seljelid, Berit and Varsi, Cecilie and Solberg Nes, Lise and {\O}ystese, Astrid Kristin and B{\o}r{\o}sund, Elin", title="A Digital Patient-Provider Communication Intervention (InvolveMe): Qualitative Study on the Implementation Preparation Based on Identified Facilitators and Barriers", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="8", volume="23", number="4", pages="e22399", keywords="eHealth", keywords="digital communication", keywords="secure messages", keywords="digital symptom assessment", keywords="implementation", keywords="tailoring", keywords="Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research", keywords="CFIR", keywords="facilitators", keywords="barriers", keywords="stakeholders", abstract="Background: Chronic health conditions are affecting an increasing number of individuals, who experience various symptoms that decrease their quality of life. Digital communication interventions that enable patients to report their symptoms have been shown to positively impact chronic disease management by improving access to care, patient-provider communication, clinical outcomes, and health-related quality of life. These interventions have the potential to prepare patients and health care providers (HCPs) before visits and improve patient-provider communication. Despite the recent rapid development and increasing number of digital communication interventions that have shown positive research results, barriers to realizing the benefits offered through these types of interventions still exist. Objective: The aim of this study is to prepare for the implementation of a digital patient-provider communication intervention in the daily workflow at 2 outpatient clinics by identifying potential determinants of implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to tailor the use of digital communication intervention to the intended context and identify key aspects for an implementation plan. Methods: A combination of focus groups, workshops, and project steering committee meetings was conducted with HCPs (n=14) and patients (n=2) from 2 outpatient clinics at a university hospital. The CFIR was used to guide data collection and analysis. Transcripts, written minutes, and notes were analyzed and coded into 5 CFIR domains using thematic analysis. Results: Data were examined and analyzed into 18 CFIR constructs relevant to the study purpose. On the basis of the identified determinants, important intervention tailoring includes adjustments to the digital features and adjustments to fit the clinical workflow and a decision to conduct a future pilot study. Furthermore, it was decided to provide the intervention to patients as early as possible in their disease trajectory, with tailored information about its use. Key aspects for the implementation plan encompassed maintaining the identified engagement and positive attitude, involving key stakeholders in the implementation process, and providing the needed support and training. Conclusions: This study offers insight into the involvement of stakeholders in the tailoring and implementation planning of a digital communication intervention in clinical practice. Stakeholder involvement in the identification of implementation facilitators and barriers can contribute to the tailoring of digital communication interventions and how they are used and can also inform systematic and targeted implementation planning. ", doi="10.2196/22399", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e22399", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33830063" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/24639, author="Acharya, Chathur and Sehrawat, S. Tejasav and McGuire, B. Deborah and Shaw, Jawaid and Fagan, Andrew and McGeorge, Sara and Olofson, Amy and White, B. Melanie and Gavis, Edith and Kamath, S. Patrick and Bergstrom, Lori and Bajaj, Singh Jasmohan", title="Perspectives of Inpatients With Cirrhosis and Caregivers on Using Health Information Technology: Cross-sectional Multicenter Study", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="9", volume="23", number="4", pages="e24639", keywords="hepatic encephalopathy", keywords="cirrhosis", keywords="outcomes", keywords="acceptance", keywords="PatientBuddy", keywords="ascites", keywords="readmissions", keywords="hepatic", keywords="encephalopathy", abstract="Background: Health information technology (IT) interventions to decrease readmissions for cirrhosis may be limited by patient-associated factors. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine perspectives regarding adoption versus refusal of health IT interventions among patient-caregiver dyads. Methods: Inpatients with cirrhosis and their caregivers were approached to participate in a randomized health IT intervention trial requiring daily contact with research teams via the Patient Buddy app. This app focuses on ascites, medications, and hepatic encephalopathy over 30 days. Regression analyses for characteristics associated with acceptance were performed. For those who declined, a semistructured interview was performed with themes focused on caregivers, protocol, transport/logistics, technology demands, and privacy. Results: A total of 349 patient-caregiver dyads were approached (191 from Virginia Commonwealth University, 56 from Richmond Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and 102 from Mayo Clinic), 87 of which (25\%) agreed to participate. On regression, dyads agreeing included a male patient (odds ratio [OR] 2.08, P=.01), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 2.3, P=.006), or hepatic encephalopathy admission (OR 2.0, P=.01), whereas opioid use (OR 0.46, P=.03) and alcohol-related etiology (OR 0.54, P=.02) were associated with refusal. Race, study site, and other admission reasons did not contribute to refusing participation. Among the 262 dyads who declined randomization, caregiver reluctance (43\%), perceived burden (31\%), technology-related issues (14\%), transportation/logistics (10\%), and others (4\%), but not privacy, were highlighted as major concerns. Conclusions: Patients with cirrhosis admitted with hepatic encephalopathy and gastrointestinal bleeding without opioid use or alcohol-related etiologies were more likely to participate in a health IT intervention focused on preventing readmissions. Caregiver and study burden but not privacy were major reasons to decline participation. Reducing perceived patient-caregiver burden and improving communication may improve participation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03564626; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03564626 ", doi="10.2196/24639", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e24639", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33744844" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/24690, author="Xu, Ran and Cavallo, David", title="Social Network Analysis of the Effects of a Social Media--Based Weight Loss Intervention Targeting Adults of Low Socioeconomic Status: Single-Arm Intervention Trial", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="9", volume="23", number="4", pages="e24690", keywords="weight loss intervention", keywords="social media intervention", keywords="electronic health", keywords="social network analysis", abstract="Background: Obesity is a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease risk factors, including hypertension and type II diabetes. Although numerous weight loss interventions have demonstrated efficacy, there is considerably less evidence about the theoretical mechanisms through which they work. Delivering lifestyle behavior change interventions via social media provides unique opportunities for understanding mechanisms of intervention effects. Server data collected directly from web-based platforms can provide detailed, real-time behavioral information over the course of intervention programs that can be used to understand how interventions work. Objective: The objective of this study was to demonstrate how social network analysis can facilitate our understanding of the mechanisms underlying a social media--based weight loss intervention. Methods: We performed secondary analysis by using data from a pilot study that delivered a dietary and physical activity intervention to a group of participants via Facebook. We mapped out participants' interaction networks over the 12-week intervention period and linked participants' network characteristics (eg, in-degree, out-degree, network constraint) to participants' changes in theoretical mediators (ie, dietary knowledge, perceived social support, self-efficacy) and weight loss by using regression analysis. We also performed mediation analyses to explore how the effects of social network measures on weight loss could be mediated by the aforementioned theoretical mediators. Results: In this analysis, 47 participants from 2 waves completed the study and were included. We found that increases in the number of posts, comments, and reactions significantly predicted weight loss ($\beta$=--.94, P=.04); receiving comments positively predicted changes in self-efficacy ($\beta$=7.81, P=.009), and the degree to which one's network neighbors are tightly connected with each other weakly predicted changes in perceived social support ($\beta$=7.70, P=.08). In addition, change in self-efficacy mediated the relationship between receiving comments and weight loss ($\beta$=--.89, P=.02). Conclusions: Our analyses using data from this pilot study linked participants' network characteristics with changes in several important study outcomes of interest such as self-efficacy, social support, and weight. Our results point to the potential of using social network analysis to understand the social processes and mechanisms through which web-based behavioral interventions affect participants' psychological and behavioral outcomes. Future studies are warranted to validate our results and to further explore the relationship between network dynamics and study outcomes in similar and larger trials. ", doi="10.2196/24690", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e24690", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33835033" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/19743, author="Tindall, Lucy and Toner, Paul and Mikocka-Walus, Antonina and Wright, Barry", title="Perceptions of and Opinions on a Computerized Behavioral Activation Program for the Treatment of Depression in Young People: Thematic Analysis", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="13", volume="23", number="4", pages="e19743", keywords="depression", keywords="qualitative", keywords="thematic analysis", keywords="young people", keywords="health care professionals", keywords="computerized therapies", abstract="Background: Depression is one of the leading causes of illness and disability in young people, with approximately 20\% having experienced a depressive episode by the age of 18 years. Behavioral activation (BA), a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence--recommended treatment for adults with depression, has shown preliminary support for its use with young people. BA may have the potential to be adapted and delivered in a computerized format to address the barriers often associated with young people accessing support. Despite the benefits of adopting computerized therapy delivery, the limited effectiveness of some programs has been attributed to a failure to tailor interventions to patients and practices. Therefore, while developing new treatments, it is important that target users be involved in the intervention design. Objective: This qualitative study aims to explore the views and preferences of young people and health care professionals regarding the development of a new computerized BA therapy for young people with low mood or depression, to ensure that the therapy was suitable for the target user. Methods: Semistructured focus groups and individual interviews were conducted with young people (those with experience in accessing support and those without) and health care professionals regarding the development of a new computerized BA therapy for young people with low mood or depression. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: A total of 27 individuals, comprising both health care professionals and young people, participated in this study. Vital information pertaining to the important components of a new therapy, including its presentation, delivery, and content, was collected. Conclusions: Variations in perspectives highlighted the need to adopt a systemic approach in therapy development by considering the opinions of young people with and without experience in accessing mental health support and health care professionals. ", doi="10.2196/19743", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e19743", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33847594" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/25219, author="Mansor, Elliza and Ahmad, Norliza and Raj, Diana and Mohd Zulkefli, Afiah Nor and Mohd Shariff, Zalilah", title="Predictors of Parental Barriers to Reduce Excessive Child Screen Time Among Parents of Under-Five Children in Selangor, Malaysia: Cross-sectional Study", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="13", volume="23", number="4", pages="e25219", keywords="child", keywords="self-efficacy", keywords="screen time", keywords="Malaysia", keywords="parent-child relations", keywords="public sector", keywords="children", keywords="screen", keywords="parental", abstract="Background: Globally, there is an increasing prevalence of excessive screen time exposure among young children, including in Malaysia. Parents are advised to limit this exposure, but there are barriers for many of them to follow this recommendation. To date, there is a lack of research on the factors that cause these parental barriers. Objective: This study aimed to determine the parental barrier toward the reduction of excessive child screen time and its predictors among parents of children aged younger than 5 years in the Petaling District, Selangor, Malaysia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2019 to June 2020 among 789 parent-child dyads attending child health clinics in the Petaling District. Validated self-administered questionnaires were used to capture information on sociodemographic, parental, child-related, and environmental factors and parental barriers. Stratified sampling with probability proportionate to size was employed. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 25 (IBM Corp). Descriptive analysis and bivariable analysis were performed before multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of parental barriers. Results: The overall mean score of parental barriers was 3.51 (SD 0.83), indicating that the average numbers of barriers experienced by parents were more than 3. The multivariable analysis showed that the predictors of parental barriers included monthly household income (adjusted $\beta$=--.03, 95\% CI --0.05 to --0.02), parents who worked in public sectors (adjusted $\beta$=.18, 95\% CI 0.06 to 0.29), positive parental attitude on screens (adjusted $\beta$=.68, 95\% CI 0.58 to 0.79), low parent self-efficacy to influence child's physical activity (adjusted $\beta$=--.32, 95\% CI --0.43 to --0.20), and child screen time (adjusted $\beta$=.04, 95\% CI 0.02 to 0.06). Conclusions: The strongest predictor of parental barriers to reduce excessive child screen time was the positive parental attitude on screen time which could contribute to their abilities to limit child screen time. Thus, future intervention strategies should aim to foster correct parental attitudes toward screen time activities among young children. ", doi="10.2196/25219", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e25219", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33847590" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/23487, author="Morriss, Richard and Kaylor-Hughes, Catherine and Rawsthorne, Matthew and Coulson, Neil and Simpson, Sandra and Guo, Boliang and James, Marilyn and Lathe, James and Moran, Paul and Tata, J. Laila and Williams, Laura", title="A Direct-to-Public Peer Support Program (Big White Wall) Versus Web-Based Information to Aid the Self-management of Depression and Anxiety: Results and Challenges of an Automated Randomized Controlled Trial", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="23", volume="23", number="4", pages="e23487", keywords="peer support", keywords="digital mental health", keywords="depression", keywords="anxiety", keywords="population reach", keywords="productivity", keywords="mobile phone", abstract="Background: Effective help for depression and anxiety reaches a small proportion of people who might benefit from it. The scale of the problem suggests the need for effective, safe web-based public health services delivered directly to the public. One model, the Big White Wall (BWW), offers peer support at low cost. As these interventions are delivered digitally, we tested whether a randomized controlled trial (RCT) intervention could also be fully delivered and evaluated digitally. Objective: This study aims to determine the reach, feasibility, acceptability, baseline costs, and outcomes of a public health campaign for an automated RCT of the BWW, providing digital peer support and information, compared with a standard website used by the National Health Service Moodzone (MZ), to people with probable mild-to-moderate depression and anxiety disorder. The primary outcome was the change in self-rated well-being at 6 weeks, measured using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale. Methods: An 18-month campaign was conducted across Nottinghamshire, the United Kingdom (target population 914,000) to advertise the trial directly to the public through general marketing, web-based and social media sources, health services, other public services, and third-sector groups. The population reach of this campaign was examined by the number of people accessing the study website and self-registering to the study. A pragmatic, parallel-group, single-blind RCT was then conducted using a fully automated trial website in which eligible participants were randomized to receive either 6 months of access to BWW or signposted to MZ. Those eligible for participation were aged >16 years with probable mild-to-moderate depression or anxiety disorders. Results: Of 6483 visitors to the study website, 1510 (23.29\%) were eligible. Overall, 790 of 1510 (52.32\%) visitors participated. Of 790 visitors, 397 (50.3\%) were randomized to BWW and 393 (49.7\%) to MZ. Their mean age was 38 (SD 13.8) years, 81.0\% (640/790) were female, 93.4\% (738/790) were White, and 47.4\% (271/572) had no contact with health services in the previous 3 months. We estimated 3-month productivity losses of {\textsterling}1001.01 (95\% CI 868.75-1133.27; US \$1380.79; 95\% CI 1198.35-1563.23) per person for those employed. Only 16.6\% (131/790) participants completed the primary outcome assessment. There were no differences in the primary or secondary outcomes between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Most participants reached and those eligible for this trial of digital interventions were White women not in recent contact with health services and whose productivity losses represent a significant annual societal burden. A fully automated RCT recruiting directly from the public failed to recruit and retain sufficient participants to test the clinical effectiveness of this digital intervention, primarily because it did not personally engage participants and explain how these unfamiliar interventions might benefit them. Trial Registration: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 12673428; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12673428 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/resprot.8061 ", doi="10.2196/23487", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e23487", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33890858" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/25480, author="Laine, Anna and Anttila, Minna and Hirvonen, Heli and V{\"a}lim{\"a}ki, Maritta", title="Feasibility of a Web-Based Psychoeducation Course and Experiences of Caregivers Living With a Person With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder: Mixed Methods Study", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="23", volume="23", number="4", pages="e25480", keywords="caregiver", keywords="informal caregiver", keywords="internet", keywords="mental health", keywords="psychoeducation", keywords="schizophrenia", keywords="mobile phone", abstract="Background: Schizophrenia is a severe mental illness that burdens both patients and caregivers. Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of a web-based psychoeducation course targeted at caregivers of persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) and to describe their experiences of living with a person with SSD based on the material caregivers produced during the web-based course. Methods: A convergent, parallel, mixed methods study design was used. First, caregivers' engagement in the course was evaluated quantitatively. Second, the overview of the course feedback was evaluated using quantitative and qualitative methods. Third, the experiences of being a caregiver to a person with SSD were analyzed qualitatively with the thematic analysis of the writings caregivers produced during the web-based course. Results: A total of 30 caregivers participated in the study and a web-based psychoeducation course. Less than two-thirds (18/30, 60\%) completed the course. Content was most often logged for the first module, Orientation (3465 log-ins), and the lowest number of log-ins was recorded for the Daily life module (1061 log-ins). Feedback on the course varied; over half (10/17, 59\%) of the caregivers considered the content to be very good or good, about half (9/17, 53\%) considered the website layout to be good, only 6\% (1/17) felt that the usability of the website was poor, and no one felt that it was very poor. From the reported experiences of being a caregiver to a person with SSD, 3 themes were formed: the caregiver's own well-being, relationship with the person with SSD, and experience of health care services. Conclusions: The web-based psychoeducation course for caregivers living with a person with SSD seems to be especially suitable for those who have little experience as a caregiver. In the future, more planning and the consideration of aspects related to the needs of specific target groups, course content, practical arrangements, and scheduling should be taken into account. In addition, although caregivers can improve their own well-being in different ways, they need regular support and cooperation from health care professionals. ", doi="10.2196/25480", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e25480", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33890862" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/25333, author="Coorey, Genevieve and Peiris, David and Scaria, Anish and Mulley, John and Neubeck, Lis and Hafiz, Nashid and Redfern, Julie", title="An Internet-Based Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease Management Integrated With Primary Care Electronic Health Records: Mixed Methods Evaluation of Implementation Fidelity and User Engagement", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="26", volume="23", number="4", pages="e25333", keywords="eHealth", keywords="electronic health record", keywords="web-based intervention", keywords="implementation fidelity", keywords="user engagement", keywords="mixed methods", keywords="cardiovascular disease", keywords="primary health care", keywords="mobile phone", abstract="Background: Growing evidence supports the benefits of eHealth interventions to increase patient engagement and improve outcomes for a range of conditions. However, ineffective program delivery and usage attrition limit exposure to these interventions and may reduce their effectiveness. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the delivery fidelity of an eHealth intervention, describe use patterns, compare outcomes between low and high users, and identify mediating factors on intervention delivery and receipt. Methods: This is a mixed methods study of an internet-based intervention being evaluated for effectiveness in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The intervention comprised medication and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk data uploaded from the primary care electronic health record (EHR); interactive, personalized CVD risk score estimation; goal setting and self-monitoring; an interactive social forum; and optional receipt of heart health messages. Fidelity was assessed over 12 months. Trial outcomes were compared between low and high users. Data sources included program delivery records, web log data, trial data, and thematic analysis of communication records. Results: Most participants in the intervention group (451/486, 93\%) had an initial training session conducted by telephone (413/447, 92.4\% of participants trained), with a mean duration of 44 minutes (range 10-90 minutes). Staff conducted 98.45\% (1776/1804) of the expected follow-ups, mostly by telephone or email. Of the 451 participants who commenced log-ins, 46.8\% (211) were categorized as low users (defined as at least one log-in in 3 or fewer months of follow-up), 40.4\% (182) were categorized as high users (at least one log-in in more than 3 months of follow-up), and 12.8\% (58) were nonadopters (no log-ins after their training session). The mean log-in frequency was 3-4 per month in ongoing users. There was no significant difference between the groups in the primary trial outcome of adherence to guideline-recommended medications (P=.44). In unadjusted analyses, high users had significantly greater eHealth literacy scores (P=.003) and were more likely to meet recommended weekly targets for fruit (P=.03) and fish (P=.004) servings; however, the adjusted findings were not significant. Interactive screen use was highest for goal tracking and lowest for the chat forum. Screens with EHR-derived data held only an early interest for most users. Fidelity measures (reach, content, dose delivered, and dose received) were influenced by the facilitation strategies used by staff, invisible qualities of staff-participant communication, and participants' responsiveness to intervention attributes. Conclusions: A multifeature internet-based intervention was delivered with high fidelity to the RCT protocol and was regularly used by 40.4\% (182/451) of users over 12 months. Higher log-in frequency as an indicator of greater intervention exposure was not associated with statistically significant improvements in eHealth literacy scores, lifestyle changes, or clinical outcomes. Attributes of the intervention and individualized support influenced initial and ongoing use. ", doi="10.2196/25333", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e25333", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33900204" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/24861, author="Brussoni, Mariana and Han, S. Christina and Lin, Yingyi and Jacob, John and Pike, Ian and Bundy, Anita and Faulkner, Guy and Gardy, Jennifer and Fisher, Brian and M{\^a}sse, Louise", title="A Web-Based and In-Person Risk Reframing Intervention to Influence Mothers' Tolerance for, and Parenting Practices Associated With, Children's Outdoor Risky Play: Randomized Controlled Trial", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="27", volume="23", number="4", pages="e24861", keywords="outdoor play", keywords="mothering", keywords="independent mobility", keywords="physical activity", keywords="risk perception", keywords="risky play", keywords="risk reframing", abstract="Background: Outdoor risky play, such as climbing, racing, and independent exploration, is an important part of childhood and is associated with various positive physical, mental, and developmental outcomes for children. Parental attitudes and fears, particularly mothers', are a major deterrent to children's opportunities for outdoor risky play. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 2 versions of an intervention to reframe mothers' perceptions of risk and change parenting behaviors: a web-based intervention or an in-person workshop, compared with the control condition. Methods: The Go Play Outside! randomized controlled trial was conducted in Canada from 2017 to 2018. Participants were recruited through social media, snowball sampling, and community notices. Mothers of children aged 6-12 years were self-assessed through eligibility questions, and those eligible and consented to participate in the study were randomized into a fully automated web-based intervention, the in-person workshop, or the control condition. The intervention was underpinned by social cognitive theory, incorporating behavior change techniques. Participants progressed through a series of self-reflection exercises and developed a goal for change. Control participants received the Position Statement on Active Outdoor Play. The primary outcome was increase in tolerance of risky play and the secondary outcome was goal attainment. Data were collected online via REDCap at baseline, 1 week, and 3 months after the intervention. Randomization was conducted using sealed envelope. Allocations were concealed to researchers at assignment and data analysis. We conducted mediation analyses to examine whether the intervention influenced elements of social cognitive theory, as hypothesized. Results: A total of 451 mothers were randomized and completed baseline sociodemographic assessments: 150 in the web-based intervention, 153 in the in-person workshop, and 148 in the control condition. Among these, a total of 351 mothers completed the intervention. At 1 week after the intervention, 113, 85, and 135 mothers completed assessments for each condition, respectively, and at 3 months after the intervention, 105, 84, and 123 completed the assessments, respectively. Compared with mothers in the control condition, mothers in the web-based intervention had significantly higher tolerance of risky play at 1 week (P=.004) and 3 months after the intervention (P=.007); and mothers in the in-person workshop had significantly higher tolerance of risky play at 1 week after the intervention (P=.02). No other significant outcomes were found. None of the potential mediators were found to significantly mediate the outcomes. Conclusions: The trial demonstrates that the web-based intervention was effective in increasing mothers' tolerance for risk in play. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03374683; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03374683 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s13063-018-2552-4 ", doi="10.2196/24861", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e24861", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33904820" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/25672, author="Marklund, Sarah and Tistad, Malin and Lundell, Sara and {\"O}strand, Lina and S{\"o}rlin, Ann and Bostr{\"o}m, Carina and Wadell, Karin and Nyberg, Andre", title="Experiences and Factors Affecting Usage of an eHealth Tool for Self-Management Among People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Qualitative Study", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="30", volume="23", number="4", pages="e25672", keywords="COPD", keywords="qualitative content analysis", keywords="eHealth", keywords="self-management", keywords="primary care", keywords="chronic disease", abstract="Background: Self-management strategies are regarded as highly prioritized in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment guidelines. However, individual and structural barriers lead to a staggering amount of people with COPD that are not offered support for such strategies, and new approaches are urgently needed to circumvent these barriers. A promising way of delivering health services such as support for self-management strategies is the use of eHealth tools. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the usage of, and factors affecting the use of, eHealth tools over time in people with COPD. Objective: This study aimed, among people with COPD, to explore and describe the experiences of an eHealth tool over time and factors that might affect usage. Methods: The eHealth tool included information on evidence-based self-management treatment for people with COPD, including texts, pictures, videos as well as interactive components such as a step registration function with automatized feedback. In addition to the latter, automated notifications of new content and pedometers were used as triggers to increase usage. After having access to the tool for 3 months, 16 individuals (12 women) with COPD were individually interviewed. At 12 months' access to the tool, 7 (5 women) of the previous 16 individuals accepted a second individual interview. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. User frequency was considered in the analysis, and participants were divided into users and nonusers/seldom users depending on the number of logins and minutes of usage per month. Results: Three main categories, namely, ambiguous impact, basic conditions for usage, and approaching capability emerged from the analysis, which, together with their subcategories, reflect the participants' experiences of using the eHealth tool. Nonusers/seldom users (median 1.5 logins and 1.78 minutes spent on the site per month) reported low motivation, a higher need for technical support, a negative view about the disease and self-management, and had problematic health literacy as measured by the Communicative and Critical Health Literacy Scale (median [range] 154 [5-2102]). Users (median 10 logins and 43 minutes per month) felt comfortable with information technology (IT) tools, had a positive view on triggers, and had sufficient health literacy (median [range] 5 [5-1400]). Benefits including behavior changes were mainly expressed after 12 months had passed and mainly among users. Conclusions: Findings of this study indicate that the level of motivation, comfortability with IT tools, and the level of health literacy seem to affect usage of an eHealth tool over time. Besides, regarding behavioral changes, gaining benefits from the eHealth tool seems reserved for the users and specifically after 12 months, thus suggesting that eHealth tools can be suitable media for supporting COPD-specific self-management skills, although not for everyone or at all times. These novel findings are of importance when designing new eHealth tools as well as when deciding on whether or not an eHealth tool might be appropriate to use if the goal is to support self-management among people with COPD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02696187; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02696187 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016851 ", doi="10.2196/25672", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e25672", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33929327" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/27463, author="Baumgartner, Christian and Schaub, Patrick Michael and Wenger, Andreas and Malischnig, Doris and Augsburger, Mareike and Walter, Marc and Berger, Thomas and Stark, Lars and Ebert, Daniel David and Keough, T. Matthew and Haug, Severin", title="CANreduce 2.0 Adherence-Focused Guidance for Internet Self-Help Among Cannabis Users: Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="30", volume="23", number="4", pages="e27463", keywords="cannabis", keywords="common mental disorders", keywords="adherence", keywords="social presence", keywords="internet", keywords="cognitive behavioral therapy", keywords="motivational interviewing", keywords="therapy", keywords="mental health", keywords="mental disorder", keywords="guidance", keywords="self-help", keywords="drug abuse", keywords="randomized controlled trial", abstract="Background: Despite increasing demand for treatment among cannabis users in many countries, most users are not in treatment. Internet-based self-help offers an alternative for those hesitant to seek face-to-face therapy, though low effectiveness and adherence issues often arise. Objective: Through adherence-focused guidance enhancement, we aimed to increase adherence to and the effectiveness of internet-based self-help among cannabis users. Methods: From July 2016 to May 2019, cannabis users (n=775; male: 406/575, 70.6\%, female: 169/575, 29.4\%; age: mean 28.3 years) not in treatment were recruited from the general population and were randomly assigned to (1) an adherence-focused guidance enhancement internet-based self-help intervention with social presence, (2) a similar intervention with an impersonal service team, and (3) access to internet as usual. Controls who were placed on a waiting list for the full intervention after 3 months underwent an assessment and had access to internet as usual. The primary outcome measurement was cannabis-use days over the preceding 30 days. Secondary outcomes included cannabis-dependence severity, changes in common mental disorder symptoms, and intervention adherence. Differences between the study arms in primary and secondary continuous outcome variables at baseline, posttreatment, and follow-up were tested using pooled linear models. Results: All groups exhibited reduced cannabis-use days after 3 months (social presence: --8.2 days; service team: --9.8 days; internet as usual: --4.2 days). The participants in the service team group (P=.01, d=.60) reported significantly fewer cannabis-use days than those in the internet as usual group; the reduction of cannabis use in the social presence group was not significant (P=.07, d=.40). There was no significant difference between the 2 intervention groups regarding cannabis-use reduction. The service team group also exhibited superior improvements in cannabis-use disorder, cannabis-dependence severity, and general anxiety symptoms after 3 months to those in the internet as usual group. Conclusions: The adherence-focused guidance enhancement internet-based self-help intervention with an impersonal service team significantly reduced cannabis use, cannabis-use disorder, dependence severity, and general anxiety symptoms. Trial Registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN11086185; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11086185 ", doi="10.2196/27463", url="https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e27463", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33929333" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/27503, author="Kirszenblat, Romain and Edouard, Paul", title="Validation of the Withings ScanWatch as a Wrist-Worn Reflective Pulse Oximeter: Prospective Interventional Clinical Study", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2021", month="Apr", day="26", volume="23", number="4", pages="e27503", keywords="connected watch", keywords="COPD", keywords="COVID-19", keywords="neural network", keywords="pulse oxygen saturation", keywords="reflective pulse oximeter", keywords="sleep apnea syndrome", keywords="SpO2", keywords="Withings ScanWatch", keywords="wearable", keywords="respiratory", keywords="oxygen", keywords="respiratory disease", keywords="oximeter", keywords="validation", keywords="accuracy", keywords="safety", abstract="Background: A decrease in the level of pulse oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) is an indicator of hypoxemia that may occur in various respiratory diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sleep apnea syndrome, and COVID-19. Currently, no mass-market wrist-worn SpO2 monitor meets the medical standards for pulse oximeters. Objective: The main objective of this monocentric and prospective clinical study with single-blind analysis was to test and validate the accuracy of the reflective pulse oximeter function of the Withings ScanWatch to measure SpO2 levels at different stages of hypoxia. The secondary objective was to confirm the safety of this device when used as intended. Methods: To achieve these objectives, we included 14 healthy participants aged 23-39 years in the study, and we induced several stable plateaus of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) ranging from 100\%-70\% to mimic nonhypoxic conditions and then mild, moderate, and severe hypoxic conditions. We measured the SpO2 level with a Withings ScanWatch on each participant's wrist and the SaO2 from blood samples with a co-oximeter, the ABL90 hemoximeter (Radiometer Medical ApS). Results: After removal of the inconclusive measurements, we obtained 275 and 244 conclusive measurements with the two ScanWatches on the participants' right and left wrists, respectively, evenly distributed among the 3 predetermined SpO2 groups: SpO2?80\%, 80\%