@Article{info:doi/10.2196/69242, author="Brown, Marie Jacqueline and Rita, Nicholas and Franco-Arellano, Beatriz and LeSage, Ann and Arcand, Joanne", title="Evaluation of a Curriculum-Based Nutrition Education Intervention Protocol in Elementary Schools: Nonrandomized Feasibility Study", journal="JMIR Form Res", year="2025", month="Apr", day="16", volume="9", pages="e69242", keywords="nutrition education", keywords="serious games", keywords="children", keywords="food literacy", keywords="school nutrition intervention", keywords="feasibility", abstract="Background: Improving children's food literacy through school-based interventions can support developing healthy eating habits. However, teachers lack appropriate resources, time, and training to provide nutrition education in schools. Serious games, which are games designed for a purpose other than entertainment, have been demonstrated to improve children's food literacy and dietary intake and can address the barriers teachers face in providing nutrition education. Foodbot Factory (Arcand Lab) is a nutrition education intervention that is aligned with curricula and uses a serious game to provide nutrition education to students. Further evidence is needed to understand how serious games, including Foodbot Factory, can be researched in schools to support nutrition education. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a research study protocol that implements the curriculum-based nutrition education intervention Foodbot Factory into a real-world classroom setting. The evaluation of the protocol included study processes, resources, and management feasibility outcomes, as well as a preliminary assessment of scientific outcomes relevant to the intervention. Methods: A nonrandomized study determined the feasibility of intervention implementation. Grade 4 and 4/5 classrooms were assigned to have nutrition education lessons for 5 days with either the Foodbot Factory or a control intervention. Outcomes were assessed in 4 feasibility domains of study processes (eg, recruitment and attrition rates), resources (eg, time taken to deliver the intervention), and management (eg, challenges with intervention delivery), and a preliminary assessment of scientific outcomes pertaining to the acceptability and impacts of the interventions. These outcomes were captured in semistructured field notes completed by study staff and a Nutrition Attitudes and Knowledge questionnaire and acceptability questionnaire completed by participants. Data were analyzed descriptively and using a paired t test to assess within-group changes in nutrition knowledge. Results: In total, 4 classrooms participated in the feasibility study, with varying recruitment rates for schools (3/20, 15\%), classrooms (4/4, 100\%), parents (54/102, 53\%), and children (49/54, 91\%). The time required to implement the research protocol, including data collection and lesson plans, was sufficient and management of the intervention implementation was overall successful. Some challenges were experienced with classroom management during data collection, specifically with electronic data collection. After the intervention, participants reported a positive affective experience (26/41, 63\%) and learning something new about healthy eating (31/41, 76\%). Participants in both study groups improved their nutrition knowledge, but the changes were not statistically significant. The Foodbot Factory group had a statistically significant improvement in their knowledge of vegetables and fruit (P=.04) and protein foods (P=.03). Conclusions: These findings indicate that the study protocol is feasible to implement and evaluate Foodbot Factory in a representative sample with select modifications to improve recruitment and data collection procedures. ", doi="10.2196/69242", url="https://formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e69242" } @Article{info:doi/10.2196/66970, author="Berm{\'u}dez-Mill{\'a}n, Angela and P{\'e}rez-Escamilla, Rafael and Segura-P{\'e}rez, Sofia and Grady, James and Feinn VI, S. Richard and Agresta, Hanako and Kim, Dean and Wagner, Ann Julie", title="The Monthly Cycling of Food Insecurity in Latinas at Risk for Diabetes: Methods, Retention, and Sample Characteristics for a Microlongitudinal Design", journal="JMIR Form Res", year="2025", month="Mar", day="28", volume="9", pages="e66970", keywords="food insecurity", keywords="monthly cycling", keywords="type 2 diabetes risk", keywords="quantitative methods", keywords="Latinas", keywords="endocrinology", keywords="nutrition", keywords="nutrition assistance", keywords="micro-longitudinal design", abstract="Background: Food insecurity (FI) is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes (T2D) that disproportionately affects Latinas. We conducted a microlongitudinal study to examine the relationship of monthly cycling of FI and diabetes risk factors. Objective: This study aimed to determine the quantitative methodology, recruitment and retention strategies, predictors of retention across time, and baseline sample demographics. Methods: Participants were adult Latinas living in Hartford, Connecticut who were recruited through a community agency, invited to participate if they were receiving Supplementary Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, screened positive for FI using the 2-item Hunger Vital Sign Screener, and had elevated risk factors for T2D using the American Diabetes Association risk factor test. Using a microlongitudinal design, we collected data twice per month for 3 months (week 2, which is a period of food budget adequacy; and week 4, which is a period of food budget inadequacy) to determine if the monthly cycling of FI was associated with near-term diabetes risk (fasting glucose, fructosamine, and glycosylated albumin) and long-term risk (BMI, waist circumference, and glycated hemoglobin) markers. We determined whether household food inventory, psychological distress, and binge eating mediated associations. We examined Health Action Process Approach model constructs. To assess the relationship between monthly cycling of FI with diabetes risk markers, we used repeated measures general linear mixed models. To assess the role of mediators, we performed a causal pathway analysis. Results: Participant enrollment was from April 1, 2021 to February 21, 2023. A total of 87 participants completed 420 assessments or a mean of 4.83 (SD 2.02) assessments. About half (47/87, 54\%) of the sample self-identified as Puerto Rican, mean age was 35.1 (SD 5.8) years, with 17.1 (SD 11.6) years in the mainland United States. Just under half (41/87, 47.1\%) spoke Spanish only, 69\% (60/87) had no formal schooling, and 31\% (27/87) had less than eighth grade education. Modal household size was 4 including 2 children; 44.8\% (39/87) were not living with a partner. About half (47/87, 54\%) were unemployed, 63.2\% (55/87) reported a monthly income