TY - JOUR AU - Li, Yang AU - Yang, Yue AU - Liu, Xiaoqin AU - Zhang, Xinting AU - Li, Fei PY - 2025 DA - 2025/4/10 TI - Effectiveness of Telemedicine-Delivered Carbohydrate-Counting Interventions in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e59579 VL - 27 KW - type 1 diabetes KW - hemoglobin A1c KW - telemedicine KW - carbohydrate counting KW - review AB - Background: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) significantly affects patients’ quality of life and can be life-threatening, necessitating improved monitoring strategies. Telemedicine, which leverages telecommunications technologies to deliver health care services and expertise, has the potential to enhance T1DM management. However, its effectiveness remains to be fully established. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various telemedicine-based carbohydrate-counting (CC) interventions in patients with T1DM. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis searched 5 databases—PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane—as well as reference lists of retrieved articles on September 26, 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of telemedicine-based CC interventions in reducing glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in patients with T1DM. Results: From 3612 citations, we identified 18 eligible RCTs (n=1627) from 14 regions for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Participants in the telemedicine intervention group experienced a 0.35% reduction in HbA1c levels (95% CI –0.54 to –0.16) compared with the control group. A total of 13 studies used smartphone apps, 4 used connected and wearable glucometers, and 3 delivered the intervention through web-based systems. Significant reductions in HbA1c were observed across smartphone apps (–0.36%, 95% CI –0.63% to –0.09%), connected and wearable glucometers (–0.35%, 95% CI –0.56% to –0.14%), and web-based systems (–0.36%, 95% CI –0.71% to –0.02%). Considerable heterogeneity was noted (I2=81%, P<.001). Telemedicine-based CC interventions also increased time in range by 9.59% (95% CI 6.50%-12.67%). However, evidence regarding treatment satisfaction, total daily insulin dose, and hypoglycemia remains inconclusive. Subgroup analysis showed that telemedicine platform variety did not significantly contribute to heterogeneity, while meta-regression indicated that the impact on HbA1c was most pronounced in trials conducted in Asia. Conclusions: Compared with usual care, telemedicine-delivered CC interventions improved HbA1c and time in range but did not significantly impact other clinically relevant outcomes in patients with T1DM. High-quality, large-scale RCTs are needed to draw definitive conclusions. These findings provide health care professionals with updated evidence on the role of telemedicine in glycemic control for patients with T1DM. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024523025; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024523025 SN - 1438-8871 UR - https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e59579 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/59579 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39965802 DO - 10.2196/59579 ID - info:doi/10.2196/59579 ER -