TY - JOUR AU - Oh, Mi-Young AU - Kim, Hee-Soo AU - Jung, Young Mi AU - Lee, Hyung-Chul AU - Lee, Seung-Bo AU - Lee, Seung Mi PY - 2025 DA - 2025/3/19 TI - Machine Learning–Based Explainable Automated Nonlinear Computation Scoring System for Health Score and an Application for Prediction of Perioperative Stroke: Retrospective Study JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e58021 VL - 27 KW - machine learning KW - explainability KW - score KW - computation scoring system KW - Nonlinear computation KW - application KW - perioperative stroke KW - perioperative KW - stroke KW - efficiency KW - ML-based models KW - patient KW - noncardiac surgery KW - noncardiac KW - surgery KW - effectiveness KW - risk tool KW - risk KW - tool KW - real-world data AB - Background: Machine learning (ML) has the potential to enhance performance by capturing nonlinear interactions. However, ML-based models have some limitations in terms of interpretability. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a more comprehensible and efficient ML-based scoring system using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. Methods: We developed and validated the Explainable Automated nonlinear Computation scoring system for Health (EACH) framework score. We developed a CatBoost-based prediction model, identified key features, and automatically detected the top 5 steepest slope change points based on SHAP plots. Subsequently, we developed a scoring system (EACH) and normalized the score. Finally, the EACH score was used to predict perioperative stroke. We developed the EACH score using data from the Seoul National University Hospital cohort and validated it using data from the Boramae Medical Center, which was geographically and temporally different from the development set. Results: When applied for perioperative stroke prediction among 38,737 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, the EACH score achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.829 (95% CI 0.753-0.892). In the external validation, the EACH score demonstrated superior predictive performance with an AUC of 0.784 (95% CI 0.694-0.871) compared with a traditional score (AUC=0.528, 95% CI 0.457-0.619) and another ML-based scoring generator (AUC=0.564, 95% CI 0.516-0.612). Conclusions: The EACH score is a more precise, explainable ML-based risk tool, proven effective in real-world data. The EACH score outperformed traditional scoring system and other prediction models based on different ML techniques in predicting perioperative stroke. SN - 1438-8871 UR - https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e58021 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/58021 DO - 10.2196/58021 ID - info:doi/10.2196/58021 ER -