TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zhang, Jinghui
AU  - Zhang, Qing
AU  - Xiao, Bowen
AU  - Cao, Yuxuan
AU  - Chen, Yu
AU  - Li, Yan
PY  - 2025
DA  - 2025/1/22
TI  - Parental Technoference and Child Problematic Media Use: Meta-Analysis
JO  - J Med Internet Res
SP  - e57636
VL  - 27
KW  - parental technoference
KW  - child
KW  - problematic media use
KW  - meta-analysis
KW  - children
KW  - youth
KW  - adolescents
KW  - phubbing
KW  - screen distraction
KW  - systematic reviews
KW  - interventions
KW  - mental health
KW  - digital health
AB  - Background: Parental technoference, the interruption of parent-child interactions by technology, has been associated with negative outcomes in children’s media use. However, the magnitude of this relationship and its moderating factors remain unclear. Objective: This study aims to systematically examine the relationship between parental technoference and child problematic media use, as well as to identify moderating factors such as age, parental technoference group, study design, and type of problematic media use. Methods: Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted up to August 2024 across multiple databases, including Web of Science, EBSCO, ProQuest, PubMed, PsycINFO, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, using predefined search strings. A total of 53 studies with a total of 60,555 participants (mean age of 13.84, SD 1.18 years) were included. Inclusion criteria comprised studies involving children under the age of 22 years, assessing the association between parental technoference and child problematic media use with valid measures, and reporting necessary statistical data. Exclusion criteria included studies focusing on other child outcomes, having sample sizes <30, or being case reports or review papers. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using R (version 4.2.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing) with the meta and metafor packages to evaluate the association and conduct moderator analyses. Results: The meta-analysis identified a significant positive association between parental technoference and child problematic media use (r=0.296, 95% CI 0.259-0.331). Moderator analyses revealed that both parental technoference group (P<.001) and study design (P=.008) significantly influenced this relationship. Specifically, the association was stronger when both parents engaged in technoference compared to when only 1 parent did, and in cross-sectional studies compared to longitudinal studies. Age, gender, publication status, and type of problematic media use did not significantly moderate the relationship (all P>.05). Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides robust evidence of the association between parental technoference and child problematic media use. The findings highlight the need for family-based interventions and underscore the importance of longitudinal research to understand the temporal dynamics of this relationship better. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023471997; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=471997 
SN  - 1438-8871
UR  - https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e57636
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/57636
DO  - 10.2196/57636
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/57636
ER  -