TY - JOUR AU - Cleal, Bryan AU - Chen, Yanbing AU - Wäldchen, Mandy AU - Ballhausen, Hanne AU - Cooper, Drew AU - O'Donnell, Shane AU - Knoll, Christine AU - Krug, Niklas AU - Raile, Klemens AU - Ubben, Tebbe AU - Tappe, Adrian AU - Lewis, Dana AU - Willaing, Ingrid AU - Skinner, Timothy AU - Braune, Katarina PY - 2025 DA - 2025/1/6 TI - Examining the Emotional and Physical Health Impact in Users of Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery and Sources of Support: Qualitative Analysis of Patient Narratives JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e48406 VL - 27 KW - automated insulin delivery KW - diabetes technology KW - type 1 diabetes KW - insulin pumps KW - continuous glucose monitoring KW - peer support KW - community support KW - open source KW - impact KW - users KW - diabetes KW - emotional health KW - challenges KW - support KW - unmet needs KW - mobile phone AB - Background: Although commercially developed automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have recently been approved and become available in a limited number of countries, they are not universally available, accessible, or affordable. Therefore, open-source AID systems, cocreated by an online community of people with diabetes and their families behind the hashtag #WeAreNotWaiting, have become increasingly popular. Objective: This study focused on examining the lived experiences, physical and emotional health implications of people with diabetes following the initiation of open-source AID systems, their perceived challenges, and their sources of support, which have not been explored in the existing literature. Methods: We collected data from 383 participants across 29 countries through 2 sets of open-ended questions in a web-based survey on their experience of building and using open-source AID systems. Narratives were thematically analyzed, and a coding framework was identified through iterative alignment. Results: Participants consistently reported improvements in glycemia, physical health, sleep quality, emotional impact on everyday life, and quality of life. Knowledge of open-source AID systems was largely obtained through the #WeAreNotWaiting community, which was also the primary source of practical and emotional support. The acquisition of the components to build an open-source AID system and the technical setup were sometimes problematic. Conclusions: The #WeAreNotWaiting movement represents a primary example of how informed and connected patients proactively address their unmet needs, provide peer support to each other, and obtain results through impactful, user-driven solutions. Alongside providing evidence on the safety and efficacy of open-source AID systems, this qualitative analysis helps in understanding how patients’ experiences and benefits range from psychosocial improvements to a reduction in the burden of managing diabetes. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/15368 SN - 1438-8871 UR - https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e48406 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/48406 DO - 10.2196/48406 ID - info:doi/10.2196/48406 ER -