TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zhu, Siying
AU  - Dong, Yan
AU  - Li, Yumei
AU  - Wang, Hong
AU  - Jiang, Xue
AU  - Guo, Mingen
AU  - Fan, Tiantian
AU  - Song, Yalan
AU  - Zhou, Ying
AU  - Han, Yuan
PY  - 2024
DA  - 2024/10/28
TI  - Experiences of Patients With Cancer Using Electronic Symptom Management Systems: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis
JO  - J Med Internet Res
SP  - e59061
VL  - 26
KW  - electronic symptom management systems
KW  - oncology care
KW  - access to care
KW  - symptom monitoring
KW  - self-management
KW  - patient-reported outcomes
KW  - health-related outcomes
KW  - quality of life
AB  - Background: There are numerous symptoms related to cancer and its treatments that can affect the psychosomatic health and quality of life of patients with cancer. The use of electronic symptom management systems (ESMSs) can help patients with cancer monitor and manage their symptoms effectively, improving their health-related outcomes. However, patients’ adhesion to ESMSs decreases over time, and little is known about their real experiences with them. Therefore, it is necessary to gain a deep understanding of patients’ experiences with ESMSs. Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize qualitative studies on the experiences of patients with cancer using ESMSs. Methods: A total of 12 electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, Embase, PsycINFO, ProQuest, Scopus, Wanfang database, CNKI, CBM, and VIP, were searched to collect relevant studies from the earliest available record until January 2, 2024. Qualitative and mixed methods studies published in English or Chinese were included. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement checklist) and the ENTREQ (Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research) statement were used to improve transparency in reporting the synthesis of the qualitative research. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklist was used to appraise the methodological quality of the included studies, and a meta-synthesis was conducted to interpret and synthesize the findings. Results: A total of 21 studies were included in the meta-synthesis. The experiences of patients with cancer using ESMSs were summarized into three major categories: (1) perceptions and attitudes toward ESMSs; (2) the value of ESMSs; and (3) barriers, requirements, and suggestions for ESMSs. Subsequently, 10 subcategories emerged from the 3 major categories. The meta-synthesis revealed that patients with cancer had both positive and negative experiences with ESMSs. In general, patients recognized the value of ESMSs in symptom assessment and management and were willing to use them, but they still encountered barriers and wanted them to be improved. Conclusions: This systematic review provides implications for developing future ESMSs that improve health-related outcomes for patients with cancer. Future research should focus on strengthening electronic equipment and technical support for ESMSs, improving their functional contents and participation forms, and developing personalized applications tailored to the specific needs and characteristics of patients with cancer. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023421730; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=421730 
SN  - 1438-8871
UR  - https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e59061
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/59061
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39466301
DO  - 10.2196/59061
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/59061
ER  -