TY  - JOUR
AU  - Gybel Jensen, Christian
AU  - Gybel Jensen, Frederik
AU  - Loft, Mia Ingerslev
PY  - 2024
DA  - 2024/4/11
TI  - Patients’ Experiences With Digitalization in the Health Care System: Qualitative Interview Study
JO  - J Med Internet Res
SP  - e47278
VL  - 26
KW  - digitalization
KW  - digital health
KW  - eHealth
KW  - digital health literacy
KW  - digital practices
KW  - patient experiences
KW  - digital health services
KW  - inequity in health
KW  - qualitative research
KW  - interview
KW  - implementation
KW  - tool
KW  - neurology
KW  - digital tool
KW  - communication
KW  - mobile phone
AB  - Background: The digitalization of public and health sectors worldwide is fundamentally changing health systems. With the implementation of digital health services in health institutions, a focus on digital health literacy and the use of digital health services have become more evident. In Denmark, public institutions use digital tools for different purposes, aiming to create a universal public digital sector for everyone. However, this digitalization risks reducing equity in health and further marginalizing citizens who are disadvantaged. Therefore, more knowledge is needed regarding patients’ digital practices and experiences with digital health services. Objective: This study aims to examine digital practices and experiences with public digital health services and digital tools from the perspective of patients in the neurology field and address the following research questions: (1) How do patients use digital services and digital tools? (2) How do they experience them? Methods: We used a qualitative design with a hermeneutic approach. We conducted 31 semistructured interviews with patients who were hospitalized or formerly hospitalized at the department of neurology in a hospital in Denmark. The interviews were audio recorded and subsequently transcribed. The text from each transcribed interview was analyzed using manifest content analysis. Results: The analysis provided insights into 4 different categories regarding digital practices and experiences of using digital tools and services in health care systems: social resources as a digital lifeline, possessing the necessary capabilities, big feelings as facilitators or barriers, and life without digital tools. Our findings show that digital tools were experienced differently, and specific conditions were important for the possibility of engaging in digital practices, including having access to social resources; possessing physical, cognitive, and communicative capabilities; and feeling motivated, secure, and comfortable. These prerequisites were necessary for participants to have positive experiences using digital tools in the health care system. Those who did not have these prerequisites experienced challenges and, in some cases, felt left out. Conclusions: Experiences with digital practices and digital health services are complex and multifaceted. Engagement in digital practices for the examined population requires access to continuous assistance from their social network. If patients do not meet requirements, digital health services can be experienced as exclusionary and a source of concern. Physical, cognitive, and communicative difficulties might make it impossible to use digital tools or create more challenges. To ensure that digitalization does not create inequities in health, it is necessary for developers and institutions to be aware of the differences in digital health literacy, focus on simplifying communication with patients and next of kin, and find flexible solutions for citizens who are disadvantaged. 
SN  - 1438-8871
UR  - https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e47278
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/47278
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38602748
DO  - 10.2196/47278
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/47278
ER  -