TY - JOUR AU - Peiffer-Smadja, Nathan AU - Descousse, Sophie AU - Courrèges, Elsa AU - Nganbou, Audrey AU - Jeanmougin, Pauline AU - Birgand, Gabriel AU - Lénaud, Séverin AU - Beaumont, Anne-Lise AU - Durand, Claire AU - Delory, Tristan AU - Le Bel, Josselin AU - Bouvet, Elisabeth AU - Lariven, Sylvie AU - D'Ortenzio, Eric AU - Konaté, Issa AU - Bouyou-Akotet, Marielle Karine AU - Ouedraogo, Abdoul-Salam AU - Kouakou, Gisèle Affoue AU - Poda, Armel AU - Akpovo, Corinne AU - Lescure, François-Xavier AU - Tanon, Aristophane PY - 2024 DA - 2024/10/7 TI - Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support System for Antimicrobial Prescribing in Sub-Saharan Africa: Multisectoral Qualitative Study JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e45122 VL - 26 KW - antimicrobial resistance KW - implementation research KW - Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research KW - CDSS KW - mobile health KW - mHealth KW - eHealth KW - mobile phone AB - Background: Suboptimal use of antimicrobials is a driver of antimicrobial resistance in West Africa. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can facilitate access to updated and reliable recommendations. Objective: This study aimed to assess contextual factors that could facilitate the implementation of a CDSS for antimicrobial prescribing in West Africa and Central Africa and to identify tailored implementation strategies. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted through 21 semistructured individual interviews via videoconference with health care professionals between September and December 2020. Participants were recruited using purposive sampling in a transnational capacity-building network for hospital preparedness in West Africa. The interview guide included multiple constructs derived from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Interviews were transcribed, and data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: The panel of participants included health practitioners (12/21, 57%), health actors trained in engineering (2/21, 10%), project managers (3/21, 14%), antimicrobial resistance research experts (2/21, 10%), a clinical microbiologist (1/21, 5%), and an anthropologist (1/21, 5%). Contextual factors influencing the implementation of eHealth tools existed at the individual, health care system, and national levels. At the individual level, the main challenge was to design a user-centered CDSS adapted to the prescriber’s clinical routine and structural constraints. Most of the participants stated that the CDSS should not only target physicians in academic hospitals who can use their network to disseminate the tool but also general practitioners, primary care nurses, midwives, and other health care workers who are the main prescribers of antimicrobials in rural areas of West Africa. The heterogeneity in antimicrobial prescribing training among prescribers was a significant challenge to the use of a common CDSS. At the country level, weak pharmaceutical regulations, the lack of official guidelines for antimicrobial prescribing, limited access to clinical microbiology laboratories, self-medication, and disparity in health care coverage lead to inappropriate antimicrobial use and could limit the implementation and diffusion of CDSS for antimicrobial prescribing. Participants emphasized the importance of building a solid eHealth ecosystem in their countries by establishing academic partnerships, developing physician networks, and involving diverse stakeholders to address challenges. Additional implementation strategies included conducting a local needs assessment, identifying early adopters, promoting network weaving, using implementation advisers, and creating a learning collaborative. Participants noted that a CDSS for antimicrobial prescribing could be a powerful tool for the development and dissemination of official guidelines for infectious diseases in West Africa. Conclusions: These results suggest that a CDSS for antimicrobial prescribing adapted for nonspecialized prescribers could have a role in improving clinical decisions. They also confirm the relevance of adopting a cross-disciplinary approach with participants from different backgrounds to assess contextual factors, including social, political, and economic determinants. SN - 1438-8871 UR - https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e45122 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/45122 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39374065 DO - 10.2196/45122 ID - info:doi/10.2196/45122 ER -