TY  - JOUR
AU  - Trupia, Dilara Vanessa
AU  - Mathieu-Fritz, Alexandre
AU  - Duong, Tu Anh
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021/11/4
TI  - The Sociological Perspective of Users’ Invisible Work: A Qualitative Research Framework for Studying Digital Health Innovations Integration
JO  - J Med Internet Res
SP  - e25159
VL  - 23
IS  - 11
KW  - digital health innovations
KW  - qualitative analysis
KW  - sociological framework
KW  - invisible work
KW  - patient work
KW  - user work
KW  - participatory health care
KW  - chronic illness
KW  - self-quantification
AB  - Background: When new technology is integrated into a care pathway, it faces resistance due to the changes it introduces into the existing context. To understand the success or failure of digital health innovations, it is necessary to pay attention to the adjustments that users must perform to make them work, by reshaping the context and sometimes by altering the ways in which they perform activities. This adaptation work, most of which remains invisible, constitutes an important factor in the success of innovations and the ways in which they transform care practices. Objective: This work aims to present a sociological framework for studying new health technology uses through a qualitative analysis of the different types of tasks and activities that users, both health professionals and patients, must perform to integrate these technologies and make them work in their daily routine. Methods: This paper uses a three-part method to structure a theoretical model to study users’ invisible work. The first part of the method includes a thematic literature review, previously published by one of the coauthors, of major sociological studies conducted on digital health innovations integration into existing care organizations and practices. The second part extends this review to introduce definitions and applications of the users’ invisible work concept. The third part consists of producing a theoretical framework to study the concept according to the different contexts and practices of the users. Results: The paper proposes four dimensions (organizational, interactional, practical, and experiential), each composed of a set of criteria that allow a comparative analysis of different users’ work according to different health technologies. Conclusions: This framework can be applied both as an analytical tool in a research protocol and as an agenda to identify less visible adoption criteria for digital health technologies. 
SN  - 1438-8871
UR  - https://www.jmir.org/2021/11/e25159
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/25159
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34734832
DO  - 10.2196/25159
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/25159
ER  -