TY - JOUR AU - Masters, Ken AU - Loda, Teresa AU - Johannink, Jonas AU - Al-Abri, Rashid AU - Herrmann-Werner, Anne PY - 2020 DA - 2020/3/9 TI - Surgeons’ Interactions With and Attitudes Toward E-Patients: Questionnaire Study in Germany and Oman JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e14646 VL - 22 IS - 3 KW - internet KW - e-patient KW - internet-informed patient KW - doctor-patient relationship KW - attitude KW - digital health KW - technology KW - e-physician KW - empowerment KW - physician KW - communication AB - Background: Doctors’ interactions with and attitudes toward e-patients have an overall impact on health care delivery. Objective: This study aimed to gauge surgeons’ interactions with e-patients, their attitudes toward those e-patient activities, the possible impact on the delivery of health care, and the reasons behind those activities and attitudes. Methods: We created a paper-based and electronic survey form based on pertinent variables identified in the literature, and from March 2018 to July 2018 we surveyed 49 surgeons in Germany and 59 surgeons in Oman, asking them about their interactions with and attitudes toward e-patients. Data were stored in Microsoft Excel and SPSS, and descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and chi-square tests were performed on the data. Results: Of our sample, 71% (35/49) of the German surgeons and 56% (33/59) of the Omani surgeons communicated electronically with their patients. Although the German surgeons spent a greater percentage of Internet usage time on work-related activities (χ218=32.5; P=.02) than the Omani surgeons, there were many similarities in their activities. An outstanding difference was that the German surgeons used email with their patients more than the Omani surgeons (χ21=9.0; P=.003), and the Omani surgeons used social media, specifically WhatsApp, more than the German surgeons (χ21=18.6; P<.001). Overall, the surgeons were equally positive about the most common e-patient activities such as bringing material from the internet to the consultation (mean 4.11, SD 1.6), although the German surgeons (mean 3.43, SD 1.9) were more concerned (P=.001) than the Omani surgeons (mean 2.32, SD 1.3) about the potential loss of control and time consumption (German: mean 5.10, SD 1.4 and Omani: mean 3.92, SD 1.6; P<.001). Conclusions: The interactions show a high degree of engagement with e-patients. The differences between the German and the Omani surgeons in the preferred methods of communication are possibly closely linked to cultural differences and recent historical events. These differences may, moreover, indicate e-patients’ desired method of electronic communication to include social media. The low impact of surgeons’ attitudes on the activities may also result from a normalization of many e-patient activities, irrespective of the doctors’ attitudes and influences. SN - 1438-8871 UR - http://www.jmir.org/2020/3/e14646/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/14646 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32149714 DO - 10.2196/14646 ID - info:doi/10.2196/14646 ER -