TY  - JOUR
AU  - Schoot, Tessa S
AU  - Weenk, Mariska
AU  - van de Belt, Tom H
AU  - Engelen, Lucien JLPG
AU  - van Goor, Harry
AU  - Bredie, Sebastian JH
PY  - 2016
DA  - 2016/05/05
TI  - A New Cuffless Device for Measuring Blood Pressure: A Real-Life Validation Study
JO  - J Med Internet Res
SP  - e85
VL  - 18
IS  - 5
KW  - hypertension
KW  - cuffless blood pressure monitor
KW  - wearable device
KW  - cardiovascular risk management
KW  - patient empowerment
AB  - Background: Cuffless blood pressure (BP) monitoring devices, based on pulse transit time, are being developed as an easy-to-use, more convenient, fast, and relatively cheap alternative to conventional BP measuring devices based on cuff occlusion. Thereby they may provide a great alternative to BP self-measurement. Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate the performance of the first release of the Checkme Health Monitor (Viatom Technology), a cuffless BP monitor, in a real-life setting. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate whether the posture of the volunteer and the position of the device relative to the heart level would influence its outcomes. Methods: Study volunteers fell into 3 BP ranges: high (>160 mmHg), normal (130–160 mmHg), and low (<130 mmHg). All requirements for test environment, observer qualification, volunteer recruitment, and BP measurements were met according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol (ESH-IP) for the validation of BP measurement devices. After calibrating the Checkme device, we measured systolic BP with Checkme and a validated, oscillometric reference BP monitor (RM). Measurements were performed in randomized order both in supine and in sitting position, and with Checkme at and above heart level. Results: We recruited 52 volunteers, of whom we excluded 15 (12 due to calibration failure with Checkme, 3 due to a variety of reasons). The remaining 37 volunteers were divided into low (n=14), medium (n=13), and high (n=10) BP ranges. There were 18 men and 19 women, with a mean age of 54.1 (SD 14.5) years, and mean recruitment systolic BP of 141.7 (SD 24.7) mmHg. BP results obtained by RM and Checkme correlated well. In the supine position, the difference between the RM and Checkme was >5 mmHg in 17 of 37 volunteers (46%), of whom 9 of 37 (24%) had a difference >10 mmHg and 5 of 37 (14%) had a difference >15 mmHg. Conclusions: BP obtained with Checkme correlated well with RM BP, particularly in the position (supine) in which the device was calibrated. These preliminary results are promising for conducting further research on cuffless BP measurement in the clinical and outpatient settings. 
SN  - 1438-8871
UR  - http://www.jmir.org/2016/5/e85/
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5414
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27150527
DO  - 10.2196/jmir.5414
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/jmir.5414
ER  -