%0 Journal Article
%@ 1438-8871
%I JMIR Publications
%V 27
%N 
%P e68549
%T Integration of Psychiatric Advance Directives Into the Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Record: Exploring the Promise and Limitations
%A Schwarz,Julian
%A Meier-Diedrich,Eva
%A Scholten,Matthé
%A Stephenson,Lucy
%A Torous,John
%A Wurster,Florian
%A Blease,Charlotte
%+ Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Seebad 82/83, Rüdersdorf, 15562, Germany, 49 33638 83 501, Julian.Schwarz@mhb-fontane.de
%K advance statements
%K advance choice documents
%K advance care planning
%K mental health
%K online record access
%K patient accessible electronic health records
%K interoperability
%K fast healthcare interoperability eesources
%K FHIR
%K self-binding directives
%K mobile phone
%D 2025
%7 18.3.2025
%9 Viewpoint
%J J Med Internet Res
%G English
%X Psychiatric advance directives (PAD), also known as advance statements or advance choice documents, are legal documents that enable people with mental health conditions to specify their treatment preferences in advance for possible future crises. Subtypes of PADs include crisis cards, joint crisis plans, and self-binding directives (also known as Ulysses contracts). These instruments are intended to improve service user involvement and need orientation in the care of mental crises and to avoid traumatization through unwanted treatment. The existing evidence suggests that people who complete a PAD tend to work more cooperatively with their clinician and experience fewer involuntary hospital admissions. Nevertheless, PADs have not been successfully mainstreamed into care due to multiple barriers to the implementation of PADs, mainly around the completion of PADs and their accessibility and use in crises. The reasons for this include the lack of support in the completion process and acceptance problems, especially on the part of professionals. The research to date primarily recommends support for service users from facilitators, such as peer support workers, and training for all stakeholders. In this article, we argue that while these approaches can help to solve completion and acceptance challenges, they are not sufficient to ensure access to PADs in crises. To ensure accessibility, we propose digital PADs, which offer considerable potential for overcoming these aforementioned barriers. Embedded in national health data infrastructures, PADs could be completed and accessed by service users themselves, possibly with the support of facilitators, and retrieved by any clinic in an emergency. We highlight the strengths and limitations of digital PADs and point out that the proposed solutions must be developed collaboratively and take into account digital inequalities to be effective support for people with serious mental health conditions.
%R 10.2196/68549
%U https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e68549
%U https://doi.org/10.2196/68549