%0 Journal Article
%@ 1438-8871
%I JMIR Publications
%V 27
%N 
%P e63324
%T Improving Digital Cancer Care for Older Black Adults: Qualitative Study
%A Wankah,Paul
%A Chandra,Shivani
%A Lofters,Aisha
%A Mohamednur,Nebila
%A Osei,Beverley
%A Makuwaza,Tutsirai
%A Sayani,Ambreen
%+ Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, 2001 McGill Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada, 1 5143962402, paul.wankahnji@mcgill.ca
%K digital care
%K cancer care
%K older Black adults
%K health equity
%K social determinants of health
%K access to care
%K health quality
%D 2025
%7 19.2.2025
%9 Original Paper
%J J Med Internet Res
%G English
%X Background: Health systems are rapidly promoting digital cancer care models to improve cancer care of their populations. However, there is growing evidence that digital cancer care can exacerbate inequities in cancer care for communities experiencing social disadvantage, such as Black communities. Despite the increasing recognition that older Black adults face significant challenges in accessing and using health care services due to multiple socioeconomic and systemic factors, there is still limited evidence regarding how older Black adults’ access and use digital cancer care. Objective: This study aims to better understand the digital cancer care experience of older Black adults, their caregivers, and health care providers to identify strategies that can better support patient-centered digital cancer care. Methods: A total of 6 focus group interviews were conducted with older Black adults living with cancer, caregivers, and health care providers (N=55 participants) across 10 Canadian provinces. Focus group interviews were recorded and transcribed. Through a theory-informed thematic analysis approach, experienced qualitative researchers used the Patient Centered Care model and the synergies of oppression conceptual lens to inductively and deductively code interview transcripts in order to develop key themes that captured the digital cancer care experiences of older Black adults. Results: In total, 5 overarching themes describe the experience of older Black adults, caregivers, and health care providers in accessing and using digital cancer care: (1) barriers to access and participation in digital care services, (2) shifting caregivers’ dynamics, (3) autonomy of choice and choosing based on the purpose of care, (4) digital accessibility, and (5) effective digital communication. We identify 8 barriers and 6 facilitators to optimal digital cancer for older Black adults. Barriers include limited digital literacy, linguistic barriers in traditional African or Caribbean languages, and patient concerns of shifting power dynamics when supported by their children for digital cancer care; and facilitators include community-based cancer support groups, caregiver support, and key features of digital technologies. Conclusions: These findings revealed a multifaceted range of barriers and facilitators to digital cancer care for older Black adults. This means that a multipronged approach that simultaneously focuses on addressing barriers and leveraging community strengths can improve access and usage of digital cancer care. A redesign of digital cancer care programs, tailored to the needs of most structurally marginalized groups like older Black adults, can enhance the digital care experience for all population groups. Public policies and organizational practices that address issues like availability of internet in remote areas, resources to support linguistic barriers, or culturally sensitive training are important in responding to the complexity of access to digital l cancer care. These findings have implications for other structurally marginalized and underresourced communities that have suboptimal access and usage of digital care. 
%R 10.2196/63324
%U https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e63324
%U https://doi.org/10.2196/63324