%0 Journal Article %@ 1438-8871 %I JMIR Publications %V 26 %N %P e56676 %T Association of Smartwatch-Based Heart Rate and Physical Activity With Cardiorespiratory Fitness Measures in the Community: Cohort Study %A Zhang,Yuankai %A Wang,Xuzhi %A Pathiravasan,Chathurangi H %A Spartano,Nicole L %A Lin,Honghuang %A Borrelli,Belinda %A Benjamin,Emelia J %A McManus,David D %A Larson,Martin G %A Vasan,Ramachandran S %A Shah,Ravi V %A Lewis,Gregory D %A Liu,Chunyu %A Murabito,Joanne M %A Nayor,Matthew %+ Sections of Cardiology and Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, 72 E Concord St, Suite L-516, Boston, MA, 02118, United States, 1 617 638 8771, mnayor@bu.edu %K mobile health %K smartwatch %K heart rate %K physical activity %K cardiorespiratory fitness %K cardiopulmonary exercise testing %D 2024 %7 13.6.2024 %9 Original Paper %J J Med Internet Res %G English %X Background: Resting heart rate (HR) and routine physical activity are associated with cardiorespiratory fitness levels. Commercial smartwatches permit remote HR monitoring and step count recording in real-world settings over long periods of time, but the relationship between smartwatch-measured HR and daily steps to cardiorespiratory fitness remains incompletely characterized in the community. Objective: This study aimed to examine the association of nonactive HR and daily steps measured by a smartwatch with a multidimensional fitness assessment via cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) among participants in the electronic Framingham Heart Study. Methods: Electronic Framingham Heart Study participants were enrolled in a research examination (2016-2019) and provided with a study smartwatch that collected longitudinal HR and physical activity data for up to 3 years. At the same examination, the participants underwent CPET on a cycle ergometer. Multivariable linear models were used to test the association of CPET indices with nonactive HR and daily steps from the smartwatch. Results: We included 662 participants (mean age 53, SD 9 years; n=391, 59% women, n=599, 91% White; mean nonactive HR 73, SD 6 beats per minute) with a median of 1836 (IQR 889-3559) HR records and a median of 128 (IQR 65-227) watch-wearing days for each individual. In multivariable-adjusted models, lower nonactive HR and higher daily steps were associated with higher peak oxygen uptake (VO2), % predicted peak VO2, and VO2 at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold, with false discovery rate (FDR)–adjusted P values <.001 for all. Reductions of 2.4 beats per minute in nonactive HR, or increases of nearly 1000 daily steps, corresponded to a 1.3 mL/kg/min higher peak VO2. In addition, ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2; FDR-adjusted P=.009), % predicted maximum HR (FDR-adjusted P<.001), and systolic blood pressure-to-workload slope (FDR-adjusted P=.01) were associated with nonactive HR but not associated with daily steps. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that smartwatch-based assessments are associated with a broad array of cardiorespiratory fitness responses in the community, including measures of global fitness (peak VO2), ventilatory efficiency, and blood pressure response to exercise. Metrics captured by wearable devices offer a valuable opportunity to use extensive data on health factors and behaviors to provide a window into individual cardiovascular fitness levels. %M 38870519 %R 10.2196/56676 %U https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e56676 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/56676 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38870519