%0 Journal Article
%@ 1438-8871
%I JMIR Publications
%V 24
%N 1
%P e34657
%T Technology Acceptance of Home-Based Cardiac Telerehabilitation Programs in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: Systematic Scoping Review
%A Ramachandran,Hadassah Joann
%A Jiang,Ying
%A Teo,Jun Yi Claire
%A Yeo,Tee Joo
%A Wang,Wenru
%+ Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, Blk MD11, Level 2, Singapore, 117597, Singapore, 65 66011761, nurww@nus.edu.sg
%K technology acceptance
%K coronary heart disease
%K home-based
%K telerehabilitation
%K web-based
%K mobile application
%K acceptance
%K heart
%K rehabilitation
%K app
%K review
%K evaluation
%K cardiac
%K cardiology
%K perspective
%K usability
%K acceptability
%D 2022
%7 7.1.2022
%9 Review
%J J Med Internet Res
%G English
%X Background: An understanding of the technology acceptance of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs is paramount if they are to be designed and delivered to target the needs and preferences of patients with coronary heart disease; however, the current state of technology acceptance of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation has not been systematically evaluated in the literature. Objective: We aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation technology acceptance in terms of (1) the timing and approaches used and (2) patients’ perspectives on its usability, utility, acceptability, acceptance, and external variables. Methods: We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus (inception to July 2021) for English-language papers that reported empirical evidence on the technology acceptance of early-phase home-based cardiac telerehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease. Content analysis was undertaken. Results: The search identified 1798 studies, of which 18 studies, with 14 unique home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs, met eligibility criteria. Technology acceptance (of the home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs) was mostly evaluated at intra- and posttrial stages using questionnaires (n=10) and usage data (n=11). The least used approach was evaluation through qualitative interviews (n=3). Usability, utility, acceptability, and acceptance were generally favored. External variables that influenced home-based cardiac telerehabilitation usage included component quality, system quality, facilitating conditions, and intrinsic factors. Conclusions: Home-based cardiac telerehabilitation usability, utility, acceptability, and acceptance were high; yet, a number of external variables influenced acceptance. Findings and recommendations from this review can provide guidance for developing and evaluating patient-centered home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs to stakeholders and clinicians. 
%M 34994711
%R 10.2196/34657
%U https://www.jmir.org/2022/1/e34657
%U https://doi.org/10.2196/34657
%U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34994711