%0 Journal Article %@ 1438-8871 %I Gunther Eysenbach %V 15 %N 4 %P e52 %T How Valid are Web-Based Self-Reports of Weight? %A Bonn,Stephanie Erika %A Trolle Lagerros,Ylva %A Bälter,Katarina %+ Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12a, Stockholm, SE-17177, Sweden, 46 852482298, stephanie.bonn@ki.se %K body weight %K Internet %K validity %D 2013 %7 09.04.2013 %9 Original Paper %J J Med Internet Res %G English %X Background: Many studies rely on self-reported anthropometric data. While paper-based self-reports have been the standard collection mode, the number of studies collecting self-reported data via the Web is increasing rapidly. Although numerous studies have shown good agreement between self-reported and measured weight using paper-based questionnaires, the validity of using the Web to inquire about weight is unknown. Objective: The objective of this study was to validate Web-based self-reports of bodyweight compared to weight measured at the study center. Methods: The validity of weight self-reported via the Web was assessed by comparing self-reports against measurements of weight in a convenience sample of 149 individuals (77.2% women, 115/149), aged 20-65 years. Study participants self-reported their weight via a Web-based questionnaire and thereafter had their weight measured in the research center. Results: The Spearman correlation coefficient between self-reported and measured weight was 0.98 (P<.001). The mean difference between self-reported and measured weight was -1.2 (SD 2.6) kg. There was a statistically significant difference between self-reported and measured weight with the self-reported being lower (P<.001). Subjects with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2, and subjects ≥30 years of age, under-reported their weight statistically significantly more than subjects with a BMI <25 kg/m2, and subjects <30 years of age, respectively. Conclusions: Our results show that self-reported weight via the Web can be a valid method of data collection. %M 23570956 %R 10.2196/jmir.2393 %U http://www.jmir.org/2013/4/e52/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2393 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23570956