@Article{info:doi/10.2196/53142,
author="Sun, Chao
and Dai, Huohuo
and M.J.J. van der Kleij, Rianne
and Li, Rong
and Wu, Hengchang
and Hallensleben, Cynthia
and Willems, Sofie H
and Chavannes, Niels H",
title="Digital Health Education for Chronic Lung Disease: Scoping Review",
journal="J Med Internet Res",
year="2025",
month="Mar",
day="18",
volume="27",
pages="e53142",
keywords="digital health education; digital health interventions; chronic lung disease; eHealth; scoping review",
abstract="Background: Chronic lung disease (CLD) is one of the most prevalent noncommunicable diseases globally, significantly burdening patients and increasing health care expenditures. Digital health education (DHE) is increasingly important in chronic disease prevention and management. However, DHE characteristics and impacts in CLD are rarely reported. Objective: This study aimed to provide an overview of the existing literature on DHE for CLD, with a focus on exploring the DHE mediums, content, mechanisms, and reported outcomes in patients with CLD. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, and The Cochrane Library with the assistance of a librarian specialist. Articles were screened by the reviewer team with ASReview (Utrecht University) and EndNote X9 (Clarivate Analytics) based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. Quality assessment was conducted with the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool. A descriptive analysis was used to summarize the study characteristics, DHE characteristics, and outcomes. Results: A total of 22 studies were included in this review with medium or high quality. They were published between 2000 and 2022, showing an increasing publication trend with the year, mostly in developed countries (16/22, 73{\%}). Websites and mobile apps (10/22, 45{\%}) were the most widely used DHE medium. Education on self-management skills of CLD was the primary topic (21/22, 95{\%}), 4/22 (18{\%}) of which mentioned DHE mechanisms. The majority of studies reported positive changes in CLD awareness (14/16, 88{\%}), clinical outcomes (3/6, 50{\%}), DHE feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction (6/8, 75{\%}), lifestyle outcomes (3/3, 100{\%}), and psychosocial outcomes (7/8, 88{\%}). Only 2 studies reported cost-effectiveness (2/22, 9{\%}). Conclusions: Despite the heterogeneity of the study situation, some aspects can be concluded. DHE can improve disease awareness and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic lung disease, with good feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction through different mediums and learning content. There is still relatively little research among people in low- and middle-income countries. Future research should consider the impact on cost-effectiveness, duration, frequency, and theoretical mechanisms of the DHE to maximize the potential impact. It should also be conducted in the context of health services research to better reflect the real world. ",
issn="1438-8871",
doi="10.2196/53142",
url="https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e53142",
url="https://doi.org/10.2196/53142"
}