@Article{info:doi/10.2196/jmir.6593, author="Admon, Lindsay and Haefner, Jessica K and Kolenic, Giselle E and Chang, Tammy and Davis, Matthew M and Moniz, Michelle H", title="Recruiting Pregnant Patients for Survey Research: A Head to Head Comparison of Social Media-Based Versus Clinic-Based Approaches", journal="J Med Internet Res", year="2016", month="Dec", day="21", volume="18", number="12", pages="e326", keywords="pregnant women; surveys and questionnaires; methods; social media", abstract="Background: Recruiting a diverse sample of pregnant women for clinical research is a challenging but crucial task for improving obstetric services and maternal and child health outcomes. Objective: To compare the feasibility and cost of recruiting pregnant women for survey research using social media-based and clinic-based approaches. Methods: Advertisements were used to recruit pregnant women from the social media website Facebook. In-person methods were used to recruit pregnant women from the outpatient clinic of a large, tertiary care center. In both approaches, potential respondents were invited to participate in a 15-minute Web-based survey. Each recruitment method was monitored for 1 month. Using bivariate statistics, we compared the number, demographic characteristics, and health characteristics of women recruited and the cost per completed survey for each recruitment method. Results: The social media-based approach recruited 1178 women and the clinic-based approach recruited 219 women. A higher proportion of subjects recruited through social media identified as African American (29.4{\%}, 207/705 vs 11.2{\%}, 20/179), reported household incomes