@Article{info:doi/10.2196/jmir.2661,
author="Bender, Jacqueline Lorene
and Yue, Rossini Ying Kwan
and To, Matthew Jason
and Deacken, Laetitia
and Jadad, Alejandro R",
title="A Lot of Action, But Not in the Right Direction: Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Smartphone Applications for the Prevention, Detection, and Management of Cancer",
journal="J Med Internet Res",
year="2013",
month="Dec",
day="23",
volume="15",
number="12",
pages="e287",
keywords="mobile; Internet; cancer; software applications; apps",
abstract="Background: Mobile phones have become nearly ubiquitous, offering a promising means to deliver health interventions. However, little is known about smartphone applications (apps) for cancer. Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize the purpose and content of cancer-focused smartphone apps available for use by the general public and the evidence on their utility or effectiveness. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the official application stores for the four major smartphone platforms: iPhone, Android, Nokia, and BlackBerry. Apps were included in the review if they were focused on cancer and available for use by the general public. This was complemented by a systematic review of literature from MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify evaluations of cancer-related smartphone apps. Results: A total of 295 apps from the smartphone app stores met the inclusion criteria. The majority of apps targeted breast cancer (46.8{\%}, 138/295) or cancer in general (28.5{\%}, 84/295). The reported app purpose was predominantly to raise awareness about cancer (32.2{\%}, 95/295) or to provide educational information about cancer (26.4{\%}, 78/295), followed by apps to support fundraising efforts (12.9{\%}, 38/295), assist in early detection (11.5{\%}, 34/295), promote a charitable organization (10.2{\%}, 30/295), support disease management (3.7{\%}, 11/295), cancer prevention (2.0{\%}, 6/295), or social support (1.0{\%}, 3/295). The majority of the apps did not describe their organizational affiliation (64.1{\%}, 189/295). Apps affiliated with non-profit organizations were more likely to be free of cost ($\chi$21=16.3, P<.001) and have a fundraising or awareness purpose ($\chi$22=13.3, P=.001). The review of the health literature yielded 594 articles, none of which reported an evaluation of a cancer-focused smartphone application. Conclusions: There are hundreds of cancer-focused apps with the potential to enhance efforts to promote behavior change, to monitor a host of symptoms and physiological indicators of disease, and to provide real-time supportive interventions, conveniently and at low cost. However, there is a lack of evidence on their utility, effectiveness, and safety. Future efforts should focus on improving and consolidating the evidence base into a whitelist for public consumption. ",
issn="14388871",
doi="10.2196/jmir.2661",
url="http://www.jmir.org/2013/12/e287/",
url="https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2661",
url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24366061"
}