Journal of Medical Internet Research

The leading peer-reviewed journal for digital medicine and health and health care in the internet age. 

Editor-in-Chief:

Gunther Eysenbach, MD, MPH, FACMI, Founding Editor and Publisher; Adjunct Professor, School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Canada


Impact Factor 5.8 CiteScore 14.4

The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is the pioneer open access eHealth journal, and is the flagship journal of JMIR Publications. It is a leading health services and digital health journal globally in terms of quality/visibility (Journal Impact Factor™ 5.8 (Clarivate, 2024)), ranking Q1 in both the 'Medical Informatics' and 'Health Care Sciences & Services' categories, and is also the largest journal in the field. The journal is ranked #1 on Google Scholar in the 'Medical Informatics' discipline. The journal focuses on emerging technologies, medical devices, apps, engineering, telehealth and informatics applications for patient education, prevention, population health and clinical care.

JMIR is indexed in all major literature indices including National Library of Medicine(NLM)/MEDLINE, Sherpa/Romeo, PubMed, PMCScopus, Psycinfo, Clarivate (which includes Web of Science (WoS)/ESCI/SCIE), EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials, DOAJ, GoOA and others. The Journal of Medical Internet Research received a CiteScore of 14.4, placing it in the 95th percentile (#7 of 138) as a Q1 journal in the field of Health Informatics. It is a selective journal complemented by almost 30 specialty JMIR sister journals, which have a broader scope, and which together receive over 10,000 submissions a year. 

As an open access journal, we are read by clinicians, allied health professionals, informal caregivers, and patients alike, and have (as with all JMIR journals) a focus on readable and applied science reporting the design and evaluation of health innovations and emerging technologies. We publish original research, viewpoints, and reviews (both literature reviews and medical device/technology/app reviews). Peer-review reports are portable across JMIR journals and papers can be transferred, so authors save time by not having to resubmit a paper to a different journal but can simply transfer it between journals. 

We are also a leader in participatory and open science approaches, and offer the option to publish new submissions immediately as preprints, which receive DOIs for immediate citation (eg, in grant proposals), and for open peer-review purposes. We also invite patients to participate (eg, as peer-reviewers) and have patient representatives on editorial boards.

As all JMIR journals, the journal encourages Open Science principles and strongly encourages publication of a protocol before data collection. Authors who have published a protocol in JMIR Research Protocols get a discount of 20% on the Article Processing Fee when publishing a subsequent results paper in any JMIR journal.

Be a widely cited leader in the digital health revolution and submit your paper today!

Recent Articles

Article Thumbnail
Digital Health Reviews

Mental health plays a key role across the cancer care continuum, from prognosis and active treatment to survivorship and palliative care. Digital health technologies offer an appealing, cost-effective tool to address psychological needs.

|
Article Thumbnail
Digital Health Reviews

older people experiencing homelessness can have mental and physical indicators of aging several decades earlier than the general population and experience premature mortality due to age-related chronic conditions. Digital interventions could positively impact the health and well-being of homeless people. However, increased reliance on digital delivery may also perpetuate digital inequalities for socially excluded groups. The potential triple disadvantage of being older, homeless, and digitally excluded creates a uniquely problematic situation warranting further research. Few studies have synthesized available literature on digital interventions for older people experiencing homelessness.

|
Article Thumbnail
Mobile Health (mhealth)

Depression affects 32% of older adults. Loneliness and social isolation are common risk factors for depression in older adults. Mobile apps can connect users and are also effective in depression management in the general population. However, older adults have specific needs in terms of the content of depression self-care interventions and their accessibility. It remains unknown whether existing apps for depression self-care are applicable to older adults.

|
Article Thumbnail
Research Letter

Despite excitement around artificial intelligence (AI)–based tools in health care, there is work to be done before they can be equitably deployed. The absence of diverse patient voices in discussions on AI is a pressing matter, and current studies have been limited in diversity. Our study inquired about the perspectives of racial and ethnic minority patients on the use of their health data in AI, by conducting a cross-sectional survey among 230 participants who were at least 18 years of age and identified as Black, Latinx, Indigenous, or Asian. While familiarity with AI was high, a smaller proportion of participants understood how AI can be used in health care (152/199, 76.4%), and an even smaller proportion understood how AI can be applied to dermatology (133/199, 66.8%). Overall, 69.8% (139/199) of participants agreed that they trusted the health care system to treat their medical information with respect; however, this varied significantly by income (P=.045). Only 64.3% (128/199) of participants felt comfortable with their medical data being used to build AI tools, and 83.4% (166/199) believed they should be compensated if their data are used to develop AI. To our knowledge, this is the first study focused on understanding opinions about health data use for AI among racial and ethnic minority individuals, as similar studies have had limited diversity. It is important to capture the opinions of diverse groups because the inclusion of their data is essential for building equitable AI tools; however, historical harms have made inclusion challenging.

|
Article Thumbnail
Consumer & Patient Education and Shared-Decision Making

Patient-centered care promotes the involvement of patients in decision-making related to their health care. The adoption and implementation of shared decision-making (SDM) into routine care are constrained by several obstacles, including technical and time constraints, clinician and patient attitudes and perceptions, and processes that exist outside the standardized clinical workflow.

|
Article Thumbnail
Telehealth and Telemonitoring

Health care wearable devices can transform health care delivery by enabling real-time, continuous monitoring that facilitates early disease detection, personalized treatments, and improved patient engagement. The COVID-19 pandemic has heightened awareness of the importance of health technology, accelerating interest in wearables as tools for monitoring health and managing chronic conditions. As we navigate the postpandemic era, understanding the adoption and data-sharing behaviors associated with wearable devices has become increasingly critical. Despite their potential, challenges and low adoption rates persist, with significant gaps in understanding the impact of sociodemographic factors, health conditions, and digital literacy on the use and data-sharing behaviors of these devices.

|
Article Thumbnail
JMIR Theme Issue: COVID-19 Special Issue

The emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants, the resulting reinfections, and post–COVID-19 condition continue to impact many people’s lives. Tracking websites like the one at Johns Hopkins University no longer report the daily confirmed cases, posing challenges to accurately determine the true extent of infections. Many COVID-19 cases with mild symptoms are self-assessed at home and reported on social media, which provides an opportunity to monitor and understand the progression and evolving trends of the disease.

|
Article Thumbnail
Digital Health Reviews

Online record access (ORA) is being increasingly implemented internationally. Despite reported benefits for patients, health care professionals (HCPs) have raised concerns about potential disadvantages. To date, no review has examined the empirical evidence on whether and how documentation changes following the introduction of patients’ ORA.

|

Preprints Open for Peer-Review

|

Open Peer Review Period:

-

|

Open Peer Review Period:

-

|

Open Peer Review Period:

-

We are working in partnership with

  • Crossref Member

  • Committee on Publication Ethics

  • Open Access

  • Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association

  •  
  •  
  • TrendMD MemberORCID Member

  •  

 

This journal is indexed in

 
  • PubMed

  • PubMed CentralMEDLINE

  •  
  • DOAJCINAHL (EBSCO)PsycInfoSherpa RomeoEBSCO/EBSCO Essentials

  •  
  • Web of Science - SCIE

  •  

  •  
  •