This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Peer-to-Peer Support and Online Communities (633) Alcohol Abuse, Alcoholism Prevention and Recovery (300)

Published on in Vol 20, No 5 (2018): May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/9605, first published .
Alcohol Consumption Reduction Among a Web-Based Supportive Community Using the Hello Sunday Morning Blog Platform: Observational Study

Alcohol Consumption Reduction Among a Web-Based Supportive Community Using the Hello Sunday Morning Blog Platform: Observational Study

Alcohol Consumption Reduction Among a Web-Based Supportive Community Using the Hello Sunday Morning Blog Platform: Observational Study

Authors of this article:

Jessica Jane Louise Kirkman1 Author Orcid Image ;   Briony Leo1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jamie Christopher Moore1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (14) Tweetations (5) Metrics

    Original Paper

    Hello Sunday Morning, Surry Hills, Australia

    Corresponding Author:

    Jessica Jane Louise Kirkman, BPsych (Hons), MClinPsych, PhD

    Hello Sunday Morning

    3/487 Elizabeth St

    Surry Hills, 2010

    Australia

    Phone: 61 1300 403 196

    Email: jessica@hellosundaymorning.org


    Related ArticleThis is a corrected version. See correction statement in: http://www.jmir.org/2018/9/e11288/

    Background: Alcohol misuse is a major social and public health issue in Australia, with an estimated cost to the community of Aus $30 billion per annum. Until recently, a major barrier in addressing this significant public health issue is the fact that the majority of individuals with alcohol use disorders and alcohol misuse are not receiving treatment.

    Objective: This study aimed to assess whether alcohol consumption changes are associated with participation in Hello Sunday Morning’s blog platform, an online forum discussing experiences in abstaining from alcohol.

    Methods: The study reports on Hello Sunday Morning participants who signed up for a 3-month period of abstinence from November 2009 to November 2016. The sample comprised 1917 participants (female: 1227/1917, 64.01%; male: 690/1917, 35.99%). Main outcome measures were Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) scores, mood, program engagement metrics, and slip-ups.

    Results: Individuals who reported hazardous (preprogram AUDIT mean 11.92, SD 2.25) and harmful consumption levels (preprogram AUDIT mean 17.52, SD 1.08) and who engaged in the Hello Sunday Morning program reported a significant decrease in alcohol consumption, moving to lower risk consumption levels (hazardous, mean 7.59, SD 5.70 and harmful, mean 10.38, SD 7.43), 4 months following program commencement (P<.001). Those who reported high-risk or dependent consumption levels experienced the biggest reduction (preprogram mean 25.38, SD 4.20), moving to risky consumption (mean 15.83, SD 11.11), 4 months following program commencement (P<.001). These reductions in risk were maintained by participants in each group, 7 months following program commencement. Furthermore, those who engaged in the program more (as defined by more sign-ins, blogs posted, check-ins completed, and engagement with the community through likes and following) had lower alcohol consumption. Finally, those who experienced more slip-ups had lower alcohol consumption.

    Conclusions: Participation in an online forum can support long-term behavior change in individuals wishing to change their drinking behavior. Importantly, reductions in AUDIT scores appeared larger for those drinking at high-risk and hazardous levels before program commencement. This has promising implications for future models of alcohol reduction treatment, as online forums are an anonymous, accessible, and cost-effective alternative or adjunct to treatment-as-usual. Further research is needed into the specific mechanisms of change within a Web-based supportive community, as well as the role of specific mood states in predicting risky drinking behavior.

    J Med Internet Res 2018;20(5):e196

    doi:10.2196/jmir.9605

    Keywords

    alcohol drinking; internet; Web-based brief alcohol intervention; moderate drinking; alcohol use; alcohol abuse; binge drinking; internet intervention; relapse prevention; drinking behavior; alcoholic intoxication; social network; blogging; blog search; internet media; platforms; community; engagement 


    Background

    Alcohol misuse is a major social and public health issue in Australia, with an estimated cost to the community of Aus $30 billion per annum [1,2]. In Australia, alcohol consumption is estimated to cause 3.2% of the total burden of disease, contributing approximately 188,000 disability adjusted life years, causing 5550 deaths per annum [1,2]. In high-income and middle-income countries, the costs associated with alcohol misuse amount to more than 1% of the gross national product, represented largely in social harm and health costs [3]. Government policies targeted at reducing alcohol consumption have focused on education about the risks and harms of alcohol consumption and reducing the accessibility and affordability of alcohol.

    Although alcohol misuse and alcohol use disorder (AUD) can be seen as distinct from each other, it can be argued that they are on the same trajectory. Most theories of alcohol dependency describe high-risk drinkers experiencing nervous system adaptations from repeated alcohol exposure—a process which underlies the development of an alcohol addiction [4,5].

    Until recently, a major barrier in addressing this significant public health issue is the fact that the majority of individuals with both high-risk drinking and AUDs are not receiving treatment [6]. For this population, a significant treatment gap exists whereby a hidden population of individuals with problematic alcohol use is dissuaded from seeking help due to a lack of accessibility of services, stigmatization, low motivation, or cost of treatment [7]. Furthermore, substantial evidence exists to show that those with less severe alcohol abuse are not offered interventions, and those who are gainfully employed are even less likely to receive any type of treatment [8]. What is notable though is that most alcohol-related harm arises from those who consume in an “at-risk” manner rather than those with an AUD [9].

    This hidden population of individuals with problematic alcohol use is a prime candidate for internet-based interventions, as a first step toward seeking help [10]. It is this population who are difficult to engage in traditional treatment services but from whom internet-based interventions are ideal due to their low cost and relative convenience. Internet-based interventions have promising applications in the treatments of addiction, with advantages including anonymity, convenience, accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and privacy [11,12]. Internet therapies can also target clients in different stages of change [13], allowing potential clients to investigate treatment options without the shame and guilt associated with face-to-face interactions. Additionally, these therapies have the potential to be more consistent than face-to-face therapy delivery, with structured programs that are delivered with clinical fidelity [14].

    Internet-based interventions can also provide the context for screening and brief intervention (SBI) for those drinking to “at-risk” levels. SBI has a growing evidence base for its effectiveness [15-18]; however, there is an absence of evidence for those experiencing more severe alcohol use problems [15,17,19]. Reviews of previous studies of electronic SBIs have also found inconsistent evidence as to their effectiveness with high-risk drinkers, with an acknowledgment that, although Web-based interventions appear to be well received, further controlled trials examining engagement and efficacy are needed within this population [20].

    It is important to acknowledge that, in this emerging field, there are many terminologies to describe interventions delivered over the internet. Common terms include e-mental health, Web-based-therapy, mHealth, cybertherapy, and telemental health. eHealth describes the range of modalities that deliver therapeutic services—such as telephone, internet, email, and videoconferencing [21]. This differs from telerehab, which is rehabilitation-focused rather than a psychological or psychosocial intervention. For ease of reference, in this paper, the term eHealth will be used to describe services delivered online.

    In terms of treatment, the existing evidence for eHealth shows promising results across multiple populations and demographics [22-26]. Again, the populations targeted in most of the research have been for problematic drinking rather than those with diagnosed AUDs, making it difficult to ascertain whether these interventions are useful for those with a serious drinking problem. More recent research that has focused on individuals with a specifically diagnosed AUD has found evidence for the efficacy of a stand-alone mobile phone alcohol reduction app, as well as internet-based interventions with bibliotherapy [27]. For both of these conditions, greater utilization of the system provided greater results over the course of the study, and participants had control over how quickly they progressed through their treatment—and were able to access the material when needed, in contrast to more traditional treatment services. The research into eHealth explores benefits such as cost-effectiveness, flexibility of design, replicability, interactivity, and ease of use, as well as the question of whether these interventions are as effective as face-to-face programs, and as adjuncts to treatment in primary care settings [28].

    In terms of less structured or formalized Web-based interventions, the internet also provides individuals the opportunity to connect with others and participate in activities such as blogging. Blogging has gained popularity over the past 10 years, with most blogs fitting the description of regular, date stamped articles that represent a timeline, and are used by the author for personally oriented communication [29]. They differ from traditional print and digital media in terms of their flexibility, interactivity, informal structure, and engagement with readers, with users having the opportunity to express their opinions on posts and in a public forum. Research into internet users has identified convenience, a sense of community, and information seeking as the major reasons for visiting blogs [30]. The impacts of blogging can also be behaviorally empowering and tie in with intrinsic motivations [31], as well as providing a cathartic space to process difficult emotions [32].

    Research has also established that a person’s social network can either increase or decrease their alcohol use [33]. Today, that includes an individual’s online social network. These social networks can allow a user to post a blog with text and images or engage in group discussions [34]. Although the impacts of social networks and blogging on behavior change are inconsistent in relation to diet and exercise [35], their impact on reducing alcohol consumption has not been determined [34,35].

    Hello Sunday Morning

    Hello Sunday Morning (HSM) is an Australian social media health promotion “movement” that asks participants to publicly set a personal goal to stop drinking or reduce their consumption, for a set period of time, and to record their reflections and progress on blogs and social networks (see Figures 1 and 2). The action of setting a goal both motivates members and holds them accountable, while also creating a message about healthy relationships with alcohol within their peer group. Created in 2010, HSM has developed a Web-based platform that combines blogging, social media, and gamification (structured games that facilitate participation and engagement with the Web-based community). HSM is unique in that the program participants produce all of the content based on their individual experiences, using the vernacular of their peer group.

    HSM has effectively built a strong culture that governs the norms and values of the community. Carah et al [36] suggested that HSM—like fitness apps, quit smoking initiatives, and mindfulness programs—is worth studying to understand how social media health promotion and treatment can overlap.

    Preliminary research has been conducted on the HSM platform, exploring blog content and qualitative reports of change. First, text analytics of the blog posts on the platform show that participants typically begin with descriptions of their drinking practices and change over time to reflect their efforts at change, and their aspirations [37]. Early evaluations have also revealed that 84% of Australian HSM users reported completing the program time without a “slip-up” (defined as a drink before finishing the program), reduced their alcohol use, reported improved mental health, and experienced a change in their perceptions of alcohol over time [38]. Specifically, participants reported increased understanding of the negative effects of alcohol, a decrease in the desire to drink alcohol for fun, and a decrease in the likelihood to drink alcohol to relieve tension. Further evaluations have demonstrated members shift from being self-focused to reflecting on the role of alcohol in society and developing a desire to support others [38]. A study of high-risk Victorian HSM participants also found that the majority of participants reported low-risk drinking at 1 month and reported improved physical health, feeling positive about themselves, greater productivity, engagement in new activities, improved mental health, new or improved relationships, and financial savings [39].

    More recent research on the HSM platform and its participants has revealed that 64% of participants were under the age of 40 years, were more likely to be female (which is the opposite of the Australian alcohol treatment population), and are riskier drinkers than other treatment-seeking populations [36]. These participants most commonly selected “fitness” and “mind and body” as their goal, whereas “sobriety” was the third most significant goal. Those drinking at high-risk levels were twice as likely to elect “alcohol”-related goals, compared with those drinking at lower risk levels. Carah et al [36] concluded that through qualitative analysis, they believe heavier drinking participants may use HSM as a treatment program. As such, it was suggested that further research is required to examine whether participants self-reported alcohol consumption changes after participation [36].

    ‎
    Figure 1. Sample blog post (Hello Sunday Morning, 2018).
    View this figure
    ‎
    Figure 2. Sample profile of Hello Sunday Morning (HSM) member (Hello Sunday Morning, 2018).
    View this figure

    This Study

    This study, therefore, aimed to address outstanding questions on whether alcohol consumption changes are associated with participation on the HSM platform and explore the reasons why this may be the case or what factors are driving the change. The primary outcome will be change in Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) scores. The AUDIT was developed by the World Health Organization and has been validated for use in Australia [40]. The AUDIT has been used as an outcome measure in previous evaluations of the HSM platform [38,39] as well as other clinical populations [41-44]. Although the gold standard for evaluating service efficacy is a randomized controlled trial design, such a design would be impractical when offering this service for the first time to the previously described hidden population who are not traditional treatment seekers. To allow for a preliminary trial of the technology, the Web-based program was openly offered to all eligible participants. This study is the first in a series examining the service, its reach, and its therapeutic components, including a randomized controlled trial currently under way.

    In this study, the following was hypothesized: (1) that participants’ AUDIT score will significantly decrease from preprogram to 1-month follow-up (4 months after program commencement), and this will be maintained at 3-month follow-up (7 months after program commencement), and further, that this change will occur in participants across all 3 AUDIT risk zones; (2) that 1- and 3-month AUDIT change scores will be negatively correlated with program engagement metrics including the number of sign-ins, posts, comments received, comments given, followers, and people following; (3) that 1- and 3-month AUDIT change scores will be negatively correlated with mood and positively correlated with slip-ups.


    Participants

    This study reports data on HSM participants who have signed up for a 3-month period of abstinence from November 2009 to November 2016. Although some participants complete multiple HSM periods of abstinence, data reported in this study reflect participants’ first engagement with the program. Participants classified as low-risk consumption (as measured by Zone 1 on the AUDIT) were excluded from the sample used in analyses, as they were not identified as having unhealthy drinking levels. The resulting sample consisted of program participants who signed up to complete one 3-month HSM experience, screened as Zones II, III, or IV on the AUDIT at program commencement, signed in at least once, and completed at least 1 follow-up survey (ie, 1- or 3-month).

    Materials

    Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test

    The AUDIT is a 10-item measure assessing alcohol consumption [40]. Participants are required to respond to items (eg, “How often do you have 6 or more drinks on one occasion?”) on a 5-point Likert scale, with each question receiving a score with a range of 0-4 points, with a potential maximum total score of 40 points. In Australian usage of the AUDIT, a score between 0 and 7 indicates low-risk consumption, a score between 8 and 15 indicates risky or hazardous consumption, a score between 16 and 19 indicates harmful consumption, and a score of more than 20 indicates high-risk or dependent consumption [45].

    Mood

    Mood was measured by a single item (“How did you feel this week?”) asked at each weekly check-in, with members responding on a 4-point visual scale of faces ranging from very happy to very sad.

    Slip-Ups

    Slip-ups were measured by a single item (“How did you go this week?”) asked at each weekly check-in, with members responding with either “I’m still going strong,” indicating they did not drink, or “I slipped up,” indicating they did drink.

    Program Engagement

    Program engagement is measured by a number of factors that were automatically logged within the website. This includes a count of the total number of sign-ins, posts made on the platform, comments received, comments given, followers, and people following the member. The ability to capture these metrics was intentionally created by the website developers, rather than relying on other metrics such as Google analytics.

    Procedure

    When participants register on the HSM Web platform, they accept the terms and conditions which state that information about their participation and alcohol use is used in research evaluations. Participants, therefore, provided informed consent for their deidentified data to be used for research purposes. Three months following the completion of their 3-month abstinence period, they are sent an email prompting them to check in to see how their relationship with alcohol has changed since signing up. They are offered a 25% discount on any HSM store purchase if they complete the follow-up survey within 48 hours.

    Data Analysis

    Results are presented for 2 different sets of data analyses. Data were cleaned and checked for appropriate assumptions of normality, sphericity, and outliers in line with the analyses conducted. First, a set of repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to explore reductions in AUDIT score following program completion. Then, separate bivariate Pearson correlations were conducted to determine associations with 1- and 3-month follow-up AUDIT change scores, with various program engagement metrics, and with mood and slip-ups. AUDIT change scores were computed by subtracting program commencement AUDIT score from 1- and 3-month follow-up AUDIT score, with the resulting variable indicating negative scores for AUDIT reduction and positive scores for AUDIT increase. All ANOVAs were conducted, with an overall alpha of .01 to provide a more conservative control of type-I error, with all correlational analyses conducted at an alpha of .05 as they were observational in nature.


    Demographic Information

    Participants were 1917 adults with an average age of 46 years (SD 11.71). Overall, 64.00% (1227/1917) of participants were female and 35.02% (690/1917) were male, with the highest proportion reporting they reside in Australia (709/1917, 36.99%), participants followed by the United States (498/1917, 25.98%), the United Kingdom (249/1917, 12.99%), and Canada (153/1917, 7.98%). In total, 25.98% (498/1917) of participants screened as Zone II on the AUDIT, 20.41% (402/1917) screened as Zone III, and the remaining 54% of participants screened as Zone IV (1029/1917). Participants also spent, on average, 41 min and 45 seconds per visit to the HSM site and visited, on average, 6 pages.

    Audit Score and Time in Program

    To test hypothesis 1, a set of repeated measures ANOVAs was conducted to investigate any reductions in AUDIT score from program commencement to 1- and 3-month follow-up. Three separate ANOVAs were conducted to determine reduction in AUDIT score for participants who screened Zones II, III, or IV, respectively, at program commencement. Intention to treat data is reported, in that participants who failed to complete a follow-up survey at 1- or 3-month follow-up had their sign-up AUDIT score imputed at the follow-up points. Across all participants at program commencement, mean AUDIT score was 20.32 (SD 6.66), placing them on average in Zone IV of the AUDIT. At 1-month follow-up, the mean score was 12.60 (SD 9.95), and at 3-month follow-up, it was 8.90 (SD 8.86).

    The assumption of sphericity was violated for all 3 ANOVAs; therefore, Greenhouse-Geisser F values and degrees of freedom are reported. For participants who screened Zone II at program commencement, there was a significant main effect of time, F1.98,916.53=401.28, P<.001, ηp2=.45, with pairwise comparisons indicating AUDIT scores reduced significantly from program commencement to 1-month follow-up and then reduced significantly again at 3-month follow-up (see Table 1 for descriptive statistics). The result showed that participants who screened Zone II at program commencement had reduced to Zone I (low-risk drinking) at 3-month follow-up.

    For participants who screened Zone III at program commencement, there was a significant main effect of time, F1.92,771.14=437.16, P<.001, ηp2=.52, with pairwise comparisons indicating AUDIT scores reduced significantly from program commencement to 1-month follow-up and then reduced significantly again at 3-month follow-up (see Table 1 for descriptive statistics). The result showed that participants who screened Zone III at program commencement had reduced to borderline Zone I (low-risk drinking) at 3-month follow-up (M=7.67).

    For participants who screened Zone IV at program commencement, there was a significant main effect of time, F1.92,1975.28=1067.23, P<.001, ηp2=.51, with pairwise comparisons indicating AUDIT scores reduced significantly from program commencement to 1-month follow-up and then reduced significantly again at 3-month follow-up (see Table 1 for descriptive statistics). The result showed that participants who screened Zone IV (high-risk or dependent drinking) at program commencement had reduced to Zone II (risky or hazardous drinking) at 3-month follow-up. Overall, 58.3% of the sample had a reduction at 1-month follow-up and 89.3% had a reduction at 3-month follow-up.

    Table 1. Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score change across time by pre-AUDIT screening level.
    ConsumptionPre, mean (SD)1 month, mean (SD)3 months, mean (SD)
    Zone IIa (n=485)11.92 (2.25)7.59 (5.70)5.39 (5.32)>
    Zone IIIb (n=402)17.52 (1.08)10.38 (7.43)7.67 (6.99)
    Zone IVc (n=1029)25.38 (4.20)15.83 (11.11)11.04 (10.14)

    aZone II: risky or hazardous consumption.

    bZone III: harmful consumption.

    cZone IV: high-risk or dependent consumption.

    Table 2. Pearson correlations between Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) scores and engagement variables.
    Variables1-month AUDITa score change3-month AUDIT score changeSign in count# of postsLikes receivedComments receivedComments givenFollowingFollowedCheck-ins
    1-month AUDIT score change—−.66d−.12d−.10c−.13d−.05−.03−.14d−.11c−.22d
    3-month AUDIT score change——−.09d−.07b−.12d−.04−.03−.09b−.09b−.23d
    Sign-in count———.60d.57d.68d.67d.43d.66d.29d
    # of posts————.84d.83d.73d.40d.76d.27d
    Likes received—————.84d.72d.54d.81d.23d
    Comments received——————.93d.44d.81d.16d
    Comments given———————.37d.78d.12c
    Following————————.75d.14d
    Followed—————————.26d
    Check-ins——————————

    aAUDIT: Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test.

    bP<.05.

    cP<.01.

    dP<.001.

    Audit Score and Program Engagement

    To test hypothesis 2, separate bivariate Pearson correlations were conducted to determine associations with 1- and 3-month follow-up AUDIT change scores, with various program engagement metrics. It was hypothesized that an increase in program engagement via following, sign-ins, posts, and comments would result in greater 1- and 3-month change scores.

    Results indicate that, as expected, 1- and 3-month AUDIT change scores were negatively associated with more sign-ins, posts, received likes, following, followers, and check-ins (see Table 2), indicating the greater the reduction in AUDIT scores, the more of each of these engagement metrics participants had. The number of received comments or comments given did not correlate with 1- or 3-month AUDIT change.

    AUD Identification Test Score and Mood

    To test hypothesis 3, that 1-month and 3-month AUDIT change would be negatively correlated with mood (ie, worse mood would result in higher AUDIT scores), and positively correlated with slip-ups (ie, more slip-ups would result in higher AUDIT scores), separate bivariate Pearson correlations were conducted. To run the analysis, the good and bad check rate was calculated, with good check indicating the proportion of check-ins where the participant indicated they had not had a drink that week, and bad check indicating the proportion of check-ins where the participant indicated they did have a drink that week.

    Table 3. Pearson correlations between Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) scores, mood, and check-in ratings.
    Variables1-month AUDITa score change3-month AUDIT score changeGood checkBad checkPositive checkNegative check
    1-month AUDIT score change—.66d.09c−.25d−.23d−.02
    3-month AUDIT score change——.07b−.26d−.24d−.01
    Good check———−.01.08b.68d
    Bad check————.96d.21d
    Positive check—————.17d
    Negative check——————

    aAUDIT: Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test.

    bP<.05.

    cP<.01.

    dP<.001.

    Moreover, positive and negative check-in was calculated, with positive check-in representing the proportion of check-ins where the participant indicated they had a positive mood that week, and negative check-in representing the proportion of check-ins where the participant indicated they had a negative mood that week.

    Results indicated that the good check rate was positively correlated with 1- and 3-month AUDIT change scores, and bad check was negatively correlated with 1- and 3-month AUDIT change scores (see Table 3). Contrary to expectations, this indicated that more slip-ups were correlated with lower 1-and 3-month AUDIT change scores, and less slip-ups were associated with higher 1- and 3-month AUDIT change scores. This indicated those who had reduced their AUDIT scores had more slip-ups during the program, than those whose AUDIT scores had increased. However, as expected, positive check-in was negatively correlated with AUDIT change scores, indicating that more check-ins where mood for the week was positive were associated with greater reduction in AUDIT scores. Interestingly, negative check-in (ie, the proportion of check-ins where mood that week was low) was not correlated with either 1- or 3-month AUDIT change scores.


    Principal Findings

    Alcohol use is a major social and public health issue in Australia and around the world, with the major barriers for accessing treatment including accessibility of services, stigmatization, low motivation, and cost of treatment [7]. Alarmingly, there is a significant gap between those who exhibit problematic alcohol use and those that receive some form of treatment [6]. Furthermore, those with less severe alcohol abuse are not offered any form of intervention [8]. It is clear that emerging technologies may offer a low-cost, accessible alternative that may be able to support this hidden population; however, limited research exists in regard to the efficacy of blogging and social media engagement on alcohol consumption.

    This study aimed to explore whether participation in the HSM platform is associated with changes in alcohol consumption. The HSM program asks participants to set a goal to stop or reduce their drinking for a set time, and to record their reflections and progress through blogs, while being connected with others within the community working toward similar goals.

    As with previous research on the platform, participants were predominately female, and were beginning the program with predominately harmful or high-risk consumption levels [36]. Results revealed that individuals who reported hazardous and harmful consumption levels and who engaged in the HSM program reported a significant decrease in alcohol consumption, moving to low-risk consumption levels 4 months following program commencement. Those who reported high-risk or dependent consumption levels before program engagement experienced the biggest reduction, moving to risky consumption 4 months following program commencement. These reductions in risk were maintained by participants in each AUDIT screening zone, 7 months following program commencement. Given the cost and wait times for traditional treatment programs, this is a significant finding, suggesting long-term behavior change can occur through the use of an easily accessible Web-based program. Furthermore, it is important to note that this program was more effective for those drinking to high-risk and hazardous levels.

    As expected, those who engaged in the program more had significantly lower levels of alcohol consumption at 1- and 3-month follow up. In particular, significant improvements were seen for those who signed-in more, posted more blogs, received more “likes” from other community members, followed more community members, had more followers, and completed more check-ins.

    It appears the engagement with the community and peer support was a key ingredient in the successful behavior change of HSM participants, with such peer-to-peer communities being described as one of the most transformational features of the internet [46]. Through this model, individuals with multiple barriers have the opportunity to connect and create supportive communities, with narrative expression having demonstrated psychological benefits for people experiencing chronic illness—allowing reflection, connection, and meaning-making [47-49].

    The benefits of such expressive writing may include acknowledging and validating experiences, communicating the experience of recovery and relapse, and allowing for reflection of the current reality. The reflective nature of narrating personal experiences encourages self-disclosure and sharing of thoughts and emotions, as well as encouraging the participant to disclose facts about themselves and reduce inhibition [49], as well as providing an opportunity to externalize their inner experiences [50]. When this content is shared within a trusted and supportive community, it appears that participants feel validated, and in turn offer support and validation to other members of the community, thus creating a network of participants working toward the same goal of long-term behavior change [46,51,52].

    The last hypothesis was that 1- and 3-month AUDIT scores would be negatively correlated with mood and positively correlated with slip-ups. However, results showed that negative mood was not related to alcohol consumption, but positive mood was significantly related to lower alcohol consumption. This is an interesting finding and warrants further investigation, particularly around what specific mood states predict drinking to excess, rather than simply positive versus negative emotions. Finally, results also show that more slip-ups were associated with lower alcohol consumption. This suggests that slip-ups provided more opportunities to learn about triggers, responses, and strategies to persist with rather than just focusing solely on staying sober. When supporting individuals experiencing a slip-up or lapse, it is therefore important to take advantage of the learning opportunity and facilitate processing, reframing, and learning rather than focusing on or trying to resolve feelings of weakness, guilt, and hopelessness.

    Limitations

    Despite the findings in this study, a number of limitations should be recognized. As noted, this study did not include a control group or benchmark group to compare to, and did not control for variables such as additional treatment (psychological or pharmacological) and support. Although this limits the conclusions that can be drawn from the analyses, it has provided preliminary data to support the currently underway research projects utilizing best practice research designs. Additionally, although results showed participants were spending an average of 41 min per visit on the HSM site, the exact nature of how they spent their time on the site is unknown. They may have been predominately reading blog posts, writing their own blog posts, or commenting on other members’ posts. Future research exploring the different functions of the program must address this limitation.

    Finally, mood was measured by a single visual scale simply describing positive and negative mood through the use of a happy or sad face dichotomy. It is recommended that a more descriptive and validated measure is used in the future, to allow more reliable evaluation of mood and mood states. Although more comprehensive measures are recommended for assessment of mood, it can also be argued that traditional questionnaires assessing mood can present issues such as cognitive load, overall burden, and longer completion times [53,54]. Previous well-validated pictorial measures of mood include the Self-Assessment Manikin, a set of 3 pictorial assessment scales measuring pleasure, arousal, and dominance [55], as well as the Smileyometer [56], the AffectButton [57], and EmoCards [58]. Each of these measures aims for respondents to report their affective state quickly and accurately. An additional benefit to these scales is that they can be used reliably across cultures [59], as well as being time-efficient ways for respondents to convey their affective state.

    Future measures may include both multidimensional tools to assess mood state, as well as brief, unidimensional pictorial measures. As mood disorders have a long-established link to alcohol use [60-62], it will be useful in future research to also utilize measures such as the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale and the K10, which are more able to assess the multidimensional nature of mood disorders and co-occurring depression, anxiety, and stress.

    Conclusions

    The findings of this study highlight a number of future directions for program development and future investigation into the elements involved in the HSM program. These findings suggest that it is possible to bring about significant change in alcohol consumption through the use of an online platform and Web-based community. The large number of participants drinking to high-risk or dependency levels has, however, highlighted the need for further accessible targeted clinical support.

    The results of this study indicate that being part of a supportive Web-based community, as well as having the opportunity to reflect on past experiences, may provide participants with the resources needed to create lasting behavior change. This is a crucial service for the hidden population of individuals with problematic alcohol use who do not seek out traditional services, or are not identified as being in-need of tailored support based on assessments or lack of, by their primary health providers. An added benefit to this is that the Web-based community is highly accessible, in that members are able to use it from their mobile phones or laptops, as well as utilizing the well-validated model of a supportive “sober” network. This can be compared with the traditional model of alcohol treatment, which is quite rigid in its service delivery and approaches—a shortcoming that is reflected in its poor engagement and outcomes [63]. It is hoped that with the introduction of new technologies, the social support model will continue to be utilized and the hidden population of high-risk drinkers will be able to access ongoing and effective support.

    Acknowledgments

    Funding for the Hello Sunday Morning platform development from 2010 to 2015 was received from Harold Mitchell Foundation, Victorian Health Promotion Agency, ACT Government, Queensland Government, West Australian Government, and the Ian Potter Foundation. This research, however, did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

    Conflicts of Interest

    The authors of this paper are all employees of Hello Sunday Morning.

    1. Health. The costs of tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug abuse to Australian society in 2004/2005   URL: https:/​/www.​health.gov.au/​internet/​drugstrategy/​publishing.nsf/​Content/​34F55AF632F67B70CA2573F60005D42B/​%24File/​mono64.​pdf [accessed 2018-05-07] [WebCite Cache]
    2. Laslett A, Catalano P, Chikritzhs T, Dale C, Doran C, Ferris J, et al. The range and magnitude of alcohol's harm to others. Fitzroy, Victoria: AER Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre, Eastern Health; 2010.
    3. Rehm J, Mathers C, Popova S, Thavorncharoensap M, Teerawattananon Y, Patra J. Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders. Lancet 2009 Jun;373(9682):2223-2233. [CrossRef]
    4. Corbin WR, Scott C, Leeman RF, Fucito LM, Toll BA, O'Malley SS. Early subjective response and acquired tolerance as predictors of alcohol use and related problems in a clinical sample. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2013 Mar;37(3):490-497 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Morean ME, Corbin WR. Subjective alcohol effects and drinking behavior: the relative influence of early response and acquired tolerance. Addict Behav 2008;33(10):1306-1313 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    6. Kohn R, Saxena S, Levav I, Saraceno B. The treatment gap in mental health care. Bull World Health Organ 2004;82(11):858-866. [CrossRef]
    7. Room R, Babor T, Rehm J. Alcohol and public health. Lancet 2005;365(9458):519-530 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    8. de Graaf R, Ten Have M, van Dorsselaer S. The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2): design and methods. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2010 Jul;19(3):125-141. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Health. 2009. Guidelines for the Treatment of Alcohol Problems   URL: https:/​/www.​health.gov.au/​internet/​main/​publishing.nsf/​Content/​0FD6C7C289CD31C9CA257BF0001F96BD/​$File/​AustAlctreatguidelines%202009.​pdf [accessed 2018-05-06] [WebCite Cache]
    10. Blankers M, Koeter M, Schippers GM. Evaluating real-time internet therapy and online self-help for problematic alcohol consumers: a three-arm RCT protocol. BMC Public Health 2009 Jan 14;9:16 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. University of Sydney. 2009. Internet therapy for problem gambling: A literature review and environmental scan   URL: http:/​/www.​greo.ca/​Modules/​EvidenceCentre/​files/​Monaghan%20et%20al%282009%29Internet_therapy_for_PG.​pdf [accessed 2018-05-07] [WebCite Cache]
    12. Monaghan S, Blaszczynski A. Internet-based interventions for the treatment of problem gambling. Toronto: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; 2009.
    13. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychother Theory Res Pract 1982;19(3):276-288 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    14. Carroll KM, Rounsaville BJ. A vision of the next generation of behavioral therapies research in the addictions. Addiction 2007 Jun;102(6):850-862 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Bien TH, Miller WR, Tonigan JS. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a review. Addiction 1993 Mar;88(3):315-336. [CrossRef]
    16. Landy MS, Davey CJ, Quintero D, Pecora A, McShane KE. A systematic review on the effectiveness of brief interventions for alcohol misuse among adults in emergency departments. J Subst Abuse Treat 2016 Feb;61:1-12. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Moyer A, Finney JW, Swearingen CE, Vergun P. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations. Addiction 2002;97(3):279-292. [CrossRef]
    18. Richardson LK, Frueh BC, Grubaugh AL, Egede L, Elhai JD. Current directions in video conferencing tele-mental health research. Clin Psychol (New York) 2009;16(3):323-338. [CrossRef]
    19. O'Donnell A, Anderson P, Newbury-Birch D, Schulte B, Schmidt C, Reimer J, et al. The impact of brief alcohol interventions in primary healthcare: a systematic review of reviews. Alcohol Alcohol 2014;49(1):66-78 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Saitz R. Alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care: absence of evidence for efficacy in people with dependence or very heavy drinking. Drug Alcohol Rev 2010 Nov;29(6):631-640 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Richardson LK, Frueh BC, Grubaugh AL, Egede L, Elhai JD. Current directions in videoconferencing tele-mental health research. Clinical Psychology 2009 Sep 1;16(3):323-338 Same as 18; delete [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Bewick BM, Trusler K, Barkham M, Hill AJ, Cahill J, Mulhern B. The effectiveness of web-based interventions designed to decrease alcohol consumption--a systematic review. Prev Med 2008 Jul;47(1):17-26. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Rooke S, Thorsteinsson E, Karpin A, Copeland J, Allsop D. Computer-delivered interventions for alcohol and tobacco use: a meta-analysis. Addiction 2010 Aug;105(8):1381-1390. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Khadjesari Z, Murray E, Hewitt C, Hartley S, Godfrey C. Can stand-alone computer-based interventions reduce alcohol consumption? A systematic review. Addiction 2011;106(2):267-282. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Carey KB, Scott-Sheldon LA, Elliott JC, Garey L, Carey MP. Face-to-face versus computer-delivered alcohol interventions for college drinkers: a meta-analytic review, 1998 to 2010. Clin Psychol Rev 2012 Dec;32(8):690-703 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Vernon ML. A review of computer-based alcohol problem services designed for the general public. J Subst Abuse Treat 2010 Apr;38(3):203-211 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Gonzalez VM, Dulin PL. Comparison of a smartphone app for alcohol use disorders with an Internet-based intervention plus bibliotherapy: a pilot study. J Consult Clin Psychol 2015 Apr;83(2):335-345 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Riper H, Spek V, Boon B, Conijn B, Kramer J, Martin-Abello K, et al. Effectiveness of E-self-help interventions for curbing adult problem drinking: a meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2011 Jun 30;13(2):e42 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Kirchoff L, Bruns A, Nicolai T. Investigating the impact of the blogosphere: Using PageRank to determine the distribution of attention   URL: http://snurb.info/files/talks2007/Blogosphere%20Impact.pdf [accessed 2017-11-28] [WebCite Cache]
    30. Johnson TJ, Kaye BK, Bichard SL, Wong WJ. Every blog has its day: politically-interested Internet users' perceptions of blog credibility. J Comput Mediat Commun 2007;13(1):100-122 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    31. Sundar S, Edwards H, Hu H, Stavrositu C. Blogging for better health: Putting the “Public” back in public health. In: Tremayne M, editor. Blogging, citizenship, and the future of the media. New York: Routledge; 2007:83-97.
    32. Baker JR, Moore SM. Blogging as a social tool: a psychosocial examination of the effects of blogging. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008 Dec;11(6):747-749. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Rosenquist JN, Murabito J, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. The spread of alcohol consumption behavior in a large social network. Ann Intern Med 2010 Apr 6;152(7):426-433 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Mita G, Ni MC, Jull A. Effectiveness of social media in reducing risk factors for noncommunicable diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Rev 2016 Apr;74(4):237-247 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Maher CA, Lewis LK, Ferrar K, Marshall S, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Vandelanotte C. Are health behavior change interventions that use online social networks effective? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2014 Feb;16(2):e40 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Carah N, Meurk C, Hall W. Profiling Hello Sunday Morning: who are the participants? Int J Drug Policy 2015 Feb;26(2):214-216. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Hamley B, Carah N. Fare. 2012. One Sunday at a time: Evaluating Hello Sunday Morning   URL: http://www.fare.org.au/wp-content/uploads/research/HSM-Evaluation-Final.pdf [accessed 2017-12-01] [WebCite Cache]
    38. Hamley B, Carah N. Hello Sunday Morning. Research Report. Queensland: Hello Sunday Morning; 2011.
    39. Pennay A, MacLean S, Rankin G. Hello Sunday Morning: alcohol, (non)consumption and selfhood. Int J Drug Policy 2016 Feb;28:67-75. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Babor T, Higgins-Biddle J, Saunders J, Monteiro MG. AUDIT: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for Use in Primary Health Care, 2nd Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
    41. Bradley KA, Rubinsky AD, Lapham GT, Berger D, Bryson C, Achtmeyer C, et al. Predictive validity of clinical AUDIT-C alcohol screening scores and changes in scores for three objective alcohol-related outcomes in a Veterans Affairs population. Addiction 2016;111(11):1975-1984. [CrossRef]
    42. Berger D, Williams EC, Bryson CL, Rubinsky AD, Bradley KA. Alcohol questionnaires and HDL: screening scores as scaled markers of alcohol consumption. Alcohol 2013 Sep;47(6):439-445 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Chavez LJ, Williams EC, Lapham G, Bradley KA. Association between alcohol screening scores and alcohol-related risks among female veterans affairs patients. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2012 May;73(3):391-400 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Rubinsky AD, Kivlahan DR, Volk RJ, Maynard C, Bradley KA. Estimating risk of alcohol dependence using alcohol screening scores. Drug Alcohol Depend 2010 Apr 1;108(1-2):29-36 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Alcohol Screen (AUDIT). Canberra, Australia: Australian Government, Department of Veterans Affairs; 2003.   URL: http://at-ease.dva.gov.au/professionals/files/2012/12/Audit-AUDIT-Tool.pdf [accessed 2018-05-08] [WebCite Cache]
    46. Ziebland S, Wyke S. Health and illness in a connected world: how might sharing experiences on the internet affect people's health? Milbank Q 2012 Jun;90(2):219-249 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Baikie K, Wilhelm K. Emotional and physical health benefits of expressive writing. Adv Psychiatr Treat 2005 Sep 1;11(5):338-346. [CrossRef]
    48. Smyth JM, Lepore SJ, editors. The Writing Cure: How Expressive Writing Promotes Health and Emotional Well-Being. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2002.
    49. Pennebaker JW. Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychol Sci 1997 May 1;8(3):162-166. [CrossRef]
    50. White M, Epston D. Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends. New York: W.W Norton; 1990.
    51. Naslund JA, Grande SW, Aschbrenner KA, Elwyn G. Naturally occurring peer support through social media: the experiences of individuals with severe mental illness using YouTube. PLoS One 2014 Oct 15;9(10):e110171. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. Chung JE. Social networking in online support groups for health: how online social networking benefits patients. J Health Commun 2014 Apr;19(6):639-659. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    53. Curran SL, Andrykowski MA, Studts JL. Short Form of the Profile of Mood States (POMS-SF): psychometric information. Psychol Assess 1995;7(1):80-83. [CrossRef]
    54. Poels K, Dewitte S. How to Capture the Heart? Reviewing 20 Years of Emotion Measurement in Advertising. Leven: Katolieke Universiteit; 2006.
    55. Sidowski JB, Johnson JH, Williams TA, editors. Behavioural treatment and bio-behavioural assessment: computer applications. In: Technology in Mental Health Care Delivery System. Norwood: Albex; 1980:129-139.
    56. Read JC. Validating the Fun Toolkit: an instrument for measuring children’s opinions of technology. Cogn Tech Work 2007 May 22;10(2):119-128. [CrossRef]
    57. Broekens J, Brinkman W. AffectButton: a method for reliable and valid affective self-report. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2013 Jun;71(6):641-667. [CrossRef]
    58. Desmet P, Overbeeke K, Tax S. Designing products with added emotional value: development and appllcation of an approach for research through design. Des J 2001;4(1):32-47. [CrossRef]
    59. Blythe M, Monk A, Overbeeke K, Wright P, editors. Measuring emotion: development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products. In: Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003:111-123.
    60. Grant BF. Comorbidity between DSM-IV drug use disorders and major depression: results of a national survey of adults. J Subst Abuse 1995 Jan;7(4):481-497. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    61. Kessler RC, Nelson CB, McGonagle KA, Edlund MJ, Frank RG, Leaf PJ. The epidemiology of co-occurring addictive and mental disorders: implications for prevention and service utilization. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1996 Jan;66(1):17-31. [Medline]
    62. Cooper ML, Frone MR, Russell M, Mudar P. Drinking to regulate positive and negative emotions: a motivational model of alcohol use. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995 Nov;69(5):990-1005. [Medline]
    63. Kaskutas LA, Subbaraman MS, Witbrodt J, Zemore SE. Effectiveness of making alcoholics anonymous easier: a group format 12-step facilitation approach. J Subst Abuse Treat 2009 Oct;37(3):228-239 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    ANOVA: analysis of variance
    AUD: alcohol use disorder
    AUDIT: Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test
    HSM: Hello Sunday Morning
    SBI: screening and brief intervention

    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 08.12.17; peer-reviewed by W Campbell, IN Gomez; comments to author 18.01.18; revised version received 14.03.18; accepted 22.04.18; published 17.05.18

    Copyright

    ©Jessica Jane Louise Kirkman, Briony Leo, Jamie Christopher Moore. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 17.05.2018.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.